On Fri, 17 Feb 2012 14:31:38 -0600, Tim McNamara
<
tim...@bitstream.net> wrote:
>In article
><
907325a0-71a8-4855...@hk10g2000vbb.googlegroups.com>,
> pmfan57 <
jwra...@aol.com> wrote:
>
>> On Feb 17, 12:29 pm, Tim McNamara <
tim...@bitstream.net> wrote:
>> > While Steely Dan was on the radio a lot during my high school and
>> > college years, I never really dug them. Everything was *too*
>> > perfect. It was the opposite of jazz. Jazz requires risk taking
>> > and perfection requires risk avoidance. While the tunes look like
>> > jazz on paper, they don't sound like jazz because everything sounds
>> > so controlled.
>>
>> Well they aren't jazz. But the guys listened to and loved it and
>> incorporate some elements, like solos by Phil Woods or Wayne Shorter
>> for example, into their music. And the guitarists did nice
>> improvisations too.
>
>Sure. I read a very interesting interview with Donald Fagen in Ben
>Sidran's book _Talking Jazz_. Fagen clearly had big ears and listened
>to a lot of jazz.
>
>> Who said their music was jazz?
>
>Nobody in this thread, anyway.
Categories are difficult. I think an argument could be made that a
chart for Black Cow (on AJA) would look every bit as 'jazz' as
Watermelon Man, for instance (as nebulous as that concept might be).
Anyway, there's a reason why I posted the query about their charts
here rather than in a rock-oriented newsgroup. I'm not sure SD could
be pigeonholed as a rock band now, and I doubt that most rock players
would have enough perspective on the changes in their tunes. No
offense to rockers--it's just a different kind of thing.
Categories aside, they've hired a lot of great jazz players for their
later sessions. They deserve credit for turning Chris Potter loose on
West of Hollywood, ending their Two Against Nature album on a great 4
minute sax solo. Definitely an unusual move.
BTW, I once asked Chris about that. He said that they kept the track
rolling, so he kept playing, assuming that they were going to fade it
out, but they didn't.