OT: Mark Sanford

[Mike Hendrix at dot]

Once upon a time Republicans prided themselves in taking the high
road. The moral high road that is.

But things have changed. They just joined the Democrats when they
elected Mark Sanford to one of the United States Representatives from
South Carolina.

I guess we can conclude that the Republicans take the moral
"high-road" when it is politically prudent to do so then return to
being normal hypocrites.

mike
--

Pensacola, FL
http://www.travellogs.us/

[film...@gmail.com]

That's just those South Carolinian Republicans who'll vote for an unrepentant, horndog, Jeezus wheezer. Our Republicans on RORT aren't like that! Nosir! The Republicans on this board demand pure conservative, family values, from Godly candidates - With Biblical Principles! HawHawHaw!

Henry Miller

[Hank]

By Jove, I think you've goat it!

Hank

[nothermark]

Or it speaks about the competition...

;-)

[Bob Hatch]

I'm sure you would have voted for the sister of Stephen Colbert. They
chose not to. After all, in your world, BHO is "DA MAN".

--
I do not carry a gun hoping that
I'll be able to shoot someone, anymore than
I carry a jack hoping I'll have a flat
tire.
Me.

[Lone Haranguer]

film...@gmail.com wrote:
> That's just those South Carolinian Republicans who'll vote for an unrepentant, horndog, Jeezus wheezer. Our Republicans on RORT aren't like that! Nosir! The Republicans on this board demand pure conservative, family values, from Godly candidates - With Biblical Principles! HawHawHaw!
>
> Henry Miller

He isn't nearly as sleazy as your heroes. Have you been watching
the hearings on the Benghazi fiasco? The Democrats were doing
their very best to hide the lies of Obama and Hillary.

The cover-up is far worse than Watergate.

LZ

[Bruce S]

On 5/8/2013 11:35 PM, film...@gmail.com wrote:
> That's just those South Carolinian Republicans who'll vote for an unrepentant, horndog, Jeezus wheezer. Our Republicans on RORT aren't like that! Nosir! The Republicans on this board demand pure conservative, family values, from Godly candidates - With Biblical Principles! HawHawHaw!
>
> Henry Miller

Such hypocrites you liberals are - first you demand that people "judge
not", and that they forgive and forget, but when the conservatives of
South Carolina do just that, you take offense. Make up your mind.

--
Bruce

"In any compromise between food and poison, it is only death that can
win. In any compromise between good and evil, it is only evil that can
profit."

[George Anthony]

"Lone Haranguer" <linu...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:av1rd7...@mid.individual.net...

Where are Woodward and Bernstein when WE need them?

[MaxD]

http://samuel-warde.com/2013/05/john-fugelsangs-devastating-message-from-the-south-carolina-board-of-tourism/

[George Anthony]

"Bob Hatch" <bob....@ymail.com> wrote in message
news:518ba450$0$28819$c3e8da3$f017...@news.astraweb.com...

If you look at whom liberals have elected over the years, I'm sure, given
the chance, those who frequent this newsgroup would certainly have voted for
the sister of a comedian. After all, they elected a comedian (Al Franken),
a clown (Barrack Obama), a witch (Nancy Pelosi) a walking gaff machine (Joe
Biden), a philanderer (Bill Clinton) and an obvious space alien (Barney
Frank. Who knows what language he speaks). The list is almost endless. My
mother used to tell me to clean the weeds from my own garden before worrying
about someone else's. Maybe you liberals should try that. So, nothermark,
Max, et al. , show how smart you are by following up with your list of whom
you consider are conservative incompetents. You guys never have an original
thought so you may as well give your version of mine.

[nothermark]

I'd like to see all living congressrats serving and former tried,
convicted, and executed for malfeasance in office if they ever voted
to pass a budget. Then we could fire all existing staff for
complicity and start over with a clean slate. While we are at it we
could claw back all the money their families made while they were in
office to help pay for the debt.

[Owen McKenzie]

"This video is private"?

--

Owen McKenzie
Posting from Largo, FL

"It is impossible to defeat an ignorant man in argument."
-- William G. McAdoo

[Mike Hendrix at dot]

On Thu, 9 May 2013 17:59:20 -0500, "George Anthony"
<gant...@gmail.net> wrote:

>
>

------------------------------------
Anthony is so, so funny. He calls Bill Clinton a philanderer, when in
a discussion about Mark Sanford, who is a ?????????

>Maybe you liberals should try that. So, nothermark,
>Max, et al. , show how smart you are by following up with your list of whom
>you consider are conservative incompetents.

Let's see, how about George W. Bush, you know, the shrub!

Rep. Todd Akin (R-Mo.): Remember how he told the local TV
interviewer that pregnancy from rape is "really rare," because "if
it's a legitimate rape, the female body has ways to try to shut that
whole thing down."


Then try Mitt Romney: How bout his verbal communication with wealthy
donors ----- You know that 47 percent of Americans are
government-addicted moochers wasn't even a classic inadvertent gaffe:
He meant to say it, and even revisited the theme after he lost the
presidential race, griping that President Obama won re-election by
handing out "gifts" to young, minority, and female voters.

