wrote:
>On Sep 11, 2021 at 12:57:25 PM CDT, "
Sav...@aol.com" <
Sav...@aol.com> wrote:
>
>> On Saturday, September 11, 2021 at 1:48:20 PM UTC-4, md wrote:
>>> On Sep 11, 2021 at 11:50:45 AM CDT, "
Sav...@aol.com" <
Sav...@aol.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Saturday, September 11, 2021 at 12:39:57 PM UTC-4, DianeE wrote:
>>>>> On 9/11/2021 11:06 AM, DianeE wrote:
>>>>>>
https://www.spontaneouslunacy.net/ray-charles-ill-do-anything-but-work-swingtime-229/
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> YOUTUBE -
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VEGDhVV9wB4
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> SPONTANEOUS LUNACY VERDICT 4/10
>>>>> ---------
>>>>> It's a high 5 for me. The lyrics are beyond inane, but the extended
>>>>> instrumental break (piano, then sax, then piano) is terrific.
>>>>
>>>> A 6 for me, I checked out the lyrics, and they make perfect sense to me. He'll
>>>> do whatever she wants, but work. As long as she pays the bills. There are
>>>> hundreds of millions of women who have that attitude, and almost as many men
>>>> who are fine with it. Why can't a man have it too?
>>> A six seems about right. Ray was obviously still in his stage of imitating Nat
>>> King Cole, and the song would fit the Cole Trio just fine, odd lyrics and all.
>>> Samp underrates it because, as usual, it's not what he calls r&b.
>>
>>
>> He doesn't call any of these R&B, they are rock and roll.
>
>Yeah, I've never quite understood that since it's all pretty much only r&b he
>discusses. Does he make a distinction between r&b and r'n'r? And if he does, I
>think he might be as interested in r'n'r's country roots as its r&b ones.
>