Some of it makes sense, some doesn't. There is a lot of chaff among well
intended advice there, I suspect. There is little by way of rigorous
scientific study of which bits are good and which aren't. I have thus taken
the liberty - for my own use and practice - to come up with what Kharaj
practice should be, for me. Here it goes -
- Kharaj practice does a lot of good. Mainly because time is invested in
singing practice - several hundreds of hours. Not so much because it is done
in very low notes. Optimum benefit would result if time was spent on just
the 4-5 notes below Madhya Sa, say down up to mandra ma, nothing further
below. In normal HCM singing, going down up to mandra ma is adequate. There
is no real need to go down further in any practice session; practice just
what is needed to sing well. (Reminds me - I once asked Pt Chaurasia if he
did any special breathing exercises, meditation etc to develop his excellent
blowing. He said, yes - I play the flute.)
- Just as I get up from bed in the morning, all my muscles are stiff, legs
are a bit wobbly, the brain is not very sharp. If I must use that time to
sing, it is hard to practice creative alaap, taans, laykari - needs sharp
brain for all that, needs flexible vocal chord muscles. But Kharaj practice
can be easily done then. So "Kharaj practice must be done before sunrise" is
perhaps an unintended variation of what really should be "if you sing very
early in the morning, do nothing other than just long stable low notes at
low/moderate volume, which cause minimum strain". Kharaj practice is useful
any time of the day; but an hour of kharaj early in the morning and an hour
of say taans at night is a better choice than taans in the morning and
kharaj at night. It is purely a matter of optimising return on investment,
not restricting kharaj to mornings.
- What does Kharaj practice actually do to the vocal chords, in physical
terms? Strengthens the muscles, firstly. When muscles become strong, they
don't become strong just for that pitch being practiced - that possibly
explains why it also opens up taar saptak, for taar saptak singing certainly
needs strength. Secondly, the long stable notes teach the muscles to reduce
wavering, very useful for HCM. Hence, no need to do all mandra notes - just
one or two will do, the intention is not to perfect the shruti of those
notes but to strengthen muscles and reduce wavering . But doing all mandra
notes is not banned - and is recommended if it breaks the monotony of the
practice and stops one from reducing/dropping such practice due to the
monotony.
- No restriction needed on use of any liquid (water/tea/coffee) during
kharaj practice, or any sleep/rest soon afterwards. Anything that helps
minimise strain - physically and mentally - is good.
- The usefulness hence is not limited only to males.
Regards - JW
1. it pays to practice lower than you will sing. when performing, the
lowest tone or a tone and a half close down and you can't use them. so
going below mandra ma is recommended
2. in some cases it is customary to reach down even to lower sa during
performance. most dhrupad performers try to. so that's another reason
to try and expand your range.
3. the muscles are actually less tense when you wake up, so it goes
both ways - practise low so as not to strain them, but also - practise
low because this is the only time of day you will be able to reach that
ati mandra dha with confidence ;-)
hello there,
This may be bit off the topic. I clearly remember this in 1960s when I
started my keen interest in ICM. I used to follow musicians' radio
broadcast as much as possible. That time AIR Pune used to have a
performer give performance at 7:15 morning, 1:00 p.m. or sometimes at
around 6:30 p.m, and then at 10:00 p.m. Most of the programs were live
programs and not the recordeed ones.* I would try to follow the vocal
artist on harmonium and on violin if I can.
Invariably morning concert of a vocalist will be at least 3-4
semi-tones lower than night concert. I am not so sure about afternoon
concert at this time. It is long time back.
I had noticed that for Hirabai, Bhimsen, Manik Varma and many other
artists that used to perform on AIR Pune at that time.
My teacher at that time (Disciple of Vinayakrao) mentioned clearly that
in the mornings naturally (physiologically?) human voice is lower in
tone than latter part of the day. I think this is the reason kharj
riyaz was performed in the morning.
cheers,
imppio
*(There used to be a slightly different announcement if the program was
recorded and not live. It would say " xyz yaannii
gaayalelaa/vaajavalelaa instead of xyz gaat/vaajawat hote". English
translation- xyz had sung/played v/s was singing/playing....)
cheers,
imppio
Really? 3-4 semitone difference for the same vocalist between morning and
night? Surely they must be performances several years across? Seems very odd
to me.
Regards - JW
-PK
might I trouble you to sketch a definition of soorilaness?
Overall, I find this discussion most interesting (being a
beginner with kharaj riyaz).
d.i.
