info
Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss
National park tries to extort photographers. You know, parks owned by the people?
12 views
Skip to first unread message
RichA
Apr 3, 2022, 7:20:47 PM4/3/22
to
geoff
Apr 3, 2022, 10:27:41 PM4/3/22
to
On 4/04/2022 11:20 am, RichA wrote:
> https://petapixel.com/2022/04/02/grand-teton-axes-controversial-plan-to-require-portrait-photo-permits/
>
".... owned by the people" - you some sort of commie or something ?
geoff
> https://petapixel.com/2022/04/02/grand-teton-axes-controversial-plan-to-require-portrait-photo-permits/
>
".... owned by the people" - you some sort of commie or something ?
geoff
Alan Browne
Apr 5, 2022, 3:36:08 PM4/5/22
to
On 2022-04-03 19:20, RichA wrote:
> https://petapixel.com/2022/04/02/grand-teton-axes-controversial-plan-to-require-portrait-photo-permits/
>
Fixed the Subject for you.
Park use fees for professional photography doesn't seem like a bad idea
to me.
At all.
Lots of costs to maintain that park. Why should someone earn revenue
off of it w/l paying fees?
--
"Mr Speaker, I withdraw my statement that half the cabinet are asses -
half the cabinet are not asses."
-Benjamin Disraeli
> https://petapixel.com/2022/04/02/grand-teton-axes-controversial-plan-to-require-portrait-photo-permits/
>
Fixed the Subject for you.
Park use fees for professional photography doesn't seem like a bad idea
to me.
At all.
Lots of costs to maintain that park. Why should someone earn revenue
off of it w/l paying fees?
--
"Mr Speaker, I withdraw my statement that half the cabinet are asses -
half the cabinet are not asses."
-Benjamin Disraeli
0 new messages