Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Value of Shaw and Wurlitzer Pianos

0 views
Skip to first unread message

jonah

unread,
Feb 15, 2004, 3:57:21 PM2/15/04
to
My daughter has been playing on our Wurlitzer console, Serial Number
2820936 for years now. Recently my aunt passed away and the estate is
going to sell her Shaw upright, Serial number 14526,manufactured in
1901.This piano has been tuned and maintained frequently. My daughter
prefers the sound and feel of the Shaw piano over our Wurlitzer. So, I
would like to know what each is worth if possible.
Thanks
dave

John Inzer

unread,
Feb 15, 2004, 8:01:12 PM2/15/04
to
===================================
According to Pierce Piano Atlas...your Wurlitzer
console is relatively new having been manufactured
about 1993.

The Shaw upright was built about 1899 by Charles
M. Stieff, Baltimore Maryland...one of the most
respected builders of their day.

Prices can vary in different parts of the country and
condition plays a major role in the value. For these
reasons...I would suggest that you have the pianos
evaluated onsite by a professional in your local area.

Comparing a relatively new Wurlitzer to a vintage
instrument built by Chas. M. Stieff would be like
comparing a Pinto to a Rolls-Royce.

In the retail market the Wurlitzer would be worth
far more than the Shaw but the Shaw is a much
better insturment. The only problem may be that
because of the Shaw's age...extensive repairs
may be required.

Apparently, your daughter has an appreciation
for quality.

--

John Inzer
return e-mail disabled

jonah

unread,
Feb 16, 2004, 2:40:31 PM2/16/04
to
"> Apparently, your daughter has an appreciation
> for quality."

She would actually prefer a baby grand but this piano may do. The Shaw
has always been in my godmother's home, and I enjoy owning pieces of
my family's history. From other postings, I am guessing that the value
in Minnesota may only be a few hundred dollars. I am not adverse to
spending some money and having it reconditioned. Since I do not have
anyone in our area that does this, I am just curious as to what it may
cost.

thanks,
dave

John Inzer

unread,
Feb 16, 2004, 10:13:41 PM2/16/04
to
jonah wrote:
> I am not adverse to spending some money and having
> it reconditioned. Since I do not have anyone in our area
> that does this, I am just curious as to what it may cost.
>
> thanks,
> dave
=============================================
It is virtually impossible to answer that question intelligently
without an onsite inspection of the instrument.

Price of repairs could go from a few hundred up into thousands.

Maybe the following site will help you find a tech in your area:
http://www.ptg.org/rptsearch/index.html

Cy Shuster

unread,
Feb 16, 2004, 10:54:04 PM2/16/04
to
Where are you in Minnesota? I know a few restorers in the Rochester area.

--Cy--

"jonah" <jona...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:cdf67e8e.04021...@posting.google.com...

H. Emmerson Meyers

unread,
Mar 24, 2004, 12:01:21 AM3/24/04
to
Why did Stief use the Shaw alias??? Was this their second tier lineup??
"John Inzer" <oo...@doobie.xyz> wrote in message
news:_DUXb.179$8Z6....@eagle.america.net...

Tom Shaw

unread,
Mar 24, 2004, 11:01:11 AM3/24/04
to
Certainly not!!!
TS
"H. Emmerson Meyers" <vkr...@starpower.net> wrote in message
news:4060ec52$0$3044$61fe...@news.rcn.com...

H. Emmerson Meyers

unread,
Mar 26, 2004, 12:04:18 AM3/26/04
to
Your answer is not responsive to the question.
"Tom Shaw" <a000...@airmail.net> wrote in message
news:c3sb9e$q...@library1.airnews.net...

John Inzer

unread,
Mar 25, 2004, 9:41:42 PM3/25/04
to
H. Emmerson Meyers wrote:
> Why did Stief use the Shaw alias??? Was this their
> second tier lineup??
=========================================
It's hard to know why anything was done the way it
was over 100 years ago. I would suspect one of three
possibilities...

Some companies used several different names so
they could service competing retailers.

Could have been marketed as a special / limited
edition.

And, as you suggested...it could be a second line to
be marketed as a price leader.

Tom Shaw

unread,
Mar 26, 2004, 10:38:10 AM3/26/04
to
Of course it was. I maintain positively and absolutely that anything named
Shaw can never be second tier.

TS
"H. Emmerson Meyers" <vkr...@starpower.net> wrote in message
news:40639001$0$3044$61fe...@news.rcn.com...

H. Emmerson Meyers

unread,
Mar 26, 2004, 10:33:32 PM3/26/04
to
Got it!

"Tom Shaw" <a000...@airmail.net> wrote in message
news:c41kdm$k...@library2.airnews.net...
0 new messages