ACDC vs The Rolling Stones
Jarl Sigurd
If you had to compare them as individual musicians, how would the
members of ACDC and the Rolling Stones compare? Who is the
better musician in each category?
Vocals: Bon Scott vs Mick Jagger
Brian Johnson vs Mick Jagger
Lead Guitar: Angus Young vs Brian Jones
or Angus Young vs Mick Taylor
or Angus Young vs Ron Wood
Rhythm Guitar: Malcolm Young vs Keith Richards
Bass: What's his name from ACDC vs Bill Wyman
Drums: Phil Rudd vs Charle Watts
Just curious what people's opinions are on this one?
Jarl Sigurd
to listen to four original songs by Jarl Sigurd, visit
http://www.ampcast.com/seatch/band.php?id=9098
Gazzard
there is a very fine line in the vocals department, both have their pro's
and cons)
But the main reason is that AC/DC is an Australian Band where as The rolling
stones are not....(i guess that make me slightly biased doesnt it?)
-gazzard-
"Jarl Sigurd" <jarls...@geocities.com> wrote in message
news:adS87.49454$TW.2...@tor-nn1.netcom.ca...
P
gazz...@dingoblue.net.au says...
> mate ther is no comparison, AC/DC wins hands down on all fronts (although
> there is a very fine line in the vocals department, both have their pro's
> and cons)
You obviously have NO taste in music, old man!
> But the main reason is that AC/DC is an Australian Band where as The rolling
> stones are not....(i guess that make me slightly biased doesnt it?)
It would make you an idiot is what I say! Only the British know how to
make 'real' music!!
Mr Scary
The Young brothers - technically brilliant and they write some storming
blues tunes.
Phil Rudd & Cliff Williams - what a ryhtm section. They do exactly what a
rythm section should - hold it all together and groove along.
Bon Scott - well, there is no comparison.
--
------------------------------------------
Stircrazy!
Making the world a louder place.
http://www.stircrazy.fsnet.co.uk
------------------------------------------
"Gazzard" <gazz...@dingoblue.net.au> wrote in message
news:3b63f21d$0$20970$7f31...@news01.syd.optusnet.com.au...
BREZ9091
Rikard Hofslagare
And before you even think to post this kinda question to a AC/DC NG you
better study up on the members, past n present!
>
> If you had to compare them as individual musicians, how would the
> members of ACDC and the Rolling Stones compare? Who is the
> better musician in each category?
>
> Vocals: Bon Scott vs Mick Jagger
> Brian Johnson vs Mick Jagger
>
> Lead Guitar: Angus Young vs Brian Jones
> or Angus Young vs Mick Taylor
> or Angus Young vs Ron Wood
>
> Rhythm Guitar: Malcolm Young vs Keith Richards
>
> Bass: What's his name from ACDC vs Bill Wyman
Well, What's his name is either Mark Evans or Cliff Williams !!!
jazzman
anybody who knows music will admit its the Stones hands-down. ACDC is a
group based around power-chords and a rhythm section bass that is routed in
playing the root on eigth-notes and a I-IV chord progression. When put that
way no band can touch ACDC but as musicians the Stones are more
versatile.....songs that allow for interesting bass patterns...chord changes
that go beyond the I-IV-V with some minors thrown in here and there. OK I
took the bait....to even respond I feel like a nerd...AGGH!!!
"Jarl Sigurd" <jarls...@geocities.com> wrote in message
news:adS87.49454$TW.2...@tor-nn1.netcom.ca...
>
BREZ9091
permanantly "unplugged"]but every song is so similar i'm surprised at thier
longevity.but they do what they do so damn well there a lotta fun,for the
kiddos.
White Spirit
Jarl Sigurd wrote:
> If you had to compare them as individual musicians, how would the
> members of ACDC and the Rolling Stones compare? Who is the
> better musician in each category?
>
> Vocals: Bon Scott vs Mick Jagger
> Brian Johnson vs Mick Jagger
Bruce Dickinson.
> Lead Guitar: Angus Young vs Brian Jones
> or Angus Young vs Mick Taylor
> or Angus Young vs Ron Wood
Dave Murray, Adrian Smith & Janick Gers.
> Rhythm Guitar: Malcolm Young vs Keith Richards
N/A.
> Bass: What's his name from ACDC vs Bill Wyman
Steve Harris.
> Drums: Phil Rudd vs Charle Watts
Nicko McBrain.
> Just curious what people's opinions are on this one?
'Nuff said.
Capper Deluxe
stones
--
Regards Capper
-----
It Was One of those nights when you turn out the lights and everything comes
into view (isn't neon bodypaint a bitch)
Visit the AC/DC Newsgroup Bootleg Trading Site at http://jump.to/ac-dc_boots
or the AC/DC chatroom at http://go.to/ac-dc_chats any sunday from 9pm UK
time
-------
White Spirit <dgc...@netscapeonline.co.uk> wrote in message
news:3B64807A...@netscapeonline.co.uk...
capn plectrum
<jarls...@geocities.com> wrote:
>
>If you had to compare them as individual musicians, how would the
>members of ACDC and the Rolling Stones compare? Who is the
>better musician in each category?
>
>Vocals: Bon Scott vs Mick Jagger
> Brian Johnson vs Mick Jagger
No brainer. Bon Scott, Brian Johnson
>Lead Guitar: Angus Young vs Brian Jones
> or Angus Young vs Mick Taylor
> or Angus Young vs Ron Wood
No brainer. Angus Young
>Rhythm Guitar: Malcolm Young vs Keith Richards
No brainer. Malcolm Young.
>Bass: What's his name from ACDC vs Bill Wyman
Well, they are basically identical. Ok, no brainier. Cliff Williams
>Drums: Phil Rudd vs Charle Watts
No brainer. Phil Rudd
>Just curious what people's opinions are on this one?
No brainer. AC/DC is a better band.
i need new boots
<capper...@blueyonder.co.uk> wrote:
>you can't seriously compare that Kid to Either DC or the
>stones
I agree. This website says otherwise, but what do they know?
http://www.bgeast.com/cat/gallery/main_G8.html
--
http://extra.newsguy.com/~shpxurnq/joebest.html
My concept album is complete!
See Me Naked!
http://www.algonet.se/~owe/joebest.html
Catman the Great
> No brainer. Malcolm Young.
> Well, they are basically identical. Ok, no brainier. Cliff Williams
> No brainer. AC/DC is a better band.
We're not a tad biased, are we?
With Regards,
Catman the Great
--
©2001 This message is the sole property of Catman the Great and the
Icelandic Viking Revival FoundationT
Any misuse of this message can and will be construed as an act of aggression
against Catman the Great, and will be punished with savage beatings by a
pair of diminutive yet suprisingly strong Viking chicks.
Rattus the RAT
> Vocals: Bon Scott vs Mick Jagger
> Brian Johnson vs Mick Jagger
Mick jagger
>
> Lead Guitar: Angus Young vs Brian Jones
Angus
> or Angus Young vs Mick Taylor
Mick Taylor & Angus
> or Angus Young vs Ron Wood
Angus
>
> Rhythm Guitar: Malcolm Young vs Keith Richards
Keith!
