Which would you buy, and why?
Agreed. The Schulze-Pollman is the better made of the two instruments as
well.
Jory
thanks,
David
"Jory" <jo...@NOSPAMieee.org> wrote in message news:<P4Fsb.139300
>Hello, what are the opinions on Schulze-Pollmann grands? I was
>looking at their website and the largest seems to be 197cm (6'4").
They also build a 6'7". SP is a top notch piano, a lot of piano for the money.
Materials and designs are superb, workmanship is impeccable. While there may
not be but 3" difference between them, they are totally different sounding
pianos. The 6'3" is more crisp sounding, the 6'7" is a piano you can simply get
lost in (in a good sense of the word).
Touch and tone is always a personal preference thing, but the SP grands are
excellent in that regard, with my personal choice being the 6'7". You can buy
better, but you'll have to dig a seriously deep pocket to do it.
Larry Fletcher
larryin...@aol.composer (Larry) wrote in message news:<20031113114825...@mb-m01.aol.com>...
Mason and Hamlin BB, Steinway B, Steinway C, Fazioli. Some might add
Seiler, Sauter or even Schimmel to the list, but I would not. Certainly
Bechstein belongs on the list. At that level of piano it becomes all about
preference. The SP has a more European tone than the Steinways or M&H so if
you want to stick with a European sound then the Fazioli or Bechstein is
probably a good choice. The Bluthner's tend to have a darker more complex
tonality than the SP, Bechstein or Fazioli.
The M&H Model BB is probably the best value in a high-end instrument, but it
does have an "American sound".
For the record I have a M&H BB, but tried the others.
Jory
>You wouldn't rank Schmimmel higher? I found a really excellent deal
>on a Schimmel; that's why I'm asking.
Not really. Schimmel is a fine piano, but I don't think it is a "better" piano
than the SP. I like the SP better than the Schimmel myself. I think Schimmels
sound like a Japanese piano.
Larry Fletcher
I find it odd -- so many salesmen and techs, including my own tuner, praise
Schimmels highly and call them fine pianos, but every time I have played a
Schimmel grand in a showroom I have been disappointed in the tone quality or
the responsiveness of the action or both. I listen to the accolades, sit down
and play, and then wonder if these pianos are like the emperor who had no
clothes. Perhaps I have just had terrible luck in never finding one that is
well prepped.
Doogle
This was exactly my impression from playing several Schimmel's (for
the 1st time) a couple of months ago. I found it felt like I was
playing a Yamaha (and for the record, I don't mind Yamahas, but I'm
not going to spend big bucks on one).
David
Jon
"Doogle333" <doog...@aol.com> wrote in message
news:20031116111515...@mb-m11.aol.com...
I was going to buy a Schimmel upright about ten years ago, but the
price was too high. Later, the dealer called and had lowered the
price buy over 1/3, since high-priced uprights are a hard sell.
Unfortunately, I had already bought a different piano.
The same Schimmel uprights today do not seem of the same quality
tone-wise. One I looked at was REALLY bright like one of the poorer
Yamahas, something I have never experienced with the European pianos I
have looked at. It hurts your ears to play it.
I would imagine it may be the same with the grands. Maybe Yamaha is
subsituting wood from their pianos? I was really disappointed. I am
not sure how that translates to the grands.
Jon
"Alex Maas" <a.m...@att.net> wrote in message
news:1c647bc3.03111...@posting.google.com...
>Some german paino's aren't german nowadays. They use inferior
>russian parts and poorer craftsmenship. Seiler is one of them
That's news to me. Can you show some proof of that? Unless they started doing
that just lately, the last Seilers I saw were pretty well made.
Larry
Doing the work of 3 men - Larry, Curly, & Moe
Caution: I do not brake for sales weasels
>Are you sure that youd didn't mean Steiner instead of Seiler?
Uh...... I hope you don't mean a Bernhard Steiner....... I don't feel up to
that one again...... ;-)
No I wouldn't. I can't explain the effusive praise Schimmel pianos get from
some technicians and especially in Larry Fine's "The Piano Book". I usually
agree with Mr. Fine or at least understand his point-of-view, but in the
case of Schimmel I cannot even get on the same page with him. I have to
believe that they've changed radically over the past few years. For me and
my money Schimmel's are just very expensive Yamaha's. That is, overly
bright, shrill and over-hyped. Add to that that their dealer network in the
US is just horrible.
I think that the "really excellent deal" you're being offered is a
reflection of the state of affairs with Schimmel.
As always this is just my opinion. YMMV.
Jory
"Jory" <jo...@NOSPAMieee.org> wrote in message
news:A4Zub.193445$275.717879@attbi_s53...
Just made a deal on a Schulze-Pollmann, so let's hope you're right.
"Jory" <jo...@NOSPAMieee.org> wrote in message news:<A4Zub.193445$275.717879@attbi_s53>...
Jon
"Larry" <larryin...@aol.composer> wrote in message
news:20031119140312...@mb-m14.aol.com...
>My dealer told me that. Perhaps the seiler dealer in Singapore orders the
>cheaper pianos. He orders a few 'german' pianos and sells it under his
>company's name. OEM pianos.
The Seiler dealer in Singapore is buying OEM Chinese built pianos and *telling*
you they were built in Germany. Lying, in other words.
Jon
"Larry" <larryin...@aol.composer> wrote in message
news:20031121094013...@mb-m22.aol.com...