My understanding of "surilapan" has two components. First is obvious,
producing the correct fundamental frequency. Second, producing an attractive
proportion of harmonics.
Suppose the madhya Sa that the singer sings in is 100 cycles. Singing Sa
with "surilapan" would firstly involve singing so that the fundamental
frequency produced is exactly 100 - or very close to it. Singing Madhya Pa
would be 150, Mandra Pa would be 75. Each note would need to be at the
predefined frequency for it to be "surila".
When he sings Pa in sur, he is not just producing 150 (the fundamental), he
is also producing 300 (2nd harmonic), 450, 600, etc at the same time. The
relative volume (power) levels of each one of these harmonics with respect
to each other is what distinguishes his voice with someone else's who also
sings at Sa = 100, so surilapan has to do with the proportion of the
harmonics in his voice spectrum. My understanding is, one of the main
objectives of voice culture practice is to alter this harmonics proportion
to get an attractive voice.
But what is that best proportion? I don't know. Studying musical instruments
might give some clue. Instruments like flute have all frequencies, some like
clarinet have all even harmonics missing entirely. Some have high volumes at
higher harmonics. Some vocalists have a good amount of high frequency
components that sounds quite attractive.
Regards - JW
Of couse, the "sureelapan" was not discussed. But harmonium tuning,
including just intonation (gandhar tuning) and tempered tuning is discussed.
I have a just intoned and a normal harmonium to illustrate. There is a
little discussion about tuning theory, but not too complex. No mathematics
involved in the tuning theory discussion, although one can use Fourier
transforms to explain.
Funnily, I have used Sa=100Hz as an example in the discussion.
I play a natya sangeet for few mins, followed by a long tuning discussion,
ending with playing yaman. During the discussions, I even show a reed and
show the instruments used to tune the reed.
Tuning is not the most exiting subject! But anybody who is interested can
share their experience, either on this group, or directly with me at
vivek...@yahoo.com.
Cheers
-Vivek
"John Wright" <notpr...@something.com> wrote in message
news:458dc13f$0$16554$afc3...@news.optusnet.com.au...
This is intriguing, because formant frequencies in human voice are not
necessarily harmonically related.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Formants
DG
As it happens the shrutis of notes in almost (?) all raags are
harmonically related -- e.g. the N and tM in Yaman being lower than
Bihag, and yet in each case tM is the 5th of N ... etc. So singing
soorily in raag requires great attention to harmonic interrelationship
between notes.
Harmonium is not a good instrument to understand all this. Learning
to tune a taanpura is an excellent method.
- PK
- PK
Thanks for posting your tips on kharaj. I am a Carnatic music pretender
of the vocal sort and over the years I have tried many practice regimes
including kharaj. Could you say more about what you actually practice
in kharaj? I remember reading somewhere (which is what I ended up doing
as well) that kharaj means holding a steady note as long as the breath
will hold. Do you do this or something different?
When practising, I recall running into all kinds of auxiliary physical
problems like hyperventilation, dryness of the throat, sitting
discomfort, etc. The funniest was that once I fell asleep spontaneoulsy
into a deep slumber in the middle of my kharaj practice and woke up an
hour later lying beside my tambura. On the technical side,i found that
it actually hurt my throat to keep pushing lower and lower (never
reached mantra sa). Did you experience such physical or other problems
and how did you overcome them?
As for benefits, my singing in the middle octave (Sa to sa) improved
even though my kharaj was in the nether regions. However it did not
perceptibly affect my singing in the higher octave (taar saptak). I
guess a different set of resonances is called for.
Is there an equivalent of kharaj practice that could be useful to
improve higher octave singing?
Best,
Then Paanan
> I remember reading somewhere (which is what I ended up doing
> as well) that kharaj means holding a steady note as long as the breath
> will hold. Do you do this or something different?
>
I do long steady notes followed by slow gamaks and taans - in the same
session.
> When practising, I recall running into all kinds of auxiliary physical
> problems like hyperventilation, dryness of the throat, sitting
> discomfort, etc. The funniest was that once I fell asleep spontaneoulsy
> into a deep slumber in the middle of my kharaj practice and woke up an
> hour later lying beside my tambura. On the technical side,i found that
> it actually hurt my throat to keep pushing lower and lower (never
> reached mantra sa). Did you experience such physical or other problems
> and how did you overcome them?
>
I don't continue if any such things happen. I like to enjoy these sessions.
As I emphasised earlier, I don't go below mandra ma very often, so I don't
feel any strain.
Regards - JW