> Bass: What's his name from ACDC vs Bill Wyman
don't know
> Drums: Phil Rudd vs Charle Watts
Phil Rudd
RAT
--
"I've never really understood the whole thing about Korn from a musical
point of view. Because I listen to music for music's sake, even though I
love attitude. I can't understand why you would take the tone out of the
music and just make it this crunchy thing that sounds like what it might
sound like inside a sausage grinder."
-Slash
----------------
"Well it's Floodin' down in Texas"
"I'm Evil"
"Rock N' Roll Ain't Noise Pollution"
--------------------------------------------------------------------
http://locomotive.s5.com/
rats_and_g...@yahoo.com
!!!***GUNS N' ROSES***!!!
GAX70
<NOmr...@stircrazy.SPAMfsnet.co.ukPLEASE> wrote:
>I am English - but AC/DC win hands down.
>The Young brothers - technically brilliant and they write some storming
>blues tunes.
>Phil Rudd & Cliff Williams - what a ryhtm section. They do exactly what a
>rythm section should - hold it all together and groove along.
>Bon Scott - well, there is no comparison.
it's very nice of you ppl to entertain Jarl. He posts these things,
spews his url and watches to see how long the threads go and how much
sand he can stir up. I think he's housebound. Maybe agorophobic. Rant
on!
Les Cargill
BREZ9091 wrote:
>
> all in good fun.i did like ac/dc, with angus young[or whichever one is now
> permanantly "unplugged"]but every song is so similar i'm surprised at thier
> longevity.
That is the formula for their longevity.
> but they do what they do so damn well there a lotta fun,for the
> kiddos.
There ya go. For the not-so-kiddos, too.
Ross M Stites
I agree here. I'm one for bands evolving over time in general, but
somehow AC/DC has managed to maintain their edge over time and be able to
churn out the same style of rock without loosing their edge.
Ross
Chris Johnson
If you want to get into guitar tones, well, I appreciate Mesa/Boogie
tones but not the ones Keith Richards gets. I guess he fried
the 'taste in tones' section of his brain a long time ago.
Meanwhile, a JTM-45 with an SG is classic, classic tone.
But, my favorite all-time AC/DC guitar tone would have to be
the 200 watt Majors used in 'Girls Got Rhythm'. What a tone!
I don't even want to THINK about how loud that must have been.
I'm not even going to bother to compare the individual musicians.
The Stones may do more complex music, but they don't make music
that I enjoy listening to and that's all.
CJ
Rowan Gazzard
"GAX70" <ig...@notsure.com> wrote in message
news:3b64c351...@news.mindspring.com...
Troglodite is the word you are after.....
capn plectrum
<Paradi...@REMOVEcatlover.com> wrote:
>> No brainer. Bon Scott, Brian Johnson
>> No brainer. Angus Young
>> No brainer. Malcolm Young.
>> Well, they are basically identical. Ok, no brainier. Cliff Williams
>> No brainer. Phil Rudd
>> No brainer. AC/DC is a better band.
>
>We're not a tad biased, are we?
>
\Not in the least. I have NEVER fallen asleep at an AC/DC concert. I
have at a Rolling Stone concert. Kinda speaks for itself.
Can you honestly disagree with any of what I said above?
Catman the Great
> have at a Rolling Stone concert. Kinda speaks for itself.
> Can you honestly disagree with any of what I said above?
Actually, yes, because I *did* fall asleep at an AC/DC concert for a few
minutes. I had been sick when I attended the SUL tour stop in my city and
the medication I'd been taking made me drowsy. AC/DC put on a great show,
but Brian Johnson is nowhere near the frontman or singer that Mick is.
Charlie Watts has a far greater range as a drummer than Phil Rudd, and I
can't see how anyone, showmanship aside, can say Angus is a better guitarist
than Mick Taylor judging by their chops alone.
capn plectrum
someone to sing loud and hard rock. Bon was able to do that, Brian
does that. Mick, welllllll.... I remember one time when the Stones
were on Saturday Night Live and Mick wanders over to Ron Wood, and he
fucking LICKED his mouth! Pretty fucking bizarre showmanship in my
book. Thats one of the reasons why I like Brian. He does his thing,
thats sing.He doesnt really banter with the audience, and thats fine
with me.
Honestly comparing AC/DC to the Stones is really kind of rediculous.
AC/DC is a hard rock band, Stones are a rock/pop band. .
To be fair to the Stones, I also fell asleep at a Black Sabbath
concert.
There are shitloads of guitarists that have much better chops that
Angus. There is just something about Angus's playing that sticks to
your ribs(and not all his playing does that mind you). There arent
many guitarists out there that make you remember them after the cd has
been taken out of the player.
Kent Pearson
Kent Pearson
Kent Pearson
Kent Pearson
~kp
John Stax
> Who's better?
>
Mary Roucoulet
the Rolling Stones.. AC/DC is alright band, & do like their album "High Way
To
Hell".. Just explain to me why the band broke up? The Rolling Stones,(since
1962 are still rock'n rolling, & rumors are said till this day),that the
Stones are going to tour next year! So now that you added the
alt.rock-n-roll.stones newsgroup to spread your article,("onto other usenet
discussion newsgroups"),whats your opinion about the Stones? My opinion is
that the Stones are # 1..
>===== Original Message From "jazzman" <crob...@bellatlantic.net> =====
>It's clear I'm taking this question(my even responding) to seriously because
>anybody who knows music will admit its the Stones hands-down. ACDC is a
>group based around power-chords and a rhythm section bass that is routed in
>playing the root on eigth-notes and a I-IV chord progression. When put that
>way no band can touch ACDC but as musicians the Stones are more
>versatile.....songs that allow for interesting bass patterns...chord changes
>that go beyond the I-IV-V with some minors thrown in here and there. OK I
>took the bait....to even respond I feel like a nerd...AGGH!!!
>"Jarl Sigurd" <jarls...@geocities.com> wrote in message
>news:adS87.49454$TW.2...@tor-nn1.netcom.ca...
>>
>> If you had to compare t! hem as individual musicians, how would the
>> members of ACDC and the Rolling Stones compare? Who is the
>> better musician in each category?
>>
>> Vocals: Bon Scott vs Mick Jagger
>> Brian Johnson vs Mick Jagger
>>
>> Lead Guitar: Angus Young vs Brian Jones
>> or Angus Young vs Mick Taylor
>> or Angus Young vs Ron Wood
>>
>> Rhythm Guitar: Malcolm Young vs Keith Richards
>>
>> Bass: What's his name from ACDC vs Bill Wyman
>>
>> Drums: Phil Rudd vs Charle Watts
>>
>> Just curious what people's opinions are on this one?
