Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Re: Election 2004

2 views
Skip to first unread message

Doorman

unread,
Jun 18, 2004, 11:18:26 PM6/18/04
to

<5lb...@rthlk.not> wrote in message news:40C92A88...@rthlk.not...
>
>
> Doorman wrote:
>
> > <5lb...@rthlk.not> wrote in message news:40C7E6A5...@rthlk.not...
> > >
> > >
> > > Doorman wrote:
> > >
> > > > It started already...the Dems have been caught and fired for
falsifying
> > > > voter registration cards in Ohio.
> > > >
> > > > When will you tell the democtrats that the ends does not justify the
> > means.
> > > >
> > > > If they cheat you to get there, will they cheat you while there?
> > >
> > > The neocon Republicans cheated in the 2000 Florida elections and the
> > neocons
> > > that made it into the White House have been cheating ever since they
got
> > in
> > > there. Ends justify the means is a part of their twisted Straussian
> > philosophy.
> >
> > Getting real tired of this.....100% of the counties that experienced
> > problems (real or perceived) were run by democtrats. The workers that
> > designed the ballots, organized the volunteers, and facilitated the
counts
> > all were democrats. The five major news organizations filed suit and
won
> > access to ALL the documentation for many recounts. The overwhelming
truth
> > is that AlGore received 503 fewer votes than Bush in the disputed
counties.
> > Ralph Nader received 9,000 or so votes in those same counties. Buchanon
> > received 8,000 votes. Most believe that Nader and Buchanon had a much
> > bigger impact on the outcome than "hanging chads".
> >
> > In the republican counties that were not picked by the democrats for
> > recount, Bush gained 4,500 votes from absentee and "recounted" ballots,
all
> > done by independent news organizations. Of course those votes did not
go
> > towards Bush's total because the democrats did not dispute the counts in
> > republican counties, only democratic counties.
> >
> > Ohio democrats are already at it again. Two democrat volunteers were
fired
> > for falsifying voter registration cards.
> >
> > Although AlGore received 500K more votes counted, 7 states showed
tallies
> > within 5% and were not recounted. Bush did not challenge in those
states
> > although he could have. Of those 7 states, AlGore won 5. Would we
> > entertain a recount on those states just to make sure Florida wasn't the
> > only problem state? Didn't think so. We certainly could assume that
since
> > the military voted about 70% for Bush, and those ballots were not
counted in
> > the 7 states, the total may be quite different.
> >
> > Facts are troublesome.
>
> I doubt shrub will get a 70% majority this time, granted that he has seen
fit to
> military paying their own airfare for furloughs from Iraq and having to
pay for
> their own artillery-resistant vests. As far as the other states you
mention, the
> issue remains the suspion of Florida, where the candidates brother, Gov.
Jeb
> guaranteed a victory. If you can't see that as an arrogant boast of voter
> tampering, then you have placed your head so far up your ass that it is
likely
> to collide with your head.

Again, the drunk don't feel pain.......

The guarantee had nothing to do with the day-to-day operations of the
election inwhich the democrats had total control. The FEC sent the blue
ribbon panel to investigate the "disenfranchisement" of black voters. After
ten days, not one, not two, not a single person claimed, nor did a single
person prove that whitie put up road blocks, burned crosses, or bombed
churches to keep them away from the polls.

Tell Kerry to vote for funding next time. Constitution....the Congress
shall have all budgetary responsibilities. Presidents don't buy, sell,
trade, or barter for anybody.....the Congress does.

Only a limpwristed civilian liberal wouldn't know that military personnel
must pay for travel during leave. Can you imagine the costs to pay the
travel expenses of 2 million servicemen that each get 30 days leave every
year? Your station is where they put you. Your leave is where you want to
go.

A recent furlough request could look like...."Sargeant, not only do I want
to travel back home for three days, but then arrange to have me flown to
Germany, then to Australia, then how 'bout a 3 day TDY to Japan." Oh, you
would only allow a paid trip to your hometown....the one you were born in,
then the one you were raised in, then the one you joined up from, then of
course the one your parents are in.

Wake up.

Doorman

--
IMPORTANT NOTICE...FORTHCOMING....
"We plan to meet next week to talk about planning a strategy session to
discuss the next step towards forming a consensus to start the development
of the rough draft for the implementation of our intention to develop a
plan."


Jim Segrave

unread,
Jun 19, 2004, 10:06:16 AM6/19/04
to
In article <kaOAc.130$%w1....@eagle.america.net>,
Doorman <doorm...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>
><5lb...@rthlk.not> wrote in message news:40C92A88...@rthlk.not...

[snip diatribe about voter disenfranchisment, rebuttal, difression on
the vagaries of leave arrangements for US militay personell]

Please take this elsewhere unless the voting/leave arrangements/US
constitution/whatever other political thme has an effect on match
equities, cube decisions or chequer play

--
--
Jim Segrave j...@jes-2.demon.nl

0 new messages