Order your DVDs, and they arrive via mail in 2-4 days. Keep
the DVDs for full 7 days. When you are finished, use the
pre-addressed, pre-paid mailer, and drop them back in the
mail. Â
Recently Added DVDs:-
Jeans
Chachi 420
Satya
Soldier
Kareeb
An Evening In Paris
Bade Miya Chote Miya
Jhooth Bole Kauwa Kate
Rental fees :Â
Rent your first two DVDs for $2.96 each . Add additional
titles to the same order for just $1.96 each, up to maximum
of 4 DVDs per order . You can reserve DVDs in advance by
emailing us at var...@indiaweekly.com . You can also
purchase new DVDs from our catalog at a low price of $20.59
with NO SALES TAX. This is a limited time promotional
offer.Â
3 Night Rental:Â
Rent your first two DVDs for $1.99 each and add additional
titles to the same order for just $1.49 each, up to maximum
of 4 DVDs per order.Â
Shipping and handling :Â
For rentals pay just $1.99 shipping and handling for the
first DVD and 99 cents for each additional DVD included in
the same orde. If you buy DVDs from our catalog, you pay
shipping & handling of $1.39 per DVD
The following DVDs are recommended - nearly all have English
subtitles
1990s - Khalnayak . Mohra , Soldier , Kuch kuch hota hai ,
Hum apke hain kaun, Border
1980s -Muqaddur ka skindar ..
1960s -Khandan
check with www.indiaplaza.com
Mo <10033...@compuserve.com> wrote in message ...
You actually like pan & scan DVDs?? Man, the reason I bought a DVD player
in the first place was to watch WIDESCREEN movies, so I can see the whole
picture as seen in the theaters. Current TVs use a 1.33:1 or Academy ratio.
TVs adapted this type of screen because this was the same ratio used in
theaters when television was invented in the 1930s. However, in a ploy to
attract viewers back to theaters, filmmakers changed the ratio to ones
larger than 1.33:1 for a better movie viewing experience. With the advent
of the VCR.....movies were being released for mass market consumption.
However, the ratio used for theatrical motion pictures was different than
what was used on TV. Thus, two processes were used to accomodate this
difference. The first is pan and scan, a hideous process that butchers the
filmmaker's vision for the film. Pan and Scan is acceptable for comedies,
but unacceptable for action and epic films. You are missing a huge chunk of
the picture....thus the person responsible for the transfer pans the
negative to show the missing info...again butchering the director's work.
Hence, the widescreen process was developed. Basically, this changes the
ratio of your TV screen to the theatrical ratio through the use of black
bars. Granted, this looks pretty bad, esp on a small TV screen, but you see
the WHOLE picture, as seen in the movie theaters. The best example for the
need for widescreen has to be the movie Ben Hur. Filmed in 70mm glory using
a MAMMOTH 2.76:1 ratio, this movie looks terrible in its pan and scan
incarnation. To cram a 2.76:1 movie onto a 1.33:1 screen.....don't get me
started. Even in the pan and scan versions, the famous chariot scene is
presented in WIDESCREEN so that we can see this incredible sequence in all
its glory.
It took me 3 years to track down a widescreen version of one of my
favorite all-time movies, Ageepath, and it was like I was watching a
different film. I could see all the incredible camera, all the participants
in a dialogue onscreen etc.
I hope that Indian DVD makes take this into consideration and offer
either both PS and WS versions on the same DVD or WS only. Dharam-Veer was
released in 1977 in 70mm glory. Seeing it at home in anything but
widescreen is a travesty.
-BH
: You actually like pan & scan DVDs?? Man, the reason I bought a DVD player
: in the first place was to watch WIDESCREEN movies, so I can see the whole
: picture as seen in the theaters. Current TVs use a 1.33:1 or Academy ratio.
: TVs adapted this type of screen because this was the same ratio used in
: theaters when television was invented in the 1930s. However, in a ploy to
: attract viewers back to theaters, filmmakers changed the ratio to ones
: larger than 1.33:1 for a better movie viewing experience. With the advent
: of the VCR.....movies were being released for mass market consumption.
: However, the ratio used for theatrical motion pictures was different than
: what was used on TV. Thus, two processes were used to accomodate this
: difference. The first is pan and scan, a hideous process that butchers the
: filmmaker's vision for the film. Pan and Scan is acceptable for comedies,
: but unacceptable for action and epic films. You are missing a huge chunk of
: the picture....thus the person responsible for the transfer pans the
: negative to show the missing info...again butchering the director's work.
