Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Before you buy.
* Sent from RemarQ http://www.remarq.com The Internet's Discussion Network *
The fastest and easiest way to search and participate in Usenet - Free!
/Tobias.
In article <0857a06f...@usw-ex0106-045.remarq.com>,
Paul Williams loves it, if my mem'ry serves me well.
tobias
You are absolutely right, Williams devotes several pages of the
second volume of his "Performing Artist" series to "Hard Rain".
But Williams is too intelligent to be labeled 'rock journalist'.
/Tobias.
It's always been one of my favourites, and the one I can handle being in my
player for the most consecutive plays.
Going, Going, Gone is a KILLER, and Dirge, OH!!!
WOO!!!!!!!!
Cheers,
Dare
I agree, and "Hard Rain" is perhaps not underrated among
hardcore Dylan fans, but I have talked to several more casual
Dylan fans, who fails to appreciate this album. This also
applies to "Street Legal", for some reason. BTW, I have read
tons of what so-called 'rock journalists' have written about
Dylan, and I have still not seen one of them raving about "Hard
Rain".
/Tobias.
<ghost_of_e...@my-deja.com> wrote in message
news:8d46tq$vc6$1...@nnrp1.deja.com...
> There's been a lot of talk about the best Dylan albums, the worst, the
> funniest, the most perverse - and so on. But what about the most
> underrated album? My favourite for the title is the brilliant,
> evocative "Planet waves". Together with "Blood on the tracks"
> and "Desire" it certainly is one of the best albums of the 70s. The
> highlights include "Going, going, gone", "Tough mama" and "Dirge".
> Other bids for the title?
>
>
"TD" <tj...@spam.ac.uk> wrote in message
news:8d5kol$atp$1...@pegasus.csx.cam.ac.uk...
> Anyone for 'Bob Dylan'? I find the question difficult because I'm not sure
> what is underrated. You can even find people who claim to dislike JWH.
>
>
It has a special place in my heart, the first Dylan album I bought. It took
me a night and about five drinks to love it.
"Brandon Zwagerman" <brand...@mailcity.com> wrote in message
news:8d5nt1$5v8$1...@peabody.colorado.edu...
> Yeah, "Bob Dylan" is excellent-- furious harmonica work in there
>
> "TD" <tj...@spam.ac.uk> wrote in message
> news:8d5kol$atp$1...@pegasus.csx.cam.ac.uk...
UNDER THE RED SKY
--
Russ Fox
http://www.foxy99.freeserve.co.uk
"I Got a headfull of ideas,
and it's driving me insane"
- B. Dylan
gondola bob <gon...@deltanet.com> wrote in message
news:140420002345285423%gon...@deltanet.com...
> ghost_of_e...@my-deja.com wrote:
>
> > There's been a lot of talk about the best Dylan albums, the worst, the
> > funniest, the most perverse - and so on. But what about the most
> > underrated album?
>
> Yes, there's been a lot of talk about that, too. ;)
>
> GB
I've never known anyone who misunderstood it. Know plenty who think it's a
dog...
Bill
"It will destroy your family, your happy home is gone
No one can protect you from it once you turn it on."
-- Bob Dylan
T.V. Talkin' Song
like the dyslexic agnostic insomniac?
- nate
Russ Fox wrote:
> Or the most misunderstood album?
>
> UNDER THE RED SKY
>
--
“Yes, to dance beneath the diamond
sky with one hand waving free...”
-Bob Dylan “Mr. Tambourine Man”
What a brilliant post! You are right - it has its place. Every Dylan song
and album has its place. I always thought "If You See Her Say Hello" was
a good song. Then one night after a tough breakup I put it on, and it
destroyed me. It was as if Dylan was singing just to me. If you wait
long enough, you'll find a time and place for all his songs. That's what
makes him a genius.
BobbyD1947 wrote:
> << You are right - it has its place. Every Dylan song
> and album has its place. >>>
>
> In the case of Self-Portrait, New Morning, and Dylan, among others, it's a
> landfill.
>
> <<<I always thought "If You See Her Say Hello" was
> a good song. Then one night after a tough breakup I put it on, and it
> destroyed me. It was as if Dylan was singing just to me. If you wait
> long enough, you'll find a time and place for all his songs. That's what
> makes him a genius.
> >>
>
> Bullshit. This statement reeks of cultism. Geniuses rarely display consistancy.
