Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

In recognition of the Wiki blackout

8 views
Skip to first unread message

Ron Capik

unread,
Jan 18, 2012, 2:29:16 PM1/18/12
to
Today is Wiki blackout day relating to bills
in congress that could affect filkdom.
On that note I'm going back in the time machine
to dig out a related song I posted to alt.music.filk
back in the mid 90's.


=================================================================
Should They Censor the Net lyrics by: the NJ Editorial Minstrel
[ttto: All for the Best {from Godspell} ]
=================================================================

If you think that
The inter-net's cursed
alt groups are bad
Some web sites are worse

Congress is sighing, crying
They think morals are declining

TV's decaying
Rap music's dismaying
And perverts are posting with mirth.

Those chat rooms are gross.
Their topics are the rude.
Your kids down load
Bit maps that are crude.

Don't you fret 'cause
Congress has this duty to protect
Should they censor the net?

-----
Some folks are
Doing what they're told
Never acting bold
Hoping some one else will protect them
Wanna slow us down
Drive us out of town
Blowing lots of smoke in the air
They make a moral sound
Never screw around
Tryin' hard to impose their values
They'll sacrifice freedoms
But what do they care
They think their values are quite neat
Not like on the street
Climbing up on their moral high ground
Thinking you and me
Are a bit too free
Surfing on that network from hell
But there's big demand for
This internet rancor
So should
Congress censor the net?
---------------------------------------------------


Later...
Ron C
--

P.F. Bruns

unread,
Jan 20, 2012, 1:08:27 AM1/20/12
to
Well done!

Perry

John Davis

unread,
Jan 24, 2012, 10:16:02 AM1/24/12
to
On 1/18/2012 2:29 PM, Ron Capik wrote:
> Today is Wiki blackout day relating to bills
> in congress that could affect filkdom.
> On that note I'm going back in the time machine
> to dig out a related song I posted to alt.music.filk
> back in the mid 90's.
(much clipped to save bandwidth)

There once was a business called Megaupload
Its owner a Mr. Dotcom

But alas.. It is not the 1st victim of said law. and several other
upload sites like Filesonic have "Gone dark" in the interest of self
preservation.

I personally feel these sites should qualify for a common carrier
exception. If USPS or UPS delivers a box to my, or your, house and
inside that box is a bunch of pirate CD's... Do they send the owners of
USPS or UPS to prison? NO,

So why Mr. Dotcom?


--
Nothing adds Excitement like something that is none of your business.
Remove the invalid part to email me.

Kip Williams

unread,
Jan 24, 2012, 11:55:06 AM1/24/12
to
John Davis wrote:

> I personally feel these sites should qualify for a common carrier
> exception. If USPS or UPS delivers a box to my, or your, house and
> inside that box is a bunch of pirate CD's... Do they send the owners of
> USPS or UPS to prison? NO,
>
> So why Mr. Dotcom?

Because it involves skeery new technology stuff, and is therefore
suspect. Why, in my day...


Kip W

Sandy Tyra

unread,
Jan 25, 2012, 10:54:36 AM1/25/12
to
Indeed. There is a new internet bumper sticker that says: You don't get
to destroy the internet just because it doesn't fit your business model.

That's a paraphrase - but it's pretty close.

Sandy

John Davis

unread,
Jan 30, 2012, 6:41:19 PM1/30/12
to
Actually.. I recall a few years ago they set a standard for Serivce
hosts. At that time the internet, as we know it today, was .. not (yet)
though the infrastructure was forming up, but there were many on-line
services such as AOL (Well it was still Q-link back then) Compuserve,
prodigy, and some others.

Compuserve was found to be a common carrier, Mostly because we do
basiclaly NO editing w/o permission (Well, might make a URL into a
clicky now days, or correct a spelling error, but for the most part we
do not edit, and for sure WE DO NOT CENSOR messages, other than if a
message is offensive or in violation of something like HIPPA (Say it
contains personal info about a teen) we move it out of public view.

But another service provider was in the habbit of editing messages big
time, If it had offensive language they removed it, Most of the time,
and when they missed one, they lost in court.

Mr. DotCom should only be held responsable for files he uploads and/or
files where he has ignored a take down request.
0 new messages