Fred Obit

[The Bloomfield Bloviator]

http://www.legacy.com/obituaries/tennessean/obituary.aspx?n=frederick-wilhelms-fred&pid=157378865&fhid=14255

[Dean F.]

He was only 62, huh? Same age as my father when he succumbed to lung
cancer.

Thanks again, dad, for telling me you'd kick my ass if you ever caught
me smoking! As a result, I never took it up.

[DCar...@aol.com]

Well I'll be damned!!!!

He went to Lafayette College??!!!!

Bruce!!!!!

Did you know that??!!!!


Dennis C from Tennessee

[DCar...@aol.com]

On May 1, 12:06 pm, The Bloomfield Bloviator <Savo...@aol.com> wrote:
> http://www.legacy.com/obituaries/tennessean/obituary.aspx?n=frederick...



Not exactly an innundation of entrants on that guestlist huh?

Maybe Grossberg and myself should drop a line.



Dennis C from Tennessee

[Jim Colegrove]

"longtime recording artists' rights advocate..."

What do you think, Dennis? Right or wrong?
Just asking.

Jim Colegrove
www.thecoolgroove.com

[DianeE]

"Dean F." <soule...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:70c0349e-d7ac-42d0...@er9g2000vbb.googlegroups.com...

> He was only 62, huh? Same age as my father when he succumbed to lung
> cancer.
>

---------------
Also the same age as Rick Sklar.

DianeE

[The Bloomfield Bloviator]

On May 1, 6:52 pm, "DCart...@AOL.com" <DCart...@AOL.com> wrote:
> On May 1, 5:25 pm, "Dean F." <soulexpr...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > He was only 62, huh? Same age as my father when he succumbed to lung
> > cancer.
>
> > Thanks again, dad, for telling me you'd kick my ass if you ever caught
> > me smoking! As a result, I never took it up.
>
>   Well I'll be damned!!!!
>
>   He went to Lafayette College??!!!!

Let me check that against my records.

[The Bloomfield Bloviator]

On May 1, 5:25 pm, "Dean F." <soulexpr...@gmail.com> wrote:

> He was only 62, huh?

I know you're surprised at that, He looked more like 82.

[DCar...@aol.com]

On May 1, 8:12 pm, Jim Colegrove <co...@thecoolgroove.com> wrote:
> On Tue, 1 May 2012 16:15:17 -0700 (PDT), "DCart...@AOL.com"

>
> <DCart...@AOL.com> wrote:
> >On May 1, 12:06 pm, The Bloomfield Bloviator <Savo...@aol.com> wrote:
> >>http://www.legacy.com/obituaries/tennessean/obituary.aspx?n=frederick...
>
> >Not exactly an innundation of entrants on that guestlist huh?
>
> >Maybe Grossberg and myself should drop a line.
>
> > Dennis C from Tennessee
>
> "longtime recording artists' rights advocate..."
>
> What do you think, Dennis?  Right or wrong?
> Just asking.
>
> Jim Colegrovewww.thecoolgroove.com

Fair question Jim and I will answer: right in the ideal but wrong
in the practice!!

First of all, Fred never EVER let you know who the rights advocate
was!!! He also cloaked himself in the politically easy raiments of
the times wheher it was Betty Harris, Betty Levette, of old Black
Betty Bam da Lam !!!!!`

I mean.....where was Freddie Fairplay when Stan Polley was ripping
off Lou Christie and Badfinger directly causing the suicides of Pete
Ham and Tom Evans? Fred always came off as too much of an elitist punk
to be a truly altruistic force out there in society and his misogeny
was plainly exposed when he repeatedly jerked around Dianne on these
boards.

I didn't realize until the obituary that he had been married to
darling Teri only 14 years meaning that there are one or two ex wives
out there who got tired of his shit and skedaddled. It makes sense
now, with that Terri and her ditzy little "celebrating" book campaign
whose sales probably cost the ecosystem only two poplars and a small
shrub in pulp production. She was obviously a trophy wife clutching
to her atrophy husband for his lawyerly status and his supposed
exalted advocate status!!!!

So Jimmy, my answer is that Freddie was a fraud. He utilized the
advocate and victim zeitgeist of the time to present an outward
appearence of civic chivalry. He never really tilted against a
windmill in his life and it's a good thing. He would have choked on
the toxic hot air blowing back, baby!!!!


Dennis C from Tennessee

[Dean F.]

Actually, he looked like Martin Mull.

[xpen...@gmail.com]

Pot calls kettle black
http://history-of-rock.com/bruce_montage.htm
Where you even 50 in that last picture?

[Michael Pendragon]

On May 2, 9:23 am, xpene...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Tue, 1 May 2012 18:08:45 -0700 (PDT), The Bloomfield Bloviator
>

> <Savo...@aol.com> wrote:
> >On May 1, 5:25 pm, "Dean F." <soulexpr...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >> He was only 62, huh?
>
> >I know you're surprised at that, He looked more like 82.
>

> Pot calls kettle blackhttp://history-of-rock.com/bruce_montage.htm

> Where you even 50 in that last picture?

Hey Doug -- Are there any pictures of you at the history-of-rock site?

[xpen...@gmail.com]

Why do you ask?

[The Bloomfield Bloviator]

On May 2, 10:14 am, xpene...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Wed, 2 May 2012 06:55:30 -0700 (PDT), Michael Pendragon
>

> <michaelmaleficapendra...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >On May 2, 9:23 am, xpene...@gmail.com wrote:
> >> On Tue, 1 May 2012 18:08:45 -0700 (PDT), The Bloomfield Bloviator
>
> >> <Savo...@aol.com> wrote:
> >> >On May 1, 5:25 pm, "Dean F." <soulexpr...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >> >> He was only 62, huh?
>
> >> >I know you're surprised at that, He looked more like 82.
>
> >> Pot calls kettle blackhttp://history-of-rock.com/bruce_montage.htm
> >> Where you even 50 in that last picture?
>
> >Hey Doug -- Are there any pictures of you at the history-of-rock site?
>
> Why do you ask?

Because we want to see just how gross you look. You've taken great
care to never have any pictures of yourself out there. We can only
assume that you look hideous.

[Jim Colegrove]

Old Black Betty Bam da Lam?
Ram Jam or Spiderbait?

