In article <
kn2tba5cj65llbqar...@4ax.com>, Andreas Skitsnack wrote:
> > > Andreas Skitsnack:
> > > What is trollish is making sweeping generalizations about the
> > > food quality and restaurant quality of a country based on a
> > > visit to one touristy area of that country. And, one based on
> > > what were evidently choices of places made haphazardly. Your
> > > extensive complaints an example of shirt-tail dragging.
> >
> > Sandman:
> > Haha! I've been to more places than one in America, so the
> > opinions of the american cousiine is based on them all. That
> > said, I'm not really "complaining".
>
> If not, you do a remarkably good job of appearing to do so.
Maybe to someone that has a hard time reading and understanding English, I
suppose...
> > Sandman:
> > I am just telling people what I think of the food when they ask,
>
> Who asked?
Last time it was John Turco, that asked about my vacation. He didn't ask me
specifically about the food, of course, but since it's a part of my overall
opinion about the vacation, I included it in the response.
> You originated comments about the "horrible" food you encountered in
> Florida.
See, Andreas, those are quote marks, but that's not a quote from me,
especially not in that context. I did indeed encounter horrible food in
America (i.e. Taco Bell), but I've never said that the food in America is
"horrible". Your reading comprehension problems are acting up again.
> Who asked or gives a rat's ass about your experiences? Those of us who
> either live in Florida or are familiar with how to find better
> restaurants than you managed to do, are not interested.
In this group - the ones living in the states are most certainly the ones
that gave a "rat's ass" the most about my opinions about the food in
America. Surprisingly so, I must add. There's a lot of misplaced pride in
the food culture of America.
I mean, I could understand an italian person, or a frenchman getting upset
if someone were to complain about their respective cousine, but an
American? It's just odd.
> > Sandman:
> > or making an joke. I didn't start a new thread in a photography
> > group to "complain" about the food.
>
> Nor did I. I started a thread that contained suggestions on how to
> find better restaurants when traveling.
But you did start a new thread about food in America, clearly showing that
out of the two of us, the one giving the most "rat's ass" about this is
you. I couldn't care less. When the subject comes up, I'll mention the
lousy food that one is likely to get in the states as a tourist.
And what supposed "suggestions" was there in your post? I mean, the only
thing that comes close is you saying that you had been willing to offer
recommendations, but that's hardly a general suggestion for "finding better
restaurants when travelling".
> > > Andreas Skitsnack:
> > > Yet, this is as marked in the US as it is in Italy where
> > > northern cuisine is different from southern cuisine...but more
> > > extensive because the US is larger.
> >
> > Sandman:
> > Problem for a tourist, especially a foreign tourist, is that it's
> > hard to know what restaurant that may or may not serve some
> > "local" cousine that may or may not be better than the "average"
> > american cousine.
See, here is where those "suggestions" should have been inserted.
> > > Andreas Skitsnack:
> > > The tourist area restaurant operator, though, cooks for some
> > > unattainable level of pleasing everyone.
> >
> > Sandman:
> > It's the other way around, if you ask me. They "cook" for the
> > lowest common denominator, and since most tourists are americans,
> > that means a lot of sugar, fat, grease, syrup, deep-frying and
> > whatnot.
>
> What confuses you about "pleasing everyone" and "lowest common
> denominator" not being the same thing?
Sorry, I got sidetracked with the "unattainable level", which to me seemed
to imply something better than "lowest common denominator", but I probably
misunderstood you. I would say that serving the lowest common denominator
is a highly attainable level. Just add sugar, fat and deep-fry it. Bam,
done.
> > > > Sandman:
> > > > The biggest probem is the usually really low aulity
> > > > of meat, produce and things like that.
> > >
> > > Andreas Skitsnack:
> > > There is a significant difference between grain-fed beef and
> > > corn-fed beef. Corn-fed beef is more expensive and more
> > > difficult to find in Florida. Only the top-end restaurants
> > > offer corn-fed beef.
> >
> > Sandman:
> > Ok, help me understand this here. We don't have "meat farms" in
> > Sweden
>
> That term is not used in the US. Beef cattle are owned by ranchers
> in the US. Ranchers are in the livestock business and farmers are
> in the agricultural business. We do use "fish farm", "pig farms",
> and "milk farms", but not "beef farms".
That wass "meat farms", and whatever you call them, they're pretty
horrific:
<
http://tinyurl.com/n7tk8mp>
> > Sandman:
> > that way you do in the states. But our cattle are fed by grazing
> > in pastures,
>
> Grass will not sustain a large herd of beef cattle. They are fed
> supplemental products; grain in some parts of the country and corn
> in other parts of the country. Grass-fed beef, unless the animal is
> part of a very small group and is pastured in a large area, is tough
> and flavorless.
Wow, that's the largest pile of bullshit you've posted in a long while. I
suppose it might be something an American would try to convince himself
about.
