Take it how you want to,
but in my honest opinion, Peavey Equipment Sucks!.
That's why I own it and stand by it myself!
Garret Lane at hp-corvallis,omx
I have to disagree here. I bought a used Peavey Combo 300 five years ago,
and it has been nothing if not the single most sturdy piece of equipment
I've ever owned. After being dropped, dragged, left overnight in a car
trunk in -30 degree weather, and generally being abused, it's *always*
worked as if it were brand new. For the last year, my band has used
it as our sole PA system -- in addition to my bass, we plug all of our
microphones into it via a small mixer. Even though the combination of the
vocals and the bass is enough to cause the speaker-protection limiter
to turn on continuously, the amp never overheats or breaks down, ever.
Sure, it doesn't sound all that great -- it's a solid-state Peavey,
after all. But it sounds decent enough, and it's far and away the most
dependable thing I've ever owned. Just enough volume, not too heavy,
it has casters so it's fairly portable, etc. etc. etc. For a bassist
who's just starting out -- as I was at the time I bought it -- I can't
imagine a better amplifier. Too bad Peavey doesn't make them anymore,
but their current line seems similar enough.
Don't get me wrong -- I wouldn't recommend this amp to any serious player
over something like a GK head and a decent cab. That's just as dependable
with much better sound. But for the money I paid ($350) and the level of
player I was at the time, I'm unbelievably happy I stumbled across this
amp.
--
Alex Basson Standard disclaimers apply.
apba...@midway.uchicago.edu I don't think for the U of C,
University of Chicago I just study here.
I'm not going to say Peavy is the best, but I've owned and gigged with
several PV amps for years (a KB100 and a KB300 both used for bass) and
have had NOTHING GO WRONG! The KB300 I stored in the trunk of my car
for months between sessions with it getting bounced around and
condensation on. I admit I was treating it as a disposable amp but the
thing is still functioning PERFECTLY!
I also toured with a PV 16 channel Mark III for 5 years and it
performed perfectly as well.
I can assure you MANY players have more than gotten their money's worth
out of PV equip.
--
("`-''-/").___..--''"`-._
`6_ 6 ) `-. ( ).`-.__.`)
(_Y_.)' ._ ) `._ `. ``-..-'
_..`--'_..-_/ /--'_.' ,'
(il),-'' (li),' ((!.-'
\
| ]
{<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<]----------------------------------------\
{<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<] ------ EL_Tigre -------- >
{<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<]----------------------------------------/
| ]
/
> In article <4l17di$o...@hpcvsnz.cv.hp.com>, Casey Larsen <caseyl> wrote:
> >Just a warning, I've had nothing but problems with Peavey
> >equipment. Always shorting out, blowing speakers, and all
> >other kinds of problems. I would not recommend any sort of
> >Peavey equipment to no one. I've been playing for over 10
> >years, and still have not seen any improvement on the quality
> >of their equipment. The only thing descent about their equipment
> >is their 5150 series stuff. The other stuff though is poorly
> >constructed and WILL eventually fall apart on you.
I too disagree with this and as a matter of fact it is totally the
opposite of my experience with Peavey equipment.
I started out with a old Standard head and 215 bottom about 16 yrs ago and I
still have them both. After I bought a MkIV head and 1810 bottom, my
band used the Standard head for our PA amp. We ran it at 2 ohms nite
after nite and all we did was put a fan on it to keep it cool. It has
never failed.
The MkIV head has had only 2 minor repairs in the 12 yrs that I have owned
it. It still works fine.
> I have to disagree here. I bought a used Peavey Combo 300 five years ago,
> and it has been nothing if not the single most sturdy piece of equipment
> I've ever owned. After being dropped, dragged, left overnight in a car
> trunk in -30 degree weather, and generally being abused, it's *always*
> worked as if it were brand new. For the last year, my band has used
Oh yea, my standard got hit by a car and worked fine at the gig that
nite! This is true, but I don't want to get into details ;-).
> Sure, it doesn't sound all that great -- it's a solid-state Peavey,
> after all. But it sounds decent enough, and it's far and away the most
> dependable thing I've ever owned. Just enough volume, not too heavy,
The older stuff, 70' and 80's, sounded ok, but the newer equipment sounds
pretty good; especially the cabinets. It would be nice it they would
stop with the big, bulky heads though and go with a steel shell instead
of the plywood.
