The Jogger in this story... well... I'd like to shake his hand!
NA
Too bad - he's turned himself in and charges are pending. The dog is
recovering, but slowly.
--
Janet B
www.bestfriendsdogobedience.com
http://pg.photos.yahoo.com/ph/bestfriendsobedience/album
But it's hardly black and white here. The owner let her dog run out into
the street, and the dog was chasing and nipping. Granted it was a toy
dog, but those little teeth can hurt!
His mistake was obviously in kicking the dog way too hard, but I sure
wouldn't blame him for trying to get it away from him. The owner shares
some responsibility here.
My thoughts exactly. Owners should control their dogs. If that dog was a
pit-bull, there would be an entirely different media slant here.
Absolutely! Which is why nobody has decided what charges, if any,
should be filed. A 4# poodle is pretty easily punted without a lot of
intent, OTOH, the little ankle biter shouldn't have been out without a
recall.
Forgot to ad - I think they should BOTH be served
reprimands/fines/charges of sorts. 2 people who were wrong and the
dog pays.
Diddy - if it was a pitbull, I doubt he would have been able to kick
it that far and damage it that much - we would only have a "pitbull
attacks jogger" story. This isn't that far from me - it's a
waterfront community near Annapolis. It's all over our local news,
daily.
> On Wed, 01 Feb 2006 18:33:32 -0500, Janet B
> <ja...@bestfriendsdogobedience.com>, clicked their heels and said:
>>Absolutely! Which is why nobody has decided what charges, if any,
>>should be filed. A 4# poodle is pretty easily punted without a lot of
>>intent, OTOH, the little ankle biter shouldn't have been out without a
>>recall.
>
>
> Forgot to ad - I think they should BOTH be served
> reprimands/fines/charges of sorts. 2 people who were wrong and the
> dog pays.
IAWTP 100%
>
> Diddy - if it was a pitbull, I doubt he would have been able to kick
> it that far and damage it that much - we would only have a "pitbull
> attacks jogger" story.
true.. but the principle still applies
change breeeds, and the owner would be facing charges
> change breeeds, and the owner would be facing charges
Regardless of breed, according to everything I've read and heard about
this incident, all the dog actually did was run to the sidewalk and yap at
the jogger's heels. That will not have the owner "facing charges" aside from
a possible civil citation for not keeping the dog on her property - this
happened on the sidewalk right in front of her house, so it's not like the
dog was running loose.
The other things about this incident that put the jogger far more in the
wrong than the owner, IMO:
One, the dog is TINY (less than 10 pounds), and couldn't possibly have
actually presented much of a threat - especially since she apparently wasn't
actually trying to bite.
Two, he kicked the dog literally across the street. WAY more force than you
need to get any dog to back off, even if the dog were larger.
Maybe you can both share a cell someday.
>
> NA
>
Was one kick not enough? Self defense is one thing, but it appeared he
was trying to kill the dog. If a human had attacked him and he shot him
once and he was down that is self defense. A second and third shot
would be attempted murder. I think the jogger is in deep poo poo. I
hope the poodle will be ok. She should have had him leashed for sure.
My dog is ALWAYS on a leash unless he is in my or his sisters fenced in
yard. He will come when called but I take no chances.
jw
If all he did was yap at his heels and wasn't even nipping this jogger
may be in some big big trouble. I believe I could outrun a 4# poodle.
I can outrun my 3.5 # Chihuahua and I'm not in the best of shape right
now.
> That will not have the owner "facing charges" aside from
> a possible civil citation for not keeping the dog on her property - this
> happened on the sidewalk right in front of her house, so it's not like the
> dog was running loose.
>
If the dog never bit the guy thats about all they could charge her with.
> The other things about this incident that put the jogger far more in the
> wrong than the owner, IMO:
> One, the dog is TINY (less than 10 pounds), and couldn't possibly have
> actually presented much of a threat - especially since she apparently wasn't
> actually trying to bite.
