On Sunday, August 14, 2022 at 4:22:22 PM UTC-4, Roger Ford wrote:
> On Sun, 14 Aug 2022 13:11:58 -0700 (PDT), Bruce <
Sav...@aol.com>
> wrote:
>
> >On Sunday, August 14, 2022 at 4:02:26 PM UTC-4, Roger Ford wrote:
> >> On Sun, 14 Aug 2022 06:34:03 -0700 (PDT), Bruce <
Sav...@aol.com>
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >> >On Sunday, August 14, 2022 at 2:22:43 AM UTC-4, Dean F. wrote:
> >> >> On Sunday, August 14, 2022 at 12:13:21 AM UTC-4, Bruce wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >
> >> >> > This was the first non major label to have a number one Billboard Pop chart hit in the 1950s.
> >> >> What is National?
> >> >
> >> >YES - That Eileen Barton disaster "If I Knew You Were Coming I Would Have Baked A Cake."
> >> I don't think Coral qualified as a "major label" did it? "Rag Mop" by
> >> the Ames Brothers was an earlier #1 than the Barton
> >>
> >> I don't think London Records with their mostly UK originated output
> >> qualified either. But their biggest US star Teresa Brewer put "Music!
> >> Music! Music!" at #1 for them (again pre-Barton)
> >
> >I messed this one up badly, I did not even have National as the answer, I had B.B.S.. But I do consider Coral as a major along with Brunswick.
> As I understand it the five major US labels in the 1950's were RCA
> VIctor,Columbia,Decca,Mercury and MGM.
>
> The many subsidaries of these (like Coral) did'nt count
>
> And even if they did then London (and Teresa Brewer) would still be
> ahead of Eileen Barton
I agree on London, but I think the subsids should all count, including Okeh and Wing. It doesn't become not a major just because they come up with a different name for a label that is also under the major's umbrella.