8x10 & 90 f/8 Super Angulon?
Benjamin Marks
Query:
Will a 90mm /1:8 Schneider Super Angulon cover 8x10? Any
hands-on experience or data from charts appreciated.
TIA,
Ben
--
Benjamin Marks
bm...@virginia.edu
Thor Lancelot Simon
In article <E19x7...@murdoch.acc.Virginia.EDU>,
Benjamin Marks <bm...@hobbes.itc.Virginia.EDU> wrote:
>
>Query:
>Will a 90mm /1:8 Schneider Super Angulon cover 8x10? Any
>hands-on experience or data from charts appreciated.
No way. I don't think the f/8 model even covers 5x7.
--
Thor Lancelot Simon t...@panix.COM
There's nothing like rancid bear fat to keep you happy. -Perry Metzger
Kerry Thalmann
bm...@hobbes.itc.Virginia.EDU (Benjamin Marks) wrote:
>
>Query:
>Will a 90mm /1:8 Schneider Super Angulon cover 8x10? Any
>hands-on experience or data from charts appreciated.
Hi Ben,
Nope, not even close. It barely (or doesn't quite) cover
5x7. The image circle is speced at 216mm. You need about
another 100mm to cover 8x10 without movement. The widest
modern lens I know of that (barely) covers 8x10 is the Nikon
120mm f8 SW (image circle of 312mm). BTW, 90mm is considered
wide angle on 4x5. Something in the 150mm - 165mm is usually
considered ultrawide on 8x10.
Kerry
Richard Knoppow
bm...@hobbes.itc.Virginia.EDU (Benjamin Marks) wrote:
>
>Query:
>Will a 90mm /1:8 Schneider Super Angulon cover 8x10? Any
>hands-on experience or data from charts appreciated.
>
>TIA,
>
>Ben
>--
>Benjamin Marks
>bm...@virginia.edu
It won't. The catalogue gives an image circle of 216mm and angle of
coverage of 100deg at infinity focus and f/22. An 8x10 would need
almost 120deg. and a 305mm image circle.
---
Richard Knoppow
Los Angeles, Ca.
dick...@ix.netcom.com
Stanley Greenberg
bm...@hobbes.itc.Virginia.EDU (Benjamin Marks) wrote:
>Query:
>Will a 90mm /1:8 Schneider Super Angulon cover 8x10? Any
>hands-on experience or data from charts appreciated.
>TIA,
>Ben
>--
>Benjamin Marks
>bm...@virginia.edu
No.
Stanley Greenberg
Hank Seidel
Benjamin Marks wrote:
>
> Query:
> Will a 90mm /1:8 Schneider Super Angulon cover 8x10? Any
> hands-on experience or data from charts appreciated.
>
> TIA,
>
> Ben
> --
> Benjamin Marks
> bm...@virginia.edu
Ben,
I once used a 90mm f 5.6 schneider super angulon on an 8 X 10 to make an
interior of a very small room. Even this lens (which covers a little
more than the f 8) did not quite cover the 8 x 10. The coreners were
unexposed. It did cover 5 x 7 though.
Hank
John Sparks
Kerry Thalmann (K.Tha...@worldnet.att.net) wrote:
>bm...@hobbes.itc.Virginia.EDU (Benjamin Marks) wrote:
>>
>>Query:
>>Will a 90mm /1:8 Schneider Super Angulon cover 8x10? Any
>>hands-on experience or data from charts appreciated.
>Hi Ben,
>Nope, not even close. It barely (or doesn't quite) cover
>5x7. The image circle is speced at 216mm. You need about
>another 100mm to cover 8x10 without movement. The widest
>modern lens I know of that (barely) covers 8x10 is the Nikon
>120mm f8 SW (image circle of 312mm). BTW, 90mm is considered
>wide angle on 4x5. Something in the 150mm - 165mm is usually
>considered ultrawide on 8x10.
I have the 120mm Nikkor SW and have used it twice on 8x10 (I
bought it to use on 4x5). It does cover 8x10 with no movements,
but it's so close that if you screw a normal 77mm filter on it,
it will cut off all 4 corners by about 1/4".
John Sparks
Quang-Tuan Luong
Benjamin Marks wrote:
>
> Query:
> Will a 90mm /1:8 Schneider Super Angulon cover 8x10? Any
> hands-on experience or data from charts appreciated.
it will just cover 5x7. the shortest lens to cover 8x10
is the 120 nikkor sw.
Tuan.
--
Quang-Tuan LUONG at SRI +1(415)859-5138 lu...@ai.sri.com
photographs in The Mountain Gallery at:
http://www.cs.berkeley.edu/~qtluong/gallery/
Mark Melendez
It depends what you shoot. If you do landscapes the lens probably won't
cover. If you shoot still life it probably will. People always quote
image circles, those are measurements taken with the lens focused at
infinity. If you use the lens for tabletop you will always have some
magnification. The more the image is magnified the larger the image
circle becomes.
Mark
Benjamin Marks wrote:
>
> Query:
> Will a 90mm /1:8 Schneider Super Angulon cover 8x10? Any
> hands-on experience or data from charts appreciated.
>
Robert Gurfinkel
What's the tuna's favorite format?
Eight by tuna!
(Or tuna quarter!)
They're not mine, please no flames.
Bob Gurfinkel.
mla...@aol.com
In article <575bu6$p...@nonews.col.hp.com>, spa...@col.hp.com (John Sparks)
writes:
>I have the 120mm Nikkor SW and have used it twice on 8x10 (I
>bought it to use on 4x5). It does cover 8x10 with no movements,
Same with the Fuji 125 f8.
Mike