Jim Colegrove
http://www.jukejumpers.com

[The Bloomfield Bloviator]

Nice of Roger and Bill to leave their condolensces and a picture.

http://www.legacy.com/guestbook/tennessean/guestbook.aspx?n=frederick-wilhelms&pid=157378865&cid=full

[xpen...@earthlink.net]

> assume that you look hideous.- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

C'mon Brucie we all know you just want to masturbate to it. Assume all
you want but we all know how hiseous you look.
In that one picture you have such a yellow cast. Couldn't you afford a
clean needle?

[Michael Pendragon]

On May 2, 10:14 am, xpene...@gmail.com wrote:

> On Wed, 2 May 2012 06:55:30 -0700 (PDT), Michael Pendragon
>

> <michaelmaleficapendra...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >On May 2, 9:23 am, xpene...@gmail.com wrote:
> >> On Tue, 1 May 2012 18:08:45 -0700 (PDT), The Bloomfield Bloviator
>
> >> <Savo...@aol.com> wrote:
> >> >On May 1, 5:25 pm, "Dean F." <soulexpr...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >> >> He was only 62, huh?
>
> >> >I know you're surprised at that, He looked more like 82.
>
> >> Pot calls kettle blackhttp://history-of-rock.com/bruce_montage.htm
> >> Where you even 50 in that last picture?
>
> >Hey Doug -- Are there any pictures of you at the history-of-rock site?
>
> Why do you ask?

I was thinking of running a "beauty contest" between you, Bruce, Tom,
Bob, Mark, Roger, Dean & co.

[xpen...@gmail.com]

Not going to include your boy toy Sharxie and yourself?

[The Bloomfield Bloviator]

On May 2, 3:00 pm, xpene...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Wed, 2 May 2012 09:48:41 -0700 (PDT), Michael Pendragon
>
>
>
>
>

> <michaelmaleficapendra...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >On May 2, 10:14 am, xpene...@gmail.com wrote:
> >> On Wed, 2 May 2012 06:55:30 -0700 (PDT), Michael Pendragon
>
> >> <michaelmaleficapendra...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> >On May 2, 9:23 am, xpene...@gmail.com wrote:
> >> >> On Tue, 1 May 2012 18:08:45 -0700 (PDT), The Bloomfield Bloviator
>
> >> >> <Savo...@aol.com> wrote:
> >> >> >On May 1, 5:25 pm, "Dean F." <soulexpr...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >> >> >> He was only 62, huh?
>
> >> >> >I know you're surprised at that, He looked more like 82.
>
> >> >> Pot calls kettle blackhttp://history-of-rock.com/bruce_montage.htm
> >> >> Where you even 50 in that last picture?
>
> >> >Hey Doug -- Are there any pictures of you at the history-of-rock site?
>
> >> Why do you ask?
>
> >I was thinking of running a "beauty contest" between you, Bruce, Tom,
> >Bob, Mark, Roger, Dean & co.
>
> Not going to include your boy toy Sharxie and yourself?

Even you probably look better than Sharx, Doug.

Get a load of Dave Bull:

http://www.flickr.com/photos/designfesta/4607797425/

[Michael Pendragon]

On May 2, 3:00 pm, xpene...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Wed, 2 May 2012 09:48:41 -0700 (PDT), Michael Pendragon
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>

> <michaelmaleficapendra...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >On May 2, 10:14 am, xpene...@gmail.com wrote:
> >> On Wed, 2 May 2012 06:55:30 -0700 (PDT), Michael Pendragon
>
> >> <michaelmaleficapendra...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> >On May 2, 9:23 am, xpene...@gmail.com wrote:
> >> >> On Tue, 1 May 2012 18:08:45 -0700 (PDT), The Bloomfield Bloviator
>
> >> >> <Savo...@aol.com> wrote:
> >> >> >On May 1, 5:25 pm, "Dean F." <soulexpr...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >> >> >> He was only 62, huh?
>
> >> >> >I know you're surprised at that, He looked more like 82.
>
> >> >> Pot calls kettle blackhttp://history-of-rock.com/bruce_montage.htm
> >> >> Where you even 50 in that last picture?
>
> >> >Hey Doug -- Are there any pictures of you at the history-of-rock site?
>
> >> Why do you ask?
>
> >I was thinking of running a "beauty contest" between you, Bruce, Tom,
> >Bob, Mark, Roger, Dean & co.
>
> Not going to include your boy toy Sharxie and yourself?

Me? No. It wouldn't be fair. I'm too damn good lookin.'

http://michaelpendragon.tumblr.com/

http://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=328336710547302&set=a.328336693880637.73537.100001129263742&ty

[The Bloomfield Bloviator]

On May 2, 3:37 pm, Michael Pendragon

> http://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=328336710547302&set=a.32833669...-

I see three out of your four music people have no pictures. I'll be
Howlin' Wolf has a picture available for Facebook people who list him.

[Michael Pendragon]

> I see three out of your four music people have no pictures. I'll be
> Howlin' Wolf has a picture available for Facebook people who list him.

You see wrong. It's three out of 13. You need to click the little
"8" button to the right (in the field marked "more").

[The Bloomfield Bloviator]

On May 2, 4:50 pm, Michael Pendragon

It's not there. Maybe only geeks who are on Facebook can see it.

[The Bloomfield Bloviator]

LOL....nice grammar, Doug !!!

You were are good man Fred. R.I.P. my friend
~ Doug Peneny, Southfield, Michigan


"were are"

ROFLMAO

[DCar...@aol.com]

were are"

You were are and is forever will be a dumbass, Pee'in Ninny!!!!

Dennis C from Tennessee

[Dean F.]

On May 1, 8:11 pm, "DCart...@AOL.com" <DCart...@AOL.com> wrote:

>  First of all, Fred never EVER let you know who the rights advocate
> was!!!   He also cloaked himself in the politically easy raiments of
> the times wheher it was Betty Harris, Betty Levette, of old Black
> Betty Bam da Lam !!!!!`

I was the one who put Betty Harris in touch with Fred. Thanks to his
efforts, Betty now owns all of her Sansu masters, one of which is
being used in an upcoming Hollywood film. I don't know how much Betty
was paid for the song, but I guarantee you it's more than she ever
made off any of her recordings back in the '60s. And by the way, Fred
never charged her a penny for his work on her behalf. (I can already
hear the snotty replies: "That's 'cuz Fred's work wasn't worth a
penny!")

And I'm quite certain Betty has a much higher opinion of herself than
as being one of "the politically easy raiments of the times," whatever
the fuck that means. As usual, Dennis, your incoherent babbling
obscured whatever point you thought you were making.

