What are your opinions on this guitar???
The sides and back are solid, but rather than rosewood (as the 'R' in
the model name suggests) i heard it uses some sort of similar wood that
is nevertheless NOT rosewood.
I found it to feel very solid but not be quite as "magical" as even the
less expensive Martin DM (laminated sides and back). This model, at
least, seems to lack the spongy sound character of the Martin.
On the other hand, the Taylor IS solid all the way around, which will
cost you a lot more on a Martin. However, am I getting too hung up on
solid vs. laminated (not top, of course) ?
So I guess I'm asking to hear what you Taylor devotees have to say about
the track record of their guitars, how well they age/break in, etc. Sell
me !
thanks,
don
George
Teflon Don wrote in message <34FB6B...@mindspring.com>...
>I am looking at buying a new Taylor D-420R or some such name (I know
>it's a 420R), ......[rest deleted]
--thom
You write...
"So I guess I'm asking to hear what you Taylor devotees have to say about
the track record of their guitars, how well they age/break in, etc. Sell
me !"
Sorry, go sell yourself. Don't be cheap, it'll cost you more in the end.
Just get yourself a solid wood Martin if that's what sounds and plays the best
for you.
The Taylors are great guitars that stand on their own terms. They deserved to
be bought for the way they play music, not because of some building
specification.
Same goes for the Martins.
Dave B.