I'm running a PV Bass Fex, CS-800, 410TX and 1/2 of my 215 cabinet and
it's been very reliable. Before I bought the 410, I tested all the big
name cabinets and the 410TX sounded (IHMO) just as good. If ya don't
believe me, check out the BP 4-10 shootout. I do plan to replace the CS-800
because it's so heavy and the 115 cab with another 410TX. I've recorded
direct to ADAT from the Bass Fex and there is 0 noise on my tracks. The
Bass Fex sounds much better than the heads (IHMO) but takes more time to
set up since it is a processor.
Anyway, before I start sounding like a Peavey commercial, this is my
experience with Peavey equipment. Everything I've owned from Peavey
has been nothing if reliable. There are other options
out there and like everything you need to try them before buying.
Later,
Darrin
Kevin, Peavey owner
Not: D-E-S-C-E-N-T. They mean different things.
Jeffrey
You used a double negative...
bfd
--
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Bill Detschel N2IPK AIX Systems Development
dets...@mhv.net (914) 246 9806 / 1147
Bass for Billy and the Lost Boys
http://lscftp.kgn.ibm.com/other/billd/billd.html
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Casey,
It is unfortunate that you have posted your recommendation by making such sweeping
generalizations. I do believe you when you say "I've had nothing but problems ...".
Your comments suggest, to me, that you have purchased Peavey equipment on more than one
occasion. If my understanding is correct, then why would you?
Peavey is a successful company. You've only to look as far as the used Peavey equipment lists
in magazines and stores. If the size of the listings and the variety of equipment listed is
truly an indicator of how bad the products are and have been, Peavey would have been out of
business long ago!
I'd be interested to know what Peavey equipment you've used, and in what situations,
and how you've used it. Honestly.
Regards,
Ern..
I can fully agree with this. I own my Peavy TNT130 12 years now. No,
it doesn't sound exceptional, but it always works. Although I have two
Trace Elliot's, I use the TNT still for small gigs and practice. There
were times we used it for keyboard and voice amp (with a Boss
BX6-mixer, like the way Alex did).
In the years 1988 / '91 I had a stack of two TNT130's. Now and then I
regret to have sold the second one.
I must say, the TNT150 and 160 version have never fascinated me. But I
am sure there are enough content user of that ones.
Well, after all those twelve years I love my Peavy still.
Gr.,
---------------------
Hans Man in 't Veld
hansman...@pi.net
---------------------
I have to disagree with this. I've bee using *Peavey Equipment* for
over 10 years, a 1x15 cabinet followed by a TNT 130. Both have been
utterly reliable.
The sound they produce isn't 'great' but it is not a bad sound. I
recently replaced the Peavey not through lack of reliability but because
the SWR Workingman's 15 is much lighter and sounds a whole lot 'better'
to my 1996 ears. I fully expect the Peavey to be still going strong in
another 7 years.
>The other stuff though is poorly
>constructed and WILL eventually fall apart on you.
Come on. Peavey gear is built like _tanks_ and weighs like it.
>Take it how you want to, but in my honest opinion, Peavey Equipment Sucks!.
Most of the Peavey range is good, honest, middle of the road equipment
and it just keeps on going - some of the high end stuff is apparently
extremely good.
The main complaint about Peavey gear is not that it sounds/is bad, but
that it is uninspiring.
--
Derek Tearne. -- http://webservices.comp.vuw.ac.nz/artsLink/ManyHands/
Some of the more environmentally aware dinosaurs were worried about the
consequences of an accident with the new Iridium enriched fusion reactor.
"If it goes off only the cockroaches and mammals will survive..." they said.
On the other hand, I'm selling my bass cabinet because it can't handle
quite enough power.
Jeff
__ _ Jeff MacDonald Mailstop 1822
/_/\/\ 3307 3rd Ave W
\_\ / jav...@spu.edu Seattle, WA 98119-1997
/_/ \
\_\/\ \ WWW: http://paul.spu.edu/~javert
\_\/
"Education is not filling a bucket, but lighting a fire."
-William Butler Yeats
Obviously I'm outnumbered here on my post. I guess that all of you
just haven't been as unlucky as I have with my equipment. I'll tell
you what I have. I'm am currently using a Peavey Mark VI bass head,
with a Peavey 4-10TX cabinet, and a Peavey 1-15TX cabinet. I have
mostly had problems with the 1-15TX cabinet. I've had to replace
the speaker basket on it 3 times!. My head has shorts in the input
jacks, and I've only had it for about 2 years. I also had a Peavey
Basic 60 before, that was O.K., until it had problems too. I think
that most of my problem is that I play in a Heavy Metal band. I don't
think that Peavey equipment was made to take that kind of abuse.
I was a little bit too eager to get any kind of stack, and did not go shopping
very well. The guy at the music store told me that this is all I would
need for that kind of music. I look back now, and think he was just trying
to make a buck off me. So now I'm currently looking for something that can
better suit my needs. I didn't mean to start such flame war with everyone,
I guess I should of worded my subject a little different. Thanks for all of
your input on this subject.