Then in a Feb. 1 interview on CNN, Romney told Soledad O'Brien, "I'm
not concerned about the very poor."


Richard Mourdock, yea the same Richard Mourdock that was set to take
over Richard Lugars seat in Indiana: Concerning a rape-abortion
question he replied, "I came to realize that life is that gift from
God. And, I think, even when life begins in that horrible situation of
rape, that it is something that God intended to happen."

How about tricky Dicky.....you know Richard Nixon????

I could go on but you get the idea. It ain't just the Democrats that
have folks running around with "shit for brains".

[Owen McKenzie]

On 5/9/2013 10:58 PM, Mike Hendrix wrote:
>
> Then in a Feb. 1 interview on CNN, Romney told Soledad O'Brien, "I'm
> not concerned about the very poor."
>

> mike
>
I found this hard to believe so I went searching, & you were right. As
far as you went. You did abbreviate the quote. And it was in 2012, not
that that matters.

See it here:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tqSrpynRTlk

[nothermark]

On Fri, 10 May 2013 08:27:29 -0400, Owen McKenzie
<owenwmc...@gmail.com> wrote:

>On 5/9/2013 10:58 PM, Mike Hendrix wrote:
>>
>> Then in a Feb. 1 interview on CNN, Romney told Soledad O'Brien, "I'm
>> not concerned about the very poor."
>>
>> mike
>>
>I found this hard to believe so I went searching, & you were right. As
>far as you went. You did abbreviate the quote. And it was in 2012, not
>that that matters.
>
>See it here:
>
>http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tqSrpynRTlk

Listen to who he defines as middle income.

I would not call anyone living on Social Security middle income...
YMMV.

He also does not have a clue about the very poor. There is no safety
net except for mothers of children and maybe geezers. That leaves a
sizeable population in trouble.

[Mike Hendrix at dot]

On Thu, 09 May 2013 09:54:12 -0700, Bruce S <bruce...@gmail.com>
wrote:

>On 5/8/2013 11:35 PM, film...@gmail.com wrote:
>> That's just those South Carolinian Republicans who'll vote for an unrepentant, horndog, Jeezus wheezer. Our Republicans on RORT aren't like that! Nosir! The Republicans on this board demand pure conservative, family values, from Godly candidates - With Biblical Principles! HawHawHaw!
>>
>> Henry Miller
>
>Such hypocrites you liberals are - first you demand that people "judge
>not", and that they forgive and forget, but when the conservatives of
>South Carolina do just that, you take offense. Make up your mind.

-------------------------

Bruce, you could be a politician. You really could. If there is one
person that could turn a turd into a popsicle it is you.

Think about this:

This just further proves what hypocrites the GOP really are. They went
after Clinton and Edwards with almost unbridled zealousness. Mark
Sanford's transgressions can be forgiven however.

Isn't it funny how hypocritical those so called "Christians" are. When
John Edwards did what he did, they were out for blood. Sanford lied
and visited his mistress in another country...all on the taxpayers
money....and they not only forgive him, they put him back in politics.
Sanford has been "forgiven".

GOP can get away with anything. God must love them more than Dems who
they would have tarred and feathered and maybe stoned.

It is sad when a party condemns others, such as Clinton for doing
something similar, then reward the man who cheated on wife, lied, and
let the taxpayers pick up the expense for his tryst in another
country. Now, he parades this woman at his side. Way to go party of
"family values"!

Senator David Vitter from Louisiana comes to mind. You remember when
Vitter was identified as a client of a prostitution service during the
DC Madam scandal. Yea, the "Christians" aka "Republicans" have chosen
to FORGIVE David Vitter as well.

Like I said Bruce, you should be in office.

[Mike Hendrix at dot]

On Thu, 09 May 2013 22:36:59 -0400, Owen McKenzie
<owenwmc...@gmail.com> wrote:

>On 5/9/2013 6:36 PM, MaxD wrote:
>> On 5/8/2013 8:49 PM, Mike Hendrix wrote:
>>>
>>> Once upon a time Republicans prided themselves in taking the high
>>> road. The moral high road that is.
>>>
>>> But things have changed. They just joined the Democrats when they
>>> elected Mark Sanford to one of the United States Representatives from
>>> South Carolina.
>>>
>>> I guess we can conclude that the Republicans take the moral
>>> "high-road" when it is politically prudent to do so then return to
>>> being normal hypocrites.
>>>
>>> mike
>>>
>>
>> http://samuel-warde.com/2013/05/john-fugelsangs-devastating-message-from-the-south-carolina-board-of-tourism/
>>
>"This video is private"?

---------------------------------------------

Owen, this is the link you are looking for.

http://current.com/shows/viewpoint/videos/john-fugelsang-on-mark-sanford-its-ok-to-be-a-bad-christian-as-long-as-youre-a-good-liar/

[Hunter Hampton]

On 5/10/2013 7:18 AM, Mike Hendrix wrote:
> Bruce, you could be a politician. You really could. If there is one
> person that could turn a turd into a popsicle it is you.

Excellent post Mike.....

