On 2014-04-24 15:37:46 +0000, somebody said:
> This is not to say that they never worked together. Since they were
> both active during the same decades it would be hard to believe thier
> paths never crossed.
I've heard people tell me that recovering junkies find it in their best
interests to avoid working with active junkies. That might have been
part of it. But predominantly Evans basically worked in a trio from
around 1959 on. Yes, he did a marvelous Symbiosis with Ogerman, a
couple with Tony Bennet and Toots Thielemans and others, but most of
his work was trio both live and in the studio. So there is a long list
of important musicians from 1960 till his death in 1980 that he never
worked with.
Though he died at the age of 51, he and Pass were both born in 1929.
While Evans was probably most lauded while in NY during the late 50's
and through the 60's; Pass was in LA and doing TV and touring as a
sideman through these years. Though Pass did great work with small
record labels, his name only became ubiquitous in the mid-70's with
Virtuoso, and his subsequent sideman work with Oscar Peterson and Ella
Fitzgerald. Then he became a mule for Pablo appearing on every damn
thing they recorded for a few years. At this point Evans was only a few
years from death.
It's true that they didn't play the same musical styles, but had they
worked together it would have been great stuff. Pass and Evans were
two of the most sympathetic players of their time; brilliant
accompanists and widely appreciated for that specific skill among many
others. I am not a fan of Oscar Peterson and though I love Pass, the
album they did together sounds to me like a juggling act, full of fast
and scary maneuvers but not much depth or introspection. That's my own
personal viewpoint and I know it will be madness for fans. Still, I
think Pass and Evans would have been vastly more interesting to me,
especially live, in a double-LP. Ah well...
---===---
"Waltz for Debbie" was written for his niece, it's stated almost
everywhere. Debby herself told me so directly while she excoriated me
for 3-5 usenet posts after I offered my viewpoint on musicans and
heroin.
I believe that great musicians saddled with heroin addictions can be
trapped in the music business by that addiction. With their options
narrowed by the habit and its illegality, they have the *possibility*
of becoming even greater, as opposed to, say going back to college and
getting a degree in law or medicine, or getting a job as a programmer.
These three specific options were the results for me and part of the
crew I played with in the 70's. A couple of the guys who became junkies
didn't have the opportunity and so they pursued whatever musical
avenues they could, or dealt dope themselves, until they both died.
Their years were filled with evictions, crashing on people's couches,
endless borrowing of money, and one dental or health crisis after
another. It was an utter misery, which seems to be on the rise again.
As for the rest of us, our end was seemingly even worse: We became amateurs.
--
Those who wish to sing always find a song. -- Swedish proverb