If I remember correctly the Metrophones were what most folks recommended.
Are there others that any of you would recommend? I don't need the metronome
feature. Also, thus far, the cheapest I've found the Metrophones is $92 at
Mars. Anybody know where to get them cheaper than that?
Thanks in advance,
Mark
http://www.drumgeeks.com
>As much as I love my Sony 7506's they are not providing enough isolation for
>me any longer.
I was using those too (still like them for my stereo & V-Drums)
>If I remember correctly the Metrophones were what most folks recommended.
>Are there others that any of you would recommend?
Tried the metrophones - great isolation, atrocious sound, design
flaws.
I got the GK Music Superphones - EXCELLENT isolation and EXCELLENT
sound (they have Sony V-6 elements inside!) They're a little pricey at
$179, but don't try to cheap out when it comes to good phones - you
really do get what you pay for.
Check them out at www.gk-music.com
Bermuda
I warn you that they won't completely isolate the sounds, but it blocks
enough to make it easier to concentrate on what you need to. In REALLY
loud situations, I'd wear some foam ear plugs in addition to the
headphones. Good luck.
--
Beethoven, Junior
"I say hurl. If you blow chunks and
she stays, she's yours. If you spew
and she bolts, it was never meant to be."
Sent via Deja.com
http://www.deja.com/
Doesn't Vic Firth make isolation headphones - some sort of Rod
Morganstien endorsed deal?
I noticed that they rated the isolation at 18-20db. The metrophone folks
claim 29db for their phones. Having used both did you feel there was that
much difference in the isolation? Also the thing I really love about the
7506's is their comfort. Seems like you can where them forever. How are the
Superphones for comfort?
"Bermuda Schwartz" <ber...@weirdal.com> wrote in message
news:n5q88tgmsqe2ehbfr...@4ax.com...
"beethovenjunior" <beethov...@my-deja.com> wrote in message
news:961pm2$oie$1...@nnrp1.deja.com...
<chris...@my-deja.com> wrote in message
news:961s5u$qpb$1...@nnrp1.deja.com...
>Thanks Bermuda. I checked out the site. Some very good testimonies there.
>And the fact that they sport the Sony V-6 components is very attractive to
>me. And really $179 is not out of line for a quality set of phones.
As long as you're not thrashing them on the road and replacing them
every year (like I did with the 7506's) then it's a good investment!
>I noticed that they rated the isolation at 18-20db. The metrophone folks
>claim 29db for their phones. Having used both did you feel there was that
>much difference in the isolation? Also the thing I really love about the
>7506's is their comfort. Seems like you can where them forever. How are the
>Superphones for comfort?
I used the different phones about a year apart, and I recall that the
Metrophones did have really good isolation, but I don't recall it
being significantly better - certainly not by 50% - than the
Superphones. btw, there's supposed to be a new Superphones model with
about 30db isolation... don't know if that ever came to pass. I can't
imagine needing more than the Superphones anyway.
The Superphones I have are plenty isolated, and pretty comfortable.
They grip your head a bit more than the Sony's do, not annoyingly so
however, and I've yet to shake them off. The Metrophones were
uncomfortably snug... the earpieces weren't very big, and they're
vinyl, and my ears felt cramped and sweaty. That's just one of the
design flaws. Another fairly serious problem is that the connecting
cord plugs into the bottom of one of the earpieces with an 1/8" mini
jack, and it falls out VERY easily. I ended up zip-tying the cord to
the earpiece brackets and the headband strap. But the biggest issue I
had with the phones - they just sounded horrible. I was taking the
output straight from a Mackie mixer, and there was nothing but
distortion (at the same levels where the Sony's, and ultimately the
Superphones, sounded clean & punchy!)
Anyway, I used the Metrophones for 2 shows, then returned them.
The Superphones don't sound quite as crisp as the 7506s... perhaps
because the element is a little farther from the ear? A little eq
solves that problem. And because there's more of a chamber, you'll get
really nice bass response in the Superphones.
They're really...uh... Super.
Bermuda
JWS
--
Jeffrey
---------------------------------------------------------
| Jeffrey W. Speegle |
|-------------------------------------------------------|
| Wideband Ink Studios | Hartselle, Alabama 35640 |
| 256.751.9850 | jeffrey...@mindspring.com |
---------------------------------------------------------
Naw, the Sony MDR-CD180's are different. I think www.bestbuy.com has
pictures of the headphones. I was under the impression that the 7506's
didn't completely enclose the ear... guess I was wrong. Actually, on
further search, I found that Aiwa advertises a set of "Noise Canceling
Headphones" that run about $50. It says they reduce noise by 70%. I
haven't tried them, but at that price they're worth trying. Here's a
link: http://www.bestbuy.com/detail.asp?e=11000084&m=58&cat=70&scat=72
Anyway, he recommended getting some. He did say that live he uses other
ear protection with side fields or in ear monitors. I have also seen a
drummer on HBO's Reverb use the VF isolation phones but I cannot
remember the name of the band or drummer.