>>
>> Jarl Sigurd
>>
>> to listen to four original songs by Jarl Sigurd, ! visit
>> http://www.ampcast.com/seatch/band.php?id=9098
>===== Original Message From "Rowan Gazzard" <gaz...@hardwarehq.net> =====
Stonegirl's 2000 Light Years From Home
http://www.geocities.com/Heartland/Pines/3929
ICQ#:51767529
Robert W. Barker
news:LL897.2189$yi7.1...@e420r-atl3.usenetserver.com...
> Well?
>
I'll take the Horses Ass, Kent. Unless it does midi guitar. :+)
J. Raoul Xemblinosky
>
> Who's better?
Mr. Ed is, of course, of course.
--
**** the .sig file of His AssHoliness, Raoul Xemblinosky mhm 15x12 ****
"Below you will find the headers and traceroute information
on one Raoul Xemblinosky (bogus name) who has been
continually abusing his usenet privileges and attempting
to create flame wars by impersonating different users and
crossposting to irrelevant newsgroups. He also seems to
change his address at every chance he gets possibly
violating his terms of agreements. I'm relatively sure you
have heard of this individual in the past as he seems to
be rather proud of his usenet accomplishments. If you
will visit http://iacw.usenet-performance-art.org/ you can
see some of his history. The archives will also display
a representation of his method of operation. He is a
bully and recruits other users to join him in his endeavors
to destroy normally docile and helpful newsgroups. Take
a look at alt.rollingstones and you can see what I mean.
The regular users in alt.music.mp3.napster have killfiled
him, but there are a lot of new users coming to the group
for assistance and these trolls, led by Raoul, have forced
these users to drop the newsgroup from their subscriptions,
thus missing an opportunity to solve their problems.
I don't know if this person has done anything that would
require his access to be cut, but it would doing a great
service to usenet if it happened."
J. Randy Jingleheimer Mitchell to "con...@bungmunch.com," 07/16/01
Maneatingcow
<jarls...@geocities.com> wrote:
>
>If you had to compare them as individual musicians, how would the
>members of ACDC and the Rolling Stones compare? Who is the
>better musician in each category?
>
>Vocals: Bon Scott vs Mick Jagger
> Brian Johnson vs Mick Jagger
Jagger loses both
>
>Lead Guitar: Angus Young vs Brian Jones
> or Angus Young vs Mick Taylor
> or Angus Young vs Ron Wood
All 3 combine lose to Angus
>
>Rhythm Guitar: Malcolm Young vs Keith Richards
>
>Bass: What's his name from ACDC vs Bill Wyman
>
>Drums: Phil Rudd vs Charle Watts
>
>Just curious what people's opinions are on this one?
>
>Jarl Sigurd
>
>to listen to four original songs by Jarl Sigurd, visit
>http://www.ampcast.com/seatch/band.php?id=9098
>
>
Maneatingcow
<jarls...@geocities.com> wrote:
I remember when the Stones tried to get AC/DC to open for them like
5-6 yrs ago?
My question always was: why would you want a better band to open for
you and blow you out of the water?
>
Matt Seniff
<KentP...@aol.coma> wrote:
>Who's better?
Tiny Tim of course!! Mr Ed's vibrato totally sucked and Tiny's
knowledge of musical lore was unsurpassed. Also Mr Ed didn't carry his
ukes in a grocery bag like Tiny did.
David Bollinger
Rolling Stones..... Four Great decades Four great chords.
db
"capn plectrum" <ive_been_th...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:3b64f67a....@news.earthlink.net...
CompUser
"Matt Seniff" wrote ...
> >Who's better?
> Tiny Tim of course!! Mr Ed's vibrato totally sucked and Tiny's
> knowledge of musical lore was unsurpassed. Also Mr Ed didn't carry his
> ukes in a grocery bag like Tiny did.
OTOH, Mr. Ed had much better bass response....and, he
carried his nuts in a sack the size of a grocery bag...a
claim Tiny Tim could never aspire to.
Steve
Lord Valve
Kent Pearson wrote:
> akakakakak!!!!!!
>
> ~kp
According to a commercial I saw yesterday, I'm
not so sure it's "versus" anymore...
Lord Valve
VISIT MY WEBSITE: http://www.nebsnow.com/LordValve
I specialize in top quality HAND SELECTED NOS and
current-production vacuum tubes for guitar and
bass amps. Good prices, fast service.
QSC amps, RNC compressors, lots of other good stuff!
NBS Electronics, 230 South Broadway, Denver, CO 80209-1510
Phone orders/tech support after 1:30 PM Denver time at 303-778-1156
VISA - MASTERCARD
"The only trouble with being blind is...you can't see a goddamn
thing!"
-Ray Charles-
Lord Valve
Kent Pearson wrote:
> Well?
Oh, come ON, Kent. The Beav never got laid.
Fonzy, on the other hand...hmmmm...
Lord Valve
VISIT MY WEBSITE: http://www.nebsnow.com/LordValve
I specialize in top quality HAND SELECTED NOS and
current-production vacuum tubes for guitar and
bass amps. Good prices, fast service.
QSC amps, RNC compressors, lots of other good stuff!
NBS Electronics, 230 South Broadway, Denver, CO 80209-1510
Phone orders/tech support after 1:30 PM Denver time at 303-778-1156
VISA - MASTERCARD
"Ninety percent of everything is CRAP." - Sturgeon's Law
Lord Valve
> Who's better?
Depends. Was Mr. Ed gay? I never saw him
hangin' out with anyone besides Wilbur.
Lord Valve
VISIT MY WEBSITE: http://www.nebsnow.com/LordValve
I specialize in top quality HAND SELECTED NOS and
current-production vacuum tubes for guitar and
bass amps. Good prices, fast service.
QSC amps, RNC compressors, lots of other good stuff!
NBS Electronics, 230 South Broadway, Denver, CO 80209-1510
Phone orders/tech support after 1:30 PM Denver time at 303-778-1156
VISA - MASTERCARD
"I'm not an asshole, but I *play* one on the Internet." - Lord Valve
Barry Debonaire
>
> AC/DC...... Three great deacades three great chords.
>
> Rolling Stones..... Four Great decades Four great chords.
Swing Out Sister could kick ACDC's ass.
Bob
"Barry Debonaire" <ya...@alt.met> wrote in message
news:3B6591...@alt.met...
> David Bollinger wrote:
> >
> > AC/DC...... Three great deacades three great chords.
> >
> > Rolling Stones..... Four Great decades Four great chords.
>
> Swing Out Sister could kick ACDC's ass.
>
Bob
Rising Power
>Hell".. Just explain to me why the band broke up? The Rolling Stones,(since
>1962 are still rock'n rolling, & rumors are said till this day),that the
>Stones are going to tour next year!
*scratching head*
If AC/DC broke up, then who was that great cover band I saw in Cologne
a few weeks ago playing AC/DC songs over two hours?
Jesse
"P" <P...@P.es> wrote in message
news:MPG.15cde1387...@news.alt.net...
> In article <3b63f21d$0$20970$7f31...@news01.syd.optusnet.com.au>,
> gazz...@dingoblue.net.au says...
