Joy wrote:
> I believe Jill meant that she'd rather keep this newsgroup on topic, or at
> least on topics that don't arouse strong negative feelings.
That's the clincher: strong feelings. We go off-topic here all the time.
So that's not the real problem. It's only when a topic can cause angry
arguments that people object to having it here.
I don't feel as strongly (speaking of strong feelings) about that rule
myself and I don't mind the occasional political discussion, or even
occasional disagreements, as long as people can keep from devolving into
rudeness and abuse.
As far as Evelyn's comment goes, it's hard to believe that subject is
even controversial. I know there are plenty of people who don't think
GMOs are dangerous, or simply don't care, and that's their business.
But are there really people who feel *so strongly* about the ability to
remain unaware of what's in their food that they want to deny that
knowledge to everyone? I mean other than the people who sell the stuff?
Seriously, it's hard to believe this is something that people would
argue about...
--
Joyce
I will not sniff at my male human's feet after he takes his shoes off,
freeze my mouth open in disgust and then sniff my private parts to compare
odors. -- Cat Resolutions