> Two, he kicked the dog literally across the street. WAY more force than you
> need to get any dog to back off, even if the dog were larger.
>
He kicked the dog 3 times. You'd think 1 would have been enough or he
could have just run a little faster. Those poodles have pretty short
legs. It ain't like he was being chased by a greyhound or something.
jw
So much depends on local law and local law enforcement. I
think we can talk about right and wrong but without specific
knowledge of the law in the locality where the thing
happened there's really no way to know who's going to be
considered responsible under the law for what.
There was a sickening thing in Michigan a few months ago,
where a junior musher repeatedly failed to contain her dogs.
Several (three, I believe) went over to a neighbor's where
they killed a couple of his rabbits. The neighbor shot the
dogs just as the kid owner arrived and as she was pleading
for him to stop. Apparently he hit a puppy in the butt and
the puppy tried to run off, so he tied a rope around its
neck, dragged it in front of the girl, and shot it again,
killing it this time.
You'd think it would be a clear case of animal cruelty, but
under the law what the neighbor did was legal because he'd
earlier informed animal control that the dogs were coming on
his property and threatening his livestock (the rabbits) and
they gave him permission to shoot them.
The law doesn't always say what you'd assume it would say,
and it's always, always necessary to contain your dogs.
--
Melinda Shore - Software longa, hardware brevis - sh...@panix.com
Prouder than ever to be a member of the reality-based community.
> There was a sickening thing in Michigan a few months ago,
> where a junior musher repeatedly failed to contain her dogs.
> Several (three, I believe) went over to a neighbor's where
> they killed a couple of his rabbits. The neighbor shot the
> dogs just as the kid owner arrived and as she was pleading
> for him to stop. Apparently he hit a puppy in the butt and
> the puppy tried to run off, so he tied a rope around its
> neck, dragged it in front of the girl, and shot it again,
> killing it this time.
That's awful. I'd be moving, but I'd also be making sure my dogs weren't
getting out!!!
Apparently they had just moved into that place and hadn't
yet gotten their dog containment squared away. The kid is
finding homes for the rest of her dogs. It's just a bad
situation. What the neighbor did went beyond protecting his
rabbits and was just cruel, but from what she's said herself
the girl was being careless about containment. She said
that she found an attorney and her parents are filing a
lawsuit.
<snipped>
> You'd think it would be a clear case of animal cruelty, but
> under the law what the neighbor did was legal because he'd
> earlier informed animal control that the dogs were coming on
> his property and threatening his livestock (the rabbits) and
> they gave him permission to shoot them.
>
> The law doesn't always say what you'd assume it would say,
> and it's always, always necessary to contain your dogs.
Where I live, the law is clear. Loose dogs come onto your property and
threaten your livestock - sheep, cows, chickens, whatever - and you can
shoot them. Without asking permission. Loose dogs are a big, big problem
for livestock owners in many parts of the country.
That said, I think this guy was particularly insensitive. The rabbits were
already dead. He should have had the dog owners charged for allowing the
dogs loose and made them replace his livestock.
It's why my dogs are fenced, almost unique among the country-dwellers in my
area. I don't feel like buying my neighbors' calves at $300-800 per. Or
being charged for running weight off a couple hundred head of cattle, at
goodness knows what price per pound.
flick 100785
I sure would like to read the local law on this one, bec. where I live the
dog owner wouldn't stand a chance of winning a civil suit.
flick 100785
I can't imagine that she would, either, and apparently
several attorneys turned her down before she found one who'd
take the case. Take it from me: being an asshole isn't
illegal.
>"Melinda Shore" <sh...@panix.com> wrote in message
>news:drsrkb$iik$1...@panix2.panix.com...
>
><snipped>
>
>> You'd think it would be a clear case of animal cruelty, but
>> under the law what the neighbor did was legal because he'd
>> earlier informed animal control that the dogs were coming on
>> his property and threatening his livestock (the rabbits) and
>> they gave him permission to shoot them.
