Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

What's the difference between the Guild M-20 and the Guild M-120?

825 views
Skip to first unread message

Tom from Texas

unread,
Jul 22, 2012, 1:59:34 PM7/22/12
to
I'm getting the GAS attack for an all mahogany small-body. Had a '37 Martin 00-17 years ago and sold to some guy from England at a Dallas Guitar Show. My mistake. But anyway anyone got one of those Guild M's or know the differenc?

Tom (don't tell Sue) from Texas

hank alrich

unread,
Jul 22, 2012, 3:23:08 PM7/22/12
to

Tony Done

unread,
Jul 22, 2012, 3:59:17 PM7/22/12
to
On 23/07/2012 5:23 AM, hank alrich wrote:
> 100
>
> HTH!
>
Also $600. After a very quick bit of research, my guess is country of
origin. The advertised specs for the GAD M-20 and GAD M-120 seem to be
the same.

--
Tony Done

http://www.soundclick.com/bands/default.cfm?bandID=784456
http://www.flickr.com/photos/done_family/

Mouldytone

unread,
Jul 23, 2012, 5:35:33 AM7/23/12
to
Haven't played or seen an M-20/M-120 in person Tom although I'd love
to have the chance to play an original Hoboken built one. I certainly
love my two f-20 spruce topped Guilds but spruce ain't mahogany
obviously. Can't help with the differences between an M-20 and an
M-120 although I notice that the GAD M-120 has an "abalone" sound-hole
rosette which I`m pretty sure the GAD M-20 didn't have. If you're not
worried about a longer scale length I recon the Martin 00-15 would be
worth contemplating perhaps? More money that the Guild of course. The
Recording King ROS 616 (similar to a Martin 000-15S in specs) looks
interesting as well for a relatively low cost guitar. Have fun
looking.
Tony Moulder
PS Just for what it's worth if the new GAD M-120 has a similar nut
width to the original f-20/m-20s you'll have to like Very narrow nut
widths. Not a problem for me 'cause I've got smallish hands but I've
heard that everything is bigger in Texas so I'm not sure how they'd
suit you? : )

Hanger

unread,
Jul 24, 2012, 6:57:20 AM7/24/12
to

Cliff

unread,
Jul 24, 2012, 7:32:51 AM7/24/12
to

Tom from Texas

unread,
Jul 26, 2012, 4:28:40 PM7/26/12
to
On Tuesday, July 24, 2012 6:32:51 AM UTC-5, Cliff wrote:
> and this is nice too:
>
> http://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/1929-MARTIN-2-17-ACOUSTIC-GUITAR-/271018007689?pt=UK_Musical_Instruments_Guitars_CV&hash=item3f19ee9c89#ht_500wt_1202

Those look like dandies but I'm just looking for something cheaper. Of course, if you want to make up the difference in price with a donation to The Fund, that would be okay, too.

Tom from Texas

Tom from Texas

unread,
Jul 26, 2012, 4:26:09 PM7/26/12
to
On Monday, July 23, 2012 4:35:33 AM UTC-5, Mouldytone wrote:
> Haven't played or seen an M-20/M-120 in person Tom although I'd love
> to have the chance to play an original Hoboken built one. I certainly
> love my two f-20 spruce topped Guilds but spruce ain't mahogany
> obviously. Can't help with the differences between an M-20 and an
> M-120 although I notice that the GAD M-120 has an "abalone" sound-hole
> rosette which I`m pretty sure the GAD M-20 didn't have. If you're not
> worried about a longer scale length I recon the Martin 00-15 would be
> worth contemplating perhaps? More money that the Guild of course. The
> Recording King ROS 616 (similar to a Martin 000-15S in specs) looks
> interesting as well for a relatively low cost guitar. Have fun
> looking.
> Tony Moulder
> PS Just for what it's worth if the new GAD M-120 has a similar nut
> width to the original f-20/m-20s you'll have to like Very narrow nut
> widths. Not a problem for me 'cause I've got smallish hands but I've
> heard that everything is bigger in Texas so I'm not sure how they'd
> suit you? : )

Well, I am interested in the shorter scale length which is what drew me to the Guilds. I've got a Recording King RAJ-27 that Stan Milam couldn't get over how loud it is. He liked how it played, too.

Tom from Texas
0 new messages