> > mate ther is no comparison, AC/DC wins hands down on all fronts
(although
> > there is a very fine line in the vocals department, both have their
pro's
> > and cons)
>
> You obviously have NO taste in music, old man!
>
> > But the main reason is that AC/DC is an Australian Band where as The
rolling
> > stones are not....(i guess that make me slightly biased doesnt it?)
>
> It would make you an idiot is what I say! Only the British know how to
> make 'real' music!!
Correction - British know how to emulate and copy black American rhythm &
blues to produce your 'real' music.....
Jesse
White Spirit
Capper Deluxe wrote:
> you can't seriously compare that Boy band Iron MAiden to Either DC or the
> stones
Iron Maiden are beyond compare. And with better songwriting.
Kent Pearson
On 30-Jul-2001, Matt Seniff <mwse...@mail.com> wrote:
> >Who's better?
> Tiny Tim of course!! Mr Ed's vibrato totally sucked
I think Ed had more of a square wave tremelo effect happening.
"Gee-e-e-e-e-e-e Wilbur"
> and Tiny's knowledge of musical lore was unsurpassed. Also Mr Ed didn't
> carry his
> ukes in a grocery bag like Tiny did.
Ed also didn't get much opportunity to tiptoe through any two lips.
~kp
Kent Pearson
On 30-Jul-2001, Lord Valve <detr...@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
> Depends. Was Mr. Ed gay? I never saw him
> hangin' out with anyone besides Wilbur.
Dear Wilbur (wherever you may be),
Please refer to the thread "Jarl Sigurgetated VS The Horses Ass"
~kp
Kent Pearson
On 30-Jul-2001, Mary Roucoulet <stone...@MailAndNews.com> wrote:
> ,whats your opinion about the Stones? My opinion is
> that the Stones are # 1..
Since you asked, my opinion is that The Stones should have retired when
Brian Jones died. After all, not only was it HIS band, Brian Jones WAS the
Rolling Stones, plain and simple. When he died, so did the band. Look up
"stale" in the dictionary, and you'll see a picture of Mick and Keith.
~kp
Kent Pearson
On 30-Jul-2001, Lord Valve <detr...@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
> Was Mr. Ed gay? I never saw him
> hangin' out with anyone besides Wilbur.
Come to think of it, as I recall, Wilbur's wife played a very minor role
~kp
Kent Pearson
On 30-Jul-2001, "Robert W. Barker" <rwba...@home.com> wrote:
> I'll take the Horses Ass, Kent. Unless it does midi guitar. :+)
A midi'd up horses ass. . . Now *there's* a concept! (Jarl, are ya
listening?)
~kp
Smakutus Maximus..
>
> Kent Pearson wrote:
>
> > Well?
>
> Oh, come ON, Kent. The Beav never got laid.
> Fonzy, on the other hand...hmmmm...
The Fonz was cool until he jumped that shark.. Once I saw the Beav fall
in that coffee cup I knew he wasn't cool.. <g>
Outt..
Jeff.
i need new boots
<rao...@zamfir.bungmunch.com> wrote:
>Kent Pearson wrote:
>>
>> Who's better?
>
>Mr. Ed is, of course, of course.
http://www.whowouldyoukill.com/daveyandgoliath.html
--
http://extra.newsguy.com/~shpxurnq/joebest.html
My concept album is complete!
See Me Naked!
http://www.algonet.se/~owe/joebest.html
i need new boots
wrote:
Because the Stones could buy and sell those fucking chumps-AssHolE
TODD TAMANEND CLARK
> Kent Pearson wrote when:
>
>> Matt Seniff wrote:
>
>>> Who's better ?
No, Tiny Tim is better than The Who.
Mister Ed is another story, however.
>> Tiny Tim, of course!!
Ditto, of course.
> Mr Ed's vibrato totally sucked...
But it was still cool to some punk Onoesque degree.
> I think Ed had more of a square wave tremelo effect
> happening. "Gee-e-e-e-e-e-e Wilbur"
>
>> ... and Tiny's knowledge of musical lore was
>> unsurpassed.
Herbert Khaury was a friend of mine. And I am still
saddened by his passing in 1996. He was an
unabridged human encyclopedia of musical knowledge,
as well as a wonderful human being.
And his command of many various vocal styles, including
deep baritones not usually associated with his infamous
falsetto, was absolutely astounding.
>> Also, Mr Ed didn't carry his ukes in a grocery bag like
>> Tiny did.
>
> Ed also didn't get much opportunity to tiptoe through any
> two lips.
Miss Vicky was indeed a babia majora.
Todd Tamanend Clark
Amateur Gynecologist/Performance Artist/Vocalist/Multi-Instrumentalist
Primal Pulse Records
Greene County, Pennsylvania
Dan Stanley
"Kent Pearson" <KentP...@aol.coma> wrote in message
>
> On 30-Jul-2001, Mary Roucoulet <stone...@MailAndNews.com> wrote:
>
> > ,whats your opinion about the Stones? My opinion is
> > that the Stones are # 1..
>
> Since you asked, my opinion is that The Stones should have retired when
> Brian Jones died. After all, not only was it HIS band, Brian Jones WAS
the
> Rolling Stones, plain and simple.
Huh? He was already dead weight by the time they made their first trek to
America, except for little overdub bits ( which he did quite well). Ok, so
he wasn't quite dead weight when they made the first trip to America..but he
was dead weight by the time of "Beggars Banquet," easy.
They should have booted him way earlier on, or he should have worked up the
nads to quit and gone to do his thing, whatever it was. People laud his
"genius", but other than a couple memorable intros to songs Mick and Keith
wrote, he didn't do much any other competent BritBlooze guy couldn't do.
> When he died, so did the band. Look up
> "stale" in the dictionary, and you'll see a picture of Mick and Keith.
> ~kp
When he died, the band blossomed from being a pop band into being a really
well realized rock band, one of the first ROCK bands.
Dan
Capper Deluxe
Jarl Sigurd <jarls...@geocities.com> wrote in message
news:adS87.49454$TW.2...@tor-nn1.netcom.ca...
>
> If you had to compare them as individual musicians, how would the
> members of ACDC and the Rolling Stones compare? Who is the
> better musician in each category?
