"Black silicon" skeptics abound...
RichA
the Harvard team is "reluctant" to publish any solid figures on the
product's sensitivity and that the articles about it have all be "puff
pieces," perhaps fit for business magazines hawking stocks but not
scientific journals.
Bruce
Cold fusion will be next. Until Focus finds a "bug" in it. ;-)
Matt Clara
news:11uhu4tsh8e2gu41o...@4ax.com...
Bit of a bully, Bruce? Just because he's an annoying little man doesn't
mean it's ok to incessantly pick at him. Why not exercise your kill filter
instead? It's not because you're having too much fun picking on him, is it,
Bruce?
Bruce
That offers quite a useful insight into why *you* pick on people, Matt.
;-)
Pete D
I can hear the music......................
Iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiit's the
Matt and Bruce Shoooooooooooooooooooooooooow!!!!
GregS
SiOnyx had some inspiring offering. I hope it works out.
Hee is what he told me.
Our measured performance today (with very crude prototypes) routinely performs like what we describe on our webpage. There is
tremendous skepticism about our technology and that is OK. What I can tell you is that we have validated our performance via
independent measurements in NIST traceable Government and commercial labs.
greg
Get lost
They've got some kind of patent protection (though whether or not what
they are doing is new is also debatable) so why not publish actual
figures? Afraid their IPO might not be so rosy if the stuff doesn't
match the hype?