On Mar 24, 7:39 am, Tom from Texas <
trisne...@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
> To deny a person, or a sheep, love based on antiquated
> > taboos is just
> > another form of prejudice, no better than prejudice against
> > homosexuality.
>
> I don't know who posted this but it was not me.
>
> Tom from Texas
The taboos against incest,necrophilia and beastiality are extremely
antiquated and should be TOTALLY ignored.
The incest experience should be supervised by a participating
adult over the age of 21 to assure that no unacceptable boundaries are
crossed. Coupled with light participation by the adult we can rest
assured the incestuous relationship stays on the correct path and
remains a harmless, enjoyable experience for the youngsters. It IS a
variation of normalcy.
If you'll examine both beastiality and necrophilia you will find that
besides the antiquated taboos associated with participation they are
TOTALLY victimless crimes. You cannot insult the dead can you?
The body is only a shell, what is wrong with expressing your love in
that manner? The world is full of hate, social injustice and war, we
must allow our minds to expand and accept new concepts.
When my father passed away {god rest his soul} I had a lifelong
fantasy of fondling his scrotum. My father had a rather large low
hanging bag and it intrigued me. I was able to make this fantasy a
reality and it was very, very good. The satisfaction experience was
ultra intense! My orgasm was earth shattering and not like any i've
had since.
There is absolutely nothing wrong with expressing your love in such a
manner just as there's nothing wrong with expressing your love with a
non human entity such as a K-9.
> Is it actually against the law to love the dead?
NO. As of May 2006, there is no federal legislation specifically
barring sex with a corpse So if we abolish the silly taboos associated
with expressing this type of love it can be a fulfilling experience
for all of us! I would recommend that each and everyone of you try it
at least once
so you will know for yourselves how silly and out-dated the taboos are
that were passed down from the priests of Godhead..
Here's examples of research done over a period of time. It correlates
the harmless nature of necrophilic relationships.
In 1958, Klaf and Brown[5] commented that, although rarely described,
necrophilic fantasies may occur more often than is generally supposed.
Rosman and Resnick[8] (1989) theorized that either of the following
situations could be antecedents to necrophilia (pp. 161):
1. The necrophile develops poor self-esteem, perhaps due in part to
a significant loss;
(a) He/she is very fearful of rejection by women/men and he/
she desires a sexual partner who is incapable of rejecting him/her;
and/or
(b) He/she is fearful of the dead, and transforms his/her
fear — by means of reaction formation — into a desire.
2. He/she develops an exciting fantasy of sex with a corpse,
sometimes after exposure to a corpse.
The authors also reported that, of their sample of 'necrophiliacs,':
* 68 percent were motivated by a desire for an unresisting and
unrejecting partner;
* 21 percent by a want for reunion with a lost partner;
* 15 percent by sexual attraction to dead people;
* 15 percent by a desire for comfort or to overcome feelings of
isolation; and
* 11 percent by a desire to remedy low self-esteem by expressing
power over a corpse (pp. 159).
Minor modern researches conducted in England have shown that some
necrophiles tend to choose a dead mate after failing to create
romantic attachments with the living.
What is wrong with continuing a relationship with a deceased
individual? Love is beautiful in ALL of its forms. To deny a person
love based on antiquated taboos and age restrictions is just another
form of prejudice, no better than racial prejudice.