I agree. It is a risk to the mother cat and I consider a spay in advanced
pregnancy unethical. It is important to keep the population of unwanted
pets as low as possible, but that does not make killing them right.
Prevention by spaying is a must, but not abortion of late pregnancies. I
think there is a huge difference between the abortion of a 2 week old
embryo and the abortion of a nearly-term foetus (whether kitty or human).
In the human issue, the mother's right to control her body are of major
consideration. That means the right to control whether she does or does
not have the child. In the case o cats, we can't ask them their choice...
we must make the decision for them. We have to try and make the right
one.
--
Tina Noyes
http://tdg.uoguelph.ca/~peak/peaksters/tina/
Catkin7940 wrote:
> I'm involved in cat rescue and never, ever spay a pregnant female. If I
> don't know she's pregnant it's different, but I just can't abort those
> who I know are. My vet is of the same opinion.
and yorst...@aol.com (YorsTrooly) replies:
> Sure, it would be nice if we could all do this, but it's not realistic. I
> don't have this option. If I did not spay the pregnant females, I would
> have 2,000 cats by now.
>
> For feral cats who are allowed to have kittens, the horrors that can
> follow allowing them to have litters are tragic.
>
> And of course, let's face reality. Unless you take a pregnant cat into
> your home without ever letting her outside, nurture the cat, spay the cat,
> then spay/neuter the kittens before placing them, then you will achieve
> nothing. A cat that has kittens that has outdoor access will almost
> invariably be pregnant again, even if only in the early stages, by the
> time the kittens are weaned.
Also, what happens to the other existing cats and kittens that you could have
saved and found homes for while waiting for the pregant cat to give birth
and for the kittens to be old enough to adopt? You might have the satisfaction
of not aborting these kittens but what about the born animals that will
be killed by some other group. I wish it was a viable option to not spay
pregant cats but there are too many unwanted, healthy, and adoptable cats
and kittens in the worldthat are killed daily in shelters to allow
unnecessary
litters to be born.
Alison
Sharon Talbert
Friends of Campus Cats
(who just inherited a litter of 7 from a feral mom I wish I could have
caught before she gave birth)
So many cats, not nearly enough laps....
Bringing more unwanted kittens into the world is not a noble deed. Just
makes more work for rescuers and shelters. There are more kittens out
there right now than can find homes as it is. Adding to their numbers is
hardly a responsible act for a cat rescuer.
I was queasy about my first spay of a far-gone feral and left it up to my
vet. She wisely spayed. Years later, old Stubbs (whose tail had to be
partly amputated at the same time due to an infection) is alive and well
and kitten-free.
Sharon Talbert
Friends of Campus Cats
On 27 Jul 1997, Tina M Noyes wrote:
> Catkin7940 (catki...@aol.com) wrote:
> : I'm involved in cat rescue and never, ever spay a pregnant female. If I
> : don't know she's pregnant it's different, but I just can't abort those
> : who I know are. My vet is of the same opinion.
>
If you allow a cat to give birth, at whatever stage the cat is at when you
decide not spay her, then it is just someone else's job to kill that same
many kittens that have already been born somewhere else. The
shelter/pound workers have it hard enough as it is, please make their job
easier.
I understand the argument that cats are not people and that we should not
anthropomorphize(sp?) by comparing a pregnant woman to a pregnant cat.
Nevertheless, cats are sentient beings with feelings. It is not difficult
to imagine that kittens can survive late term spaying. It would be
interesting to hear from a candid veterinarian on this point.
I have been involved in cat advocacy for more than twenty years. I am far
from a "Kitty right to lifer" I know how frustrating the overpopulation
situation is, but I believe it can only be solved through education and
enlightened shelters and workers who multiply their numbers through the
humane and socially responsible examples they set.
When I caught Pixel she was ready to give birth at any moment. We spayed her
anyway and now everytime I look at that sweet cat I wonder what her kittens
might have been like. I know I did the "right thing", but I still feel bad.
Then Effie came along and had her kittens in my office before I could get
her spayed (I'm sure I probably could have managed to get her in if I'd
tried really hard to get help, but after Pixel I just let it slide awhile).
I realize that there are other kittens out there somewhere looking for
homes, but I wouldn't have adopted them anyway. I had already decided to
keep my household closed to outside cats to avoid any problems with viruses,
etc. These kittens are relatively guaranteed to be free of FeLV and FIV
because they came from the same colony as my other cats who are free.
Besides, I'd experienced a number of losses of older feline friends recently
and couldn't bear the thought of killing anymore.
I'm not saying the latter was right, just that it was right for me at the
time. This is a matter not only of statistics, but of the fight between
heart and head as well. Please don't condemn others, but do continue the
discussions. These are important subjects that need to be discussed calmly
and with intelligence AND compassion.
--
Andrea
aka Cheshire Cat
Sharon Talbert
Friends of Campus Cats
On 3 Aug 1997, NSFR wrote:
> Hi Sharon
> We here have had to spay 4 pregnant females this season. Not something we
> want to do but an absolute necessity. We do not have space or adopters for
> more kittens. I agree it is not an easy choice. The same as euthanizing
> cats that test positive for FIV or Feline Leukemia but these are choices
> made so that healthy cats can get homes.
(rest snipped)