: Hence, the widescreen process was developed. Basically, this changes the
: ratio of your TV screen to the theatrical ratio through the use of black
: bars. Granted, this looks pretty bad, esp on a small TV screen, but you see
: the WHOLE picture, as seen in the movie theaters. The best example for the
: need for widescreen has to be the movie Ben Hur. Filmed in 70mm glory using
: a MAMMOTH 2.76:1 ratio, this movie looks terrible in its pan and scan
: incarnation. To cram a 2.76:1 movie onto a 1.33:1 screen.....don't get me
: started. Even in the pan and scan versions, the famous chariot scene is
: presented in WIDESCREEN so that we can see this incredible sequence in all
: its glory.
Good post. I think all movies should be seen in widescreen, comedies or
otherwise. Has Ben Hur been released on DVD yet?
: It took me 3 years to track down a widescreen version of one of my
: favorite all-time movies, Ageepath, and it was like I was watching a
: different film. I could see all the incredible camera, all the participants
: in a dialogue onscreen etc.
You have the widescreen version of Agneepath? Where did you get it? I
absolutely love the movie. A suberbly made movie played to perfection by
Amitabh Bachan. His protrayal of the anti-hero was superb. I hope they
release a DVD on it soon.
: I hope that Indian DVD makes take this into consideration and offer
: either both PS and WS versions on the same DVD or WS only. Dharam-Veer was
: released in 1977 in 70mm glory. Seeing it at home in anything but
: widescreen is a travesty.
Agreed.
--
Niraj Agarwalla -- ni...@shore.net -- http://www.shore.net/~niraj
I'll be first one to buy a Widescreen version of Agneepath on DVD. I picked
up a widescreen version of Agneepath in Toronto...it came in a plastic case
and was manufactured by Tridev video (I think). One problem.....it's the
version of Agneepath where Amitabh uses his normal voice...instead of that
cool raspy voice he used in the orignal version. This second version came
out a week after the original.....due to the fact the Indian public didn't
appreciate his raspy voice in the movie....I personally like the original
version better. The second version has a different background score
too....it borrows heavily from Scarface.
-BH
Another feature is 'songs audio' option from the menu . This
displays a still picture of a song and plays the music and
with the chapter search button takes you to the next button.
Unfortunately the disc does not have a repeat function. The
songs however can be recorded on to tape -and sound much
clearer than prerecorded tapes and the 'songs audio' option
means that thing like cars stopping etc . that you hear in
movies during songs are eliminated .
Another option is the 'cast menu' where each actor/actress
has her name and still picture.
Bollywood is just out to entertain and I dont think they
ever employ any history consultants and this movie
cheerfully mixes Roman gladiator fights , French sword
fights , Spanish Galleons with heavy guns , Greek male
miniskirts , Royal roman purple curtains , gypsy dances (
Neetu Singh is excellent as the fun loving gypsy belle) ,
intelligent hawks , ancient Indian customs . Some of the
gory fights have been cut a bit and I am not sure why .
The Queen's evil brother switches his own son for the Kings
and throughout treats the King's son with great cruelty ,
choice swear words .. The joke is that his wife switched
them back while he was sleeping..
This movie
Only in a few of the Superdigital ones will you find
picture quality as good as this one . A South Indian Tamil
film dubbed into Hindi . It was a blockbuster in the south
but didnt do well in the North . Nowadays they play safe and
remake the movie in Hindi again - eg Judaii , Hum apke dil .
The songs are beautifully picturised . One shows Ash - real
life Miss World - in the costumes of the host country
dancing on top of the Great Wall of China, Eiffel Tower ,
Leaning Tower and the Pyramids . Because the humans are next
to the structures you really get an idea of the scale of
these structures.
Its a story of twins who must marry twin girls , so this one
girl who loves one of the boys pretends she is her own twin
to woo the other boy until they ask her to do a dance with
her twin . She gets a friend to do a 3D computer model and
dances with that one .Of course the guys are too drunk to
notice the image passing through the real girl and then the
file gets corrupted and the image becomes a skeleton and the
skeleton does a great Indian classical dance - copied from
Sinbad obviously .
A real pity they didnt include the Tamil sound track . This
song 'Dhak tin tin' sounded absolutely superb when sung in
Tamil on Zee TV's Saregama show . Its worth getting the
Tamil version of the DVD -there are only two movies on sale
at indiaplaza.com and this is not one of them..
Aap Aye Bahar Ai ? 1960 -Rajinder Kumar , Sadhana
No subtitles . WEG
Picture quality -excellent (considering the age)
Sound -very good
Can one master the sound at too high a volume ? This one is
very loud . I think DEI has the most melodious sound so far
Some past reviews on Ramli
SATYA- DEI/EROS-1998, 5.1 dolby digital,english
subtitles,175 minutes.
