--
You can check out any time you like
But you can never leave..........
Laissez le bon temps rouler!
.........
"Ritchie Mudge" <necr...@netspace.net.au> wrote in message
news:8dna6p$2pf3$1...@otis.netspace.net.au...
: I occasionally see pictures or footage of cats with small stubby ears. At
: first I thought they were simply regular cats with their ears cocked
: forward, or cats with damaged ears, but it occurred to me that there might
: actually be a breed of cats with these stubby ears (somewhat
Garfield-like).
:
: Can anyone confirm this? What breed, if any, are these cats?
:
: Ritchie
:
:
Now I just have to find a breeder in Victoria, Australia...
Ritchie
Ritchie Mudge <necr...@netspace.net.au> wrote in message
news:8dna6p$2pf3$1...@otis.netspace.net.au...
Ritchie-
Scottish folds are no longer recognized by British cat organizations.
The genetic mutation the causes the ear folds is also associated with
other genetic defects that are crippling and sometimes fatal. The folded
ears are charming, but is it worth it?
--
Paul
USENET: people having unprotected conversations with multiple partners.
ibidem <ibi...@coldcuts.worldnet.att.net> wrote in message
news:38FF9A...@coldcuts.worldnet.att.net...
That's true, Krazee, but if you're going to maintain breed standards,
that's what you have to do: breed folds to folds. That's why the British
associations no longer recognize this critter as a breed. I do believe
they're still recognized in the states, but those folks across the pond
declaw as well.
Manx cats, too, are no longer recognized in England. The genetic
problem there is more closely associated with the breed. The
genetically- mutated absence of a tail also leads to lumbar spinal
fusions and deformities and other skeletal problems, really pretty awful
stuff.
--
You can check out any time you like
But you can never leave..........
Laissez le bon temps rouler!
.........
"ibidem" <ibi...@coldcuts.worldnet.att.net> wrote in message
news:38FFD5...@coldcuts.worldnet.att.net...
Hopitus <hop...@mediaone.net> wrote in message
news:D6RL4.2745$V4.2...@typhoon.pompano.mediaone.net...
Janet-
You are absolutely right, and I am wrong. The Manx cat is still
recognized and shown in England.
The best I can recall about the issue was a cat magazine article about
two years ago, saying that Manx's were being considered for decommision
(Refutation? Shunning? What do they call it?) because of all the horrid
defects that are directly associated with the Manx gene. (There is, I
believe, something called a "Manx Syndrome" which includes all the
crippling and lethal deformities Manx are prone to.) The article, if I
recall accurately, said that it was expected that Manx cats would no
longer be recognized.
They are still recognized, and you are correct, Janet.
Camilla-
Yup. But this means that the Manx gene doesn't breed true. Or, more
accurately, that when it does breed true, it leads to all the awful
birth defects. In other words, bred true, the Manx is a genetic horror.
And if you dare not breed Manx to Manx (or rumpy to rumpy) there is a
legitimate question as to whether the Manx can even be called a distinct
breed.
Camilla
ibidem <ibi...@coldcuts.worldnet.att.net> skrev i en
nyhedsmeddelelse:390125...@coldcuts.worldnet.att.net...