rene galindo
rgal...@castle.cudenver.edu
A friend of mine who's a professional photographer uses Palmolive dish soap
instead of Photo Flo (just a drop or two with plenty of water). This alternative
was chosen mostly for convenience and economy rather than disliking Photo Flo.
>Will that residue eventually harm the negative?
If you mean Photo Flo, I can't imagine Kodak would continue to market a harmful
product for so long. I've heard no complaints.
------------------------------------------------------------
Christopher Heider, Webmaster
Dun and Bradstreet Information Services, N.A.
hei...@dbisna.com
http://www.dbisna.com/
"If you ain't the lead dog, the scenery never changes."
- Age Old Yukon Saying
------------------------------------------------------------
Hope this helps.
Ed Lukacs
He claims it works well, doesn't foam much, and costs about
$10.00 / gallon in high concentration. Mix is 1oz/gallon.
My question... (I am not reccomending this) From someone who
knows or cares, does this seem reasonable?
It doesn't really matter, wetting agents are not that
expensive:)
--Dana Rees
Orem, Utah
While I'm not an expert on the chemical make up of Photo Flo. I always use it. I do
know of a guy who used distiled water for the final rinse.
Michael Smith
10 ml photoflo
100 ml 70% isopropyl alcohol (rubbing alcohol)
mix with 1 gallon distilled water
the alcohol disrupts the hydrogen bonding of the water.
it works great with my negatives.
Yes. I use plain distilled water and I have no residue problems. -D.M.
(I usually shoot in 120 for B&W.)
Don't you get water spots? I certainly do.
*************
Ted W. Simon
simo...@mindspring.com
Nothing is true. Everything is permitted.
- William S. Burroughs
- Cities of the Red Night
Happy drying!
Mel
(exiled Brit in Belgium)