At the Crow last Friday I listened to two guitarists that both played ES
335s and they sounded great.
Here are my questions to the omniscient RMMGJ forum:
Was 1990 a good year for ES 335s? You sometimes hear certain years were
not so good for Gibson.
Do you guys feel the ES 335 is good for straight ahead bebop playing?
Any experience with the combination ES 335/Polytone?
Are there any preffereed ES 335 types for straight ahead Jazz playing?
Thanks,
Dick
--
Posted via Mailgate.ORG Server - http://www.Mailgate.ORG
As for "dot" ES-335s, I only see that the old ones (Dots) 1958-61 are
the real ones. The dot ES-335s are no real big deal unless you're
looking at it from a collection standpoint. Now, the old dots are
worth a lot of bucks. I prefer a smaller neck and some of the old dots
had larger necks. Larry Carlton help popularize the ES-335, but his
guitar was not a dot. As for the later dot reissues, I really don't
know if a certain year is better. I would imagine that the ones the
Gibson Custom shop makes are pretty good.
Byron Atkins
Before this one, I had a standard production 335 that was actually a
phenomenal playing instrument, but I found the neck a bit thin for my
tastes, so when I played a Historic with the big neck I swapped. The
standard 335 worked great. When I had that, I did not have a
Polytone, so I can't comment on that.
I also had for a while a walnut colored one from the 70's I think with
the trapeze tailpiece. Lot's of people rag on these versions, but
mine was very nice, and I used it extensively, though I was playing
more blues and rock when I owned it.
I think the only one I wouldn't suggest are the ones that come with
Dirty Fingers pickups - the ones I've played were super hot, and I
prefer lower output pickups with more detail.
As far as what year, I think Gibson is reasonably consistent these
days, but was less so in the late 80's and early 90's - I played a lot
of dogs from that era. There are great ones from the 70's, 80's, and
90's, and there are dogs. I think the necks on the production ones
were a little thicker in the late 80's than on the current one, so
your 1990 one might have that trait. (I had a couple late 80's ones
with big necks...)
"Dick Onstenk" <d.on...@chello.nl> wrote in message news:<9e8b917af1daecce3f8...@mygate.mailgate.org>...
Skip
"Dick Onstenk" <d.on...@chello.nl> wrote in message
news:9e8b917af1daecce3f8...@mygate.mailgate.org...
> GAS-attack. Saw a 1990 Gibson red ES 335 dot for sale.
Unfortunately, there is always a guitar for sale somewhere.
>
> At the Crow last Friday I listened to two guitarists that both played ES
> 335s and they sounded great.
Dick, all guitars sound great especially in the hands of a competent
player;-}
>
> Here are my questions to the omniscient RMMGJ forum:
>
> Was 1990 a good year for ES 335s? You sometimes hear certain years were
> not so good for Gibson.
> Do you guys feel the ES 335 is good for straight ahead bebop playing?
> Any experience with the combination ES 335/Polytone?
The 335 seems quite trebly compared to what my ears are accustomed to
these days. It's a good match with the polytone since they are so dark
sounding.
> Are there any preffereed ES 335 types for straight ahead Jazz playing?
The preferred type of ES335 for jazz is an L5. Have fun and good luck.
I still have my 335 (not a dot) but I've become partial to hollow
bodies for jazz.
Mike
Mike Ellenberger
Listen to some soundclips at
http://home.att.net/~grumpmeister/MikesJazzPage.html
> The preferred type of ES335 for jazz is an L5.
Maybe *your* preferred type is an L5; my 335 gets me a nice round sound
without feedback hassles.
-- Bob Russell
http://www.uncwil.edu/people/russellr
> Do you guys feel the ES 335 is good for straight ahead bebop playing?
> Any experience with the combination ES 335/Polytone?
> Are there any preffereed ES 335 types for straight ahead Jazz playing?
Dick:
I've used a 335 for jazz for about 17 years and have gotten what I feel are
very good sounds out of it. It all depends on what your idea of a good sound
is; if your model for good tone is the "like an acoustic but louder" ideal,
then a 335 won't do that. If a darker "set-in pickup" sound is what you
like, then a 335 can certainly do that.
Some great players have used 335-style guitars. Grant Green used a 330 quite
a bit. Emily Remler used a 345 or 355 (I forget which). Remo Palmier used a
355 in his later years, if I remember correctly. Mick Goodrick used an old
Epiphone Sheraton for his work with Gary Burton and others up into the '80s.
Mike DeMicco uses a 335-style guitar.
Bottom line is, what do you think? If you've heard guys sounding good on
335s, and if you sound good on a 335, who cares what anyone else thinks?
Feed your GAS! :)
"Bob Russell" <bobrus...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:B8E13162.1F88%bobrus...@hotmail.com...
Bob you're right about the feedback. I couldn't resist ribbing Dick a
little. I got my 335 in 1967 and still pull it out occasionally.
Mike
--
one of my students brought over an ES-345 over during a lesson, the gtr
itself needed a bit of work, we compared gtrs.. To me the neck had the same
feel and we could make both sound very similar despite the fact that I have
SD PAF's and the other came with stock Gibson p/u and both were strung up
differently. It would seem that this style of gtr is not as temperamental
to enviromental factors as my archtops.it even sounded good through the
polytone mini brute that we played on. I'd like to second what Bob has
commented here:
if your model for good tone is the "like an acoustic but louder" ideal,
> then a 335 won't do that. If a darker "set-in pickup" sound is what you
> like, then a 335 can certainly do that.
I think the 335 will sound great for some upcoming gigs that I will be doing
with an organ trio.
