I am sure that time will show that every line of this amazing record has
been 'stolen' from some source or other. And when we have tracked them all
down and congratulated ourselves, we shall be no nearer to understanding the
genius of the man who assembled this unique collage like some crazy cosmic
magpie.
Take Bob's art to apart piece by piece and you prove nothing.
The sea is made from individual drops. You could track each one down the
river or cloud it sprang from, but you wouldn't touch the majesty of the
ocean.
Keep stealin' Bob !!!!!
"Candy" <ca...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:juzPa.391416$VP.60...@twister.neo.rr.com...
<bob's got nothing to prove....
Dylan has Oscar chances?
--
John Howells
how...@punkhart.com
http://www.punkhart.com
<The album was called Love and THEFT ! That was the whole point/joke.
<I am sure that time will show that every line of this amazing record has
<been 'stolen' from some source or other. And when we have tracked them all
<down and congratulated ourselves, we shall be no nearer to understanding the
<genius of the man who assembled this unique collage like some crazy cosmic
<magpie.
<Take Bob's art to apart piece by piece and you prove nothing.
<The sea is made from individual drops. You could track each one down the
<river or cloud it sprang from, but you wouldn't touch the majesty of the
<ocean.
<Keep stealin' Bob !!!!!
It wouldn't surprise me to find that all of "Honest With Me" was
lifted from other sources. That song never made any sense to me,
and now I understand why: it's just random phrases thrown together.
I would rather Dylan not write any more songs than to write them
like this.
I have a feeling that this incident will cause a lot of damage to
Bob's reputation.
Totally agree, John
> I have a feeling that this incident will cause a lot of damage to
> Bob's reputation.
And rightly so.
Best wishes,
John
> It wouldn't surprise me to find that all of "Honest With Me" was
> lifted from other sources. That song never made any sense to me
That's the only Dylan song that never made sense to you?
> I would rather Dylan not write any more songs than to write them
> like this.
That's a tad harsh, don't you think?
John J.
Oscar for the soundtrack, maybe, is what you're talking about?
I love Bob Dylan's _music_ but doubt that the _film_ or his acting
in the film are "brilliant."
-- frosty
T
"John Howells" <how...@punkhart.com> wrote in message
news:VsCPa.23405$Nf.6...@sea-read.news.verio.net...
It makes plenty of difference.
Dockery
It's not a joke. No matter how graciously Mr. Saga takes it, no writer
appreciates having his words taken by someone else. Esp. one that made
bunches of $$$ and turned a lot of heads with nice wordplay... Damn. I'd
sure like to hear what Dylan's got to say about this.
Dockery
Obviously.
Will
To complain that Dylan has used some lines from an obscure text and
therefore should not be writing any more is just plain STUPID.
Picasso used the colour red in his paintings. This colour had been used
before in paintings dating back to the cave walls. What people saw was
Picasso's USE of the colour.
Dylan has used some phrases from Yakuza, but you would have to be a blind,
deaf, imbecilic fuck-head not to see that he has made some fantastic new art
from these phrases.
Throughout his career he has quoted and alluded to the Bible.. just read the
book of Isaiah and then listen to John Wesley Harding. He is very well
read, it's well known.
It is called making great art. Get used to it.
Jim
"frosty" <fro...@nospam.com> wrote in message
news:VaFPa.650$_K5...@fe01.atl2.webusenet.com...
This is an incredibly stupid point. He didn't shout the word "now". He
lifted entire phrases and claimed them as his own, as "by" Bob Dylan. it's
closer to what Litchenstein did with comix artists like Steve ditko to make
his "paintings".
Dockery
Yakuza is flattered that Dylan has 'sampled' him. His story was perfectly
in keeping with what Dylan wanted to say on Love and Theft.
Get over it or go back to law school.
Jim
"Ironywaves" <irony...@knology.net> wrote in message
news:vgvlqkp...@corp.supernews.com...
and nothiing to lose.
But he'll never be invisible.
Candy <ca...@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:<juzPa.391416$VP.60...@twister.neo.rr.com>...
What Oscar would he be in line for, Best Unintentional Comedy? And a
little plagiarism wouldn't bother the folks in Hollywood, that's standard
business practice there.
>I have a feeling that this incident will cause a lot of damage to
>Bob's reputation.
