HDR. The horror continues
RichA
then headed into a darkroom, dodging and burning tools in hand. Some
of it isn't bad and a very small fraction is actually good. But is it
is as misused by people as most Brit landscape shooters overemphasize
green and can't seem to balance blue to save their lives.
Ray Fischer
Every one of those photos is far better than any I've seen from you, snob.
--
Ray Fischer
rfis...@sonic.net
bugbear
> Most of it looks like the product of someone who got horribly drunk,
> then headed into a darkroom, dodging and burning tools in hand.
Well done! You actually qualified your assertion
with the word "most".
A substantial improvement.
BugBear
RustY �
"RichA" <rande...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:75605a1d-3f29-4388...@26g2000yqo.googlegroups.com...
> Most of it looks like the product of someone who got horribly
I would be lost without your insight Ray - Keep up the trolling mate.
icester
Yes,
some people have misinterpreted the HDR imaging usage.
Placing side by side, HDR and a single properly exposed image from
HDR
sequence would
show the defects.
bugbear
>
> Yes,
> some people have misinterpreted the HDR imaging usage.
> Placing side by side, HDR and a single properly exposed image from
> HDR
> sequence would show the defects.
Do tell:
http://i48.photobucket.com/albums/f234/bugbear33/photo_tech/final.jpg
http://i48.photobucket.com/albums/f234/bugbear33/photo_tech/mist5.jpg
BugBear
corks
"RichA" <rande...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:75605a1d-3f29-4388...@26g2000yqo.googlegroups.com...
Bruce
A pity that the improvement did not continue further in the same post,
because we got an all-encompassing sweeping generalisation about "Brit
landscape photographers". :-(
RichA
Take a look at Brit landscape shots in magazines some day.
Chris Malcolm
> On Jan 7, 1:49?pm, Bruce <docnews2...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Thu, 07 Jan 2010 09:39:27 +0000, bugbear
>>
>> <bugbear@trim_papermule.co.uk_trim> wrote:
>> >RichA wrote:
>> >> Most of it looks like the product of someone who got horribly drunk,
>> >> then headed into a darkroom, dodging and burning tools in hand.
>>
>> >Well done! You actually qualified your assertion
>> >with the word "most".
>>
>> >A substantial improvement.
>>
>> A pity that the improvement did not continue further in the same post,
>> because we got an all-encompassing sweeping generalisation about "Brit
> Take a look at Brit landscape shots in magazines some day.
Or listen to those US tourists visiting the greener parts of Britain
who exclaim about how unbelievably green the landscape is. I've heard
them say that even though they'd been told about it, they would never
have believed quite how green it was if they hadn't seen it with their
own eyes :-)
--
Chris Malcolm
Bruce
wrote:
I do, every month.
Contrary to your ridiculous assertion, they don't all look the same.
bugbear
> Or listen to those US tourists visiting the greener parts of Britain
> who exclaim about how unbelievably green the landscape is. I've heard
> them say that even though they'd been told about it, they would never
> have believed quite how green it was if they hadn't seen it with their
> own eyes :-)
>
British people going to Ireland have the same reaction.
It ain't called the Emerald Isle for nothing.
BugBear
Martin Sørensen
As a friend said to me while we visited North Wales: "I don't think it
is grass. I think it is algea."
Robert Coe
: On Thu, 07 Jan 2010 09:39:27 +0000, bugbear
He says they overemphasize green. Perhaps he holds them responsible for the
cyan skies he griped about a couple of weeks ago.
Bob
Bruce
>On Thu, 07 Jan 2010 18:49:36 +0000, Bruce <docne...@gmail.com> wrote:
>: On Thu, 07 Jan 2010 09:39:27 +0000, bugbear
>: <bugbear@trim_papermule.co.uk_trim> wrote:
>:
>: >RichA wrote:
>: >> Most of it looks like the product of someone who got horribly drunk,
>: >> then headed into a darkroom, dodging and burning tools in hand.
>: >
>: >Well done! You actually qualified your assertion
>: >with the word "most".
>: >
>: >A substantial improvement.
>:
>: A pity that the improvement did not continue further in the same post,
>: because we got an all-encompassing sweeping generalisation about "Brit
>: landscape photographers". :-(
>
>He says they overemphasize green.
As any visitor to England, Wales, Scotland and Ireland will tell you,
the British Isles *are* very green. Most visitors will also have
personal experience of the reason why - it rains quite a lot. ;-)
>Perhaps he holds them responsible for the
>cyan skies he griped about a couple of weeks ago.
He has so many gripes that he must need to buy industrial quantities
of Pepto-Bismol. ;-)
Robert Coe
wrote:
: "RichA" <rande...@gmail.com> wrote in message
: god you're an obnoxious cunt
I have never seen that term applied to a male, except in the photography
newsgroups. Is that British and/or Australian usage? (Sorry to stray OT, but
I've been wondering about it for weeks.)
Bob
Paul Furman
Common American junior high language.
tony cooper
Common usage in the UK, Oz, and Ireland by those who are common.
--
Tony Cooper - Orlando, Florida
tony cooper
wrote:
Not calling a male a cunt, though.
clw
Robert Coe <b...@1776.COM> wrote:
> On Fri, 8 Jan 2010 01:45:07 +0800, "corks" <triga...@nospam.iinet.net.au>
> :
> : god you're an obnoxious cunt
>
> I have never seen that term applied to a male, except in the photography
> newsgroups. Is that British and/or Australian usage? (Sorry to stray OT, but
> I've been wondering about it for weeks.)
>
> Bob
It is a most useful term if you want to terminally insult a female.
clw
tony cooper <tony_co...@earthlink.net> wrote:
Possibly. Using the term implies some sort of gender abnormality and is
derogatory simultaneously.
Wilba
> Robert Coe wrote:
>> corks wrote:
>>>
>>> god you're an obnoxious cunt
>>
>> I have never seen that term applied to a male, except in the photography
>> newsgroups. Is that British and/or Australian usage? (Sorry to stray OT,
>> but I've been wondering about it for weeks.)
>
> Common usage in the UK, Oz, and Ireland by those who are common.
LOL. Well put. Calling God one might get you in some strife.
John McWilliams
Right. Just as some males are bitches.
But it's all so crude in writing in a public forum. Shows lack of verbal
skill, usually.
--
john mcwilliams
tony cooper
Nonsense. No gender abnormality is implied. When used to describe a
male by someone from the UK, Australia, or Ireland it's simply a
vulgarism describing a contemptible person.
It's similar to the US usage of "asshole". You aren't implying that a
person has a rectal abnormality when you use that word. You are just
picking an offensive and vulgar word to express your contempt.
Peter
news:71nik5tass46p2onr...@4ax.com...
> It's similar to the US usage of "asshole". You aren't implying that a
> person has a rectal abnormality when you use that word. You are just
> picking an offensive and vulgar word to express your contempt.
>
Actually it would be a rectal abnormality, not to have one.
--
Peter
tony cooper
Nothing abnormal about newsgroups, then.
Peter
Be nicer if there was only one.
--
Peter
Robert Coe
We could have an election. In effect, many of the credible candidates are
already campaigning.
Bob