[DCar...@aol.com]

Incoherent is: "You were are good man Fred RIP your friend"

Betty Harris has no more business owning her recording masters than
Doug Peneny does owning a Pulitzer in literature, baby!!!!

It took the herculean efforts of Arthur Alexander, Bert Berns, Alan
Touissant, and others to establish the"dime a dozen" vocalist that was
Ms Harris into the artist that she was !!!!

She has again further benefited from the "look at me" meliorists of
the world like Fred Wilhelms to make that almighty civlilly righteous
stand and help this poor hapless soul. Wilhelms took on these called
plight of the tread upon black female artists in an era whre it
professionally aggrandizing to do so. It was a politcal slam dunk,
baby!! Nobody dare broach any opposition to Freddie's crusade for
fear of being labeled backward and bigoted!!!

That's what I mean by Freddie being swaddled in politically safe
raiment!! Hell his was an impenatrable suit of cultural armor,
baby!!!

Why don't we call him a glorified charity case worker and let it go
at that !!! He wasn't so much an advocate for artists as he was for
artifice..................................his own!!!!


Dennis C from Tennessee

[The Bloomfield Bloviator]

And yet he was a Republican.

[Michael Pendragon]

Those with photos are: Frankie Laine, Bobby Darin, Pat Boone, Crystal
Gayle, Johnnie Ray, Georgia Gibbs, Kay Starr, Connie Francis, and
Elvis Presley.

Btw: It's got nothing to do with popularity. Facebook pulls the
photos from Wikipedia articles on the artists. Wiki watchdogs remove
any photos where the rights to use them have not been supplied by the
author. In other words, the Howlin' Wolf photo appears because it has
been shown to be in public domain.

[Michael Pendragon]

On May 2, 9:24 pm, "DCart...@AOL.com" <DCart...@AOL.com> wrote:

My impression of Fred is that he was partly the Robin Hood figure Dave
Marsh proclaimed him to be. Otoh, this image served him well as a
celebrity lawyer, and he *might* have cultivated/exploited it with an
eye toward advancing his career. Whether a possibly selfish
motivation negates the good he achieved for artists like Betty Harris
is a moral issue that is best left to the theologians. Being more of
a utilitarian than a moralist, myself, I think a man deserves to reap
a few rewards for his good works.

But Fred went a little too far in his good deeds when he helped out
that CUNT LaVern Baker -- a vindictive, jealous and petty bitch who
deserved to die penniless.

[DCar...@aol.com]

On May 3, 12:57 am, Michael Pendragon

> deserved to die penniless.- Hide quoted text -

>
> - Show quoted text -

But Fred went a little too far in his good deeds when he helped out
that CUNT LaVern Baker -- a vindictive, jealous and petty bitch who
deserved to die penniless.

You might say she was the poster gal for the banality of evil?

[The Bloomfield Bloviator]

Doug added a picture to his salute to Fred !!!

http://www.legacy.com/guestbook/tennessean/guestbook.aspx?n=frederick-wilhelms&pid=157378865&cid=full

We finally get to see what he looks like......and it ain't good.

[Marc Dashevsky]

In article <e22a991f-619d-40a8...@y7g2000vbx.googlegroups.com>, Sav...@aol.com says...

> Doug added a picture to his salute to Fred !!!
>
> http://www.legacy.com/guestbook/tennessean/guestbook.aspx?n=frederick-wilhelms&pid=157378865&cid=full
>
> We finally get to see what he looks like......and it ain't good.

Did you really have to upload that photo? Out of respect to the
mourners, let them mourn without having your bile imposed upon them.


--
Go to http://MarcDashevsky.com to send me e-mail.

[Michael Pendragon]

Or the evil of banality. Either way, an excellent description.

[The Bloomfield Bloviator]

On May 3, 10:15 am, Marc Dashevsky <use...@MarcDashevsky.com> wrote:
> In article <e22a991f-619d-40a8-8841-0e2e59e5f...@y7g2000vbx.googlegroups.com>, Savo...@aol.com says...

>
> > Doug added a picture to his salute to Fred !!!
>

> >http://www.legacy.com/guestbook/tennessean/guestbook.aspx?n=frederick...

>
> > We finally get to see what he looks like......and it ain't good.
>
> Did you really have to upload that photo? Out of respect to the
> mourners, let them mourn without having your bile imposed upon them.

Besides, there's nothing there that would bother any mourners. Just
pictures of people saluting Fred with a RIP message.

[The Bloomfield Bloviator]

On May 3, 10:15 am, Marc Dashevsky <use...@MarcDashevsky.com> wrote:

> In article <e22a991f-619d-40a8-8841-0e2e59e5f...@y7g2000vbx.googlegroups.com>, Savo...@aol.com says...

>
> > Doug added a picture to his salute to Fred !!!
>

> >http://www.legacy.com/guestbook/tennessean/guestbook.aspx?n=frederick...

>
> > We finally get to see what he looks like......and it ain't good.
>
> Did you really have to upload that photo? Out of respect to the
> mourners, let them mourn without having your bile imposed upon them.

I know Doug is ugly as sin, but I can't stop him from adding his
photo.

[Michael Pendragon]

Godfrey Daniel! That's *exactly* how I imagined he would look.

[Travis_Trite]

> > That's what I mean by Freddie being swaddled in politically safe
> > raiment!! Hell his was an impenatrable suit of cultural armor,
> > baby!!!
> >
> > Why don't we call him a glorified charity case worker and let it go
> > at that !!! He wasn't so much an advocate for artists as he was for
> > artifice..................................his own!!!!
> >
> > Dennis C from Tennessee
>



> And yet he was a Republican.

Really? I'm a little surprised to hear that.

How do you know that?

[The Bloomfield Bloviator]

It says that in one of the posts that someone made saluting him.

[Travis_Trite]

>
> "The Bloomfield Bloviator" <Sav...@aol.com> wrote in message
> news:fdefea5a-dc3b-48cb...@l7g2000vbz.googlegroups.com...

Thanks, Mr. Eagle Eye :)

[xpen...@gmail.com]

Denny, like his loser friend Bruce, is simply jealous of those who
accomplish positive things.

[xpen...@gmail.com]

The invitation to come pay me a visit is still open.
Nice teeth, Brucie.
http://history-of-rock.com/teeth_vs_teeth.htm

[xpen...@gmail.com]

Does Bruce pluck or wax so not to have a uni-brow?
http://history-of-rock.com/teeth.jpg

[The Bloomfield Bloviator]

On May 3, 3:32 pm, xpene...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Thu, 3 May 2012 07:20:11 -0700 (PDT), The Bloomfield Bloviator
>

No pictures, Doug?

http://www.facebook.com/dpeneny

It's called "Facebook" it's supposed to show your face. You must be
fucking hideous the way you never post a picture anywhere.