> > Sandman:
> > I usually buy meat that is local, I go down to a food hall and buy
> > prime beef that is fresh and tastes awesome.
>
> That is done in the US, but that is not a sufficient source for
> restaurant use.
There is no reason it couldn't be. I mean, sure there aren't all that many
ranches close to downtown NY, perhaps, but USA has tons of empty space.
It's probably just that the large (i.e. enormous) meat packing factories
beat them on price, so that's the kind of meat most Americans (and
restaurants) have access to.
Local meat here is more than twice the price than packed meat, but packed
meat here is still a lot better than grocery store meat in the states.
> > > Andreas Skitsnack:
> > > Produce quality, the things you mostly see in the salad course,
> > > also vary regionally in the US. Florida restaurants generally
> > > buy locally grown products because of shipping costs, and
> > > tomatoes, lettuce, and that sort of this don't have the same
> > > quality if grown in the sandy soil of Florida. Midwestern
> > > tomatoes, for example, are far superior to Florida-grown
> > > tomatoes.
> >
> > Sandman:
> > Maybe. I think most of the problems with produce when I've been
> > there is that it has never tasted fresh.
>
> We already know you pick "horrible" restaurants.
There's that disingenous quote again.
> > > > Sandman:
> > > > FOr instance; in America, the soda is sweetened with
> > > > syrup instead of real sugar, as opposed to most of the rest
> > > > of the world, which means that a Coke tastes... well, worse.
> > >
> > > Andreas Skitsnack:
> > > Just above you've complained about the high sugar content in our
> > > food.
> >
> > Sandman:
> > Yeah? I don't drink soda's myself. This was just a "for instance".
>
> You don't drink soda, but you somehow know that our soda is "worse"?
Yup.
> But, you're "not really complaining"...just making derogatory
> comparisons about things you about which don't have personal
> experience.
I do. I have tasted Coca Cola in the states. It tastes funny. Which is
partly due to the syrup and probably partly due to the water being a lot
different as well.
> > > > > Andreas Skitsnack:
> > > > > I've never used Yelp or that type of
> > > > > thing for a recommendation. It's ridiculous to do so. Yelp
> > > > > recommendations are often "salted" by the restaurant.
> > > >
> > > > Sandman:
> > > > Proof? No? Thought so.
> > >
> > > Andreas Skitsnack:
> > > I need proof for this?
> >
> > Sandman:
> > Yup. Or rephrase it as an opinion or a suspicion.
Or keep it unsusbtantiated.
> > > Andreas Skitsnack:
> > > It's well-known and general knowledge that the Yelp review that
> > > says "Great food and great service" was probably provided by a
> > > waiter at that restaurant. If you want an outside opinion, see
> >
> > Sandman:
> > "well known" and "probably"... Hmm, no proof there.
>
> OK, you just keep deluding yourself if it makes you feel better.
Hey, I don't know either way - I just saw you make a claim and your
credibility is in the negative space, so it's not like I'd take a claim
from you at face value.
> While you think that Yelp is a dependable source of valid
> information, you admit to using Yelp and finding only "horrible"
> food.
It's all extremes to you. I've used Yelp a sum total of perhaps three times
in my life. It was recommended to me when I was in the states (as a last
resort). The fact it led me to the wrong place was not someting I
attributed to that particular resturant gaming the review system, but
because it's a popular restaurant *among americans*, and indeed, it was
packed with your typical stereotypical ghetto tourists. It's hard knowing
where to go, and Yelp didn't help, but I have no reason to believe it
didn't work because it was cheated by the restaurant. There's a difference.
> > > Andreas Skitsnack:
> > > How many authentic Yelp reviews did *you* submit based on your
> > > experience?
> >
> > Sandman:
> > Only one. In fact, I asked about recommendations for restaurants
> > in another group and someone there told me that using Yelp could
> > at least give an indication.
>
> How'd that work out for you?
Bad. But again, that's not necessarily due to your still unsubstantiated
claim.
> The big problem with Yelp is that if it's a good restaurant it will
> naturally generate good reviews.
Sounds great!
> If it's a bad restaurant, the owners/management want to be included in
> the Yelp listings so they "salt" the reviews with contributions from
> employees, friends, and family.
Cool, and by doing that, they surpass the geniunely good restaurants? So...
still don't have any source for this claim?
> You won't know which is which, and - evidently - followed the
> recommendations that led you to "horrible" food.
I know. But let's test your "theory". Here's the area in which the
"horrible" restaurant was found:
<
https://www.google.com/maps/@28.3393268,-81.5961586,17z>
You're not alowed to zoom and/or pan. That's the area we were in. Please
point out the really good restaurants in that area that a european tourist
would like, and then point out how we would have found out about them.
Thanks in advance.
--
Sandman[.net]