Hunter

[Bruce S]

On 5/10/2013 5:27 AM, Owen McKenzie wrote:
> On 5/9/2013 10:58 PM, Mike Hendrix wrote:
>>
>> Then in a Feb. 1 interview on CNN, Romney told Soledad O'Brien, "I'm
>> not concerned about the very poor."
>>
>> mike
>>
> I found this hard to believe so I went searching, & you were right. As
> far as you went. You did abbreviate the quote. And it was in 2012, not
> that that matters.
>
> See it here:
>
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tqSrpynRTlk

Anybody who pays attention to what is actually happening in the world
already knew the rest of that comment by Romney. Mike gets his news
from MSNBC and knows only the propaganda they broadcast.

[Mike Hendrix at dot]

On Fri, 10 May 2013 09:57:58 -0700, Bruce S <bruce...@gmail.com>
wrote:

>On 5/10/2013 5:27 AM, Owen McKenzie wrote:
>> On 5/9/2013 10:58 PM, Mike Hendrix wrote:
>>>
>>> Then in a Feb. 1 interview on CNN, Romney told Soledad O'Brien, "I'm
>>> not concerned about the very poor."
>>>
>>> mike
>>>
>> I found this hard to believe so I went searching, & you were right. As
>> far as you went. You did abbreviate the quote. And it was in 2012, not
>> that that matters.
>>
>> See it here:
>>
>> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tqSrpynRTlk
>
>Anybody who pays attention to what is actually happening in the world
>already knew the rest of that comment by Romney. Mike gets his news
>from MSNBC and knows only the propaganda they broadcast.

------------------

Bruce, Wrong Again!!!!

I only have access to over the air broadcast and MSNBC does not have a
station in Pensacola.

Ya wanna try again?

[George Anthony]

"Mike Hendrix" <mike (at) travellogs (dot) us> wrote in message
news:lkhqo85ek8hvocmmb...@4ax.com...

National networks, just as bad.

[Owen McKenzie]

I see you responded to Bruce but not to me. Do you think your posting of
the quote was honest when it wasn't complete?

[Mike Hendrix at dot]

------------------------
So Anthony, is "FOX" the only "accurate" source for news?

[George Anthony]

"Mike Hendrix" <mike (at) travellogs (dot) us> wrote in message

news:bjpqo895qmtl2ku2d...@4ax.com...

That's "Mr. Anthony" to you (disrespecting me because I'm black?) and yes,
pretty much. It's certainly no less accurate than the networks and
generally much more so.

[MaxD]

Hmm. I never expected the race card to be pulled by you George. I
thought you disdained that sort of thing.

[Bruce S]

So, if not MSNBC, what is your excuse for not knowing what Romney
actually said?

--
Bruce

Grammar - The difference between knowing your shit and knowing you're shit.

[Bruce S]

Let me answer that question with a question of my own: I got my news of
the incident from FOX News and knew the truth; you got your news from
the MSM and believed the lie; which network do you think was more accurate?

[nothermark]

Aside from the fact that we would not know if you did not tell us...

[nothermark]

On Fri, 10 May 2013 18:30:56 -0700, Bruce S <bruce...@gmail.com>

I think if you go to the trouble of digging both sources had the same
news at the same time. Both were relying on the same feeds. The
difference is the slant and the amount of coverage. Evidently Fox had
more coverage than the MSM.

As a side note it must really gall the folks at FOX that they are not
considered MSM. ;-)

[Bob Hatch]

Of course he does. It's the same thing he pulled with the McCain
statement about the economy back in '08.

[George Anthony]

"MaxD" <gmd...@att.net> wrote in message
news:518d8b95$0$7711$c3e8da3$12bc...@news.astraweb.com...

I do, it was tongue-in-cheek, which apparently you missed.

[George Anthony]

"nothermark" <nothe...@not.here> wrote in message
news:4cbro89donrtdrb2s...@4ax.com...

See my reply to Max.

[Mike Hendrix at dot]

On Fri, 10 May 2013 18:30:56 -0700, Bruce S <bruce...@gmail.com>

--------------------------
Bruce, you either have a reading problem or a comprehension problem.

I did not get my news from MS anything.

I reported what Romney said. Period.! Did I report EVERYTHING that
Romney said?

NO! But what I said Romney said was 100% accurate whether you like it
or not.

What I wrote is accurate whether reported by MS----whatever or by Faux
News.

[Mike Hendrix at dot]

On Fri, 10 May 2013 16:53:19 -0500, "George Anthony"

Anthony, I did not disrespect you because of your color because I do
not know what color you are. I disrespected you because you are an
idiot!

[Mike Hendrix at dot]

Owen, I absolutely believe it was honest. What do you think was no
honest about it?

What would you add to take away from what Romney said?

[Mike Hendrix at dot]

On Fri, 10 May 2013 17:53:51 -0700, Bruce S <bruce...@gmail.com>

--------------------------

Bruce, are you saying that Romney did not say:
"I'm not concerned about the very poor"?

If you want to provide every word he spoke in his interview that is
fine with me. I just provided one sentence to make a point. And I
obviously made that point.....in spades!

[Major Oz]

On Wednesday, May 8, 2013 9:49:40 PM UTC-5, Mike Hendrix wrote:

....pretty much what was expected....


But.......

Ever consider that he might be the better legislator ?