The latest dvd release from DEI/EROS is Ram Gopal Verma's
critically acclaimed crime drama "Satya" and it is given a
first-class treatment which is, of late, becoming
commonplace from DEI/EROS.
Giving the dvd consumer more than a no-frills product, which
companies like Superdigital and WEG have been dumping on the
consumer, is one sure way to attract and keep new customers.
For instance, where else can you get such cool main menu
graphics like they give you in the "Satya" dvd. Press DVD
menu and you get an image of "Satya" star J.D.Chakravarthy
pointing a gun straight at you. Select an option and you
hear the sound of 3 gunshots followed by smoke oozing out
the gun barrel and a jigsaw puzzle dismantling of the image
as you head to your destination. Subtitles, song menu,
chapter index, play movie, upcoming dvd releases, and
details of currently available dvd releases are available at
your fingertips.
Set in Mumbai, this is the story of Satya (Chakravorty) who
comes to the big city to earn a living but is soon drawn
into the Mumbai underworld. He eventually meets and falls in
love with Vidya (Urmilla Matondkar, excellent in a small
role) which complicates the life he has been living and what
he hopes for their future. "Satya" is a violent and
realistic crime drama with excellent perfomances by all.
Expertly directed by Verma, one of bollywood's most
inventive directors.
The video picture is excellent, on par with DEI/EROS
superbly done "Soldier." The 5.1 audio is in a word-
sensational. During a violent gun battle with police,
bullets fly from speaker to speaker, from front to back and
side to side. It was so realistic I almost felt like ducking
for cover, myself. The backgrond music by Vishal is
stirring, and the songs are melodious and memorable.
Especially "Gholi Mar", "Sapne Mein," and "Baadlon Se." Lata
Mangeshkar and the other singers excel.
A must-have dvd. "Satya" is not yet available at most
outlets, but can be purchased directly from DEI at:
www.indianfilmsdvd.com ..Irwin Mann ( in fact Satya is now
availble from www.indiaplaza.com , www.scan.co.uk and
others)
Satya
Starring: Urmila Matondkar and introducing Chakravarthy
Director: Ram Gopal Varma Music: Vishal
SATYA is a truly excellent, completely atypical Indian film.
It's a gangster movie (a "triad" movie if you will) with the
values of an art movie. The story is gripping, the
photography and acting are great, the setting is realistic,
and unlike most Indian films, the action scenes are done
well.
Non-Hindi speakers will be able to appreciate the visual and
musical aspects of the film, but will be frustrated at not
being able to understand the dialogue, even though the
overall story is still comprehensible. I really hope this
movie gets subtitled and released in American theatres.
Ironically, I think SATYA will appeal more to western
audiences than to Indian ones.
Although the soundtrack album is very good, the movie
actually has very little singing and dancing in it. It's
mostly a straight western-style drama, with the music played
in the background. In the two lone dance numbers, the
director seems to deliberately flaunt Indian film
conventions. In one number, instead of good-looking actors
in gorgeous costumes dancing to elaborate choreography, we
get scruffy, undershirted gangsters goofing around in a bar.
In both numbers, the mouth-to-voice matching is very
careless so that men end up mouthing to women's voices,
individuals mouth to choruses, etc. -- as if to say "this is
all very silly, you know." I got the feeling the director
wanted to make a non-musical, but was required to put in
dance numbers by commercial forces.
Also non-standard is that the intermission comes about 2
hours into the film and the second part only runs for a
half-hour or so. Ram Gopal Varma also directed the films
SHIVA, DROHI, RAAT, RANGEELA, DAUD and the upcoming KAUN. If
SATYA is any indication, they should all be worth checking
out.
Unsubtitled: Worth seeing, but frustrating Subtitled: Highly
recommended Rave reviews (which include plot summaries):
http://www.indiabollywood.com/filmreview/satya.htm
http://www.planetbollywood.com/Film/satya.html
http://www.indiaworld.co.in/open/rec/films/new.html
http://www.indolink.com/bollywood/mvierevs.html
And one not-rave, but which still agrees it's excellently
made: http://www.indiamovies.com/darmi.htm
(I don't agree with the criticisms in this review. I think
the reviewer just didn't get it, but it may echo the
feelings of the average Indian filmgoer.)..Kent Johnson
Superbly crafted, Well directed, Powerfully enacted - that
in short is Satya. There is hardly a dull moment, even
though the movie runs for almost 3 hours. Without any
frills, the action starts straightaway from the first frame.
No longdrawn flashbacks or detailed background here, as we
follow Chakri's non-descript entry into city, his skirmishes
with the local don's and gradual entry into the underworld.
The plot sounds familiar, but lot of thought and heart seems
to have gone into scripting Satya. The effort shows!