Casey Larsen.
cas...@hpcvjf20.cv.hp.com
Scott
>Just a warning, I've had nothing but problems with Peavey
>equipment. Always shorting out, blowing speakers, and all
>other kinds of problems. I would not recommend any sort of
>Peavey equipment to no one. I've been playing for over 10
>years, and still have not seen any improvement on the quality
>of their equipment. The only thing descent about their equipment
>is their 5150 series stuff. The other stuff though is poorly
>constructed and WILL eventually fall apart on you.
>Take it how you want to,
Moondog says: My 9 year old TNT130 has been good to me( even when I vomited on
it during a gig.
From Cape Town "that which does not kill me better run like hell"
<snip>
>>but in my honest opinion, Peavey Equipment Sucks!.
>>
>
<snip some more>
>I can assure you MANY players have more than gotten their money's worth
>out of PV equip.
>--
/
--
I am one of those players. I still have a mid 70's Festable Series 800 amp
that I used to power mains and it still works great (now it is a backup amp
because I need more power now but if I need it I know it will do the job).
I had a TKO 65 that was used just about everyday for 3 years and it never
failed. Gigged with it in places that it was much too small (the DDT
compression saved it many times I am sure). I did have a Bandit 112 that after
4 years of being used as a guitar amp and a monitor for our drummer (when I
turned to bass) failed with a bad solder joint ($40 repair with labor). A
bass playing friend had the same problem on a 2 year old TNT115. Both of
these amps have been moved around alot.
Recently I lent my Peavey speaker'ed rig to a bassist who's less than one year
old Trace Elloit(sp?) rig failed him and I just got back my Laney VC30 guitar
amp (< 1 year old) after it failed to switch channels and had major preamp
rework. That has been my experience anyway.
##################################################################
# John Deal - jd...@xyplex.com (508) 952-4837 #
##################################################################
>I think that most of my problem is that I play in a Heavy Metal band. I don't
>think that Peavey equipment was made to take that kind of abuse.
What you're saying sounds quite strange to me, because I thought
that Peavey gear would be quite good for violent music : we own here a
Peavey TNT 160 combo on which several bands of heavy-metal, trash play
often, and it is unbreakable (thanks to the indluded limiter, I
suppose).
I myself don't like Peavey amps, but because of the sound they
produce, altough I think it's not so bad for big rock (not usually my
style of playing) . I own a Hartke combo, and I believe it is easier
to damage the speaker (a 15"). Of course, I prefer its sound, but
sometimes when I play loud, I check the speaker's excursion.
BTW, when you write you had to change your speaker's basket,
do you realy mean the metal-part ? Maybe did I not well understand ?
(I don't know all the technical vocabulary in english).
G.Racinet
>that most of my problem is that I play in a Heavy Metal band. I don't
>think that Peavey equipment was made to take that kind of abuse.
Hmmm. Could be you're just unlucky. I abuse my Combo 210TX at every
gig, and it works like a dream. I've heard reports of people spilling whole
beers into their Peavey equipment, and it works just fine after it dries out.
Peavey's supposed to be some of the more durable equipment out there.
----
Mike Waldron ba...@cs.montana.edu 49 20 6C 6F 76 65 20 4A 65 73 75 73 21
Bride-Whiteheart-King's X-Extreme-Rush-and, of course. . .
"Never have I seen the righteous forsaken/Never have I seen their children out
begging/Never have I seen one of them slip through Your hands." -Steve Taylor
Sub Sonic
Casey Larsen
Really like my Hartke,
Frank Morales
Bad Dog
The sound even stopped my from buying a couple Basses. The shop have a
fender hollow Precision and Gibson Victory. But all I could try them
through was Peavy amps, and they sounded so bad i didn't buy either.
Don
Amen!
Don
Was the original poster hired by Peavy by any chance? Where's the
TE/H&K/wtf salesperson saying that the TE/H&K/wtf equpment sucked,
provocating all those replies of happy customers?
This reminds me of comp.sys.mac.programmers.codewarrior where some
Symantec/Metrowerks-representative starts asking "which compiler should I
use?" everytime the ever-lasting "my IDE (that's another word for Penis)
is bigger than yours" thread threatens to come to an end... oh mah gawd...
