I like wabbits!
Cyphe...@nyc.rr.com
--
Freddie D. 'fag' Shorts
I'm loud and I'm proud. I'm gay and I like it that way!
Another proud buttplug owner. Honk if yer horny!
I support Gay Pride! The Ramrod rocks!
Wanna hire me for web site development? I'm way under-employed!
Contact me by email (mailto:cyphe...@nyc.rr.com) or mail me at
FS Newssite Inc.
101 West 23rd St. Suite 2237, New York, NY, 10011
On second thoughts, don't bother. Just sign me up for subscriptions.
I like to steal copyrighted material.
Check out my current web sites -
http://www.orwellian.org
http://www.miscstuff.org
http://home.nyc.rr.com/cypherpunk/
"What does Carl Sagan have to do with cometary composition?" - Davie "Uranus" Tholen
"Hey readers, I got a phone call from Guiness. Yes, *the* Guiness.
Apparently he's adding a new category to the Book of World Records,
namely the record for most informationless, invective-filled postings
by one person in a given time period, and he's identified a candidate
for the record holder, namely our own Jeff Glatt. Guiness asked me
to be the official counter.
Stay tuned for updates!" - Davie "Guiness" Tholen
"First of all, there haven't been any "Guinness" responses from me.
I spoke with someone named Guiness. Second of all, that was limited
to a two-day count, over a week ago now, so you can't justify the
word "typical"." - Davie "Guinness" Tholen
"I'm not talking about a company; I'm talking about a person who called
me. Obviously someone who spells his name differently. You know, sort
of like Hartman and Hartmann." - Davie "Hartmann^H" Tholen
"And that's the end of Dave Tholen's autobiography. It begins and ends
with "He cowered and hissed"." - Jeff Glatt
"[I do "Dave Tholen" better than Dave Tholen. In fact, Dave is now
totally expendable, not that he was useful before]" - Jeff Glatt
"Bullshit, Jason." - Davie "Boulder Dash" Tholen
"Are you a queer?" - Davie "homophobe" Tholen
"You're a kook and a queer." - Davie "queer basher" Tholen
"You asked for it, Morbius." - Davie "Id" Tholen
"Morbius a.k.a. Robin it still at it." - Davie "a.k.a." Tholen
"Wake up to reality, Morbius." - Davie "not in RL" Tholen
"Can't you complain to the troll?" - Davie "troll" Tholen
"I never start these threads. I do finish them." - Davie "shutup" Tholen
"Not at all; I don't repeat the same thing over and over like you did."
- Davie "repetitive" Tholen
"The "Morbius Variety Hour" is now being rebroadcast for our c.s.m.a
affiliates..." - Davie "Ed Sullivan" Tholen
"I'm quite sure that OS/2 is not causing brain damage." - Davie "drain bamage" Tholen
"The Yes-Yes list is made available to you by a generous contribution
from the Krell." - Davie "Morbius" Tholen
"Followed by another dull episode of the "Morbius Non-Variety Hour".
1> Same Tholen time, same Tholen channel...:)
Same Morbius (unless he's the same Robin -- you know, Batman's sidekick)."
- Davie "hourless" Tholen
tho...@antispam.ham
> Do youz like wabbits, trolen?
Who is "trolen", Cypherpunk? There is nobody in this newsgroup using
that alias. And what does your question have to do with classical
music, Cypherpunk?
> Freddie D. 'fag' Shorts
>
> I'm loud and I'm proud. I'm gay and I like it that way!
> Another proud buttplug owner. Honk if yer horny!
> I support Gay Pride! The Ramrod rocks!
What does that have to do with classical music, Cypherpunk?
> Wanna hire me for web site development? I'm way under-employed!
No surprise there, really.
Edward M. Kennedy
>> Do youz like wabbits, trolen?
>
> Who is "trolen", Cypherpunk? There is nobody in this newsgroup using
> that alias. And what does your question have to do with classical
> music, Cypherpunk?
Is tholen not aware of an internationally acclaimed opera starring Buggs
Bunny and Elmer Fudd?
--Tedward
tho...@antispam.ham
>>> Do youz like wabbits, trolen?