Ok since you asked and there's been little or no discussion on this i will
answer
>
> Vocals: Bon Scott vs Mick Jagger
Bon Scott is a better Lyricist than Messr Jagger but Jagger is a better
singer than bon scott
> Brian Johnson vs Mick Jagger
Jagger isa Better Lyracist than Johnston but Johnston is a better singer
conclusions Jagger is a Good allrounder but individually at their strengths
both Scott and Johnston are better Points 1-1 Draw
> Lead Guitar: Angus Young vs Brian Jones
> or Angus Young vs Mick Taylor
> or Angus Young vs Ron Wood
Guitarists are a very Personal taste, all have sold Millions upon millions
of records and have had people emulating their styles for years none flub
notes too often so they are all compitent. again overall Draw 0-0 (1 point
to chuck berry)
>
> Rhythm Guitar: Malcolm Young vs Keith Richards
>
for pure rhythm it has to be mal, keith is good but he breaks into lead too
often to be a straight rhythm man points 1 AC/DC 0 Rolling Stones
> Bass: Mark Evans vs Bill Wyman
George Young Vs Bill Wyman
Cliff Williams vs Bill Wyman
wyman Beats Evans, Young Beats Wyman, Williams vs Wyman tough Call and to
be honest i'd put williams ahead by a nose but only because i have more of
his recorded works than i have Wyman's Points 2-1 ACDC
>
> Drums: Phil Rudd vs Charle Watts
>
again Both Know their craft , both aare their bands backbones rhythmically,
and both put down a solid foundation for their fellow bandmembers to build
on i think charlie gets this one purely because he smiles when playing 1-0
the stones
total ponts - AC/DC 4 Rolling stones 3
> Just curious what people's opinions are on this one?
both are Great live , putting on Dynamic shows and at comparable costs the
last time i saw each i felt i got good vlaue for money with both bands but
the stones had the better support act , so both great acts and very little
separating them
a good evenings listening with either
--
Regards Capper
-----
It Was One of those nights when you turn out the lights and everything comes
into view (isn't neon bodypaint a bitch)
Visit the AC/DC Newsgroup Bootleg Trading Site at http://jump.to/ac-dc_boots
or the AC/DC chatroom at http://go.to/ac-dc_chats any sunday from 9pm UK
time
J. Raoul Xemblojobsky
>
> AC/DC...... Three great deacades three great chords.
>
> Rolling Stones..... Four Great decades Four great chords.
Swing Out Sister could kick ACDC's ass.
Chris Johnson
I think that IS Yarl, come to think of it...
CJ
wicked_gravity
news:rpnbmtkgia1f81gd3...@4ax.com...
> On Mon, 30 Jul 2001 08:55:30 -0500, "J. Raoul Xemblinosky"
> <rao...@zamfir.bungmunch.com> wrote:
>
> >Kent Pearson wrote:
> >>
> >> Who's better?
> >
> >Mr. Ed is, of course, of course.
>
> http://www.whowouldyoukill.com/daveyandgoliath.html
Davey is no match for Goliath. That would be as much of a mismatch as this:
http://www.bgeast.com/cat/gallery/main_G8.html
Chris Johnson
"A horse is a horse, of course, of course, and no one should suck off
a horse, of course, unless, of course, the horse has a job in Tijuana!"
Alternate ending: "...unless, of course, the horse is the famous Johnny
Holmes!"
CJ
drdan
Beav.....And Gilbert convinced his dumb ass to climb into that thing.....
Dan
"Smakutus Maximus.." <smak...@home.com> wrote in message
news:3B65D9FF...@home.com...
Adam J. Cook
"Kent Pearson" <KentP...@aol.coma> wrote in message
news:Qlk97.4101$9i1.3...@e420r-atl1.usenetserver.com...
>
>
> > ,whats your opinion about the Stones? My opinion is
> > that the Stones are # 1..
>
> Since you asked, my opinion is that The Stones should have retired when
> Brian Jones died. After all, not only was it HIS band, Brian Jones WAS
the
> Rolling Stones, plain and simple. When he died, so did the band.
This is one of the stupidest fucking posts I've ever come across.
Congrats.
- Adam
Kent Pearson
On 30-Jul-2001, "Dan Stanley" <vze2...@verizon.net> wrote:
> > Since you asked, my opinion is that The Stones should have retired when
> > Brian Jones died. After all, not only was it HIS band, Brian Jones WAS
> the
> > Rolling Stones, plain and simple.
>
> Huh? He was already dead weight by the time they made their first trek to
> America, except for little overdub bits ( which he did quite well). Ok, so
> he wasn't quite dead weight when they made the first trip to America..but
> he
> was dead weight by the time of "Beggars Banquet," easy.
You can't be serious. He was the only breath of fresh air the band ever
had, as well as the only menber with an original bone in his body.
>
> They should have booted him way earlier on, or he should have worked up
> the nads to quit and gone to do his thing, whatever it was. People laud
> his
> "genius", but other than a couple memorable intros to songs Mick and Keith
> wrote, he didn't do much any other competent BritBlooze guy couldn't do.
Horse shit. Brian *was* a genius, "of sorts". Keith Richard is a cheap
copy of Chuck Berry, who was a cheaper copy of T-Bone Walker. It sure wasn't
HIM who had the understanding of Muddy and Howlin' when the band was a blues
band in the early years. It was Brian Jones who taught those cats what blues
was, when Jagger was still some pasty pimple faced kid living with "mum" in
middle class suburbia. Brian was already doing it. Brian was an
originator, and an inovator. You didn't see Mick or Keith introducing the
sounds of sitars, electric dulcimers, eastern modes and rhythms, etc. If it
weren't for Brian, the Beatles would have steamrollered the band into
oblivion, and *that's* a fact.
> > When he died, so did the band. Look up
> > "stale" in the dictionary, and you'll see a picture of Mick and Keith.
> When he died, the band blossomed from being a pop band into being a really
> well realized rock band, one of the first ROCK bands.
<yawwwwwwn> Stale stuff. Very stale stuff. You wanna talk about *real*
rock of that day, lets talk about Cream, Hendrix or The Who - all of who'd
mop the proverbial floor with the Stones, Keith's *extremely* boring Chuck
Berry schtick and Jagger's ridiculous prancing. Be serious. These other
guys were exciting musicians who were masters of their instruments and took
rock to the limit. The Stones were a circus outfit. Even Charlie Watts has
publicly admitted that the band embarrasses him to play with them. What
further testimony do you need?
~kp
Kent Pearson
On 30-Jul-2001, i need new boots <joe...@kidleopard.com> wrote:
> Because the Stones could buy and sell those fucking chumps-AssHolE
Maybe so. BFD. AC/DC can still play rings around the Stones. Ain't exactly
my cup of tea, but be serious. Any comparison is absurd. It'd be like
comparing the New York Dolls to Cream, for cryin' out loud. There's a place
for the Stones. It's shared with Michael Jackson, Madonna, Britney Spears,
Back Street Boys, New Kids On The Block, Ramones . . . get my drift?
~kp
Kent Pearson
On 30-Jul-2001, "Adam J. Cook" <ajco...@swbell.net> wrote:
> This is one of the stupidest fucking posts I've ever come across.
> Since you asked, my opinion is that The Stones should have retired when
> > Brian Jones died. After all, not only was it HIS band, Brian Jones WAS
> the
> > Rolling Stones, plain and simple. When he died, so did the band.
The truth hurts, doesn't it :-)
~kp
i need new boots
Horseshit! Wilbur's wife was HOT!
capn plectrum
really don't see anything to really compare between the two. Anyway,
just so you have the info correct, AC/DC hasn't broken up, and is one
of the more stabilized bands as far as personell.
capn plectrum
of the water on musicianship.