[DCar...@aol.com]

On May 3, 3:32 pm, xpene...@gmail.com wrote:

> On Thu, 3 May 2012 07:20:11 -0700 (PDT), The Bloomfield Bloviator
>

You were are good man Fred. R.I.P. my friend

> ~ Doug Peneny, Southfield, Michgan


Dougie....................This is your one big public chance to stamp
something memorable and profound onto a civic document and you come
off as a linguistically spastic motherfucker!!!!

I see you're finally peeking out from going underground after this
compositional abortion, baby!!!

Dennis C from Tennessee

[Dean F.]

On May 3, 2:27 pm, xpene...@gmail.com wrote:

> Denny,  like his loser friend  Bruce, is simply jealous of those who
> accomplish positive things.

Dennis resented Fred for making him look like the pathetic buffoon he
is. Not that Fred would have considered that one of his biggest
challenges (or accomplishments)!

[The Bloomfield Bloviator]

Huh?

You've got that ass backwards, son.

Dennis made Fred look like a buffoon. One of the best was when he said
that Teri was writing a sequel to her book "Celebrating Mothers." The
sequel was inspired by Fred, and was called "Celebrating
Motherfuckers."

[xpen...@gmail.com]

The buffoon is the one that looks like a raccoon, jock sniffer.
>
>

[starga...@gmail.com]

There isn't enough virtue in Bruce, Marc, for you to have even one iota of influence, unfortunately

[DCar...@aol.com]

On May 7, 3:07 pm, "stargazer...@gmail.com" <stargazer...@gmail.com>
wrote:

> On Thursday, May 3, 2012 10:15:36 AM UTC-4, Marc Dashevsky wrote:

> > In article <e22a991f-619d-40a8-8841-0e2e59e5f...@y7g2000vbx.googlegroups.com>, Savo...@aol.com says...

> > > Doug added a picture to his salute to Fred !!!
>

> > >http://www.legacy.com/guestbook/tennessean/guestbook.aspx?n=frederick...

>
> > > We finally get to see what he looks like......and it ain't good.
>
> > Did you really have to upload that photo? Out of respect to the
> > mourners, let them mourn without having your bile imposed upon them.
>
> > --

> >   Go tohttp://MarcDashevsky.comto send me e-mail.

> There isn't enough virtue in Bruce, Marc, for you to have even one iota of influence, unfortunately

> There isn't enough virtue in Bruce, Marc, for you to have even one iota of influence, unfortunately

Have you checked out the number of real mourners on that obituary
notice

You can count the number on your fuckin' thumbs !!!

Nuff said, baby!!!!

Dennis C from Tennessee

[Dean F.]

On May 3, 9:15 am, Marc Dashevsky <use...@MarcDashevsky.com> wrote:

> Did you really have to upload that photo? Out of respect to the
> mourners, let them mourn without having your bile imposed upon them.

That's been my main concern throughout this affair.

Whatever negative feelings people here have for Fred, he brought them
on himself. But his family had nothing to do with it, so I sincerely
hope none of those people learn of what's been going on around these
parts. Talk about kicking people when they're down!

[xpen...@gmail.com]

You didn't really expect different from Brucie and his crew did you?

[Mark Dintenfass]

In article
<868c030a-32af-4692...@23g2000yqo.googlegroups.com>,

I've been away for a week and came home to find this group had hit a
new low, which given some of our previous lows had not seem possible.
Bad enough was Scarlotti's childish attempt to mock Roger's contests
("You're ugly!" "No, you're ugly!"), and the fact that usually sensible
people like Marc and Frank played along with this vindictive nastiness
only proves that vanity makes old men stupid. Much worse, of course,
was the vile dance of the ghouls brought on by Fred's death. Except for
Marc's too-mild complaint, I found no one speaking up for ordinary
decency until you finally said something yesterday. So thanks for that.
The desecration of Fred's memorial site is the most despicable thing
I've ever seen from members of this group, and the absence of strong
protest from other people is possibly the most cowardly.

There's been a lot of self-justifying talk in the past about how you
act on the Usenet doesn't have anything to do with what you're really
like. It's bullshit. If you're a prick on Usenet, you're a prick,
period.

Special note to Roger: I strongly suggest you suspend the current
contest for a couple of weeks. It has the potential to be the best
contest yet, but right now it seems like bringing flowers into a sewer.

--
--md
_________
Remove xx's from address to reply

[The Bloomfield Bloviator]

On May 8, 9:47 am, Mark Dintenfass <mdintenf...@xxnew.rr.com> wrote:

> and the absence of strong protest from other people is possibly the most cowardly.

No, the most cowardly would be the absence of you and others in not
protesting some of the shit that Fred pulled with Diane. In that case
a living breathing person who was aware of the abuse was being
affected. In the case of things posted on Fred's obit site, there's
nothing there that anybody who is not part of this group would be
aware of being anything but a tribute to Fred.

All that is there is a couple of pictures of people telling Fred to
RIP. The worst that could happen to any of Fred's relatives is that
they look at the picture of Doug and wonder how he ever got so ugly.

You and several others here were all afraid to tell Fred off in
public.

[xpen...@gmail.com]

On Tue, 8 May 2012 06:56:00 -0700 (PDT), The Bloomfield Bloviator
<Sav...@aol.com> wrote:

>On May 8, 9:47 am, Mark Dintenfass <mdintenf...@xxnew.rr.com> wrote:
>
>> and the absence of strong protest from other people is possibly the most cowardly.
>
>No, the most cowardly would be the absence of you and others in not
>protesting some of the shit that Fred pulled with Diane.

How about you showing us those postings to these groups
that you consider so terrible.

> In that case
>a living breathing person who was aware of the abuse was being
>affected. In the case of things posted on Fred's obit site, there's
>nothing there that anybody who is not part of this group would be
>aware of being anything but a tribute to Fred.
>
>All that is there is a couple of pictures of people telling Fred to
>RIP. The worst that could happen to any of Fred's relatives is that
>they look at the picture of Doug and wonder how he ever got so ugly.

Brucie you are just a lying POS but we've all known that for years.