>> Who is "trolen", Cypherpunk? There is nobody in this newsgroup using
>> that alias. And what does your question have to do with classical
>> music, Cypherpunk?
> Is tholen not aware of an internationally acclaimed opera starring Buggs
> Bunny and Elmer Fudd?
There is a big difference between an opera and a cartoon written to parody
opera, Kennedy.
Cyphe...@nyc.rr.com
What a studiously wooden response from someone who is parodied for
giving wooden responses.
How ironic, Tholen.
Daniel Kolle
>Do youz like wabbits, trolen?
Tholz is incapable of liking anything, Cypherpunk.
--
Daniel "Mister Brevity" Kolle
A.A. #2035
tho...@antispam.ham
> Cyphe...@nyc.rr.com wrote:
>> Do youz like wabbits, trolen?
> Tholz is incapable of liking anything, Cypherpunk.
Who is "Tholz", Kolle? There is nobody in this newsgroup using that
alias.
Adam Funk
Categories X and parody(X) are not necessarily disjoint.
--
The President: "Call the FBI, the CIA and the Pentagon. Find out who
won that game!" (Edwards 1976)
Chris McGonnell
>On 2008-04-29, tho...@antispam.ham wrote:
>
>> Edward M. Kennedy writes:
>>
>>>>> Do youz like wabbits, trolen?
>>
>>>> Who is "trolen", Cypherpunk? There is nobody in this newsgroup using
>>>> that alias. And what does your question have to do with classical
>>>> music, Cypherpunk?
>>
>>> Is tholen not aware of an internationally acclaimed opera starring Buggs
>>> Bunny and Elmer Fudd?
>>
>> There is a big difference between an opera and a cartoon written to parody
>> opera, Kennedy.
>
>Categories X and parody(X) are not necessarily disjoint.
True dat ...
--
Chris McG.
Harming humanity since 1951.
"Well now you're just getting SILLY." -- Darla
** Posted from http://www.teranews.com **
tho...@antispam.ham
>> Edward M. Kennedy wrote:
>>>>> Do youz like wabbits, trolen?
>>>> Who is "trolen", Cypherpunk? There is nobody in this newsgroup using
>>>> that alias. And what does your question have to do with classical
>>>> music, Cypherpunk?
>>> Is tholen not aware of an internationally acclaimed opera starring Buggs
>>> Bunny and Elmer Fudd?
>> There is a big difference between an opera and a cartoon written to parody
>> opera, Kennedy.
> Categories X and parody(X) are not necessarily disjoint.
What does that have to do with college basketball, Funk?
Art Deco
Classic erroneous presupposition.
--
"Substantiation that you regard yourself as a God to be worhsipped [sic]
should be your concern, Deco."
-- David Tholen
Art Deco
Classic erroneous presupposition.
ah
> :nelohT
>
>>Edward M. Kennedy writes:
>>
>>>>> Do youz like wabbits, trolen?
>>
>>>> Who is "trolen", Cypherpunk? There is nobody in this newsgroup using
>>>> that alias. And what does your question have to do with classical
>>>> music, Cypherpunk?
>>
>>> Is tholen not aware of an internationally acclaimed opera starring Buggs
>>> Bunny and Elmer Fudd?
>>
>>There is a big difference between an opera and a cartoon written to parody
>>opera, Kennedy.
>
> Classic erroneous presupposition.
No surprise there, really.
--
ah
ah
> :nelohT
>
>>Daniel Kolle <Daniel...@gmail.com> writes:
>>
>>> Cyphe...@nyc.rr.com wrote:
>>
>>>> Do youz like wabbits, trolen?
>>
>>> Tholz is incapable of liking anything, Cypherpunk.
>>
>>Who is "Tholz", Kolle? There is nobody in this newsgroup using that
>>alias.
>
> Classic erroneous presupposition.
How ironic.
--
ah
tho...@antispam.ham
> :nelohT
Still suffering from attribution problems, Deco?
>> Edward M. Kennedy wrote:
>>>>> Do youz like wabbits, trolen?