> Anyone who would make a claim like this about Dylan's music doesn't "get" him
> any more than those that say he's a great writer but a lousy singer. Dylan has
> created some of the greatest music in the history of western civilization. He's
> also put out more sheer garbage than any other major popular musician.
>
> And you know what? I bet the man himself would agree with me on this one.
>
> Robert D.
>
> "Swallow your pride...you will not die, it's not poison"
That onus belongs to Elvis Aron Presley.
a man who basically threw it all away
Speaking of cultism, I'd say later generations will have to decide if his
music is some of the best in Western history. In any case, a record isn't
necessarily either great or garbage, and I think anyone who doesn't "get"
New Morning doesn't entirely "get" Bob Dylan yet. Which isn't surprising, he
has such varied taste. I can't remember the interview but he himself said a
couple of years ago that he wouldn't think his old fans would have stayed
with him.
Ken
You're wrong. There are several artists who have put out more sheer garbage
than Dylan. In fact, by my count Bob only ranks fourth on the SGM (Sheer
Garbage-o-Meter), behind Neil Diamond, Roger Whittaker, and Michael Bolton
(the latter has far fewer albums out than Bob, but he has managed to master
the trick of compressing and condensing his garbage, so that each album
counts for something like five time its weight in crap). And it's a distant
fourth, too.
Seriously, I find myself slightly annoyed with people who come to this
newsgroup seemingly determined _not_ to like Bob too much. I'm all for
objectivity and honesty and rationality, but holy bronze idols, Batman,
we're fans of the man. You're on a Bob Dylan newsgroup--if you're surprised
and offended by someone praising the man too much, you've only yourself to
blame. It's like going to a Trekkie convention and being disgusted that
everybody wears funny costumes: it means you either went to the convention
knowing nothing about Star Trek or you went with the intent to make fun of
the people there. Either way you're the problem.
>And you know what? I bet the man himself would agree with me on this one.
But so what? He'd be agreeing with you out of humility.
Glynne
np: Heart: mix
________________________________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com
dec1(snip):<< He's put out "more sheer garbage than any other major popular
musician"? Excuse
me, but I think the you're the one who doesn't "get" him. Has he put out more
garbage than Madonna, Prince, The Rolling Stones, Queen? Hey, all of those
people/groups had superb hits, but they had a lot of garbage, too, and
considering
the length of time they've been around and the amount of songs they've
released,
it's my opinion that they and other "popular" artists have spewed out more
garbage
than Dylan in a shorter period of time. The Stones, of course, have been
around
for quite awhile, but how many of their songs even come close to the brilliance
of
Dylan's? You can't be serious.
>>
Robert D.
olompali (snip):<<
That onus belongs to Elvis Aron Presley.
a man who basically threw it all away
>>
Robert D.
oldbollweevil (snip):
<< There are several artists who have put out more sheer garbage
than Dylan. In fact, by my count Bob only ranks fourth on the SGM (Sheer
Garbage-o-Meter), behind Neil Diamond, Roger Whittaker, and Michael Bolton >>
Robert D.
Dear Fans,
Out of concern for the environment I am donating all vinyl, cassettes & CD's
of "Dylan" to the new Malibu Colony landfill. This will allow increased
development of luxury condos & also give me a sizable tax write-off. I only
ask that the other serious popular musicians respond in kind. May I suggest
"Satanic Majesties" by the Strollin' Berrymen, "It's Hard" by the Mockers &
"Back to the Egg" by Lord McCatney. Through the ether I've summoned up the
great Pelvis, who has assured me that all copies of "Clambake" can be justly
buried in the earth.
Your icon,
ZimBobby
<< practically everything
he did before and after his poorly concieved acting career was high quality.
>>
I saw Presley live for the first time in early 1956. It was one of the most
mesmerizing, life altering events of my existence. I saw him again less then
a year before he died. I cried, it was so bad. He acted as though he didn't
even care about putting on a good show.
I pray this never happens to Dylan. I hope he has better people watching out for
him. But I also think he's much more in control of his life than Elvis ever
was. Elvis succumbed to the fast life. Dylan may have been a little reckless in
his younger days, but it seems he has mellowed more over the years and is taking
better care of himself. Or maybe he's not, but for a guy who's going on 59 years
old, he's doing one hell of a great job.
* Sent from AltaVista http://www.altavista.com Where you can also find related Web Pages, Images, Audios, Videos, News, and Shopping. Smart is Beautiful