In the comparison of AC/DC to the Stones, Im basing it on rock band
versus rock band. AC/DC is a far more superior rock band that Stones.
And I do like the stones. I think "Honky Tonk Woman" is one of the
greatest rock songs ever written, but AC/DC, whoa, Ill never forget
the first time I heard them and being totally floored by them.
J. Raoul Xemblinosky
>
> On Mon, 30 Jul 2001 21:36:07 GMT, "Kent Pearson"
> <KentP...@aol.coma> wrote:
>
> >
> >On 30-Jul-2001, Lord Valve <detr...@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
> >
> >> Was Mr. Ed gay? I never saw him
> >> hangin' out with anyone besides Wilbur.
> >
> >Come to think of it, as I recall, Wilbur's wife played a very minor role
> >
> >~kp
>
> Horseshit!
What other kind of shit would one expect?
> Wilbur's wife was HOT!
>
> --
> http://extra.newsguy.com/~shpxurnq/joebest.html
> My concept album is complete!
>
> See Me Naked!
> http://www.algonet.se/~owe/joebest.html
--
**** the .sig file of His AssHoliness, Raoul Xemblinosky mhm 15x12 ****
"Below you will find the headers and traceroute information
on one Raoul Xemblinosky (bogus name) who has been
continually abusing his usenet privileges and attempting
to create flame wars by impersonating different users and
crossposting to irrelevant newsgroups. He also seems to
change his address at every chance he gets possibly
violating his terms of agreements. I'm relatively sure you
have heard of this individual in the past as he seems to
be rather proud of his usenet accomplishments. If you
will visit http://iacw.usenet-performance-art.org/ you can
see some of his history. The archives will also display
a representation of his method of operation. He is a
bully and recruits other users to join him in his endeavors
to destroy normally docile and helpful newsgroups. Take
a look at alt.rollingstones and you can see what I mean.
The regular users in alt.music.mp3.napster have killfiled
him, but there are a lot of new users coming to the group
for assistance and these trolls, led by Raoul, have forced
these users to drop the newsgroup from their subscriptions,
thus missing an opportunity to solve their problems.
I don't know if this person has done anything that would
require his access to be cut, but it would doing a great
service to usenet if it happened."
J. Randy Jingleheimer Mitchell to "con...@bungmunch.com," 07/16/01
J. Raoul Xemblinosky
How true.
i need new boots
<rao...@zamfir.bungmunch.com> wrote:
>i need new boots wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, 30 Jul 2001 21:36:07 GMT, "Kent Pearson"
>> <KentP...@aol.coma> wrote:
>>
>> >
>> >On 30-Jul-2001, Lord Valve <detr...@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
>> >
>> >> Was Mr. Ed gay? I never saw him
>> >> hangin' out with anyone besides Wilbur.
>> >
>> >Come to think of it, as I recall, Wilbur's wife played a very minor role
>> >
>> >~kp
>>
>> Horseshit!
>
>What other kind of shit would one expect?
>
You got me there, but Wilbur's wife was a real hottie.
J. Raoul Xemblinosky
>
> On Mon, 30 Jul 2001 23:45:46 -0500, "J. Raoul Xemblinosky"
> <rao...@zamfir.bungmunch.com> wrote:
>
> >i need new boots wrote:
> >>
> >> On Mon, 30 Jul 2001 21:36:07 GMT, "Kent Pearson"
> >> <KentP...@aol.coma> wrote:
> >>
> >> >
> >> >On 30-Jul-2001, Lord Valve <detr...@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> Was Mr. Ed gay? I never saw him
> >> >> hangin' out with anyone besides Wilbur.
> >> >
> >> >Come to think of it, as I recall, Wilbur's wife played a very minor role
> >> >
> >> >~kp
> >>
> >> Horseshit!
> >
> >What other kind of shit would one expect?
>
> You got me there, but Wilbur's wife was a real hottie.
Didn't Wilbur drive a Studebaker, too?
> >> Wilbur's wife was HOT!
> >>
> >> --
> >> http://extra.newsguy.com/~shpxurnq/joebest.html
> >> My concept album is complete!
> >>
> >> See Me Naked!
> >> http://www.algonet.se/~owe/joebest.html
>
> --
> http://extra.newsguy.com/~shpxurnq/joebest.html
> My concept album is complete!
>
> See Me Naked!
> http://www.algonet.se/~owe/joebest.html
Ross M Stites
><yawwwwwwn> Stale stuff. Very stale stuff. You wanna talk about *real*
>rock of that day, lets talk about Cream, Hendrix or The Who - all of who'd
>mop the proverbial floor with the Stones, Keith's *extremely* boring Chuck
>Berry schtick and Jagger's ridiculous prancing. Be serious. These other
>guys were exciting musicians who were masters of their instruments and took
>rock to the limit. The Stones were a circus outfit. Even Charlie Watts has
>publicly admitted that the band embarrasses him to play with them. What
>further testimony do you need?
I really can't comment on one era of the Stones vs. the others, but I have
to agree that Cream/Hendrix/The Who all kill the Stones for good music and
good musicianship...especially on guitar. Not that we need to raise the
heat any more here, but I'd say the exact same thing about the
Beatles. You can give me all the "you had to be there" comments you want,
but I'll take any of those other bands anytime...far, far more interesting
and challenging IMO.
Ross
trippy
<9Q897.3422$9i1.1...@e420r-atl1.usenetserver.com>, said the following
tripped out things:
> Well?
The Fonz would win for he hace grateness and catchphrases.
--
Trippy
http://www.geocities.com/tobydog9/
Mr.T.t...@chorus.net
(I pity the fool, who doesn't take out Mr.T. before e-mailing me)
Skepticult # 365-12149-907
Rank : Seargent First Class
WORTHLESS SCUM #246
I'm spooge too.
Cool quote:
"I'd rather spend my time seeing how hard a
400-pound gorilla can tighten a vise around my penis before I pass out
from the
pain then be forced to slog through your orgasmic rants, now that you've
found
human contact."
--- myf...@aol.com (Charade)
Love from my fans:
"Please excuse the American slang, but you sir are a DICK!"
--- P...@P.net "P"
"Declare victory and run! Thats all you Amerikkans know! It sure worked
for you in BVietname!"
--- P...@P.net "P", Acknowleging my victory
"I have already states, yes I do want attention!"
--- sxw_...@hotmail.com (Brandon Hex), after morphing 4 times to avoid
an imaginary killfile.
"You is smarter when YOU is on crack."
--- Jesus Slut Fucker <drap...@home.com>, weighs in on the drug debate.
"Hurry, hurry, hurry...Heinie awaits with the soap!"
--- "Seafood" <na...@sanctum.com>, on his motivations.
"You sure are a moron. Sollog was 20 days off on a event that occurs
once every 800 or so
days. That is a 95% accuracy rate."
--- fvcky...@hotmail.com (Fvck You Too), on prediction accuracy.