But, without taking away any credit from Ramu (director),
Satya is engaging becoz of ManojBajpai's Outstanding
performance. as the local underworld don (character which is
rumoured to have traces of ArunGawli). The last time a new
actor gave such a mesmerising performance on his debut was
NanaPatekar and that was ages ago. All the time, you feel
that this guy is living the role , rather than acting it. It
bestows the movie with credibility and raises it above the
usual underworld yarn.
Another unique aspect of Satya is the dialogues. It's filled
with punch and has those gags which lightens up a tense
scene. Check out for the scene, when Manoj's gang goes to
collect "Hafta"- where the sidekick cracks a joke which
almost puts u in a light mood, but a violent ambush
brutually cuts it short. Or the scene which has Manoj
torturing a rival gang member,whereas the gang members
around manoj casually joke and rag chakri about Urmila,
Gotta mention about the "Chu*ya" dialogues - wondering how
it got past the censors! No doubt, it's a commonly used
slang and gives the interaction between characters a
"natural" look, but what did Ramu offer to get it past the
fickle censorboard?
Satya scores on the technical aspects too. Photography is
good and jells well with the different moods of the movie.
Ramu got a Cinematographer from outside to get a "outsider
perspective" of Bombay. There isn't too much experimentation
- lighting etc.
Editing is another highlight. As i mentioned before, there
is hardly a dull moment, except for the short period where
two songs follows each other in rapid succession. Songs are
OK. I liked the Background score better. It's a pity that
Background music is hardly given any importance in our
films, whereas it has a great role in enhancing the affect
of a scene. Satya has a good Bg score.
On to the acting credits. We see a different Urmila here. A
sariclad, demure character. No, there are no "dream scenes
sneaked in to show her dancing Rangeela style" :-) . She has
given a decent performance. Chakri barely manages to scrape
thru as Satya. He lacks the screen presence or personality
to enact "sunnydeol" type of role.
But, the director has used him Smartly; he hardly speaks in
the movie (must be some record) and most of the scenes are
(deliberately?) dominated by Manoj or Urmila, whenever they
are around. In effect, Ramu seems to have converted a major
liability into an asset, by making Chakri a passive pivot
around whom the film revolves.
A movie worth a look; Considering the drought of engaging
movies around, it is Definitely worth a visit.
cheers.. raj
A very young looking , very beautiful and very short skirted
Urmilla - who would think it was the same woman in Satya !
?
How do people watch a film they have never seen before on
DVD ? I tend to watch all the songs and then bits of the
movie over a couple of days . The only disadvantage is that
you get a good idea of the ending before the start. Not that
it matters too much . The songs , dances , dialog , dresses
, background props are really what makes these movies so
entertaining .
This film is about the making of a Bollywood movie - a
comedy about what the producer and director have to go
through with actresses and their mothers .
Pity it is not subtitled by the new boys in town - Media
Digital . There is slight color bleed in the scenes with
high light levels but otherwise its just about perfect. I
prefer Anu Malik's music above that of ARR but the songs in
this one are fairly good and beautifully picturized and I
may add a comment after having seen the rest of the move..
A very young looking , very beautiful and very short skirted
Urmilla - who would think it was the same woman in Satya !
?
How do people watch a film they have never seen before on
DVD ? I tend to watch all the songs and then bits of the
movie over a couple of days . The only disadvantage is that
you get a good idea of the ending before the start. Not that
it matters too much . The songs , dances , dialog , dresses
, background props are really what makes these movies so
entertaining .
This film is about the making of a Bollywood movie - a
comedy about what the producer and director have to go
through with actresses and their mothers .
Pity it is not subtitled by the new boys in town - Media
Digital . There is slight color bleed in the scenes with
high light levels but otherwise its just about perfect.
If they could subtilte the dialog and all the songs
accurately as was done in Sikander ka Muqaddar they would
have huge sales from video stores and libraries.
I would suggest subtitling in English , Hindi ,Urdu , Arabic
and Spanish . It probably costs only a few hundred dollars
to get all those done and expand the potential market a
hundredfold..
: Oh yes ? Name the songs that you remember , know the lyrics of and
: stay humming in your head . You will find they are all non ARR songs.
: Anu Malik doesnt write the lyrics . ARR just copies western composers
: and his music has a very monotonus beat .
Well everyone has been going crazy over the DIL SE tune "Chaiyya Chaiyya"
recently. Plus he did do the soundtracks for both ROJA and BOMBAY. Have
you listened to the theme of BOMBAY yet? It is magnficient. You always complain
about the lack of orchestration in Indian film music, you shoud listen to the
BOMBAY theme.
