Any advice appreciated.
Thanks,
Matt Clara
--
Don
Vancouver, USA
"Matt Clara" <no...@myexpense.com> wrote in message
news:VTZEm.288146$cf6....@newsfe16.iad...
"Don Schmidt" <Don Engi...@PNB.Retired_1987> wrote in message
news:A5qdneIb9MpA8XnX...@posted.palinacquisition...
--
Don
Vancouver, USA
"Matt Clara" <no...@myexpense.com> wrote in message
news:Gb_Em.10547$86....@newsfe15.iad...
>'Couldn't get the link to work.
Works fine here. Check your Internet service.
--
Best regards,
John
Buying a dSLR doesn't make you a photographer,
it makes you a dSLR owner.
"The single most important component of a camera
is the twelve inches behind it." -Ansel Adams
>"Matt Clara" <no...@myexpense.com> wrote in message
>news:VTZEm.288146$cf6....@newsfe16.iad...
>>I know it's possible to purchase "B&W" inks comprised of black with shades
>>of gray to replace the Cc,M,Y, cartridges in my old Epson 1270, but I don't
>>know where to buy inks with a good reputation for this purpose.
>That's a new one to me; my inkjet printer produces shades of gray by the
>amount of black it uses to cover the area being printed, no matter how small
>the area.
>(The white is the paper being printed on)
Gray inks produce a much superior result for critical work.
For more information, see
<http://www.normankoren.com/makingfineprints4.html>
On the very rare occasion when I might have to ask a related question; I
weed-out my news-group printer, supplies, and inks ideas from:
comp.periphs.printers
alt.comp.periphs.printers and the rest of the news-groups this question is
directed to just ain't gonna cut it.
I'd redirect this there for you, but you need the learning experience.
You'll remember better next time. Ye ol' "give fish or teach to fish"
thing.
> I know it's possible to purchase "B&W" inks comprised of black with shades
> of gray to replace the Cc,M,Y, cartridges in my old Epson 1270, but I don't
> know where to buy inks with a good reputation for this purpose.
piezography inks at inkjet mall
> >'Couldn't get the link to work.
>
> Works fine here. Check your Internet service.
it's not his internet service.
Perhaps if you're too ignorant to understand what it is I'm asking you
should just keep your mouth shut? Or is running your mouth without any
thought just how you "roll"?
<http://www.inksupply.com/bwpage.cfm?setMediaCookie=1&the_media_linkID=142>
It works fine for me as well.
Don Schmidt's problem must be either with his ISP or their upstream
provider.
> It works fine for me as well.
> Don Schmidt's problem must be either with his ISP or their upstream
> provider.
it didn't work when i tried it as well as through this useful site:
<http://downforeveryoneorjustme.com/>
thus, it would appear to be *their* isp that's flaky.
Doesn't seem to work here either ("Connection timed out").
Perhaps the site server is on a computer they turn off after work... :/
-Miles
--
Sabbath, n. A weekly festival having its origin in the fact that God made the
world in six days and was arrested on the seventh.
Perhaps if you're so ignorant or clueless that you can't tell you're
posting in the *darkroom* newsgroup, you should cease to do so.
There are newsgroups for digital imaging. This isn't one of them. Read
the newsgroup charter, comply with it -- or at least make the most minimal
kind of effort to -- or don't post. It's really very simple.
Why would you expect other people to help you if you're going to start
out by spitting in their faces?
--
Thor Lancelot Simon t...@rek.tjls.com
"Even experienced UNIX users occasionally enter rm *.* at the UNIX
prompt only to realize too late that they have removed the wrong
segment of the directory structure." - Microsoft WSS whitepaper
Take care,
--
Don - Vancouver, USA
"May your shadow be found in happy places." - Native North American
"dj_nme" <dj_...@optusnet.com.au> wrote in message
news:4ae4f1de$0$21852$afc3...@news.optusnet.com.au...
There's a digital usenet group. This group tends to be more photo
darkroom, as in film and such. If you want a question about hybrid
processes, there's also a hybrid photo forum.
> There's a digital usenet group. This group tends to be more photo
> darkroom, as in film and such. If you want a question about hybrid
> processes, there's also a hybrid photo forum.- Hide quoted text -
>
> In article <I33Fm.3493$aD1....@newsfe19.iad>,
> "Matt Clara" <no...@myexpense.com> wrote:
>
>> "Lawrence Akutagawa" <lakuN...@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
>> news:hc1urf$ojc$1...@news.eternal-september.org...