>>
>> The law doesn't always say what you'd assume it would say,
>> and it's always, always necessary to contain your dogs.
>
>Where I live, the law is clear. Loose dogs come onto your property and
>threaten your livestock - sheep, cows, chickens, whatever - and you can
>shoot them. Without asking permission. Loose dogs are a big, big problem
>for livestock owners in many parts of the country.
Yep. We live in the city, officially, but it's really a small town in
a county that is mostly from rural to very country. A few years ago,
when we were still doing Sibe rescue, a foster Siberian dug out of the
side yard when my brother-in-law was letting them out (I was in the
hospital after brain surgery at the time, and DH got a call while he
was visiting me). Said foster home went a street north (into the
township) and killed a few chickens. DH rushed home and there was the
foster dog, with feathers in her mouth. He went over to talk to the
chickens' owner and apologized all over himself, offering to pay for
the chickens. The chickens' owner kept muttering about calling the
police. Finally DH told him it was a rescue, if the guy wanted to
call the police, fine, he'd just take Nakita back to the APL and
they'd put her down. The guy settled down and didn't accept any money
for the chickens. But we were very lucky.
>That said, I think this guy was particularly insensitive. The rabbits were
>already dead. He should have had the dog owners charged for allowing the
>dogs loose and made them replace his livestock.
Agreed. But some people just like revenge.
Mustang Sally
The last bite I got was from a tiny Pomeranian bitch. She managed to nip
my thigh through my jeans, about 2' from ground level. She drew blood,
albeit a tiny amount, and left a bruise.
I admit to nightmares about a flock of cute, cuddly, Cujo Pomeranians
swarming over me like a school of piranha, leaving nothing but a gnawed
skeleton. But maybe that's an over-reaction.
Dog owners should not allow their dogs to harass passersby, no matter what
size, shape, age, or condition the dog is in.
> Two, he kicked the dog literally across the street. WAY more force
> than you need to get any dog to back off, even if the dog were larger.
Maybe it's living with cattledogs, who're bred to take a kick and keep
coming, but I'm not sure about "way more force than you need to get any dog
to back off". Certainly more force than was needed to get that tiny yapper
to back off, but probably not *any* dog.
>He kicked the dog 3 times. You'd think 1 would have been enough or he
>could have just run a little faster. Those poodles have pretty short
>legs. It ain't like he was being chased by a greyhound or something.
You've never tried to catch a little poodle, have you? I don't think
3 kicks were justified, but I wouldn't expect the guy to run away.
When our little poodle doesn't want to be caught, you see just how
athletic a breed it is. He's no greyhound, but he's damn fast.
--
Paula
Persons with names like Sierra, Sequoia, Auburn, and Rainbow
can't sing the Blues no matter how many men they shoot in Memphis.
> You've never tried to catch a little poodle, have you?
I worked at a vet hospital as a kid. I've chased a lot of little dogs
including mine. They can be real hard to get hold of. They can change
directions in a flash. And if they don't have a collar on its hard to
get hold of something.
> I don't think
> 3 kicks were justified,
I don't think anybody does except the original jerk poster.
> but I wouldn't expect the guy to run away.
I guess its hard to say what I'd do in a situation like that. Not much
time to make a decision. I just figured if I was already running
(jogging) and a dog was coming after me I'd try to run a little faster
before I stopped and took the time to kick him. (and give him a chance
to get a good bite) I'd hope when I got past the house the dog would
give up and go home. This worked for me a lot as a kid. Maybe I was
just darn lucky. I was definitely a lot faster. The dog might have
chased him 10 miles. I know in a dead sprint I can beat my dog at least
until I get real winded. I just figured if this guy was jogging he had
to have been in better shape than me because the only jogging I do is
to the mailbox and back in the rain.
> When our little poodle doesn't want to be caught, you see just how
> athletic a breed it is.
I didn't mean to imply they weren't athelitic. Its just I know I can
usually outrun a short legged dog if we're racing. Now catching one is
a totally differnt story!