[nothermark]

On Fri, 10 May 2013 23:49:01 -0500, "George Anthony"

Did see it. You and I suffer from the same problem. Our sense of
humor is not always in sync with most folks... ;-)

[nothermark]

And about what I would expect from Townhall....

[Mike Hendrix at dot]

On Fri, 10 May 2013 23:04:58 -0700 (PDT), Major Oz <ozm...@gmail.com>
wrote:

---------
But, but-gasp, how could he possibly be a better legislator for the:
"Born Again Christians in the moral purity party, you know the party
of conservative moral principles"?

[MaxD]

Have you tried this:
;-)

[Owen McKenzie]

On 5/11/2013 1:22 AM, Mike Hendrix wrote:
>
> I reported what Romney said. Period.! Did I report EVERYTHING that
> Romney said?
>
> NO! But what I said Romney said was 100% accurate whether you like it
> or not.
>
> What I wrote is accurate whether reported by MS----whatever or by Faux
> News.
>
> mike
>

I'll repeat my question, do you think your post was an honest portrayal
of what Romney said?

It reminds me of something I read years ago about a newspaper reviewing
a Broadway show. In part, the review read "They wasted a lavish
production on a dismal show."

Ads placed by the theater quoted the paper's review as "A lavish
production!"

[George Anthony]

"MaxD" <gmd...@att.net> wrote in message

news:518e645c$0$38232$c3e8da3$f626...@news.astraweb.com...

That takes the fun out of it :-)

[Owen McKenzie]

Did not the quote continue with "There is already a safety net in place
for them."?

[George Anthony]

"Mike Hendrix" <mike (at) travellogs (dot) us> wrote in message

news:2elro8dn8i59jup8u...@4ax.com...

Another humorless liberal (in denial) and again with the name calling.

[George Anthony]

"Mike Hendrix" <mike (at) travellogs (dot) us> wrote in message

news:lllro81a57f2vr046...@4ax.com...

Taken out of context. A typical liberal tactic. Look for the complete quote
and you'll understand what he meant.

[Owen McKenzie]

But you did not provide one sentence, you provided *part* of one
sentence. Look at the link a posted above and tell me if you honestly
believe your original post was a fair representation of what he was saying.

[Mike Hendrix at dot]

On Sat, 11 May 2013 11:59:26 -0400, Owen McKenzie

Owen, again for your benefit I did not quote the entire interview, but
I have already indicated that.

Would this make you happy?:

Then in a Feb. 1 interview on CNN, Romney told Soledad O'Brien, "I'm

not concerned about the very poor there is already a safety net in
place for them."?

Would that adequately soothe your sensitivities?

What is sooooo very funny about this discussion is how it started with
a really disgusting tirade by Anthony ----- this one if you will
recall:

"If you look at whom liberals have elected over the years, I'm sure,
given the chance, those who frequent this newsgroup would certainly
have voted for the sister of a comedian. After all, they elected a
comedian (Al Franken), a clown (Barrack Obama), a witch (Nancy Pelosi)
a walking gaff machine (Joe Biden), a philanderer (Bill Clinton) and
an obvious space alien (Barney Frank. Who knows what language he
speaks). The list is almost endless. My mother used to tell me to
clean the weeds from my own garden before worrying about someone
else's. Maybe you liberals should try that. So, nothermark, Max, et
al. , show how smart you are by following up with your list of whom
you consider are conservative incompetents. You guys never have an
original thought so you may as well give your version of mine."

To which I replied with the "list" that Anthony requested. Here is
that "list" Anthony requested:

"Let's see, how about George W. Bush, you know, the shrub!

Rep. Todd Akin (R-Mo.): Remember how he told the local TV
interviewer that pregnancy from rape is "really rare," because "if
it's a legitimate rape, the female body has ways to try to shut that
whole thing down."


Then try Mitt Romney: How bout his verbal communication with wealthy
donors ----- You know that 47 percent of Americans are
government-addicted moochers wasn't even a classic inadvertent gaffe:
He meant to say it, and even revisited the theme after he lost the
presidential race, griping that President Obama won re-election by
handing out "gifts" to young, minority, and female voters.

Then in a Feb. 1 interview on CNN, Romney told Soledad O'Brien, "I'm
not concerned about the very poor."

Richard Mourdock, yea the same Richard Mourdock that was set to take
over Richard Lugars seat in Indiana: Concerning a rape-abortion
question he replied, "I came to realize that life is that gift from
God. And, I think, even when life begins in that horrible situation of
rape, that it is something that God intended to happen."

How about tricky Dicky.....you know Richard Nixon????

I could go on but you get the idea. It ain't just the Democrats that
have folks running around with "shit for brains"."

With all of that and you folks want to pick a nit about a Romney
Quote???????

What gives with that?

Somehow, I think you need to get a better stick to hang your hat on.

Both political parties have plenty of boobs to go around. It ain't
just the Democrats that have the loose screws!!!!!