[The Bloomfield Bloviator]

On May 8, 10:42 am, xpene...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Tue, 8 May 2012 06:56:00 -0700 (PDT), The Bloomfield Bloviator
>

> <Savo...@aol.com> wrote:
> >On May 8, 9:47 am, Mark Dintenfass <mdintenf...@xxnew.rr.com> wrote:
>
> >> and the absence of strong protest from other people is possibly the most cowardly.
>
> >No, the most cowardly would be the absence of you and others in not
> >protesting some of the shit that Fred pulled with Diane.
>
> How about you showing us those postings to these groups
>  that you consider so terrible.

Sure, right after you show us your picture.

[Michael Pendragon]

On May 8, 9:47 am, Mark Dintenfass <mdintenf...@xxnew.rr.com> wrote:

> In article
> <868c030a-32af-4692-add9-fab9b80b4...@23g2000yqo.googlegroups.com>,

Mark Dintenfass: Always the holier-than-thou windbag.

[The Bloomfield Bloviator]

On May 8, 9:47 am, Mark Dintenfass <mdintenf...@xxnew.rr.com> wrote:
> In article
>

> There's been a lot of self-justifying talk in the past about how you
> act on the Usenet doesn't have anything to do with what you're really
> like. It's bullshit. If you're a prick on Usenet, you're a prick,
> period.

So, you're saying that Fred was also a prick in real life just as he
was one Usenet.

Now, because he's dead, we're supposed to pretend that he wasn't a
prick?

[Michael Pendragon]

He's saying that while Fred may have been a prick in real life, you
shouldn't take it out on his family members (by posting joke pictures
on their Remembrance board).

Of course he's got to stretch that sentence out into a lengthy
paragraph, throw in a dig or two at me, and depict himself as a pillar
of virtue who's appalled by such things ... but that's what we've come
to expect from Professor Pomposity.

[The Bloomfield Bloviator]

On May 8, 11:38 am, Michael Pendragon

<michaelmaleficapendra...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On May 8, 11:19 am, The Bloomfield Bloviator <Savo...@aol.com> wrote:
>
> > On May 8, 9:47 am, Mark Dintenfass <mdintenf...@xxnew.rr.com> wrote:
>
> > > In article
>
> > > There's been a lot of self-justifying talk in the past about how you
> > > act on the Usenet doesn't have anything to do with what you're really
> > > like. It's bullshit. If you're a prick on Usenet, you're a prick,
> > > period.
>
> > So, you're saying that Fred was also a prick in real life just as he
> > was one Usenet.
>
> > Now, because he's dead, we're supposed to pretend that he wasn't a
> > prick?
>
> He's saying that while Fred may have been a prick in real life, you
> shouldn't take it out on his family members (by posting joke pictures
> on their Remembrance board).

How would his family members know that they were joke pictures? Are
you saying that they would obviously realize that nobody could really
be as ugky as the picture that Doug posted there?......I mean, that is
a picture of a real person.

> Of course he's got to stretch that sentence out into a lengthy
> paragraph, throw in a dig or two at me, and depict himself as a pillar
> of virtue who's appalled by such things ... but that's what we've come
> to expect from Professor Pomposity.

Mike, if something happens to you and you die, can I have your
permission in advance to post a joke picture on your Remembrance
Board?

[F R]

Mark>

and the fact that usually sensible people like Marc and Frank played
along with this vindictive nastiness only proves that vanity makes old
men stupid.

-----------------------
Guilty as charged Mark. However my motives for "entering" have nothing
to do with Mike's so called vindictive nastiness.
That phrase or one like it never entered my mind.

Not sure if you participated in Bruce's dogshit contest, but wouldn't
you consider that "vindictive nastiness" as well, since it was obviously
a dig at the music Mike so cherishes.

In fact, if you've read his thread about the photo contest, I suggested
to Mike that anyone who has not volunteered to be in it should be
respected and their pic should be eliminated.

A stupid old man? Well, shortly I'll be 69 so mea culpa on that...but
vanity has nothing to do with it. I consider myself at best, average
looking.

[Michael Pendragon]

On May 8, 11:46 am, The Bloomfield Bloviator <Savo...@aol.com> wrote:
> On May 8, 11:38 am, Michael Pendragon
>
>
>
>
>
> <michaelmaleficapendra...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On May 8, 11:19 am, The Bloomfield Bloviator <Savo...@aol.com> wrote:
>
> > > On May 8, 9:47 am, Mark Dintenfass <mdintenf...@xxnew.rr.com> wrote:
>
> > > > In article
>
> > > > There's been a lot of self-justifying talk in the past about how you
> > > > act on the Usenet doesn't have anything to do with what you're really
> > > > like. It's bullshit. If you're a prick on Usenet, you're a prick,
> > > > period.
>
> > > So, you're saying that Fred was also a prick in real life just as he
> > > was one Usenet.
>
> > > Now, because he's dead, we're supposed to pretend that he wasn't a
> > > prick?
>
> > He's saying that while Fred may have been a prick in real life, you
> > shouldn't take it out on his family members (by posting joke pictures
> > on their Remembrance board).
>
> How would his family members know that they were joke pictures?  Are
> you saying that they would obviously realize that nobody could really
> be as ugky as the picture that Doug posted there?......I mean, that is
> a picture of a real person.

Perhaps they know Doug personally? He and Fred used to work as a tag
team here.

> > Of course he's got to stretch that sentence out into a lengthy
> > paragraph, throw in a dig or two at me, and depict himself as a pillar
> > of virtue who's appalled by such things ... but that's what we've come
> > to expect from Professor Pomposity.
>
> Mike, if something happens to you and you die, can I have your
> permission in advance to post a joke picture on your Remembrance

> Board?- Hide quoted text -

You've got my permission to *create* my Remembrance Board when I go.
What you do with it afterward's of no concern to me.

[Michael Pendragon]

On May 8, 12:40 pm, espon...@webtv.net (F R) wrote:
> Mark>
> and the fact that usually sensible people like Marc and Frank played
> along with this vindictive nastiness only proves that vanity makes old
> men stupid.
> -----------------------
> Guilty as charged Mark. However my motives for "entering" have nothing
> to do with Mike's so called vindictive nastiness.
> That phrase or one like it never entered my mind.

Nor should it.

As you may recall, this contest originated on the spur of the moment
as a joke reponse to Doug's asking me why I wanted to see a picture of
him. Roger and his "contests" were the farthest things from my mind.

[xpen...@gmail.com]

You can't produce any of those "posts"
because there are none jock sniffer.

[Boogity Boogity]

"Michael Pendragon" <michaelmalef...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:a47d99fa-9694-4afb...@bh8g2000vbb.googlegroups.com...