I think you are being rather unfair to ARR by saying that he "just
copies western composers". It is true that ARR incorporates Western music
to his songs, but he does it so well. He does it much better than other
music directors who either just lift entire songs, or mix it in such a way
that it becomes a bit obtuse. I personally think of him as a crafsman of
sort. He subtly mixes Western beats with Indian film music. It works well,
in my opinion.
p.s.
Did he do the music for HUM SE MUQABALA?
--
>I cannot believe that you prefer Anu Malik over AR Rahman. All Anu Mailk
>ever does is copy songs and he is very un original. He is so horrible, ie
>in HADMRH "bill and monica went up the hill"? That is plain stupid. AR
>Rahman on the other hand is very original and introduced new type of music
>to Bollywood. AR Rahman is simply the best in Bollywood, even in INdia. I
>cannot believe that you said ANU MALIK is better than him... I am in total
>shock!
I hate anu Malik, i met that dude so many times, and he always thinks
hes some kind of western stud, he wears a dumb jamaican hat that dont
even suit him, he relly irritates me, and his voice suxks, he should
quit singing and stick to making music,..i mean anu has made some good
music but still he is really annoying.
AR rahman is the man!!! he rules, especially after vande mataram, he
is mantaining his number 1 position!
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Shaz's updated homepage is at http://user.online.be/sordenn
(Desiconnection.ml.org is gone...sorry!)
Shefreni Shakur-'You can kill a revolutionary but you can not kill a revolution.'
ICQ Account UIN #3508351 Nickname- Warren Ji
WEED tho KACHI magar PAAN tho AACHI!
Will Durant: "India was the mother of our race and Sanskrit the mother of Europe's languages. She was the mother of our philosophy, mother through the Arabs, of much of our mathematics, mother through Buddha, of the ideals embodied in Christianity, mother through village communities of self-government and democracy. Mother India is in many ways the mother of us all."
® All Rights Reserved 1999
© Shaz Corporation.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Well i am musician myself...... and i think ARR songs r much better and they r MUCH
> MUCH more harder to compose that the Anu stuff... ARR r much catchy.... Chiyya
> chaiyaa is way has WAY Different beat pattern than any other Bollywood song... on
> the other hand look at Anu's Janam Samja Karo..... it's pure techno krap...... all
> simple LOOPS and Samples from western beats.... nothing original even i can do at
> home with my computer... and the English lyrics on that song...... give me a
> break.....
I don't know about you, but I cringe whenever I heard English lyrics in
Indian film music. It just doesn't come out right. The heavily-accented
English sounds atrocious. Just imagine if a Western artists tried to
sing a Hindi song, I think the result would be the same.
--
Niraj Agarwalla -- ni...@shore.net -- http://www.shore.net/~niraj
GO RED SOX!!!!
If it sounds so "alien to subcontinental brains" then why is ARR so
popular in India? I think you have been living in the UK too long.
Who can tell me if Khal Nyaak is available in any format in this country I
fell in love with this soundtrack whilst in India ( especially chole ke
peche ka hey, excuse my spelling) whenever i hear bollywood music i think
of being woken up on a bus with this song blaring out) and my audio tape is
wearing a bit thin.
(awaiting the flames for posting totally of subject in a dvd NG)
--
Gareth Bill - Mid Wales - UK
Hasnat Mosharraf wrote in message <36EA051B...@hotmail.com>...
>Well i am musician myself...... and i think ARR songs r much better and
they r MUCH
>MUCH more harder to compose that the Anu stuff... ARR r much catchy....
Chiyya
>chaiyaa is way has WAY Different beat pattern than any other Bollywood
song... on
>the other hand look at Anu's Janam Samja Karo..... it's pure techno
krap...... all
>simple LOOPS and Samples from western beats.... nothing original even i can
do at
>home with my computer... and the English lyrics on that song...... give me
a
>break.....
>
ar rahman does not copy western composers... that is Anu Malik.. you can
trace parts of his songs in kareeb to HAPPY BIRTHDAY TO YOU, music from the
godfather... he made two copies of the macarena. the music he called his
own in THE GENTLEMAN... three songs were AR Rahman's including roop suhna,
ashiqui mein and chiku biku... AR Rahman did the original music in Tamil.
Anu Malik has copied countless songs from the south (not ARR's but other
people's as well). ARR is simply the best. his sound is not alien to
india.. have you heard classical jiya jale or kehta hai mera dil?
mani ratnam - one of the best directors in india, has only used ARR for his
past 5 films, dil se, iruvar, bombay, thiruda thiruda, roja.
shekhar kapur - one of the best directors in india, has ARR lined up for his
next hindi film, Taram Pum Pum.
raj kumar santhoshi who had anu mailk do china gate had ARR do upcoming
pukar. he loved ARR so much that he begged him to do music for his next
film starring shah rukh and aamir.
subhash ghai wanted ARR to do music for pardes but ARR didnt have time. so
now ARR is doing TAAL and also his next, SHIKHAR. subhash ghai said about
ARR in an interview "he is the only music director in india that knows
hindustani classical, karnatic classical, and western classical" subhash
ghai has said that arr is the best music director in india. have you heard
the songs from ROJA, Bombay, Dil Se, Sapnay, Jeans, Rangeela, Chor Chor,
Hindustani, Vande Mataram, the list goes on.