[Mike Hendrix at dot]

On Sat, 11 May 2013 11:58:11 -0400, Owen McKenzie
<owenwmc...@gmail.com> wrote:

>On 5/11/2013 1:22 AM, Mike Hendrix wrote:
>>
>> I reported what Romney said. Period.! Did I report EVERYTHING that
>> Romney said?
>>
>> NO! But what I said Romney said was 100% accurate whether you like it
>> or not.
>>
>> What I wrote is accurate whether reported by MS----whatever or by Faux
>> News.
>>
>> mike
>>
>
>I'll repeat my question, do you think your post was an honest portrayal
>of what Romney said?
>
>It reminds me of something I read years ago about a newspaper reviewing
>a Broadway show. In part, the review read "They wasted a lavish
>production on a dismal show."
>
>Ads placed by the theater quoted the paper's review as "A lavish
>production!"

Absolutely, word for word!!!!!

Right out of the asses mouth, if you will.

[Bruce S]

No, what you wrote was a LIE. When you intentionally quote someone in a
manner that leads people to believe that person said something other
than what was actually said, you are a liar.

--
Bruce

"In any compromise between food and poison, it is only death that can
win. In any compromise between good and evil, it is only evil that can
profit."

[Bruce S]

If your point was that you are a liar, or that you are completely
uninformed, you made it.

[bill horne]

Using that would make "whoooosh" obsolete - and life would be drearier
without whooooshes.

--
bill
Theory don't mean squat if it don't work.

[nothermark]

On Sat, 11 May 2013 11:59:26 -0400, Owen McKenzie

Even with that he is wrong. The safety net only applies to people
with dependents.

[bill horne]

I don't know why you're arguing with him when you agree with him. You
said, "your original post was a fair representation of what he was
saying".

[Owen McKenzie]

Just as honest as his :-)

[MaxD]

On 5/11/2013 10:30 AM, bill horne wrote:

> MaxD wrote:


>> Have you tried this:
>> ;-)
>
> Using that would make "whoooosh" obsolete - and life would be drearier
> without whooooshes.
>

Well, whoooooooosh to you in that case.
Oh, and Happy Mother's day to all you muthas

[George Anthony]

"Mike Hendrix" <mike (at) travellogs (dot) us> wrote in message

news:l3rso8hpnajhtt1jl...@4ax.com...

Didn't I tell you it's "Mr. Anthony"? I would hardly call that a tirade, by
the way and your response just proved my point that liberals never have an
original "cogent" thought. You know full well you deliberately took Romney's
quote out of context and now you're backtracking at the speed of sound to
try to get out of it.

[MaxD]

No, Romney actually said what Mike wrote. Mike may have edited it but
the media do that all the time. ;-)

[Owen McKenzie]

On 5/11/2013 12:19 PM, Mike Hendrix wrote:
>
> Owen, again for your benefit I did not quote the entire interview, but
> I have already indicated that.
>
> Would this make you happy?:
>
> Then in a Feb. 1 interview on CNN, Romney told Soledad O'Brien, "I'm
> not concerned about the very poor there is already a safety net in
> place for them."?
>
> Would that adequately soothe your sensitivities?
>

> mike
>
Do you see any difference between: "I'm not concerned about the very
poor there is already a safety net in place for them." and: "I'm not
concerned about the very poor..."?

That is the sum total of my interest in this. I think you were
misleading in what you posted, and I called you on it.

[MaxD]

On 5/11/2013 10:37 AM, bill horne wrote:
> Owen McKenzie wrote:

>> But you did not provide one sentence, you provided *part* of one
>> sentence. Look at the link a posted above and tell me if you honestly
>> believe your original post was a fair representation of what he was
>> saying.
>
> I don't know why you're arguing with him when you agree with him. You
> said, "your original post was a fair representation of what he was saying".
>

Precisely.

[Major Oz]

On Saturday, May 11, 2013 8:12:42 AM UTC-5, Mike Hendrix wrote:

> But, but-gasp, how could he possibly be a better legislator for the:
>
> "Born Again Christians in the moral purity party, you know the party
>
> of conservative moral principles"?

You are making the obvious MSM error: confusing the frosting with the cake.

[Lone Haranguer]

Just more proof that Mike's mind is wired for the liberal's
typical dishonesty,

LZ

[Lone Haranguer]

Just proof that you deliberately distorted the remark. Typical
dishonesty on your part.

LZ

>
> Would that adequately soothe your sensitivities?
>

> mike

[Bob Hatch]

And so does Mike. :-)


--
I do not carry a gun hoping that
I'll be able to shoot someone, anymore than
I carry a jack hoping I'll have a flat
tire.
Me.

[Bruce S]

On 5/11/2013 9:59 AM, MaxD wrote:

And whenever it is edited in such a way that it changes the meaning of
what was actually said, it becomes a lie. (But you knew that.)