On May 8, 9:47 am, Mark Dintenfass <mdintenf...@xxnew.rr.com> wrote:
>
>> I've been away for a week and came home to find this group had hit a
> new low, which given some of our previous lows had not seem possible.
>> Bad enough was Scarlotti's childish attempt to mock Roger's contests
> ("You're ugly!" "No, you're ugly!"), and the fact that usually sensible
>> people like Marc and Frank played along with this vindictive nastiness
> only proves that vanity makes old men stupid. Much worse, of course,
>> was the vile dance of the ghouls brought on by Fred's death. Except for
> Marc's too-mild complaint, I found no one speaking up for ordinary
>> decency until you finally said something yesterday. So thanks for that.
> The desecration of Fred's memorial site is the most despicable thing
>> I've ever seen from members of this group, and the absence of strong
> protest from other people is possibly the most cowardly.
>

>Mark Dintenfass: Always the holier-than-thou windbag.

As someone who has been accused of the same thing, I take solace in the
knowledge that to you, Bruce, Dennis, Rocky and other denizens of the depths
of humanity, having ANY morals is "holier than thou."

And I too would like to be removed from your "contest." I'm not even a
member of the group.

[The Bloomfield Bloviator]

On May 8, 1:24 pm, "Boogity Boogity" <wlastn...@optonline.net.invalid>
wrote:
> "Michael Pendragon" <michaelmaleficapendra...@gmail.com> wrote in message

Fred danced all over the grave of Rocky's daughter. What goes around,
comes around.

> And I too would like to be removed from your "contest." I'm not even a
> member of the group.

You've been posting more than Fred lately.

[Michael Pendragon]

On May 8, 1:24 pm, "Boogity Boogity" <wlastn...@optonline.net.invalid>
wrote:

> "Michael Pendragon" <michaelmaleficapendra...@gmail.com> wrote in message

I've got nothing against someone's having morals, Bill. I just don't
cotton to people who constantly go around proclaiming their morality
with a bullhorn.

> And I too would like to be removed from your "contest." I'm not even a
> member of the group.

Not after you go and put quotation marks around it.

Anyway, didn't you know? Once you're in this group you're in it for
life.

And don't worry, Bill. I think you've got a good shot at surviving
the first round or so -- chicken legs and all. :-)

[Dean F.]

On May 8, 12:24 pm, "Boogity Boogity"

<wlastn...@optonline.net.invalid> wrote:

> As someone who has been accused of the same thing, I take solace in the
> knowledge that to you, Bruce, Dennis, Rocky and other denizens of the depths
> of humanity, having ANY morals is "holier than thou."

Admittedly, Bill, I was one of the people who accused you of that; but
in this case, we actually agree.

When my father died in 1998, the last thing I'd have wanted (or
needed) was someone to remind me that he had been an abusive drunk for
the first 15 years of my life. I was painfully aware of that fact
already, and would have been sorely tempted to punch out anyone who
had said such a thing to me. Thankfully, my friends and relatives
behaved like the grown-ups they were.

[Dean F.]

On May 8, 8:47 am, Mark Dintenfass <mdintenf...@xxnew.rr.com> wrote:

> Except for
> Marc's too-mild complaint, I found no one speaking up for ordinary
> decency until you finally said something yesterday. So thanks for that.
> The desecration of Fred's memorial site is the most despicable thing
> I've ever seen from members of this group, and the absence of strong
> protest from other people is possibly the most cowardly.

I was hesitant to say anything because I'm not exactly a blushing
virgin when it comes to breaches of Netiquette.

But to reiterate my original point: all of this caterwauling about
Fred has absolutely no effect on the man himself as he has now
shuffled off this mortal coil. His family, however, is still drawing
breath and presumably are in the throes of their grief. And the last
thing those poor people need is to come across this newsgroup and read
all this mean-spirited crap.

> There's been a lot of self-justifying talk in the past about how you
> act on the Usenet doesn't have anything to do with what you're really
> like. It's bullshit. If you're a prick on Usenet, you're a prick,
> period.

When your world extends only to your fingertips, you can't be expected
to have a modicum of empathy or compassion for anyone but yourself.

> Special note to Roger: I strongly suggest you suspend the current
> contest for a couple of weeks. It has the potential to be the best
> contest yet, but right now it seems like bringing flowers into a sewer.

That's a good idea! How about it, Roger?

[Boogity Boogity]

"The Bloomfield Bloviator" <Sav...@aol.com> wrote in message
news:03143ec0-ade0-4e5a...@2g2000yqp.googlegroups.com...

On May 8, 9:47 am, Mark Dintenfass <mdintenf...@xxnew.rr.com> wrote:

>> and the absence of strong protest from other people is possibly the most
>> cowardly.

>No, the most cowardly would be the absence of you and others in not
>protesting some of the shit that Fred pulled with Diane. In that case
>a living breathing person who was aware of the abuse was being
>affected.

Was Fred not a living breathing person at the time? It's OK when you and
your unholy
triumverate were heaping abuse on him just because it was fun, but it's
wrong when the "favor" is returned upon someone you ostensibly care about?

Absurd!

[Dean F.]

On May 8, 9:52 am, Michael Pendragon

<michaelmaleficapendra...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Mark Dintenfass: Always the holier-than-thou windbag.

Michael Pendargon: Always the virulent, toxic wanker with the worst
fucking musical taste in history of mankind.

[DCar...@aol.com]

On May 8, 4:54 pm, "Boogity Boogity" <wlastn...@optonline.net.invalid>
wrote:
> "The Bloomfield Bloviator" <Savo...@aol.com> wrote in messagenews:03143ec0-ade0-4e5a...@2g2000yqp.googlegroups.com...

Fred was a living breathing bag of scum who slapped a gravely ill
Dianne around repeatedly on these boards while his mewling acolytes
sat on their stubby little typing digits!!!

To his credit, I think Dintenfass might have spoken up in protest
once but to his discredit, he slunk away when Fred crammed his puny
indignation back up his professorial arse!!

But enough of this!!

Time for the beauty contest!!!

I'll shovel no more dirt Mr Wilhelm's
way.............................six feet's more than enough, baby!!!!

Dennis C from Tennessee

[Mark Dintenfass]

In article
<03143ec0-ade0-4e5a...@2g2000yqp.googlegroups.com>, The

True, I decided not to enter what turned into the ugliest feud we've
ever had. It would have done no good. But you no doubt recall how, at
your request, I tried hard to get Fred to see how ugly his posts had
become. The trouble with feuds is that they keep escalating until both
sides forget all decency.