I could not ask for more than this time together
I could not ask for more than this time with you
Every prayer has been answered
Every dream I've had's come true
Right here in this moment is right where I'm meant to be
Here with you here with me
No I could not ask for more than this time together
'Cause it's all I've waited for
And I could not ask for more
Sara Evans -- "I could not ask for more"
MEOW
J. Raoul Xemblinosky
Agree about Cream and Hendrix, could be persuaded about the Who. But
*no* group in the history of rock music has been so overrated as the
fucking Beatles.
Robb Scott
Electri...@aol.coma wrote:
> The truth hurts, doesn't it :-)
Well, it's an opinion, so "truth" kinda shifts accordingly, no?
My own take is that the Stones did some of their greatest stuff after
Jones's departure. "Exile", "Some Girls", tunes like "Brown Sugar",
"Sympathy", Honky Tonk Women", ...excellent stuff.
Granted, there's been a lot of sub-par material, probably more than the
good stuff. "Angie"....eeesh. "Sucking in the 70s" was truth in
advertising.
"Outa Tears" is a great recent Stones tune, IMO.
----------------------
The One True Robb
Reply to ro...@ycrdi.com
----------------------
Matt Seniff
wrote:
>
>"Matt Seniff" wrote ...
>
>> >Who's better?
>> Tiny Tim of course!! Mr Ed's vibrato totally sucked and Tiny's
>> knowledge of musical lore was unsurpassed. Also Mr Ed didn't carry his
>> ukes in a grocery bag like Tiny did.
>
>OTOH, Mr. Ed had much better bass response....and, he
>carried his nuts in a sack the size of a grocery bag...a
>claim Tiny Tim could never aspire to.
>
>Steve
Do you know this from some personal experience? In fact Tiny had quite
a reputation as a lady's man, odd as that may seem to those who only
saw him on the Johnny Carson show etc. His music and abilities far
transcended the clownish appearances on network TV. He said any
publicity was good publicity and didn't care if he was made fun of as
long as he was on TV. In fact I have been pushing my buddy to do
something with the raw DATs that were used as a foundation for the I
Love Me Cd (released on Ponk/Seeland records). These tapes are just
Tiny on uke and vocs and are a riveting performance to say the least.
I only wish that I had known and been associated with these folks when
they recorded that CD. matt
Matt Seniff
<KentP...@aol.coma> wrote:
>
>On 30-Jul-2001, Lord Valve <detr...@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
>
>> Was Mr. Ed gay? I never saw him
>> hangin' out with anyone besides Wilbur.
>
>Come to think of it, as I recall, Wilbur's wife played a very minor role
Wilbur was also the lead in Ed Wood's Glen or Glenda he played the
Glen/Glenda character in 1953. Did you also know that Tiny Tim did a
cover of the MR Ed theme song (at the request of the president of his
fan club who was also the president of the Mr Ed fan club)? It is a
small world after all. matt
Ross M Stites
>> I really can't comment on one era of the Stones vs. the others, but I have
>> to agree that Cream/Hendrix/The Who all kill the Stones for good music and
>> good musicianship...especially on guitar. Not that we need to raise the
>> heat any more here, but I'd say the exact same thing about the
>> Beatles. You can give me all the "you had to be there" comments you want,
>> but I'll take any of those other bands anytime...far, far more interesting
>> and challenging IMO.
>Agree about Cream and Hendrix, could be persuaded about the Who. But
>*no* group in the history of rock music has been so overrated as the
>fucking Beatles.
Thanks. I figured I was getting ready to read my first flame for not
putting the Beatles on a pedestal!
Ross
howldog
wrote:
> People laud his
>"genius",
well he DID play a mean recorder.
howldog
>
>"Outa Tears" is a great recent Stones tune, IMO.
I really like even some of the newer stuff, Voodoo Lounge has some
great stuff on it, Blinded By Rainbows is really good.
Mike Hartigan
You had to be there!
Gorblimey
Mike Hartigan <mi...@hartigan.dot.com> wrote in message
news:E785DC319190EF1D.74716F7F...@lp.airnews.net...
> On 31 Jul 2001 09:57:30 -0500, Ross M Stites said...
> > "J. Raoul Xemblinosky" <rao...@zamfir.bungmunch.com> writes:
> >
> > >> I really can't comment on one era of the Stones vs. the others, but I
have
> > >> to agree that Cream/Hendrix/The Who all kill the Stones for good
music and
> > >> good musicianship...especially on guitar. Not that we need to raise
the
> > >> heat any more here, but I'd say the exact same thing about the
> > >> Beatles.
You don't think Hendrix ripped up all those Beatles songs because he could
play them properly do you?
Pete
darrell
Gorblimey <persisten...@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:3BA97.15765$
> You don't think Hendrix ripped up all those Beatles songs because he could
> play them properly do you?
I saw an interview with Paul McCartney a while ago where he talked about going
to see Hendrix play a show, and I guess Jimi knew he was coming. That morning
they had just released the Sgt. Pepper album and Paul said Jimi opened up the
show playing "Sgt. Pepper". He was amazed when he started playing a tune that
was so new and then proceeded it take it into "Jimi territory". Would have been
great to be there.
darrell
Barry Debonaire
>
> "Barry Debonaire" <ya...@alt.met> wrote in message
> news:3B6591...@alt.met...
> > David Bollinger wrote:
> > >
> > > AC/DC...... Three great deacades three great chords.
> > >
> > > Rolling Stones..... Four Great decades Four great chords.
> >
> > Swing Out Sister could kick ACDC's ass.
> >
> Hahahahaha
You think I am kidding.
Ross M Stites
>You don't think Hendrix ripped up all those Beatles songs because he could
>play them properly do you?
<G> The wonderful thing about Hendrix is he could anything out there and
make it his. It didn't matter who wrote the original, when he played it
he owned it.
Ross
S. Gardo
That's it : Hendrix, The Beatles, The Stones, The Kinks etc. are UNIQUE.
Why should we compare Hendrix with The Beatles? Guys like Chuck Berry
made the real Rock'n'Roll songs and rest of the world played the covers.
Stefan
Gabriel Ballet
Kent Pearson <KentP...@aol.coma> a écrit dans le message :
Qlk97.4101$9i1.3...@e420r-atl1.usenetserver.com...
>
> On 30-Jul-2001, Mary Roucoulet <stone...@MailAndNews.com> wrote:
>
> > ,whats your opinion about the Stones? My opinion is
> > that the Stones are # 1..
>
> Since you asked, my opinion is that The Stones should have retired when
> Brian Jones died
...and if I follow you, AC/DC should have stopped when Bon died ? Bullshit
!!
By the way, I wondered if other bands had survived to their singer's
death...does anybody have an idea ?