Skip
>
>
> I think the 335 will sound great for some upcoming gigs that I will be doing
> with an organ trio.
> Skip
I used to try to do the big archtop thing; I really did. I finally decided
that it just isn't practical for me. My 335 gets me a good sound without
woofiness or feedback at "noisy club" volumes. I've been using it for so
long that playing it always feels like jumping into a nice warm swimming
pool to me.
I grew up in the age of the solidbody. Hell, they've been around since the
late '30s and they've been mass-produced since the late '40s; they're hardly
"new-fangled" anymore. I use an ASAT Deluxe for most of what I do these
days, even jazz gigs. But the 335 seems to me to be a sensible compromise
between solid and hollow; even though the ASAT's doing a great job for me, I
still love my 335 and I still take it out on gigs pretty often.
Those archtops are beautiful guitars, though. I can certainly see why many
players get so attached to them. I've had a couple myself and will probably
have another one at some point. I think people get too worked up about it
sometimes. I once recorded two nights of a gig in the same place with the
same band. The first night, I used my 335; the second night, I used a
Heritage 575. When I listened to the recordings, I was surprised at how
little difference it really made. Sounded like me either way!
"Doug Allen" <imlo...@webtv.net> wrote in message
news:10435-3C...@storefull-2391.public.lawson.webtv.net...
The Heritage Millennium series guitars are hollow under the pickups, begin at
around $1200 & are only 1/4" larger than a LP.
Jay Wolfe
Bob Russell <bobrus...@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:<B8E28ADE.2069%bobrus...@hotmail.com>...
Gibson has been making 335's the last few years with the "1960 slim
taper" neck, which is very slender from the fingerboard to the back,
like a Les Paul Classic. So if you want a skinny neck, this might be
the way to go. I have never owned a real 335 because of the price, but
I had a Korean Sheraton for a while that I liked a lot. Great tone,
but with more sustain and less feedback. Also, the thin body and
larger-area top makes them more comfortable for me than a regular
fat-bodied archtop with a smaller-area top.
Another advantage: they are much easier to play in the high register
than either a regular jazzbox or a Les Paul.
Mark Smart
I don't see any reviews, yet, but the thing is relatively brand new,
is made of solid, carved woods and lists for about $4,500.
http://www.gibson.com/whatsnew/pressrelease/2002/jan15a.html
http://www.gibsoncustom.com/custom/cs336.html
http://www.elderly.com/new_instruments/items/CS336-FC.htm
Do you remember the movie "FireStarter", wherein a young girl had the
ability to start fires with her mind. Well, Mr. GasStarter, it seems
you have a similar ability using just your posts!
Greg
Yes, but are the Millenium's (Millenium, SAE, H-155 and H-158) shaped
like an LP and don't they use laminate woods (on the semi-hollows)?
These CS-336 is shaped like an ES-335 using solid, carved woods.
BTW, the H-158 is gorgeous!!!! Of any LP type, the only one I ever
really thought of was that one that custom job that Gibson had that
was semi-hollow, but now I see that Heritage has the same thing.
Greg
>
> Jay Wolfe
"Greg D" <oas...@cox.net> wrote in message
news:293e6062.02041...@posting.google.com...
I believe Emily Remler played a ES 330 but had the pick-ups changed to
humbuckers. It seems Tony Purrone used to play a ES- 335. Randy
Johnson plays a Gulid version of one. The Gibson 335s are great
guitars for the high register. At one time (in the 1970s) I knew
several very good Texas Jazz guitarists from the Austin area that were
using 335s, namely Fred Walter and Mitch Watkins (Mitch had an old
Dot). Fred still plays his. I think Steve Masakowski used to play one
and also believe that his custom 7 string is designed a bit after the
335. The scale length 24 3/4 is a very comfortable one. I have no big
problem going from my Byrdland to my 335, however the switch from a
Byrdland to my Bendetto seems drastic.
Byron Atkins
The Heritage H158 & SAE (same as 158, but with an acoustic pickup also) are the
only Millenniums with lam. body. The 155, Std. Ultra, DC, etc. are all solid
carved body guitars. The H158, BTW, is a terrific guitar with excellent tone.
I'm really impressed with it, and the price is same as the H535 & Prospect
models.
Jay Wolfe
There are many more great guitars produced in "bad model years" in the
70s than poor guitars. It's just that the percentage of poor guitars
is higher in those years than in other years. Likewise, there are
plenty of problem guitars made in the "good model years". The bottom
line is you have to examine the guitar and play it. Better yet, have
it appraised by a professional at a shop you trust. This is exactly
why I have never understood how anyone can buy a guitar over ebay,
especially an old expensive one.
To specifically answer your question, 90 was supposed to be a good
year for Gibson.
As for whether a 335 is appropriate for Be-Bop, I can't imagine why
you would use that guitar for straight ahead jazz. The 335 is great
for blues, and servicable enough for some jazz, but it won't get the
sound you are looking for. This guitar has humbucker pickups which
get a great "biting" sound. You want a single coil pickup for a
"nasally" sound. You don't need two pickups, a single pickup model
would be perfect for the type music you want. The 335 is semi hollow
body, and relatively thin. For the sound you want, you need a big fat
hollowbody arch top. The 335 is not particularly cheap, if you are
going to spend big bucks you might as well get the guitar you want.
Now, if you are playing bebop and other types of music, and want to do
it with one guitar, you will have to compromise, and then maybe the
335 is the best compromise, it depends on the other types of music you
are going to play.
Good luck.
Philip
The size of the 335 style guitar is a plus as well. There are smaller
versions of the semi-hollow that may be worth considering: See my web
site:
Peter Anagnostos