1) Some settings can only be set uing a DIP switch. What bothers me
here is the multiple flash switch. It should be
on the outside of the meter.
2) The lens cap keeps falling off. Why didn't they implement a thread
or a bayonet???
3) The memory only works in shutter speed mode NOT in aperture mode.
Otherwise it's a nice tool.
best regards
jan
InglesFam wrote in message <19981210092516...@ng114.aol.com>...
Other than that - I love it!
Michael
I also had trouble with the lens cap. I took black plastic electrical tape
and put a layer on the inside of the cap. That seems to do the trick.
I also think for this amount of money, they could have included a way to
show the amount of flash and ambient (contribution of each to the final
reading) using one reading as the Minoltas do.
But I do like the spot meter.
Jack Isham
Jan Schledermann wrote in message <74p2f4$l...@news3.euro.net>...
Jay
My biggest gripe is that the lens cap keeps falling off. Like one or two
other people, I stuck some tape on the inside to reduce its diameter. The
lens cap seems almost like an afterthought.
Another gripe I have is that if you are in aperture-priority mode and set
the meter to say f/4, then take a reading, the meter will sometimes give you
something like 1/60 at f/4 9/10 instead of 1/125 at f/2.8 9/10, which would
be closer to what I wanted (almost f/4 instead of almost f/5.6). I suppose
that the thinking is that you're using aperture mode because you want a
certain DOF, and if the meter reduced the f-number, the DOF would be
reduced, so it always increases the f-number.
I've not found the DIP switches to be a problem. They just turn various
features on and off. I just turned them all on except for the half shutter
speeds (my Bronica doesn't do half speeds).
If you really want a spot meter, then the 508 isn't going to cut it; get a
dedicated spot meter. But if you usually take ambient readings and want a
spot meter for occasional use, the 508 is probably the best choice.
Willis
InglesFam wrote in message <19981210092516...@ng114.aol.com>...
>I'm thinking about purchasing a Sekonic L-508 light meter, and would like
any
>comments on it.
Michael
Krishm1 wrote in message <19981210154412...@ng113.aol.com>...
Lloyd
This meter has saved me a number of times as it is much more accurate than my
in-camera meter.
Rocknl