[Mark Dintenfass]

In article <ffbiq7p9g70837n8v...@4ax.com>,

Come off it, Doug. You've used this occasion to simply re-start your
feud with Bruce. If someone utters ugly words at a funeral, the guy who
uses that as an excuse to start a brawl is disrespecting the mourners,
too.

[Mark Dintenfass]

In article
<620302c6-757d-4815...@f10g2000yqe.googlegroups.com>,

Michael Pendragon <michaelmalef...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Of course he's got to stretch that sentence out into a lengthy
> paragraph, throw in a dig or two at me, and depict himself as a pillar
> of virtue who's appalled by such things ... but that's what we've come
> to expect from Professor Pomposity.

No, you're pompous! And ugly, too!

[Mark Dintenfass]

In article <286-4FA9...@storefull-3113.bay.webtv.net>, F R

<espo...@webtv.net> wrote:

> Mark>
> and the fact that usually sensible people like Marc and Frank played
> along with this vindictive nastiness only proves that vanity makes old
> men stupid.
> -----------------------
> Guilty as charged Mark. However my motives for "entering" have nothing
> to do with Mike's so called vindictive nastiness.
> That phrase or one like it never entered my mind.
>
> Not sure if you participated in Bruce's dogshit contest,

I didn't.

> but wouldn't
> you consider that "vindictive nastiness" as well, since it was obviously
> a dig at the music Mike so cherishes.


> In fact, if you've read his thread about the photo contest, I suggested
> to Mike that anyone who has not volunteered to be in it should be
> respected and their pic should be eliminated.
>
> A stupid old man? Well, shortly I'll be 69 so mea culpa on that...but
> vanity has nothing to do with it. I consider myself at best, average
> looking.

No one is good-looking after 50 unless they have access to Hollywood
plastic surgeons. And after 60, as you can see in the tabloids at
supermarket checkout counters, even that doesn't work.

I know you're an extremely good-natured guy, Frank, but despite what
Mike says, he has never been the victim here.

[The Bloomfield Bloviator]

On May 8, 4:54 pm, "Boogity Boogity" <wlastn...@optonline.net.invalid>
wrote:

> "The Bloomfield Bloviator" <Savo...@aol.com> wrote in messagenews:03143ec0-ade0-4e5a...@2g2000yqp.googlegroups.com...

The battle was me and my guys (Dennis, Rocky, etc..) against him and
his guys (Doug, Bugge, etc...). Diane was not involved, and was also
very sick. That cocksucker Wilhelms knew she was sick and still
started in on her. So as far as I'm concerned, I could care less about
offending his mourners since he didn't care at all about starting in
on Diane back then.

Diane and I wouldn't hesitate to spit and piss on his grave if we were
close by.

[starga...@gmail.com]

I'd be with you, Mark in favor of suspending the vocal groups contest for a couple weeks, in fact, I would ask even more, that Roger suspend the vocal groups contest until Pendragon/Scarlotti cancels his "Beauty Contest", and use and carrot and stick approach to enforce some civility in here.

You know who I am.

Nick K.

[The Bloomfield Bloviator]

On May 8, 9:04 pm, "stargazer...@gmail.com" <stargazer...@gmail.com>
wrote:

> I'd be with you, Mark in favor of suspending the vocal groups contest for a couple weeks, in fact, I would ask even more, that Roger suspend the vocal groups contest until Pendragon/Scarlotti cancels his "Beauty Contest", and use and carrot and stick approach to enforce some civility in here.
>
> You know who I am.
>
> Nick K.

There's absolutely no reason to suspend anything.

Mike's gonna run his contest and probably only have 4 or 5 voters, but
the rest of you will not be able to resist lurking in those
proceedings.

[Jim Colegrove]

I have to agree. Eveyone takes things way too seriously here.
Freddie's dead and so will we all be soon enough.


Jim Colegrove
www.thecoolgroove.com

[xpen...@gmail.com]

Alleged daughter.

[xpen...@gmail.com]

On Tue, 8 May 2012 17:43:13 -0700 (PDT), The Bloomfield Bloviator
<Sav...@aol.com> wrote:

>On May 8, 4:54 pm, "Boogity Boogity" <wlastn...@optonline.net.invalid>
>wrote:
>> "The Bloomfield Bloviator" <Savo...@aol.com> wrote in messagenews:03143ec0-ade0-4e5a...@2g2000yqp.googlegroups.com...
>> On May 8, 9:47 am, Mark Dintenfass <mdintenf...@xxnew.rr.com> wrote:
>>
>> >> and the absence of strong protest from other people is possibly the most
>> >> cowardly.
>> >No, the most cowardly would be the absence of you and others in not
>> >protesting some of the shit that Fred pulled with Diane. In that case
>> >a living breathing person who was aware of the abuse was being
>> >affected.
>>
>> Was Fred not a living breathing person at the time? It's OK when you and
>> your unholy
>> triumverate were heaping abuse on him just because it was fun, but it's
>> wrong when the "favor" is returned upon someone you ostensibly care about?
>
>The battle was me and my guys (Dennis, Rocky, etc..) against him and
>his guys (Doug, Bugge, etc...). Diane was not involved, and was also
>very sick. That cocksucker Wilhelms knew she was sick

Prove that Fred knew.

[xpen...@gmail.com]

He can save time and give you the fuglie award right now.

[F R]

Mark>

I know you're an extremely good-natured guy, Frank, but despite what
Mike says, he has never been the victim here.

------------------------
Thanks Mark, and I can't remember specifically Mike claiming he's a
victim, and if he has, he had to be facetious since he gives at least as
good as he gets and often instigates for no other reason than that he
can.

[Michael Pendragon]

You're right, Frank

Bob has accused me of this in the past. Perhaps Mark is confusing
Bob's flights of fancy with reality.

The last time this came up, I replied (tongue-sort-of-in-cheek), that
I think of myself more along the lines of a martyr.

[Mark Dintenfass]

In article
<87a2c9e8-c183-4a8c...@bh8g2000vbb.googlegroups.com>,

Dean F. <soule...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > Special note to Roger: I strongly suggest you suspend the current
> > contest for a couple of weeks. It has the potential to be the best
> > contest yet, but right now it seems like bringing flowers into a sewer.
>
> That's a good idea! How about it, Roger?

I have exchanged e-mails with Roger and am now convinced the contest
should not be disrupted by other things.