> He's no greyhound, but he's damn fast.
>
>
>
I can out run my Chi, but he can definitely outmaneuver me. He can spin
around and change directions in a flash. If he didn't want to get
caught I might not be able to catch him until he did. Luckily he'll
come to me when called. Unfortunately he doesn't always do the same for
my wife which agrivates her to no end.<g>
jw
>On Thu, 02 Feb 2006 05:49:13 GMT, John Wesley
><JohnWes...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>>He kicked the dog 3 times. You'd think 1 would have been enough or he
>>could have just run a little faster. Those poodles have pretty short
>>legs. It ain't like he was being chased by a greyhound or something.
>
>You've never tried to catch a little poodle, have you? I don't think
>3 kicks were justified, but I wouldn't expect the guy to run away.
>When our little poodle doesn't want to be caught, you see just how
>athletic a breed it is. He's no greyhound, but he's damn fast.
If he were being chased by a greyhound, the greyhound would have
passed him up and he wouldn't have had to worry about it.
Mustang Sally
John Wesley wrote:
> In article <11u2d00...@corp.supernews.com>,
> nudean...@yaEXPUNGEhoo.com says...
> > http://www.nbc4.com/news/6525189/detail.html
> >
> > The Jogger in this story... well... I'd like to shake his hand!
>
> Maybe you can both share a cell someday.
>
> >
> > NA
> >
>
> Was one kick not enough? jw
Perhaps he shoulda just threw IT to the GRHOWEND and climbed all
over IT like a raped ape an grHOWEL into ITS throat an bit It on its
ear?
LIKE THIS:
: HOWEDY sinofabitch,
:
: "Sionnach" <rhyfe...@msn.com> wrote in message
: news:bvtf67$106jeh$1...@ID-45033.news.uni-berlin.de...
: >
: > <yawn> Once again- that's NOT a quote
: > from any post of mine; JH "wrote" it, not me.
:
: No, that's a flat HOWET lie, sinofabich. It's a
: direct quote from YOU, with exception of TWO
: WORDS, "smartly" and "neatly."
:
: > It's quotes from two different posts, by two
: > different people -
:
: ONLY if you're SCHIZOPHRENIC, sinofabitch.
:
: > both taken out of context-
:
: YOU'RE A LIAR.
:
: We got your original post in The Puppy
: Wizard's Archives.
:
: You'll see your own words EXXXACTLY as
: QUOTED. And we'll likeWIZE see you DENYING
: your own words in three different ways!!!
:
: > and with extra wording added in by a third person.
:
: NO. YOU'RE A LIAR.
:
: The ONLY "extra words" SMARTLY and NEATLY,
: were INDEEDY, added by The Puppy Wizard, HOWEver
: they were NOT SIGNIFICANT, except for poetic license:
:
: You're a liar and a dog abuser and a MENTAL CASE:
:
: "When it was obvious that she had NO intention
: of paying any attention to anything but the other
: dogs (and that I was in danger of having my arm
: dislocated <G>), I didn't even think about it; I
: dropped the leash, threw my right arm over the
: Lab's shoulder, grabbed her opposite foot with
: my left hand, rolled her on her side, leaned on
: her, said "GRRRR!" and nipped her ear (not
: particularly hard- I wasn't trying to *hurt* her, just
: get her attention!)."
:
: From: Sionnach (rhyfe...@msn.com)
: Subject: Re: I dropped the leash!
: Date: 2003-12-15 07:55:16 PST
:
: > "I Dropped The Leash, Threw My Right Arm
: > Over The Lab's Shoulder, Grabbed Her Opposite
: > Foot With My Left Hand, Rolled Her On Her Side,
: > Leaned On Her, Smartly Growled Into Her Throat
: > And Said "GRRRR!" And Neatly Nipped Her Ear,"
:
: <yawn> That's not a quote written by me, kiddo.
: That's an amalgam of two different people's posts,
: with extra words added by Jerry.