[nothermark]

On Sat, 11 May 2013 09:21:40 -0700, Bruce S <bruce...@gmail.com>

I just tagged that to keep for one of those discussions where you are
quoting TownHall do the exact same thing. ;-)

[Mike Hendrix at dot]

On Sat, 11 May 2013 11:01:05 -0500, "George Anthony"

Anthony, you write the following:

"If you look at whom liberals have elected over the years, I'm sure,
given the chance, those who frequent this newsgroup would certainly
have voted for the sister of a comedian. After all, they elected a
comedian (Al Franken), a clown (Barrack Obama), a witch (Nancy Pelosi)
a walking gaff machine (Joe Biden), a philanderer (Bill Clinton) and
an obvious space alien (Barney Frank. Who knows what language he
speaks). The list is almost endless. My mother used to tell me to
clean the weeds from my own garden before worrying about someone
else's. Maybe you liberals should try that. So, nothermark, Max, et
al. , show how smart you are by following up with your list of whom
you consider are conservative incompetents. You guys never have an
original thought so you may as well give your version of mine. "

and then have the balls to call someone else a "name caller".

You sir are a real piece of work. Typical Republican!!!!

[Mike Hendrix at dot]

--------------------------

Not backtracking at all Anthony. Romney said what I quoted. Keep in
mind you wanted a list of "REPUBLICANS" to match the list you
provided.

I gave you the list and I wasn't backtracking. That was a full
frontal assault.

[Mike Hendrix at dot]

On Sat, 11 May 2013 10:19:20 -0700 (PDT), Major Oz <ozm...@gmail.com>
wrote:

Possibly so, but the frosting is served with the cake isn't it????

[D-R]

On 5/10/2013 10:30 PM, Mike Hendrix wrote:

> --------------------------
>
> Bruce, are you saying that Romney did not say:
> "I'm not concerned about the very poor"?
>
> If you want to provide every word he spoke in his interview that is
> fine with me. I just provided one sentence to make a point. And I
> obviously made that point.....in spades!

Mike you are dancing... What you did, was at best an attempt to
distort the context of a statement and at worst was a deliberate lie.
Take your pick.

--

AJ

[George Anthony]

"Mike Hendrix" <mike (at) travellogs (dot) us> wrote in message

news:2afto81i246q2oocm...@4ax.com...

The only thing I have ever called you is "liberal". If you think liberal is
derogatory and is a negative word, I'll take it back.

[George Anthony]

"Mike Hendrix" <mike (at) travellogs (dot) us> wrote in message

news:elfto8l4fv0e3kjip...@4ax.com...

I didn't necessarily want it, but I baited you into it. Try thinking for
yourself some time, you'll be amazed at how enlightening it is. By the way,
my daddy can beat up your daddy... nah, nah, nah.

[Mike Hendrix at dot]

On Sun, 12 May 2013 08:31:43 -0500, "George Anthony"

------------------
Damn Anthony, you are good at the backstroke my friend.

So you can call every democratic politician virtually any name you
want while only calling me a "liberal" somehow clears you of being a
"name caller".

On the otherhand I will admit to being a name caller. You remain
stupid!

[George Anthony]

"D-R" <#BadAd...@home.com> wrote in message
news:518ee0eb$0$52252$c3e8da3$92d0...@news.astraweb.com...

I think ol' Mike was a crawfish in a prior life.

[George Anthony]

"Mike Hendrix" <mike (at) travellogs (dot) us> wrote in message

news:cl6vo8pi8t0087ikn...@4ax.com...

Boy, is that the pot calling the kettle black!

>
> So you can call every democratic politician virtually any name you
> want while only calling me a "liberal" somehow clears you of being a
> "name caller".
>
> On the otherhand I will admit to being a name caller. You remain
> stupid!
>
> mike
> --
>
>
>
> Pensacola, FL
> http://www.travellogs.us/

Okay, so calling politicians what they actually are in a newsgroup they will
never see is the same as calling me, to my face, an idiot or stupid? Tell
me, is Bill Clinton not a philanderer? Is Al Franken not a comedian? Is
Barack Obama not a clown (look at those ears)? You may have an argument with
Pelosi but that's debatable. Is Joe Biden not a walking gaff machine? And
if you don't think Barney Frank has to be an alien, you're sadly mistaken.
By the way, you didn't tell me if you think "liberal" is derogatory.

But back to the topic at hand, why did you take Romney's words out of
context? And just for you: :-)

[nothermark]

On Sun, 12 May 2013 08:50:51 -0500, "George Anthony"

FWIW, aside from being disrespectful most, if not all, of your
descriptions are wrong as far as most folks are concerned.

Name calling as humor has a limitied shelf life. It rapidly becomes
boring on one hand and is counter productive to an interesting
discussion of a topic on the other. Many of us find an exchange of
ideas interesting. Some are too busy trying to be a clown.

[Mike Hendrix at dot]

On Sun, 12 May 2013 08:50:51 -0500, "George Anthony"

---------------------------

Thanks for the smiley face Anthony. VBG

btw, was the list of "Republicans" I provided satisfactory?

[George Anthony]

"nothermark" <nothe...@not.here> wrote in message
news:hg8vo8lq102uvbvt5...@4ax.com...

You mean "most liberals" not most folks. I'd venture to say most
conservatives would say I have aptly described them. And this country has
survived political humor for many years, much worse in the formative years.
In your eyes it's only disrespectful when it comes from a conservative. Does
limited shelf life apply to calling Bush, shrub?

[George Anthony]

"Mike Hendrix" <mike (at) travellogs (dot) us> wrote in message

news:chkvo8d78s288ef20...@4ax.com...

When you tell me if you think "liberal" is derogatory, I'll answer your
question.

