What does everyone think? Is there a noticeable sound difference
between an adjustable and non-adjustable bridge?
For example, there the following "violin style" bridge is
available:
Welcome to mandolinbridge.com home of Tourtellotte Handcrafted
Instruments and the Tourtellotte Violin Style Mandolin Bridge.
at
http://home.bellsouth.net/p/s/community.dll?ep=16&groupid=63628&ck=
Thanks for any opinions on the above
Entfred
They do sound different, and seem to increase volume, but you need to define "better" <g>. You can make your own if you want, take a look at
http://dunwellguitar.com/SolidBridge/SolidBridge2.htm
and also Red's pages at
http://www.murphymethod.com/redbridge.html
Alan D.
Dunwell Guitar
1891 CR 68-J, MSR
Nederland, Co. 80466
Very interesting web page links you gave below.
better would mean
1. more volume
2. more sustain
3. better high, low, mid frequency responses. One or more of these
would be advantageous
4. less rattling with bridge adjustment screws? not sure if they are
rattling, but might be.
Would be cool to try this on an acoustic steel string guitar.
> Alan,
>
> Very interesting web page links you gave below.
>
> better would mean
> 1. more volume
> 2. more sustain
> 3. better high, low, mid frequency responses. One or more of these
> would be advantageous
> 4. less rattling with bridge adjustment screws? not sure if they are
> rattling, but might be.
>
> Would be cool to try this on an acoustic steel string guitar.
>
Ugggghhh, doesn't cross over that easy. SS bridge doesn't easily lend itself to being replaced with a standing bridge with addidional down pressure, higher neck back angle, etc.....starting to look like an arch top to me....
Alan D.
Dick Thaxter