:
: From: Sionnach (rhyfe...@msn.com)
: Subject: Re: another question from me and joy?
:
: Date: 2002-04-10 19:40:33 PST
:
: "BethF" wrote:
: >
: > I don't think any of our regulars bite their dogs ears
: > to leash train them.
:
: He's repeating one of Jerry's confabulations... I did,
: once, lightly nip a seriously out-of-control, temper-tantruming
: Labrador on the ear to get her attention.
>
: It had fuck-all to do with leash training though, and
: everything to do with getting through to an incredibly
: hard-headed, tough-minded, and spoiled-rotten dog
: that A. she was NOT going to physically control me
: the way she had every other female human she'd
: dealt with and B. that I was worth paying attention to.
:
: It came up in a discussion where someone else
: mentioned having nipped a terrier puppy who
: wouldn't stop play-biting. In both cases, it was a
: one-time instinctive response to an unusual situation.
:
: --------------------
:
: sinofabitch writes:
: > >> What I have said- repeatedly - is that he took
: > >> posts from two different people,
: > >> took pieces of them out of context,
: > >> cobbled them together,
: > >> then added his own words:
:
: "Neatly," and "Smartly."
:
: > >>and a fake signature.
:
: "sinofabitch" instead of sionnach.
:
: > >> Which is exactly what he did.
: > >> The actual quote is misleading
: > >> when taken out of context, and Jerry's
: > >> faked "quote" is downright meaningless.
>
: > >Here's Jerry's version
>
: > > "I Dropped The Leash, Threw My
: > > Right Arm Over The Lab's Shoulder,
: > > Grabbed Her Opposite Foot With My
: > > Left Hand, Rolled Her On Her Side,
: > > Leaned On Her, Smartly Growled Into
: > > Her Throat And Said "GRRRR!" And
: > > Neatly Nipped Her Ear," sinofabitch.
>
: > >Here's yours;
>
: > > "I dropped the leash, threw my
: > > right arm over the Lab's shoulder,
: > > grabbed her opposite foot with my
: > > left hand, rolled her on her side,
: > > leaned on her, said "GRRRR!" and
: > > nipped her ear.
: > > --Sara Sionnach
:
: BWAHAHAHHAHAAAA!!!!!
BWEEEEEEAHAHAHAHHAHAHAAA!!!
"Rocky" <2...@rocky-dog.com> wrote in message
news:Xns92FEEC097E4AAau...@130.133.1.4...
>
> Linda wrote in rec.pets.dogs.behavior:
> > When you compare using sound and
> > praise to solve a problem with using
> > shock collars, hanging, and punishment
> > how can you criticize the use of sound?
> There's nothing more to be said, then.
> You've made up your mind.
> But you've impressed me by mentioning
> that you're a professor with 30 years of
> experience.
> So, can you cite some examples of
> people recommending "shock collars,
> hanging, and punishment"?
> --
> --Matt. Rocky's a Dog.
>
>> I do know that hitting, hurting your dog
>> will often make the dog either aggressive
>> or a fear biter, neither of which we want
>> to do.
>
> And neither does anyone else, Jerome.
> No matter what Jerry Howe states.
>
> --Matt. Rocky's a Dog.
>
> BUT, giving you the benefit of the
> doubt, please provide a quote (an
> original quote, not from one of Jerry
> Howe's heavily edited diatribes) that
> shows a regular poster promoting or
> using an abusive form of training.
> --Matt. Rocky's a Dog.
>
> So, can you cite some examples of
> people recommending "shock collars,
> hanging, and punishment"?
> --
> --Matt. Rocky's a Dog.
>
> What's the point, but: Refer me to those posts of
> which you have read so many. While you're going
> through them, point out those which recommend
> shocking, and pinching, and beating. Thank you.
> --
> -Matt. Rocky's a Dog.
> Rocky wrote:
> "Deltones" <vibrov...@hotmail.com> said in
> rec.pets.dogs.behavior:
>
> > After your defense of "Limited" choking, what
> > would be the point? Where I come from, choking
> > is choking. It's never limited.