Ok, here is my list of songs that i know the lyrics to and hum in my head...
Kehna Hi Kya (bombay)
chotti si asha (roja)
hai rama (rangeela)
jiya jale (dil se)
chaiyya (dil se)
anjali (duet/tu hi mera dil)
mere yaara dildara (kabhi na kabhi)
bol sajni (doli sajake rakhna)
ma tujhe salam (vande mataram)
premika na pyar se (humse hai muqabala)
chanda re (sapnay)
ajooba (jeans)
my list goes on FOR EVER.
ARR is simply the best in INdia.
Bye
Neekesh
Let see. He has done ROJA, BOMBABY, and DIL SE. He may have done
others in Hindi, and plus he has dones tons of music for Tamil movies.
--
Niraj Agarwalla -- ni...@shore.net -- http://www.shore.net/~niraj
GO RED SOX!!!!
Mo, Judaai was by Nadeem Shravan. Border only had ONE good song. Ishq's
song "mr lova luva" was copied from an English song. Virasat was a movie
remade from Tamil so I would not be surprised if the songs are "inspired" by
Illayraja's Tamil songs. ARR uses many traditional instruments in Dil Se,
En Swasa Kaatre, Jeans, Duet.. etc!
ARR has had the following hit movies:
Roja (all languages, his FIRST movie)
Bombay (all languages)
Jeans (Tamil)
Rangeela (Hindi)
Minsara Kanavu (Tamil)
Indian (all languages, Hindustani)
Gentleman (Tamil)
Kaadhalan (Tamil)
AND SO MANY MORE in Tamil and Hindi. Every MUSIC ALBUM of his has been a
hit even if the movies flopped.
This upcoming year he will have hits in Hindi: TAAL, PUKAAR...etc, and
Tamil: PADAIYAPPA, KADHALAR DHINAM, TAJ MAHAL, MUDHALVAN.. etc.
Bye
Neekesh
Mo, I dont think u can judge a coposer on how the movie does. It more
depends on the actor/actress/director....blablabla.... but the musical
score it self.... it's another thing which ARR has done a kick ass job
so far...
And abt computer and music.... agree ARR does lotsa composition on
modern time but then again there is no musik director in bollywood that
doesnt use computer composition... and ANU, he uses heavy computer
synsthesizing....trust me... the whole Janam Samja Karo is an example of
it...
LOOPS and cd sampling ...... the song janam samja karo..... my lord
heavy sampling..... even fm Bally Sagoos Jugni Sample is in it..
"Neekesh Dharia" <neekesh...@cfu.net> wrote:
>> Saw him on Channel V's BPL recently . He pointed out that he
>>gave four superhits in one year - Ishq , Virasat , Judaii ,
>>Border .
>> Has any of ARRs movies ever been a hit - it would if he
>>would use more Indian instruments like Tabla , Sarangi
>>instead of computer synthesizers..
>Mo, Judaai was by Nadeem Shravan. Border only had ONE good song. Ishq's
They charge £18 ( including VAT) , £1 postage -free if more
than 5 ordered and deliver next day .
The ones you will enjoy are
Khalnayak
Mohra
Satya
Soldier
Border
>AR Rahman is simply the best in Bollywood, even in INdia
That can't be true. Vishal Bharadwaj beats him hands down in all categories
of music. He is the only "quality film" MD we have in India. Rahman
is good but not as good and original as Vishal. Moreover, Rahman has declined
considerably ever since he got fame in Bollywood.
Shridhar
>Are there any Tamil DVDs that show classical South Indian dances ?
Ya the woman who gave birth to you, Mrs. Moron !
> I liked the classical song in Jeans-sung on Zee's Saregama-
> -Din dhak din - but I have a feeling that was the one not
> done by ARR . Hopefully they will bring out the Tamil
> version of Jeans on DVD soon ..
What an A..hole. Can;t he get the facts correct before shooting off.? The song
was composed by ARR.
Khuda Gawah on VHS was an atrocious pan and scan version. I hope the DVD
is in widescreen or at least has the option to view it in ws.
Many thanks
Mo (10033...@compuserve.com) wrote:
: But the movies all seem to have flopped. His music sounds
: ARR is simply the best in INdia.