Maybe we can get back to talking about music now?

[F R]

Mark>

I have exchanged e-mails with Roger and am now convinced the contest
should not be disrupted by other things.
Maybe we can get back to talking about music now?

------------------
Yes!!! The contest is only sane thing that's gone on here lately.

[Roger Ford]

No,West Ham United reaching the playoff final seems pretty sane to me
as well

ROGER FORD
-----------------------

"Spam Free Zone" - to combat unwanted automatic spamming I have added
an extra "b" in my e-mail address (mari...@bblueyonder.co.uk).
Please delete same before responding.Thank you!

[xpen...@gmail.com]

No, Mark. I'm using this to set the record straight. I've challenged
Bruce to produce some of those terrible posts and he has backed down.
Diane isn't as innocent as she like everyone to believe. IMO anyone
that lets any of these posts make their life "miserable" needs mental
help. I'd really like to know what the purpose of Diane's "I'm the
fuck out of here" was about. Instead of pulling Bruce up she has over
the years sunk to his level. You think she finds it offensive with
Bruce's use of cunt hair as a measuring stick?

[xpen...@gmail.com]

Not youthful but you can still be good looking relative to your age.
Looking at this picture http://history-of-rock.com/beanie.jpg Bruce is
looks to be an ugly 70 year old. The kicker is in the picture he was
only about 50. God only knows what he'll look like at 70 assuming he
makes it that long. If there was true justice in this world the EPA
would cite him for visual pollution, fine him and make put a bag over
his head.

[Mark Dintenfass]

In article <8gplq714bs7dh3not...@4ax.com>,

<xpen...@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Tue, 08 May 2012 18:15:19 -0500, Mark Dintenfass
> <mdint...@xxnew.rr.com> wrote:
>
> >In article <ffbiq7p9g70837n8v...@4ax.com>,
> ><xpen...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >
> >Come off it, Doug. You've used this occasion to simply re-start your
> >feud with Bruce. If someone utters ugly words at a funeral, the guy who
> >uses that as an excuse to start a brawl is disrespecting the mourners,
> >too.
>
> No, Mark. I'm using this to set the record straight.

Sorry, Doug, this won't wash. If you cared about Fred at all, or just
common decency, you wouldn't be restarting old wars now. As I told
Bruce, using what you consider someone else's offenses to justify your
own is just ugly rationalization.

> I've challenged
> Bruce to produce some of those terrible posts and he has backed down.

Anyone interested can easily find them through Google.

[xpen...@gmail.com]

On Wed, 09 May 2012 18:46:10 -0500, Mark Dintenfass

<mdint...@xxnew.rr.com> wrote:

>In article <8gplq714bs7dh3not...@4ax.com>,
><xpen...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> On Tue, 08 May 2012 18:15:19 -0500, Mark Dintenfass
>> <mdint...@xxnew.rr.com> wrote:
>>
>> >In article <ffbiq7p9g70837n8v...@4ax.com>,
>> ><xpen...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >
>> >
>> >Come off it, Doug. You've used this occasion to simply re-start your
>> >feud with Bruce. If someone utters ugly words at a funeral, the guy who
>> >uses that as an excuse to start a brawl is disrespecting the mourners,
>> >too.
>>
>> No, Mark. I'm using this to set the record straight.
>
>Sorry, Doug, this won't wash. If you cared about Fred at all, or just
>common decency, you wouldn't be restarting old wars now. As I told
>Bruce, using what you consider someone else's offenses to justify your
>own is just ugly rationalization.

You are entitled to whatever opinion you like but facts are stubborn
things. A Johnny Cash sang "I Was there When it Happened." Diane's
has the nerve to whine about people's defense of Fred when it was her
boyfriend who started the latest round. I don't see her protesting
Bruce's inclusion of her pissing on Fred's grave either. For whatever
reason some around here think Diane is a victim that should get free
pass even though her hands aren't clean.

>
>> I've challenged
>> Bruce to produce some of those terrible posts and he has backed down.
>
>Anyone interested can easily find them through Google.

They can start with The Real Diane Steps up.

[Stargazer 267]

I was also there at the time, and on the receiving end (entirely
unprovoked) of Fred's abuse. I don't know why Fred suddenly went off
the deep end like he did. But there's no denying the fact that he was
lashing out at everyone -- friend and foe alike. Maybe that's when he
first found out about his illness. Maybe he had other problems going
on in his life at the time. I don't know, but I can overlook (though
not forget or completely forgive) it on the basis of his previous
conduct here which was always exemplary, even when dealing with trolls
like (we all know who I mean). You, on the other hand, have always
been a deceitful, slanderous, vindictive, quarrelsome s.o.b. (first
class), and your current attacks on Diane (allegedly in Fred's memory)
are as transparent as a midtown koorvah's negligee.

-- Nick K.

[starga...@gmail.com]

The above post allegedly, but not really signed by me, and ending with
that word "negligee" is actually a post by the imposter-charlatan
Michael Punk-Rodent, a.k.a. Pendragon (Scarlotti). Don't believe me?
Look at the actual email address? It is stargazer276(AT)gmail.com,
not mine, which is stargazer267(AT)gmail.com. He's hoping there's
some Mr. Magoos among you he can make a fool of in my name. If this is
not enough to make you want to killfile "Stargazer 267" (notice the
capital "S" and the space in the handle or nickname, which also
differentiates from my email (I do not use a handle or "pen-name" here
anyway right now) with a lower case "s" and NO space prior to the
numeral section, as such: "stargazer267(AT)gmail.com, then I guess you
just want to waste your own time.

[Michael Pendragon]

On May 11, 5:36 pm, "stargazer...@gmail.com" <stargazer...@gmail.com>
wrote:

Do you mean to say that you disagree with the sentiments Stargazer 267
expressed? Admit it -- I read your little mind.

[DCar...@aol.com]

On May 12, 12:56 am, Michael Pendragon

Quick read

[RWC]

On Wed, 09 May 2012 21:21:12 GMT, mari...@bblueyonder.co.uk (Roger Ford) wrote:

>>Yes!!! The contest is only sane thing that's gone on here lately.
>
>No,West Ham United reaching the playoff final seems pretty sane to me
>as well
>

I Remember Wembley,
When West Ham beat West Germany,
Martin one and Geoffrey three,
And Bobby got his OBE,
I remember Wembley,
When West Ham beat West Germany!

[Martin Peters, Geoff Hurst, & Bobby Moore (team captain)
playing for England at the 1966 World Cup Final]

:-)