Good grief, why? The public isn't going to suddenly stop liking Dylan's
classic songs because of this, even if they know about it. Who is left to
suddenly hold him in contempt, hardcore fans who spend a little too much
time wondering what The Great One had for breakfast and what meaning there
is in him preferring orange juice to grapefruit? If anything this might
establish that Dylan is wider-read than we previously realized, it's not
like these lyrics were allegedly inspired by the National Enquirer.
I think I'll stay.
> Yakuza is flattered that Dylan has 'sampled' him. His story was perfectly
> in keeping with what Dylan wanted to say on Love and Theft.
>
>
> Get over it or go back to law school.
>
> Jim
Why don't you? The Picasso comparison was *way* off, and I commented on it.
And will continue to.
My take on Love & Theft is that Dylan played the ultimate prank on everyone. It used to be people tripped over themselves to talk about Dylan's rapidly plunging career. When Time Out Of Mind arrived it was an amazing show of talent, meant to prove to the world that the Muse was back. When it was announced that Love And Theft was going to be released, too many people looked up the title on amazon.com and came back with reports that this album shares the name of a book about black face minstrel shows and black face in general. The questions were all the same, 'what does this cryptic message mean'?
I believe that Dylan intentionally released Love And Theft an album so terrible and laughable to see the reactions of the fans and press. I think Dylan knew the album was bad (every song's music is so generic, bland and so typical of whatever style he is trying to play that it rapidly wears out it's intention; furthermore, the lyrics seemed to be nothing more than bad comedy jokes from the cast of the Dean Martin Roast) and I think Dylan wanted to see if everyone would fawn all over him.
Why would he do this? The press were pretty contemptible towards him in the 80's and it wasn't until 1989's Oh Mercy and his first Bootleg Series that people began taking him seriously again. Add to that fact that Time Out Of Mind caused virtually all of us to hyperventilate, I think Dylan decided he was don a mask (ala blackface) and present himself as this old vaudevillian artist whose work was mediocre, cliched and filled with one bad joke after another. It was, in a nutshell, Dylan as Weird Al.
When the press went crazy and the Dylan list went crazy, both with over adulation heaped upon Love & Theft, I can imagine Dylan laughing about how gullible everyone was. So he stole lyrics (he comes from a folk background where it is common place; check out Talking Poetry With The Taxman and you'll find Billy Bragg copped the music from "Chimes Of Freedom" for "Ideology" and never credited Dylan). What everyone should be concerned about, more than his pinching of the occasional lyric, is finding the answer to the question: is Love & Theft one huge private joke, one huge "gotcha!" from Dylan himself? Myself, that's the only way I can even pull out Love & Theft to give it a listen. And it's not that often I want to hear the bard doing a bad Henny Youngman impersonation. If I want to hear good comedy rock from Dylan I'll listen to "I Shall Be Free" or "Motorpsycho Nightmare" or "Bob Dylan's 115th Dream", but you'll not get me to play Love & Theft. I truly do believe that Self Portrait is the better of the two albums. In other words, to my ears, Love & Theft ranks in the bottom five worst Dylan albums.
tony
Myself, that's the only way I can even pull out Love & Theft to give it a listen. And it's not that often I want to hear the bard doing a bad Henny Youngman impersonation.
love and theft was the first dylan album I ever heard that utterly perplexed me. What was he doing? Isn’t his voice way to ragged, even for him, this time? Why is he saying that he has nothing to say anymore and that his writing would never do “you justice in rhythm or rhyme?” Why the hell is he crooning? Egads!!
So I kept listening and listening and listening and now I love this album.
His voice is powerful and perfect. He has nothing to say compared to the immense reality of a person’s life (he’s just a song and dance man). He croons because he wants to.
Give it a try.
Dale
your kidding no! after 42 years of music making his reputation is at
stake? because he twisted phrases to fit his song on a great recording
in 2001
your kidding no! after 42 years of music making his reputation is at
A tad defensive aren't we?
I have and will defend Dylan in a lot of cases, but not in the case of this
obvious plagerism.
Dockery
phew! I thought you must be kidding, John.
What's to kid about? The newspapers and tv news around here covered
it quite extensively, and always as if it were some great revelation
of fraud and deceit. The public at large probably thinks Dylan is
a has-been phoney, and I don't see how this new controversy is
going to help his image in the public eye. It will cause damage
("Bob Dylan? didn't I hear recently that he stole some songs from
somebody?" - that will be the lasting impression among many people),
but I don't expect that damage to extend here. I never meant that.
D. Ball
"John Howells" <how...@punkhart.com> schrieb im Newsbeitrag
news:2JAQa.24199$Nf.6...@sea-read.news.verio.net...