RLLRRL,
Sluggo
In article <961s5u$qpb$1...@nnrp1.deja.com>,
--
Three lefts don't make a right... but it can sound cool.
>I use AKG K270s'
>These mothers are HUGE closed ear / dual element
>studio phones.
I have a pair of the 240's (same earpiece design) and there's very
little isolation in terms of a live performance.
Bermuda
>further search, I found that Aiwa advertises a set of "Noise Canceling
>Headphones" that run about $50. It says they reduce noise by 70%.
I don't know about the $50 model, but I had an amazing pair of Koss
noise-canceling phones on a helicopter ride, and they really do work!
Not sure about the fidelity for music, and since their high-end phones
cost over $1000, I'd be very cautious about anything under $500.
Or, for $179, you could get the Superphones! :)
Bermuda
No I'm not a raod dog. I've got several years on my 7506's! Although the
foam covering is finally starting to split!
Thanks for the info Bermuda. These def sound like what I'm after.
"Jeffrey Speegle" <jeffrey...@mindspring.com> wrote in message
news:3A84D2D8...@mindspring.com...
"Bermuda Schwartz" <ber...@weirdal.com> wrote in message
news:0rna8t8o0mfjn6oc3...@4ax.com...
>I don't think manufactures have siiting on top of live drums in mind when
>they make noise cancelling headphones ;-)
Probably not... but, I wonder?
Rod is one of my all time favorites. I've had the oppotunity to talk
with him a little after JID shows. Wow, what a cool dude.
You said something about his "other" kit during the clinic? What
configuration was that? Was it different from his usual Premier?
Unfortunately, I've been unable to listen to much of Platypus or
Ruddess-Morganstein Project. I guess I should pick that stuff up - I
better complete my Britney Spears and 98 Degrees selection first! ;-)
http://headwize.com/projects/noise_prj.htm
"Bermuda Schwartz" <ber...@weirdal.com> wrote in message
news:jsua8torn223ul1hk...@4ax.com...
The 240s' and 270s' are DRASTICALLY different
in their design (I own K141, K240 & K270)
The earpiece on the 70s' are MUCH larger
than that of the 40s' and sits down OVER
your ear (read as 'ear INSIDE the phone')
and the pads seal against your skull.
I agree, the 40s' give little isolation,
but the 70s' are a completely different
ball game! ...hence the difference in $
between the two models.
JWS
--
JWS
Mark
I use Studio-Kans, they cover the ear entirely and have a liquid filled
pad around the edge for comfort and isolation. They are rated 30dB
noise reduction which is as much as you get from in-ear molded plugs
for instance. They do not provide the highest fidelity sound but in a
band situation or for practicing along to CDs, they do the job well
enough. I paid mine approximately $100. Well worth it.
--
Michel
-- We get old too soon and smart too late --
-MIKE-
--
http://mikedrums.com
mi...@mikedrums.com or hit 'reply'
>nope!
>
>The 240s' and 270s' are DRASTICALLY different
>in their design (I own K141, K240 & K270)
>The earpiece on the 70s' are MUCH larger
>than that of the 40s' and sits down OVER
>your ear (read as 'ear INSIDE the phone')
>and the pads seal against your skull.
>
>I agree, the 40s' give little isolation,
>but the 70s' are a completely different
>ball game! ...hence the difference in $
>between the two models.
>
I stand corrected! Still, I've never heard of AKG's mentioned
favorably in a discussion about high isolation. very few standard
phones offer(ed) such a good seal... with the exception of the
following: Koss Pro4AA (those heavy phones from 30 years ago that were
re-introduced through radio Shack a few years back) and the Koss red
Devils (c1972, with cushy foam earpads that sealed well.)
Bermuda
"Michel" <md...@my-deja.com> wrote in message
news:964n2m$uv4$1...@nnrp1.deja.com...
"-MIKE-" <mi...@mikedrums.com> wrote in message
news:ktnh6.260897$iy3.57...@news1.rdc1.tn.home.com...
I'll have to check who makes them, I'm not at home right now. As far as
the quality of sound, they are pretty good but I wouldn't classify them
as high-fidelity, they have a good frequency response over 15-25000.
They are rated 29dB reduction, and have a volume control built in.
They have a removable 9' cable and a liquid filled pad around the
earpieces for comfort and isolation. I find the sound quality quite
satisfactory when practicing with the band or when playing along to
CDs, but if you are looking for very high quality high fidelity
earphones, you should expect to pay a lot more than $100. Cheers
Try the NEW Sennheisers I think the number is 9270 (not the base
9200's) very comfortable and VERY good blocking. I play in a completly
enclosed sound room and have tried all the Fostec's, Sony's, BM's and
others. These give me the range of sound for around $100.00 retail
(list is like $180.00). I could not find these anywhere, asked Sam Ash
to order and got them for $90.00 to boot!
--
kANDLe
[email is fake-please use group to reply]