>
> So, you can't point out abuse where none occurs.
> Thank you for your contribution.
>-
> --Matt. Rocky's a Dog.
>
From: Rocky (2...@rocky-dog.com)
Subject: Re: How to handle aggressive situations
Date: 2004-10-19 19:42:54 PST
Melanie L Chang said in rec.pets.dogs.behavior:
> I try really hard not to yell. The times that I have, Solo
> joined in and then lunged to the end of the leash.
Or, at the other end of the spectrum, Rocky cowers,
thinking I'm angry at him - a reason I don't "yuk out"
others' dogs at agility trials or training.
--
--Matt. Rocky's a Dog.
---------------
From: Rocky <2...@rocky-dog.com>
Date: 10 Jun 2003 18:00:45 GMT
Subject: Re: Absolutely abysmal agility day
Robin Nuttall said in rec.pets.dogs.behavior:
> One of the things that frustrates me the most about agility
> is that people seem to think that ALL dogs are fragile,
> shrinking flowers who cannot be corrected in any way.
Well, maybe one day -- when Friday doesn't take correction so
much to heart -- I'll try something different. Right now, he's
just getting the confidence to work a few jumps ahead of me.
--
--Matt. Rocky's a Dog.
From: Rocky (mbon...@sunada.com)
Subject: Re: Leg Humper
Date: 1999/09/14
Bioso...@aol.com (Jerry Howe) wrote in
<37D698CF.405B0...@bellsouth.net>:
> By "sticking your knee up," I can only presume that you are
> suggesting that the people knee the dog in the chest. If
> that's what you meant, just say it, instead of beating around
> the bush to avoid criticism from people like me. That kind of
> crap has got to stop, and that's why I'm here, to help wean
> you guys off of the abuse and into the proper methods of
> dealing with behavior problems.
Jerry, I was appreciating your explanation
up until this last paragraph.
Why did you blow it?
--Matt
From: Rocky <2...@rocky-dog.com>
Date: 16 Sep 2003 03:47:41 GMT
Subject: Re: Dominant Agressive Puppy????
Nessa said in rec.pets.dogs.behavior:
> the only thing I remember learning from a spanking was to
> run faster than my dad and NOT GET CAUGHT. so what does
> that say?
I learned to put a comic book down the back of my pants. And
sometimes my parents pretended not to notice. In retrospect,
that's pretty cool.
--
--Matt. Rocky's a Dog.
"Rocky" <2...@rocky-dog.com> wrote in message
news:Xns92FE730764918au...@130.133.1.4...
> Melinda Shore wrote in rec.pets.dogs.behavior:
>
> > But he's the one producing the training MATTerial.
> Ack. You just gave him some moore ammunition.
> --
> --Matt. Rocky's a Dog.
"Warning: Sometimes The Corrections Will Seem
Quite Harsh And Cause You To Cringe. This Is
A Normal Reaction The First Few Times It Happens,
But You'll Get Over It." mike duforth,
author: "Courteous Canine."
Sionnach wrote:
> "diddy" <di...@diddy.net> wrote:
>
> > change breeeds, and the owner would be facing charges
>
> Regardless of breed, according to everything I've read and heard about
> this incident, all the dog actually did was run to the sidewalk and yap at
> the jogger's heels. That will not have the owner "facing charges" aside from
> a possible civil citation for not keeping the dog on her property - this
> happened on the sidewalk right in front of her house, so it's not like the
> dog was running loose.
BWEEEEEAAHAHAHAHHAHAAAA!!!
> The other things about this incident that put the jogger far
> more in the wrong than the owner, IMO:
The jogger was on a PUBIC sidewalk mindin his own business and
was ATTACKED by a viciHOWES, HOWETA CON-TROLL, dog <{) : ~ ( >
> One, the dog is TINY (less than 10 pounds),
So are you, but you're viciHOWES and dangerHOWES.
