Nonsense; that's an eighties Roadstar (or related) Ibanez. At the time
Ibanez was making the best production guitars in the world (far
superior to Fender and Gibson). That particular model guitar played
like a dream (much, much better than a strat) and sounded great too.
Although Lorne would sound good on almost any guitar.
Tuck Andrus had a story on his site about being poor and using crappy guitars
and one day loaning one to a much better player than himself. He said the guy
made it sound amazing and he was convinced ever after that tone was in the hands.
That being said, I think there are few people in the world that spend more time
and energy than Tuck on getting his tone :)
Hmmm... perhaps from a technical perspective. But once he found it, he
wrote a treatise about it and then stuck with it thenceforth! He has
essentially two guitars, one for recording and one for playing (both
old L-5CES that have had the electronics modified).
This is quite different than those of us who constantly change, tweak,
alter, augment, and replace our setup - guitars, amps and all!
Roger
Greg
> Tuck Andrus
Do you mean "Tuck Andress"? :)
--
jazzy [Krzysiek Inglik]
http://GuitarZone.org
GG # 7101960
Hmmm... perhaps from a technical perspective. But once he found it, he
wrote a treatise about it and then stuck with it thenceforth! He has
essentially two guitars, one for recording and one for touring (both
Lorne has also played a Les Paul and a Tele, and sounded the same on
them too.
Interesting that he seems to be using a Pick, I've always seen him play
fingerstyle!.
BG
I don't like a lot of acoustic sound coming through, and on quiet gigs a
loud hollow-body can really penetrate.
But, yeah, Lofsky would still be a bitch even if he was playing a plexiglass
B.C. Rich Warlock.
"oasysco" <oas...@cox.net> wrote in message
news:1107126894....@c13g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
This is particularly true for the classic electric jazz sound, with
flatwound strings and a relatively dark tone. This can be achieved on
practically any electric guitar with humbuckers if you string it with
flats and use the neck pup. True, it's less convincing on a Strat - but
again, *playing jazz* is an expression of musical language, which
transcends the voice speaking it.
So we're dealing more with expectation and tradition than NEED when we
talk about using certain guitars for any particular genre of music. I
am a somewhat conspicuous consumer when it comes to guitars, but
nonetheless I stand by the assertion that I sound "like me" on any of
my various axes. It's more about what I *prefer* to play than what I
*need* to play.
Roger
Personally, I just think Lofsky makes it work for him.
"oasysco" <oas...@cox.net> wrote in message
news:1107126894....@c13g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
(re. Tuck Andress:)
> Hmmm... perhaps from a technical perspective. But once he found
> it, he wrote a treatise about it and then stuck with it
> thenceforth! He has essentially two guitars, one for recording and
> one for playing (both old L-5CES that have had the electronics
> modified).
When I saw Tuck & Patti a few weeks ago, he was playing this funny
small solid-body guitar. Kind of like a Steinberger in that the tuners
were on the body. I assume he uses it for ease of travel. It sounded
good.
Thanks,
Sotos
"Nil" <redn...@REMOVETHIScomcast.net> wrote in message
news:Xns95F568A1...@216.196.97.136...
> Would very much appreciate hearing more about their performance.
> Which songs did they play, how'd they sound, was he playing
> through a guitar amp (that you could tell) or PA system?
> Inquiring minds and all that.
I was misrememering a bit - the show was last October, and now I'm
getting a bit fuzzy on the details...
It was at a club called Scullers in Allston, Mass. (part of Boston).
Short set, as there was another later show. I'm forgetting the songs -
Patti did here shoes song, Tuck did a solo. It was mostly their kissy-
huggy love songs. Very nice, great playing. It looked like they were
having fun.
Tuck had this small solid-body guitar that I assume was custom made for
him. His whole amplification system was in a suitcase-like floor box. I
couldn't see much of what was in it... a volume pedal, and what looked
to be a stomp-box or two that he never touched. That box of stuff was
connected to a small rack at the back of the stage that held the PA
which amplified the vox and guitar to a pair of smallish speakers. It's
a very compact setup, and obviously made for quick 'n light travel.
> On 06 Feb 2005, "Sotos" <spa...@cox.net> wrote in
> news:P0sNd.55248$jn.1888@lakeread06:
>
>> Would very much appreciate hearing more about their performance.
>> Which songs did they play, how'd they sound, was he playing
>> through a guitar amp (that you could tell) or PA system?
>> Inquiring minds and all that.
>
> I was misrememering a bit - the show was last October, and now I'm
> getting a bit fuzzy on the details...
<...>
> Tuck had this small solid-body guitar that I assume was custom made for
> him. His whole amplification system was in a suitcase-like floor box.
I was at the last show on Sunday of that run at Sculler's. He
mentioned to the audience that it was his emergency backup guitar,
that the L5 had been picking up a radio station.
And the guitar really did sound excellent, I didn't think he lost
much tone by using it.
As amazing as Tuck's playing is, as I listen to Tuck and Patti
over time the real delight is the near-perfect musical converation
between them.
http://www.frameworks-guitars.com/
>
> A Frameworks, perhaps? I've been lusting
> after a nylon-string for a long time,
> but with the dollar so far down against
> the euro, it's not going to happen anytime
> soon:
>
> http://www.frameworks-guitars.com/
Not a frameworks, it had a compact solid-body body. I would've
guessed a custom made item.