: Bye
: Neekesh
Since you post non-music related things here, regardless of what others say,
might as well give you some hints.
Try Vijayanthimala movies.
I prefer ar over anu but like them both, they are more "original" than the
trite Jatin-Lalit or Anand-Milind or Viju or Nadeem(?)-Shravan. And I dont
care if they copy until what they copy and how they copy is good.
Shridhar wrote in message <7cgnps$b...@drn.newsguy.com>...
I have a tamil friend whose last name is Chakravarty. Any way Bongs can not
prounounce the letter 'v'; they pronounce it as 'b'; ergo all bongs (hey
that is an endearment - no flames please) are Chakraborty.
Listen to the following song sung by Geeta Dutt carefully
"Gareeb Jaan Ke Hum ko Naa tum bhulaa dena
Tumhi ne dard diya hai, tumhi davaa dena"...
Geeta Dutt can not say the word "davaa", she pronounces it as "dabaa"
There was a little piece by Khushwant Singh, a long time back. It talked
about how children of mixed race parentage seem to be more beautiful. Hema's
parents apparently had rented were Khushwant Singhs property in Delhi. If I
remember right he said, her mother is Tamil and father a Panjabi.
But she is a professional dancer and has been performing Bharatanatyam. Mo,
being mo, would assume all south Indians are Tamil and Bharatanatyam is to
be seen only in Tam movies. That explains the question.
Interestingly, I don't know if Hema has ever acted in South movies. I
believe her first movie was with RK (Sapno Ka Saudagar ?). But she does have
a southie accent when speaking in English, IMO.
Enjoy,
... Nataraj
P.S. : I might not either subscribe to Singh's view on mixed race parentage
or for that matter that north and south Indians are different races.
I thought that Jeans was a disappointment. I did, however, like Uyire (Dil Se)
Remove 'KILLSPAM' to reply.
Newspaper Headline: "Kids make nutritious snacks."
Yeah right. And she probably pronounces -
- nanhii kalii sone chalii *habaa* dhiire aanaa
- ko_ii duur se *aabaaz* de chale aa_o
- *baqt* ne kiyaa kyaa haseen sitam
etc.
Other such hightly entertaining insights and gross
generalizations about speakers of the different languages
will be greatly appreciated.
C
Chetan,
Bongs are good at being able to pronounce the letter 'w'. They have a
problem with the letter 'v'. All examples you give should use the letter
'w'. :-) :-)
Since you ask for other insights, you seem to have a trouble between 'v' and
'w' :-)
The french can not pronounce the letter 'h';
My gujju friends pronounce the word 'wrap' as 'rape'. I better stop before I
get deeper in the hole I seem to be digging. This is meant to be fun buddy.
So chill....
deepak
Couldn't help jumping in. :-) Being half Bengali (my mom's Bengali), and
having lived 20 odd years in Calcutta, I guess I felt I had to say something.
First, it is true that there is no 'v' sound in Bengali. However, that does
not mean that Bengalis cannot pronounce the 'v' sound (or the 'w' sound for
that matter). You make it sound like its a physical impossibility for a
Bengali to pronounce the 'v' sound. :-) Let me assure you that it is not
true. :-) However, I will concede that Bengalis who aren't in the habit of
using Hindi on a regular basis may have problem with it. Generalizations of
any kind (including this one :-) are bad but to say that Geeta Dutt couldn't
pronounce 'davaa' is taking things into the realms of absurdity. I suppose
Hemant Kumar and Manna De also had this affliction?
As for distinguishing between the 'v' sound and the 'w' sound, both 'davaa'
and 'havaa' use 'v' in Hindi, which means that as far as pronunciation in
Hindi goes, both are pronounced the same. So how could she pronounce 'havaa'
and not 'davaa'?
Or is there a letter for 'w' in Hindi that I am unaware of? Before you raise
any questions, let me tell you that I studied Hindi as my second language, not
Bengali.
> The french can not pronounce the letter 'h';
> My gujju friends pronounce the word 'wrap' as 'rape'. I better stop before I
> get deeper in the hole I seem to be digging. This is meant to be fun buddy.
> So chill....
At least you seem to be aware of your predicament.
Pointing out pronunciation mistakes by a singer is nothing to joke about. Or
haven't you been reading about the Rafi-saaGar controversy? :-))
Nita
nahii.n khel ai "Daag" yaaro.n se kah do
ke aatii hai urduu zubaa.N aate aate
Visit my Urdu Poetry Page:
http://www.geocities.com/~fhnaqvi/
-----------== Posted via Deja News, The Discussion Network ==----------
http://www.dejanews.com/ Search, Read, Discuss, or Start Your Own
On Thu, 18 Mar 1999 21:32:02 -0500, Niraj Agarwalla <ni...@shore.net>
wrote:
On Thu, 18 Mar 1999, Mo wrote:
> Have you bought a DVD player yet , what do you think of the
> pictures .