> and couldn't possibly have actually presented much of a threat -
Sez you? You're a MENTAL CASE. Suppose the jogger was
AFRAID of dogs? Ever hear of Post Traumatic Stress Syndrome?
Suppose the jogger was diabetic? Ever hear of folks losin a limb
from a TINY WHOWEND?
> especially since she apparently wasn't actually trying to bite.
The dog ASSAULTED an innocent passerbye.
> Two, he kicked the dog literally across the street.
That's the dog OWNER'S fault.
> WAY more force than you need to get any dog to back off,
That's IRRELEVENT. The jogger was bein ATTACKED.
> even if the dog were larger.
Hey, it AIN'T like it was a INNOCENT DOG like THIS WON:
HOWEDY jw,
John Wesley wrote:
> In article <11u2d00...@corp.supernews.com>,
> nudean...@yaEXPUNGEhoo.com says...
> > http://www.nbc4.com/news/6525189/detail.html
> >
> > The Jogger in this story... well... I'd like to shake his hand!
>
>
>You've never tried to catch a little poodle, have you? I don't think
>3 kicks were justified, but I wouldn't expect the guy to run away.
>When our little poodle doesn't want to be caught, you see just how
>athletic a breed it is. He's no greyhound, but he's damn fast.
They are brilliant in agility, hardly any breed better at that size.
Doug
--
Doug Weller --
Doug & Helen's Dogs http://www.dougandhelen.com
A Director and Moderator of The Hall of Ma'at http://www.hallofmaat.com
Doug's Archaeology Site: http://www.ramtops.co.uk
That just brought a thought to my head that gave me a much needed
smile on a Friday. It seems to me that different breeds would have
different reactions to running out of the garage door to see a jogger
going down the street. So while the little poodle may have said to
himself, "I am going to run that intruder off!" or if it were Mimi's
poodle, "I am a German Shepherd, FEAR ME!1!" your greyhound would be
thinking more along the lines of "It's a RACE! YAY!!!" Then I was
thinking what other dogs might say. At my house, depending on the
dog, you could get Sammie, the FEAR my fluffy ferocity response or one
of the following:
"Look! Someone new has come over to play with me and pet me!" (which
may well scare the jogger more than the poodle response)
"Oh puhleeze! Isn't it bad enough I have to share my domain with all
these people and dogs already? Now more of them are showing up to get
on my nerves?"
"Yeah, you just keep running *away* from the house, and nobody gets
hurt, right, Mom? Or should I let him stay like that guy who turned
off my flushing water bowl just because you think he's okay?"
What would your dogs say at seeing the jogger as they came out of the
garage door?
>On Fri, 03 Feb 2006 05:29:13 GMT, in rec.pets.dogs.behavior, Paula wrote:
>
>>
>>You've never tried to catch a little poodle, have you? I don't think
>>3 kicks were justified, but I wouldn't expect the guy to run away.
>>When our little poodle doesn't want to be caught, you see just how
>>athletic a breed it is. He's no greyhound, but he's damn fast.
>
>They are brilliant in agility, hardly any breed better at that size.
To our mini poodle, all the world is an agility course, and he's never
even heard of agility.
> What would your dogs say at seeing the jogger as they came out of the
> garage door?
Before or After House Renovations?
BHR Chihuahuas: We are going to kill you with our vicious teeth!
AHR Chihuahuas: Oh, did five people just tramp through the
house? Ho hum, we are sleepy.
BHR Yellow Lab: Who are you? Oh wait, are you chasing a wabbit?
Wait, let's chase that wabbit together!
AHR Yellow Lab: (Same)
FurPaw
--
"...curious...that women would move from playing with Barbie to
denouncing Barbie to remaking themselves as Barbie."
Maureen Dowd, _Are Men Necessary?_
To reply, unleash the dog
>
> And I hate just about anything (with their women and their food being
> notable exceptions) French!
>
> France.
>
> <spit>
>
>
LMAO!
jw