[Hank]

On Sunday, May 12, 2013 2:20:30 PM UTC-4, George Anthony wrote:

>
> > Thanks for the smiley face Anthony. VBG
>
> >
>
> > btw, was the list of "Republicans" I provided satisfactory?
>
> >
>
> > mike
>
> > --
>
> >
>
> >
>
> >
>
> > Pensacola, FL
>
> > http://www.travellogs.us/
>
>
>
> When you tell me if you think "liberal" is derogatory, I'll answer your
>
> question.

I use to think it was, but not any more after reading some of the posts from the so-called 'conservatives" in this NG. You can call me Liberal anytime, just don't call me a RORT Conservative.

Hank

[Mike Hendrix at dot]

On Sun, 12 May 2013 11:31:14 -0700 (PDT), Hank <nineb...@aol.com>
wrote:

-----------------------------------------

Hank, I am a Ron Paul backing conservative, but there is NO WAY I can
stomach the "neo-conservative" folks that end up being the Republican
candidates.

Ol Anthony can call me "liberal" all he wants to, like you I would
rather be called LIBERAL than for anyone to associate me with the so
called "RORT-Conservatives".

That, my friend, would hurt to the quick.

[nothermark]

On Sun, 12 May 2013 13:19:20 -0500, "George Anthony"

Limited shelf life is just that. It does not matter who/what the
subject of that type of humor is. If it is anything it is more
intellect specific than topic specific as there are some bad comedians
that dwell on it then wonder why their audience never grows large.
Calling Bush a Shrub was funny once. By the second or third time it
is boring and a few times after that it is just disrespect. Same
thing for Obama's ears or liberal Intelligence. There are examples
enough on both sides that resorting to that form of humored just
results in a pissing contest. Everyone engaged gets wet and smelly.

[Lone Haranguer]

Mike Hendrix wrote:
> On Sun, 12 May 2013 11:31:14 -0700 (PDT), Hank <nineb...@aol.com>
> wrote:
>
>> On Sunday, May 12, 2013 2:20:30 PM UTC-4, George Anthony wrote:
>>
>>>> Thanks for the smiley face Anthony. VBG
>>>> btw, was the list of "Republicans" I provided satisfactory?
>>>> mike
>>>> --
>>>> Pensacola, FL
>>>> http://www.travellogs.us/
>>>
>>>
>>> When you tell me if you think "liberal" is derogatory, I'll answer your
>>>
>>> question.
>> I use to think it was, but not any more after reading some of the posts from the so-called 'conservatives" in this NG. You can call me Liberal anytime, just don't call me a RORT Conservative.
>>
>> Hank
> -----------------------------------------
>
> Hank, I am a Ron Paul backing conservative,

Liar.

Ron Paul supporters don't cheer for Obama and his crooks like you
do. It would take a strong pry bar to pry your lips from Obama's
ass.

Mike

LZ

[MaxD]

On 5/12/2013 12:20 PM, George Anthony wrote:

> When you tell me if you think "liberal" is derogatory, I'll answer your
> question.

If it's a liberal serving of Butter Pecan Ice cream it ain't derogatory.

If it's liberal ketchup on French Fries it ain't derogatory.

If it's real Maple syrup on homemade pancakes...well you get the picture.

If it's fresh whole milk on warm cornbread...

[MaxD]

Why is it so hard to accept that Mark Sanford screwed up.
He might not be as bad as Clinton getting a blow job in the oval office
but he's still a slimy creature and the only reason he got elected was
because of the choice the voters had.

[D-R]

Ya know I am not sure any of us are pure enough to withstand too
much scrutiny. I tell my kids I screwed up a lot in my past life and
now try to make up for it.... That said I don't think we should look
too closely at a politicians outside private life.... is he honest in
his dealings with the public and does he represent the best interests of
his constituents? Does he keep his word and communicate his policies to
the public? I really don't care who he sleeps with outside of his
office, just not in his office. When caught in the public spotlight
just fes up and don't lie, the coverup is usually worse than the offense..
.
--

AJ - up in the Arizona mountains

[nothermark]

We don't even know how "slimy" he might be as all we know is a small
part of the story.

[Lone Haranguer]

Mikey warned him that people of high moral character can't get
elected.

So Sanford went beaver hunting and let the media get a whiff of
the quiff.

Now he got a promotion.

LZ

For those of a limited vocabulary.
http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/quiff

[Kenn Smith]

Methiks that you overlook the political histoy of the south.

Before the passage of the Civil Rights Act the south was solidly
Democrat. Solid to the point that there were "Yellow Dog Democrats"
which meant that the party could run an old yellow dog against a
Republican and the dog would win.

With the passage of the CRA the political landscape changed overnight.
While very few southerners changed their belief systems they felt that
the Democrats had abandoned them and went Republican en masse. South
Carolina and much of the rest of the south are now Yellow Dog Republican
territory. Sooner or later the cycle will reverse but I don't see a
future of equally balanced (or nearly so) political power in at least my
state, Texas.

[Janet Wilder]

I have friends who are are proud of their Mexican heritage, yet they
are staunch Republicans and they insist that many other Hispanics are
as conservative as they are.