FDj
PS: Is that new Ibanez with the plexi-glass cover any worth? ;)
--
Florian Dejako, IRC: FDj on #macdev
private: f...@muc.de, work: f...@miles.de
> In article <4lgm70$k...@hpcvsnz.cv.hp.com>, Casey Larsen <caseyl> wrote:
> >Well Fellow Bassists,
> >
>
> >that most of my problem is that I play in a Heavy Metal band. I don't
> >think that Peavey equipment was made to take that kind of abuse.
>
> Hmmm. Could be you're just unlucky. I abuse my Combo 210TX at every
> gig, and it works like a dream. I've heard reports of people spilling whole
> beers into their Peavey equipment, and it works just fine after it dries out.
> Peavey's supposed to be some of the more durable equipment out there.
>
> ----
> Mike Waldron ba...@cs.montana.edu 49 20 6C 6F 76 65 20 4A 65 73 75 73 2
> Bride-Whiteheart-King's X-Extreme-Rush-and, of course. . .
> "Never have I seen the righteous forsaken/Never have I seen their children ou
> begging/Never have I seen one of them slip through Your hands." -Steve Taylo
>
>
welp, i have a peavy fury bass, and a peavy tko 65 amp (compared to
some of the stuff you guys talk about my amps kinda nothin') but
anyways i belive that peavys are pretty tough, because i droped my amp
down the stairs (whoops!!) and nothing even happened to it, and it
sounds sweet too!
my opinion
adam
I will have to concur here. I have been playing a Peavey T-40 bass for
the past 5 years. I practice with it, play gigs with it and record with it.
I also have been playing Peavey amps. I play through a Peavey Mark III head
a Peavey 1810 cab.I also use a Peavey 210TX Combo and a Peavey Basic60
practice amp. I just put money down on a Peavey Forum 5 string bass.
I have NEVER had any problems with any of my Peavey equipment. Well,
one problem. A couple of years ago I had to have the jack on my T-40
replaced because the connections were going bad... but this is a
15 or 20 year old bass.. and has a lot of miles on it. Personally
I find this pretty damned reasonable.
For the money I think Peavey makes really decent bass equipment. It's
inexpensive and reliable.
Just my opinoin.
Later,
Dan Perkins
>Just my opinoin.
>Later,
>Dan Perkins
i gotta agree too, i have a peavy 5-string, a peavy 4-string
fretless, and also a 4x10 cabinet, an 18 cabinet, and a 2x15 cabinet.
if anyone had told me 5 years ago that i would be running all this
peavy stuff, i would have laughed at them. now, i reccomend it. i
play the hell out of my stuff, and i get compliments on the sound
regularly. and the stuff never breaks (knock on wood)...
also, like mr. perkins, this is just my opinion....
later,
dan eschete
Umm... just because a manufacturer makes a lot of student instruments
doesn't mean that everything they make is geared twords students. Have
you seen Peavey's Brian Bromberg model? Its gorgeous... graphite neck,
flamed maple top, piezoelectric pickup, a very flexible active
circuit... a very impressive and extremely good sounding and easy to
play instrument...
--
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Barry J. Bocaner _________/|
<ba...@igc.net> (___|_____\|__________
_|__________)-
"If you listen to a piece of classical music it's a piece of music, but if
you listen to a pop song from 1954 it sounds like a pop song from 1954.
How much of the music that's being written today will be worth listening
to in ten years, except for nostalgia?" -Geddy Lee
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
: I have NEVER had any problems with any of my Peavey equipment. Well,
: one problem. A couple of years ago I had to have the jack on my T-40
: replaced because the connections were going bad... but this is a
: 15 or 20 year old bass.. and has a lot of miles on it. Personally
: I find this pretty damned reasonable.
: For the money I think Peavey makes really decent bass equipment. It's
: inexpensive and reliable.
: Just my opinoin.
Just to be difficult...
Over the years I've walked into a number of music stores and on several
occasions I've been handed a variety of models of Peavey basses. It
usually takes about five minutes before I insist on a bass I can get a
good tone out of. I've yet to find one I liked the sound of or the feel
of. It would be tempting to say that they were all set up badly by
store personell who wanted to sell me a more expensive instrument, but
the thing is, it wasn't always the same store or the same people and in
a couple of cases they were pushing Peavey pretty hard.
As far as the rest of the Peavey equipment I've encountered, my
experiences have been pretty mixed. It tends to be adequate equipment,
but not excellent or outstanding. If it doesn't break right away, it
generally lasts forever. But it's mediocre for as long as it lasts.
Bang for buck, it's pretty good. But I find it's worth the extra bucks
to get more bang from higher quality equipment.
Also, just an opinion.
--
--------------------------------------------------------
Michael Riehle mri...@netcom.com
CIS: 76450,26 michael...@peoplsoft.com
#include <std.disclaimer>
--------------------------------------------------------