On Mon, 23 Sep 2013 12:54:43 -0700 (PDT), rpjazzguitar
<
rpjazz...@gmail.com> wrote:
>It's HSS. I never use the humbucker. Same for my genuine Fender. The
>bridge position just sounds harsh to me.
I've heard some good jazz guys use the bridge with reasonable
success, but that's not easy. Generally needs a very different touch.
>I did try a Lil 59 in the neck position of the Fender. It didn't
> really solve the problem (plinkiness up high) and I ended up feeling
> like I lost what I liked about the guitar -- that single coil sound
> in the middle of the neck. I put the stock pickup back in.
The Lil '59 is probably best-of-breed as buckerish-sounding
strat-sized pickups go. But the narrow magnetic aperture is never
going to sound like a wide bucker. And as you noticed, the magical
sounds that you can get from a single coil are not going to happen at
all.
Here are two ways to go:
Seymour Duncan makes a wide bucker called the "Stag Mag." It's a wide
bucker that's built much like two side-by-side single coils. The
coils in regular buckers are coupled via a common magnet structure, so
even when one of the coils is switched out, there is still a
horseshoe-shaped mag field. And normal buckers will not have as many
turns of wire on an individual coil as a normal strat pickup. The
Stag-Mag does. But the down-sides are that you'd have to rout for it.
And though the double coil mode will sound way more buckerish, it's
not going to sound exactly like a regular bucker. Those are the
tradeoffs.
The other route, which may work better: Keep the stock strat pickup.
Find a foot-switchable EQ pedal, preferably a 'parametric' rather than
'graphic' (Graphic has a bunch of sliders preset to different
frequencies.) Boost the range around 800 Hz, with very gradual
rolloff on both sides (A sharp 'High-Q' peak will sound too wah-ish.
Gradual peak will not) Roll the top off above 5KHz. That will give a
roughly bucker-like response curve. There will be way more body to
the sound, and rich punchy presence to single notes.
You can test-drive this first by hooking up a graphic EQ to verify the
concept, but I recommend going with a parametric once you've
established that it will work for you. Graphic EQ's are typically
heavy with components and have more odd phase shifts. Parametrics
should sound smoother, and you'll be able to fine-tune the frequency
and Q (sharpness) of the boosted range.
Let me know if you decide to do try that. FWIW, in my own amp
designs, I've used 800hz as a mid-boost frequency for doing just that.
So this is not just an arbitrary guess. But you may want to adjust to
your taste and to the amp that you're using. (Again, parametric would
be ideal)