Where is "local" just down the road in Birmingham or somewhere foreign
like the USA? Laws vary from country to country
Where I am the school is private property and as the owner they can
permit or deny any photography they choose. So if you have an exclusive
deal then the other person can not take photos and sell them.
Practically speaking it is far easier to stop them taking photos at the
time than try and stop them selling after the event.
However if it was not explicitly an exclusive deal than AFAIK there is
nothing you can do about it
--
\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\
\/\/\/\/\ Chris Hills Staffs England /\/\/\/\/
\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/
Questions the lawyer will ask:
Where did this happen.
Show me your written contract.
Show me a ticket to the event.
Where there any signs posted about no photography. Show them to me and their
placement.
Show me all the advertisements for the event.
Show me the model and property releases you have.
Show me the creative releases you have from the producers of those events.
Tell me all about the event.
Who is this third party. (e.g. Newspaper that may have the legal right to publish)
Answer you are likely to get may be along the lines of:
You do not have standing to sue.
However the school may and the persons in the pictures may.
You are going HUH?
It isn't your copyright that is being violated. It isn't your right of privacy
that is being violated. It isn't your right of publicity for your school
property that is being violated. It wasn't your property that was trespassed
upon to make those photographs. Remember the contract you have is between you
and the school, not this other third party.
You may be able to sue based upon a claim that this person is interfering in
your business based upon the contract you have with the school. The real claim
you may have might be against the school for not strip searching the patrons to
prevent cameras from getting in the venue or not suing this third party to stop
them.
In short, you need to talk to a lawyer.
So your ethics are that mums and dads cant take pics of their kids
performing?
Stopping them is a real bastard act. Not many can afford to pay just to
get pics to send to grandparents or keep for memories etc
David
"David Ross" <da...@djross.com.au> wrote in message
news:david-22F80A....@news.bigpond.com...
If it's a public school, and a performance is open to the public, there
isn't much that can done about it. The parents of the "performers" would
have standing to object to images of their minor children being sold.
Generally, weddings are not open to the public, so an uninvited person would
not be permitted to photograph the wedding. You could photograph the wedding
party when they come outside the church and cross the line onto public
property. But I suspect sales of such limited images would be nil.