Mary Roucoulet
>===== Original Message From how...@yahoo.com (howldog) =====
Stonegirl's 2000 Light Years From Home
http://www.geocities.com/Heartland/Pines/3929
ICQ#:51767529
i need new boots
<rao...@zamfir.bungmunch.com> wrote:
>i need new boots wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, 30 Jul 2001 23:45:46 -0500, "J. Raoul Xemblinosky"
>> <rao...@zamfir.bungmunch.com> wrote:
>>
>> >i need new boots wrote:
>> >>
>> >> On Mon, 30 Jul 2001 21:36:07 GMT, "Kent Pearson"
>> >> <KentP...@aol.coma> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> >
>> >> >On 30-Jul-2001, Lord Valve <detr...@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
>> >> >
>> >> >> Was Mr. Ed gay? I never saw him
>> >> >> hangin' out with anyone besides Wilbur.
>> >> >
>> >> >Come to think of it, as I recall, Wilbur's wife played a very minor role
>> >> >
>> >> >~kp
>> >>
>> >> Horseshit!
>> >
>> >What other kind of shit would one expect?
>>
>> You got me there, but Wilbur's wife was a real hottie.
>
>Didn't Wilbur drive a Studebaker, too?
>
No. I don't think so.
i need new boots
<Electri...@aol.coma> wrote:
>
>On 30-Jul-2001, i need new boots <joe...@kidleopard.com> wrote:
>
>> Because the Stones could buy and sell those fucking chumps-AssHolE
>
>Maybe so. BFD. AC/DC can still play rings around the Stones. Ain't exactly
>my cup of tea, but be serious. Any comparison is absurd. It'd be like
>comparing the New York Dolls to Cream, for cryin' out loud. There's a place
>for the Stones. It's shared with Michael Jackson, Madonna, Britney Spears,
>Back Street Boys, New Kids On The Block, Ramones . . . get my drift?
>
>~kp
Sure, but someone posed the question "why would the Stones expect
AC/DC to open for them" What do you think, they even take into a
consideration how good the other band is, as to not insult them with
an offer to open for them? From a financial standpoint, nearly
*everyone* is a potential opening act for them.
StratMatt
dammit!!!
Raoul J. Xemblinosky
>
> On Tue, 31 Jul 2001 00:35:44 -0500, "J. Raoul Xemblinosky"
> <rao...@zamfir.bungmunch.com> wrote:
>
> >i need new boots wrote:
> >>
> >> On Mon, 30 Jul 2001 23:45:46 -0500, "J. Raoul Xemblinosky"
> >> <rao...@zamfir.bungmunch.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> >i need new boots wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >> On Mon, 30 Jul 2001 21:36:07 GMT, "Kent Pearson"
> >> >> <KentP...@aol.coma> wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >> >
> >> >> >On 30-Jul-2001, Lord Valve <detr...@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
> >> >> >
> >> >> >> Was Mr. Ed gay? I never saw him
> >> >> >> hangin' out with anyone besides Wilbur.
> >> >> >
> >> >> >Come to think of it, as I recall, Wilbur's wife played a very minor role
> >> >> >
> >> >> >~kp
> >> >>
> >> >> Horseshit!
> >> >
> >> >What other kind of shit would one expect?
> >>
> >> You got me there, but Wilbur's wife was a real hottie.
> >
> >Didn't Wilbur drive a Studebaker, too?
> >
>
> No. I don't think so.
I think so.
http://members.tripod.com/~horsefame/images/mred5.jpg is clearly a
Stude.
http://www.tvacres.com/license_MZ.htm lists the car as a 1961 Stude.
--
**** the .sig file of His AssHoliness, Raoul Xemblinosky mhm 15x12 ****
"The regular users in alt.music.mp3.napster have killfiled
Satellite Blues
lost or sumthin? Just I havent seen half of these names before. It could be
cause of the weed but.........
--
Satellite Blues
"You Can Stick It Where It Hurts...........MAC!"
"StratMatt" <matt...@earthlink.net> wrote in message
news:yfK97.11485$bl1.1...@newsread1.prod.itd.earthlink.net...
Kent Pearson
On 1-Aug-2001, "Satellite Blues" <cjs...@telus.net> wrote:
> Alls I wanna know is, are all these people replying
> lost or sumthin? Just I havent seen half of these names before.
> It could be
> cause of the weed but.........
>
> --
Jarl the troll is the only one who's lost, as he crossposts bait to many
different groups. These unfamiliar names are from these unfamiliar groups.
Some have weed, some have not.
~kp
Holtz
trippy wrote:
> This dude "Kent Pearson" KentP...@aol.coma, in article
> <9Q897.3422$9i1.1...@e420r-atl1.usenetserver.com>, said the following
> tripped out things:
>
> > Well?
>
> The Fonz would win for he hace grateness and catchphrases.
>
C'mon, everyone knows Parker Lewis can't lose!
Holtz.
Wu Wu Meng
> trippy wrote:
>
> > This dude "Kent Pearson" KentP...@aol.coma, in article
> > <9Q897.3422$9i1.1...@e420r-atl1.usenetserver.com>, said the following
> > tripped out things:
> >
> > > Well?
> >
> > The Fonz would win for he hace grateness and catchphrases.
> >
>
> C'mon, everyone knows Parker Lewis can't lose!
this begs the question...what about ferris bueller?
Per
Let me introduce you to Rjocky, the weed eater.
--
per @ flonk . org / http://www.flonk.org
PjerTheMutantVjiking @ meow . org
mhm 24x23 icq: 6047688 wgp.org/home/aavf3
Rocky
>Kent Pearson wrote:
>>
>> On 1-Aug-2001, "Satellite Blues" <cjs...@telus.net> wrote:
>>
>> > Alls I wanna know is, are all these people replying
>> > lost or sumthin? Just I havent seen half of these names before.
>> > It could be
>> > cause of the weed but.........
>> >
>> > --
>>
>> Jarl the troll is the only one who's lost, as he crossposts bait to many
>> different groups. These unfamiliar names are from these unfamiliar groups.
>> Some have weed, some have not.
>
>Let me introduce you to Rjocky, the weed eater.
Hey Pjer.
This bloke got some nice skunk to share then?
Rocky.
mhm xvi x iii
PRODIGY
"Firestarter"
I'm the trouble starter, punking instigator.
I'm the fear addicted, danger illustrated.
I'm a firestarter, twisted firestarter,
you're the firestarter, twisted firestarter.
I'm the bitch you hated, filth infatuated.
Yeah, I'm the pain you tasted, fell intoxicated
I'm a firestarter, twisted firestarter,
you're the firestarter, twisted firestarter.
I'm the self-inflicted, punk detonator.
Yeah, I'm the one invented, twisted animator.
I'm a firestarter, twisted firestarter,
you're the firestarter, twisted firestarter.
starter... starter... starter...
Meow.
Kent Pearson
On 1-Aug-2001, Per <bo...@bork.bork> wrote:
> > Some have weed, some have not.
>
> Let me introduce you to Rjocky, the weed eater.
Thanks, I've got a weed whacker.
~kp
i need new boots
Well, he didn't drive it much.
Rocky
Just pass me a few buds matey, and I'll leave you to your whacking.
>~kp