I'm occasionally, when using the above set-up, getting black blocks on
the right hand side of my negatives. Either a half, a third, or a
quarter of the print \ negative is just black, and the other,
remaining section is perfectly exposed. Sort of like if you take a
photo with a flash at the wrong shutter speed. These are photos taken
out side in good daylight.
The edge of the black, where it meets the exposed film, is slightly
blurred.
If you think you can help, e-mail me on- or off-list and I'll try and
send you some examples by e-mail.
Is the autowinder pulling the negative on too early?
Is the shutter-aperture (not sure if that's what it's called) closing
to soon?
Please help, I'm a bit worried \ annoyed.
Can't afford a new camera,
Best,
G.
Hi Gareth:
> I'm occasionally, when using the above set-up, getting black blocks on
> the right hand side of my negatives. Either a half, a third, or a
> quarter of the print \ negative is just black, and the other,
> remaining section is perfectly exposed. Sort of like if you take a
> photo with a flash at the wrong shutter speed. These are photos taken
> out side in good daylight.
>
> The edge of the black, where it meets the exposed film, is slightly
> blurred.
If I have understood your problem, it appears to be a shutter problem to
me. Perhaps the shutter is not opening completely at times?
Having said that, what does the blur look like? Blur as in something in
motion or blur as in out-of-focus?
In any case, I think you should have it checked by a camera repair
person.
Hope this helps.
Abusaleh
Mmmm, or closing too soon?
> Having said that, what does the blur look like? Blur as in something
in
> motion or blur as in out-of-focus?
The blur, from exposed picture to 'blackness' isn't a motion blur, but
a sort of 'fade-out' blur. A very quick reduction in 'brightness' from
left to right, over a space of a centimetre on a 6x4 print. Behind
this 'brightness fade' the picture remains sharp...
It's just struck me that it's bound to be the shutter, not the
autowind, because if it was to do with the autowind, the negative
would be in motion, causing motion blur. Yes?
G.
> It's just struck me that it's bound to be the shutter, not the
> autowind, because if it was to do with the autowind, the negative
> would be in motion, causing motion blur. Yes?
Yes, thats why I was wondering about the nature of the blur :)
And I've heard X-xxx bodies shutter could show such sympton when they have
not used for some time at all and you suddernly start using them again. In
this case, after releasing a shutter many times(some excersizes), it fixes
its problem itself.
If broken, it would have broken itself soon after all.
Ryujin
> My x700 started showing a same sympton a few years ago.
> At first one or nothing in a roll such problem happened. But later,
a few or
> more in a roll. I stopped using the camera.
> Then, I was tempted to buy classic SLRs (same Minolta mount) made in
1960'.
> I use and love them now.
>
> And I've heard X-xxx bodies shutter could show such sympton when
they have
> not used for some time at all and you suddernly start using them
again. In
> this case, after releasing a shutter many times(some excersizes), it
fixes
> its problem itself.
> If broken, it would have broken itself soon after all.
Mmm. I've been using for quite a while. I'm not sure how long you mean
when you say 'not used for some time'... but my problem did start
slowly and then get worse.
Thanks
G.