The way I see it, it's no different than any other part of the country.
The older generation, usually the first generation Americans, are
liberal and Democrats and their children, who have to work for a living
and pay high taxes, are conservative and Republican.

--
Janet Wilder
Way-the-heck-south Texas
Spelling doesn't count. Cooking does.

[Lone Haranguer]

*********************************
advocates of immigration amnesty would now like to deny the
obvious: that *even /talk/ of amnesty is a powerful magnet for
more illegal border-crossing.* They should go to South Texas,
where the rush has already started, according to a report from
WOAI in San Antonio
<http://radio.woai.com/articles/woai-local-news-119078/obama-will-let-me-out-11180453/>.


The debate in Washington on immigration reform has had no
political impact, but the debate is having a major impact on
south Texas, 1200 WOAI news reports.


Read more:
http://dailycaller.com/2013/04/13/magnet-on-amnesty-border-rush-starts/#ixzz2T7pwtYNr

Officials say the number of people entering the U.S. illegally is
way up and, tragically, the number of undocumented immigrants who
have been found dead in the unforgiving Texas Brush Country is
way up, and is on path this year to beat last year’s record for
the number of people found dead in the ranch country.

Linda Vickers, who owns a ranch in Brooks County, which is Ground
Zero for the immigration debate, pins the blame directly on talk
of ‘amnesty’ and a ‘path to citizenship’ for people who entered
the U.S. illegally.

She recalls one man being arrested on her ranch not long ago.

“The Border Patrol agent was loading one man up, and he told the
officer in Spanish, ‘Obama’s gonna let me go’.”

Border Patrol agents report that immigrants are crossing the
border, and in some cases surrendering while asking, “Where do I
go for my amnesty?”


Read more:
http://dailycaller.com/2013/04/13/magnet-on-amnesty-border-rush-starts/#ixzz2T7pWJGEa
******************
And Obama and Napolitano claim the border is "secure".

LZ

[Hunter Hampton]

On 5/12/2013 4:42 PM, Janet Wilder wrote:
> The way I see it, it's no different than any other part of the country.
> The older generation, usually the first generation Americans, are
> liberal and Democrats and their children, who have to work for a living
> and pay high taxes, are conservative and Republican.

Try to tell that to Carl....

Hunter

[George Anthony]

"nothermark" <nothe...@not.here> wrote in message

news:ne40p8hr3g5svtjal...@4ax.com...

How do you know you only know a small part of the story?

[Bruce S]

On 5/12/2013 2:42 PM, MaxD wrote:

Did I miss part of this thread? Has anyone suggested something other
than that?

--
Bruce

"In any compromise between food and poison, it is only death that can
win. In any compromise between good and evil, it is only evil that can
profit."

[Mike Hendrix at dot]

On Sun, 12 May 2013 14:58:08 -0700, D-R <#BadAd...@home.com> wrote:


> Ya know I am not sure any of us are pure enough to withstand too
>much scrutiny. I tell my kids I screwed up a lot in my past life and
>now try to make up for it.... That said I don't think we should look
>too closely at a politicians outside private life.... is he honest in
>his dealings with the public and does he represent the best interests of
>his constituents? Does he keep his word and communicate his policies to
>the public?

I actually think this is the way the majority of voters feel about the
issue as is born out by election results of tainted individuals.

However, someone that would lie & cheat on his wife and family would
most certainly cheat on "the public" which he represents. AMEN!

A liar and cheat is nothing more than a liar & a cheat, there is no
getting around it. Whether it is Clinton or the Republican
Congressman in question.

> I really don't care who he sleeps with outside of his
>office, just not in his office.

Obviously the voting public does not give a rip either. And that
would be Republicans as well as Democrats.

>When caught in the public spotlight
>just fes up and don't lie, the coverup is usually worse than the offense.

That is the obvious best course of action but it is extremely
difficult for those in power to admit any fault.

Tricky Dickie could have gotten away with Watergate if he had just
fessed up and done it quickly. He was an extremely popular president
until that incident. I suspect he would have been forgiven as quickly
as Clinton was.

[Major Oz]

On Sunday, May 12, 2013 1:20:30 PM UTC-5, George Anthony wrote:

> When you tell me if you think "liberal" is derogatory, I'll answer your
> question.

Depends on if you are in a truck stop in Texas or on virtually any university campus.

[film...@gmail.com]

If there is such an increase of Mex crossing the Border, then why are the big ag concerns across the West howling about the lack of people to work in the fields this season?

Growers in the Fresno area are having to pay $1.50 more per hour now, and claim by Summer the rate may climb to $2 per hr over last year's wages!


The Jolly Green Giant

[Larry]

George, haven't you learned yet? Whatever mark posts is fact. He
does not care about anything else, just whatever he feels is true is,
in his mind, a fact....
--
Larry
Citrus County Florida

[nothermark]

Because we do not know much about it. The Drive by Media was all over
him when it happened and there was little detail. Have you seen any
more come out?

[nothermark]

It is sometimes fact and annotated. It is sometimes recollection or
opinion and thus easily challenged by anyone with facts to back it. To
reiterate, facts to back their opinion. Not just a different opinion.