>>>
>>> "Matt Clara" <no...@myexpense.com> wrote in message
>>> news:VTZEm.288146$cf6....@newsfe16.iad...
>>>
>>>> I know it's possible to purchase "B&W" inks comprised of black
>>>> with shades of gray to replace the Cc,M,Y, cartridges in my old
>>>> Epson 1270, but I don't know where to buy inks with a good
>>>> reputation for this purpose.
>>>>
>>> [chuckle] In the darkroom? With what developer, pray tell - good
>>> old Dektol? How about Bromofort? Perhaps Selectol-Soft to cut
>>> down that contrast? Or maybe Ilford PQ Universal Paper Developer?
>>> Or even Arista Liquid Paper Developer?
>>
>> Perhaps if you're too ignorant to understand what it is I'm asking
>> you should just keep your mouth shut? Or is running your mouth
>> without any thought just how you "roll"?
>
> There's a digital usenet group. This group tends to be more photo
> darkroom, as in film and such. If you want a question about hybrid
> processes, there's also a hybrid photo forum.
My ISP (Verizon by proxy) doesn't carry any newsgroups with the word
"hybrid" in their title. Perhaps you could provide us the exact name of
this newsgroup?
--
Found--the gene that causes belief in genetic determinism
--
.~. Jean-David Beyer Registered Linux User 85642.
/V\ PGP-Key: 9A2FC99A Registered Machine 241939.
/( )\ Shrewsbury, New Jersey http://counter.li.org
^^-^^ 18:35:01 up 26 days, 3:34, 3 users, load average: 4.35, 4.34, 4.27
It's on the web, which is far more up-to-date for digital people than a
Usenet film group.
http://www.hybridphoto.com/forums/home.php
After all, if you're digital, you're more modern than Usenet.
There is a digital photography group, but I'd have to look at my
killfile to get the full name of that one.
> David Nebenzahl wrote:
>
>> My ISP (Verizon by proxy) doesn't carry any newsgroups with the word
>> "hybrid" in their title. Perhaps you could provide us the exact name of
>> this newsgroup?
>
> Have you checked lately? My ISP does not carry any newsgroups at all
> anymore. They did not reduce their prices when they cut off the UseNet.
Well, obviously, since I'm posting here!
But yes, I checked just before posting that. I'm actually surprised I
still have Usenet access; Verizon was supposed to have pulled the plug
on that service by now. So I guess I'm just hanging on by a thread.
(When they do, I know there are lots of other providers out there,
including many that are free, like aioe.org.)
Then explain why at least one film newsgroup (rec.photo.equipment.35mm)
has been taken over by digital users? (Of course, they claim that it's
for *them*, since some of their cameras resemble 35mm film cameras.
Bullshit.)
--
.~. Jean-David Beyer Registered Linux User 85642.
/V\ PGP-Key: 9A2FC99A Registered Machine 241939.
/( )\ Shrewsbury, New Jersey http://counter.li.org
^^-^^ 21:10:01 up 26 days, 6:09, 3 users, load average: 4.74, 4.83, 4.71
> On 10/26/2009 3:11 PM Rebecca Ore spake thus:
>
> > In article <4ae5ec03$0$11300$8226...@news.adtechcomputers.com>,
> > David Nebenzahl <nob...@but.us.chickens> wrote:
> >
> >> My ISP (Verizon by proxy) doesn't carry any newsgroups with the word
> >> "hybrid" in their title. Perhaps you could provide us the exact name of
> >> this newsgroup?
> >
> > It's on the web, which is far more up-to-date for digital people than a
> > Usenet film group.
>
> Then explain why at least one film newsgroup (rec.photo.equipment.35mm)
> has been taken over by digital users? (Of course, they claim that it's
> for *them*, since some of their cameras resemble 35mm film cameras.
> Bullshit.)
I have no idea. My film cameras out-number my digital cameras.
> You still have more or less full access to the usenet through Google
> groups and, possible, Yahoo.
Thanks but no thanks. I'd rather not post or read at all than use
Google's ill-conceived brain-damaged spam portal.