I want to buy a grand piano and I have been told by my piano teacher
that August Förster are wonderful pianos, with competitive price.
As I did not have the chance to try one yet, I was wondering if anybody
has experience with these pianos. I am particularly interested by 170cm
and 190cm grands.
Thanks a lot.
Michael.
Samuel et Michael wrote in message <395DEDF6...@village.uunet.be>...
Is your piano teacher on crack? Competitive prices? Really.
The Försters are nice pianos but are very pricey. I would suggest trying a
variety of pianos while balancing quality with value.
And tell your piano teacher to shut up about things he/she knows little
about.
Orin
>Sammy:
>
>Is your piano teacher on crack? Competitive prices? Really.
>
>The Försters are nice pianos but are very pricey.
Maybe one of our Canadian friends can shed a little more light on this, but it
is my understanding that Samicks (or maybe even some Chinese stuff) are sold in
Canada with the name August Forster on them. Some kind of dispute over the name
left two separate August Forsters - one builds good pianos in Germany, one is
an importer who's use of the name is limited to Canada.
If the original poster lives in Canada (and I have no clue as to whether or not
he does) it's possible this is what's being discussed.
Larry Fletcher
Pianos, Inc.
Atlanta, GA
Dealer/Technician
Doing the work of three men..........Larry, Curly, and Moe.
The August Förster I want to buy is made in Löbau, Germany. The price is lower in
Europe than in US and Canada, that's why I call it competitive. The 170cm is around
2300US$ which is not so expensive for a grand piano.
Michael.
If you can get a Förster for $2300 US then my apologies for the piano teacher\crack
comment. If I recall, new Försters would start selling around $30,000 US in the US.
And you can get one for $2300 -WOW!
Orin
Orin Harrison wrote in message <395F7B11...@aol.com>...
when a friend of mine and me started playing the piano about 10 years ago,
we both bought pianos.
I got a very nice Schimmel and he got a August Förster upright.
Compared with the Schimmel, the Förster has a more mellow sound while the
Schimmel is very bright, and the keys have to be pressed very strong while
they cant be pressed very deep (half a finger...).
I never really liked that piano and even my friend told me that my "old"
Schimmel sounded wonderfull compared with his Förster.
Sebastian
Samuel et Michael <sam.mic.p...@village.uunet.be> schrieb in im
Newsbeitrag: 395DEDF6...@village.uunet.be...
Incidentally, it seemed to me that structurally, the build quality was not quite
up to the standards of some other German companies, such as Bluthner, Grotrian,
Bechstein, etc. More like Baldwin vs. Steinway. . . but it didn't seem to matter
at all. Sounded beautiful, and showed no signs of deterioration whatsoever. . .
Interestingly, this scale design doesn't employ a tuned duplex. In fact there's
no duplex at all on the far end of the strings, similar to (I think) Petrof in
that regard.
At this price I'd consider it an exceptional value. The big grands at least are
beautiful pianos. Personally I'd love to have one sitting here. . .
g.g.
> I recently played a used August Forster...... Interestingly, this scale
design doesn't employ a tuned duplex. In fact there's
> no duplex at all on the far end of the strings, similar to (I think)
Petrof in
> that regard.
>
George, educate me, please...what is a "tuned duplex?"
> Sounded beautiful. . .
> Interestingly, this scale design doesn't employ a tuned duplex. In fact there's
> no duplex at all on the far end of the strings
Yes, and what whould be the advantage to these, then?
Clark
> George, educate me, please...what is a "tuned duplex?"
There are better people than me to explain this, but. . .
. . .very simply put, it's an effort to control the harmonics of the waste
ends of the strings (between the hitch pins and the bridge on the far side,
and between the tuning pins and the agraffes, or capo d'astro bar, on the
near side). Steinway, for example, uses a fixed system of connected aliquots
on the far end, which has been copied by the Asians and others. In the old
days all the better American manufacturers used separate pieces which could
be tapped into different positions (Mason & Hamlin still uses these). Then
Baldwin (thinking they found the perfect locations) started welding them in
place, then Steinway (thinking -they- found the perfect locations) came up
with the whole rack of little polished terminators you see today.
On the near end, most manufacturers attempt to "tune the plate" by
calculating the best length between the string bearing rests and the point of
termination, but some manufacturers also attempt to use some form of
adjustment here as well. Estonia uses little aliquots, and Baldwin uses
adjustable slides for each unison on its two big grands. Some designs (such
as Baldwin L and R) attempt to "tune" the entire plate merely by length of
waste ends and nothing else (with some pretty wild results).
It seems to me that the lower-tension designs benefit more from a tuned
duplex (due to longer sustain) whereas on pianos like Yamaha it probably
doesn't make as much difference because their high tension design produces a
clean, quick-decaying tone.
The whole theory behind tuning the duplex is 1) to try to eliminate
unsympathetic harmonics which would result in an unfocused or weakened
fundamental tone (especially in the treble), and 2) to add color and sustain
to the tone by finding a harmonic that actually enhances the quality of tone
from a given unison (or at least the subjective perception of that tone).
This is obviously very complex when you consider that the number of
combinations is in theory quite high (the number of unmuted duplexes and the
number of unisons squared). So creating a "tuned duplex" that will
consistently produce a pleasing tone across the whole scale must certainly be
a time-consuming and tedious job, even with computers, since there are so
many variables that a computer can't calculate (i.e.: imperfections in wire,
variations in soundboard impedance, density of plate, resonance of case,
quality of hammers, etc., etc.).
Therefore, a design like the Mason & Hamlin, that can be adjusted manually by
a real expert (assuming you could find one), is probably the best. But
getting back to the August Forster (and other pianos like it with either no
waste end, or muted waste ends), you really have to wonder if it's all worth
it in the end (no pun intended). Because these pianos often sound great and
aren't lacking in color at all.
Well, there's the limit of my knowledge. It's a fascinating subject. Along
with other aspects of scale design. . . Wish I had time to learn more. Some
of the above is conjecture based on the substitution of logic where no hard
and fast information is available, so if anyone reads an inaccuracy in any of
the above, please feel free to correct it. . .
g.g.
I will check back soon to see if this post worked. Would like to get
replies.
Frank Woodside
Classic Piano Centre
Vancouver, B.C.
Canada
My direct E:Mail is Buck@axion .net
Larry Fletcher <larryin...@aol.comnojunk> wrote in message
news:20000701144353...@ng-cu1.aol.com...
>Hi. I have never posted to a news group before as I am Computer dumb but
>piano knowledgeable. There are two August Forster pianos built. One by
>Petrof and the real one built by Forster in Lobau, Germany.
Hi Buck,
First, welcome to rmmp! Second, thanks for the informed clarification. I knew
the Canadian A.F. was built by someone other than the German maker, but wasn't
sure who was building it. I thought I had heard it was Samick but wasn't sure,
and felt certain an informed Canadian would provide the correct info. Thanks
for doing so.