Not yet. I have gone to my friends house to see it. I have
seen the bootleg copies of HAHK and KKHH. Though I frown upon
piracy, but I was rather surprised by the better picture DVDs
offered; considering that most of my Hindi movie watching was
done through pirate video. I just hope the Hindi film industry
doesn't screw it up like they did with VHS.
Deepak Sabnis wrote:
>
> Bongs are good at being able to pronounce the letter 'w'. They have a
> problem with the letter 'v'. All examples you give should use the letter
> 'w'. :-) :-)
>
> Since you ask for other insights, you seem to have a trouble between 'v' and
> 'w' :-)
Obviously. I was born and brought up in India. In the Sanskritic
languages (basically all the languages of the North), there is
no sound corresponding to the 'v' sound. As a result, many
Indians end up using 'v' and 'w' sounds interchangeably. I
remember my first summer in the US when I got lost, had to stop
to ask for directions and a cop told me that there was no Wine
St in the city but I was a couple of blocks from a Vine St.
However, all this has nothing to do with the current thread.
Here, you implied that Bongs are incapable of pronouncing the
'w' sound. I simply wanted to point out that that was not true.
Bongs do have trouble with 'w' / 'b' but if they have a fair
degree of exposure to other languages, they can cultivate the
'w' sound. As somebody else said, you only have to listen to
some of our singers from Bengal - Geeta, Manna, Hemant.
BTW, you had a good point when you said that all Bongs are
'Chakrabarty'. However, that does not mean that they or
somebody else cannot spell it 'Chakravarty'. This merely
shows the inadequacy of transliteration. The problem is
compounded when there are more than two languages involved.
Enough violation of newsgroup charters.
C
Irwin wrote :
Bandhan (1998)- English subtitles. 165 minutes. Dolby
Digital 2 channel mono.
Starring Salman Khan, Jackie Shroff, Shweta Menon, Rambha,
Ashwini Bhave.
Video is excellent. Audio is very good.
"Bandhan" is a melodramatic and sexy film of the bonds
between brother (Khan) and sister (Bhave),
husband (Shroff) and wife (Bhave) that are tested to the
breaking point by outside forces (the stunning
Shweta Menon, who steals the movie as the seductress
Vaishali), and the struggle to maintain those
bonds.
"Bandhan" has Khan in some exciting action scenes and
features some fine songs, especially the
excellent "Tere Naina" and the risque dance by Menon of "Dil
Kis Ko." The video is an excellent, bright
transfer with few faults. It's a shame that "Bandhan" wasn't
made with 5.1 or stereo sound, yet the
mono soundtrack is very good and clear considering.
Although a box office and critical flop when released,
"Bandhan" is worth viewing on dvd for the
memorable music and interesting performances by Shroff and
Bhave, and especially for Shweta
Menon's sensuous portrayal of the "fallen woman" Vaishali.
Released by EROS/DEI.. Irwin Marin
--
Richard
ssca...@iupui.edu wrote in message ...
Pancham forever ,
Manish
Mo <10033...@compuserve.com> wrote in message
news:BbcK2.37117$Eb....@nnrp2.clara.net...
???? too poor to afford a DVD player? Did you invent the DVD format? Are
you receiving royalties for every DVD player sold, because all you rant and
rave about is how wonderful DVD players and DVDs are. Sure, DVDs are cool,
but are not as revolutionary as you make them out to be. Sure, LDs are
bigger, but they can also provide excellent picture and sound....and have
been out for almost 25 years. As well, many people prefer to see movies in
theaters, like myself. So in order for me to discuss a movie with you,
should I take my stopwatch to the movie?? Not everyone needs a DVD player,
and many people are living quite well without one. I am quite happy with my
LD player, for I can still get all the English movies I want, with Dolby
Digital sound and excellent picture......so why would I need to buy a DVD
player? I holding out on a DVD player until rental of movies is more
widespread.....when Blockbuster starts renting them. By the way, DVDs are
easily scratched and according to several Blockbuster managers and video
store owners, are not as durable as LDs. I can go to my local library and
rent 7000 LDs for free...so why would I want a DVD player?????? Please,
please stop your pro-DVD rant, we know how much you like them....statements
such as you have made in your post are not going to win you new fans.
One more thing....DO NOT CROSSPOST into irrelevant newsgroups!!!! It's BAD
netiquette and if people want to read about Indian movies, they know where
to go.
Annoyed,
-BH