Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

NAKED CHILDREN at risk in social nudism of exploitation

0 views
Skip to first unread message

Zee

unread,
Dec 7, 2006, 6:03:02 AM12/7/06
to
so David and Dario agree that incestuous families are attracted to
social family nudism and from reading the NUDISMS HALL OF SHAME about
predators...ref camp photographers....management and staff as well as
owners have been found guilty of molestation of children...mostly
little girls but some boys have been molested also....ref...ravenwood
..weatherford.texas.......so the folks that have cameras... are it
seems.... the prime perpertrators of sexual exploitation in the world
of social family nudism....so even here in rec nude there seems to be
an unending desire to take pictures and covet said pictures as naked
nudist pictures have value.....so a lot of nudist are into picture
taking ...should this be stopped and let nudist enjoy the social
nakedness and be free of the risk of child sexual exploitation as well
as victims of child porn that also has been a simultanous problem with
some of the molestation convictions......rec nude would be a great NG
to discuss this problem and possible eradication of this nuisance
jonZeee

Mark

unread,
Dec 7, 2006, 7:23:40 AM12/7/06
to

"Zee" <jon...@webtv.net> wrote in message
news:1165489382....@n67g2000cwd.googlegroups.com...

> ......rec nude would be a great NG
> to discuss this problem and possible eradication of this nuisance
> jonZeee
>

First of all--the "problem" is in your head and in your perverse fantasies,
and in no way does it resemble the 'reality' of family nudism.....

Secondly, the "eradication of this nuisance" would be BEST served by the
disappearance of our village idiots, namely you, Anna (and all of his
aliases), sportbug, (and all the other assorted idiots that spam here from
time to time).....


Zee

unread,
Dec 7, 2006, 7:59:39 AM12/7/06
to
goofus.....your opinion is noted but you do realize that others besides
you have differing opinions about your credibility and your opinion of
others credibility.....this is a serious subject because children are
at risk....and certainly newbies are not biased like you so they are
very interested in the subject...there have been pictures taken of kids
at nudist camps from parked rv s and newbies should be warned of this
nasty act.....to insure that cameras are not used to take unapproved
photos...may be all camps should have everybody park outside the gate
and walk in naked except for spare change and towel and cooler and they
could be searched....you know like you guys suggest the airlines
do.......jonZeee

Richard C.

unread,
Dec 7, 2006, 9:45:07 AM12/7/06
to
"Zee" <jon...@webtv.net> wrote in message
news:1165489382....@n67g2000cwd.googlegroups.com...

sportbug

unread,
Dec 7, 2006, 1:35:36 PM12/7/06
to

> Secondly, the "eradication of this nuisance" would be BEST served by the
> disappearance of our village idiots, namely you, Anna (and all of his
> aliases), sportbug, (and all the other assorted idiots that spam here from
> time to time).....

pity yourself. Include yourself as the Village Idiot. What you said
is uncalled for. Is this what you do for a living: Calling people
names? Now, I suspect Bill Pennington will come to the rescue.

-T.

unread,
Dec 7, 2006, 11:24:52 PM12/7/06
to
On 7 Dec 2006 03:03:02 -0800, "Zee" <jon...@webtv.net> wrote:

Jon Zee is, by his own admission, a pedophile, misogynist, and a
racist. He is also, demonstrably, a liar. He has not been vouched for
by anyone in organized nudism, so there is a good chance that he is a
fabrication. Jon is unable to substantiate any of his claims with
verifiable data. Anything "he" says, should be taken with a grain of
salt and a dram of tequilla.

-T.


When the man said alcohol, tobacco, and firearms, I just naturally assumed he was making a delivery.

-T.

unread,
Dec 7, 2006, 11:31:26 PM12/7/06
to
On 7 Dec 2006 04:59:39 -0800, "Zee" <jon...@webtv.net> wrote:

>....your opinion is noted but you do realize that others besides
>you have differing opinions about your credibility

Pretty much evryone is sure about YOU"RE credibility...you have none.

>...this is a serious subject because children are
>at risk....

Particularly around you.

>..there have been pictures taken of kids
>at nudist camps from parked rv s

Blah, blah, blah. And your verifiable evidence is where????

Dan Abel

unread,
Dec 8, 2006, 5:05:18 AM12/8/06
to
In article <ddqhn2hn5dedv0vvj...@4ax.com>,
-T. <stinson...@charter.net> wrote:

> On 7 Dec 2006 04:59:39 -0800, "Zee" <jon...@webtv.net> wrote:

> >..there have been pictures taken of kids
> >at nudist camps from parked rv s
>
> Blah, blah, blah. And your verifiable evidence is where????


Maybe he was the one taking the pictures?

:-(

--
Dan Abel
da...@sonic.net
Petaluma, California, USA

David Looser

unread,
Dec 8, 2006, 6:54:31 AM12/8/06
to
"Zee" <jon...@webtv.net> wrote in message
news:1165489382....@n67g2000cwd.googlegroups.com...

> so David and Dario agree that incestuous families are attracted to
> social family nudism

And you wonder why we call you a liar?. This is a particularly pointless lie
as it's so easy for anyone to look back through the rec.nude archive to see
what was actually said.

David.

Terry J. Wood

unread,
Dec 8, 2006, 3:24:27 PM12/8/06
to
-T. <stinson...@charter.net> wrote in
news:iuphn2piulvu57dv6...@4ax.com:

> Anything "he" says, should be taken with a grain of salt and a dram
> of tequilla.

I keep him in my kill file because I'm on a salt free diet. Try it. It
will lower your blood pressure! :-)

-T.

unread,
Dec 8, 2006, 9:20:06 PM12/8/06
to
On Fri, 08 Dec 2006 02:05:18 -0800, Dan Abel <da...@sonic.net> wrote:


>Maybe he was the one taking the pictures?

Well you know what they say, confession is good for the soul.

0 new messages