>>>> Who is "trolen", Cypherpunk? There is nobody in this newsgroup using
>>>> that alias. And what does your question have to do with classical
>>>> music, Cypherpunk?
>>> Is tholen not aware of an internationally acclaimed opera starring Buggs
>>> Bunny and Elmer Fudd?
>> There is a big difference between an opera and a cartoon written to parody
>> opera, Kennedy.
> Classic erroneous presupposition.
Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
tho...@antispam.ham
> :nelohT
Still suffering from attribution problems, Deco?
>> Daniel Kolle <Daniel...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> Cyphe...@nyc.rr.com wrote:
>>>> Do youz like wabbits, trolen?
>>> Tholz is incapable of liking anything, Cypherpunk.
>> Who is "Tholz", Kolle? There is nobody in this newsgroup using that
>> alias.
> Classic erroneous presupposition.
Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
Art Deco
How ironic.
Art Deco
Classic pontification.
Art Deco
How ironic.
Art Deco
Non sequitur.
tho...@antispam.ham
> :nelohT
Still suffering from attribution problems, Deco?
>>> :nelohT
>> Still suffering from attribution problems, Deco?
Note: no response.
>>>> Edward M. Kennedy wrote:
>>>>>>> Do youz like wabbits, trolen?
>>>>>> Who is "trolen", Cypherpunk? There is nobody in this newsgroup using
>>>>>> that alias. And what does your question have to do with classical
>>>>>> music, Cypherpunk?
>>>>> Is tholen not aware of an internationally acclaimed opera starring Buggs
>>>>> Bunny and Elmer Fudd?
>>>> There is a big difference between an opera and a cartoon written to parody
>>>> opera, Kennedy.
>>> Classic erroneous presupposition.
>> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
> How ironic.
Where is the alleged irony, Deco?
tho...@antispam.ham
> :nelohT
Still suffering from attribution problems, Deco?
>>> :nelohT
>> Still suffering from attribution problems, Deco?
Note: no response.
>>>> Daniel Kolle <Daniel...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>> Cyphe...@nyc.rr.com wrote:
>>>>>> Do youz like wabbits, trolen?
>>>>> Tholz is incapable of liking anything, Cypherpunk.
>>>> Who is "Tholz", Kolle? There is nobody in this newsgroup using that
>>>> alias.
>>> Classic erroneous presupposition.
>> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
> Non sequitur.
Another unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
Art Deco
What does your question have to do with rabbits, Tholen?
Art Deco
Illogical.
tho...@antispam.ham
> :nelohT
Still suffering from attribution problems, Deco?
>>> :nelohT
>> Still suffering from attribution problems, Deco?
Note: no response.
>>>>> :nelohT
>>>> Still suffering from attribution problems, Deco?
>> Note: no response.
Note: still no response.
>>>>>> Edward M. Kennedy wrote:
>>>>>>>>> Do youz like wabbits, trolen?
>>>>>>>> Who is "trolen", Cypherpunk? There is nobody in this newsgroup using
>>>>>>>> that alias. And what does your question have to do with classical
>>>>>>>> music, Cypherpunk?
>>>>>>> Is tholen not aware of an internationally acclaimed opera starring Buggs
>>>>>>> Bunny and Elmer Fudd?
>>>>>> There is a big difference between an opera and a cartoon written to parody
>>>>>> opera, Kennedy.
>>>>> Classic erroneous presupposition.
>>>> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>>> How ironic.
>> Where is the alleged irony, Deco?
> What does your question have to do with rabbits, Tholen?
I see that you didn't answer the question, Deco. No surprise there,
really.
tho...@antispam.ham
> :nelohT
Still suffering from attribution problems, Deco?
>>> :nelohT
>> Still suffering from attribution problems, Deco?
Note: no response.
>>>>> :nelohT
>>>> Still suffering from attribution problems, Deco?
>> Note: no response.
Note: still no response.
Art Deco
>Art Deco <er...@caballista.org> writes:
>
>> :nelohT
>
>Still suffering from attribution problems, Deco?
>
>>>> :nelohT
>
>>> Still suffering from attribution problems, Deco?
>
>Note: no response.
Response.
>
>>>>>> :nelohT
>
>>>>> Still suffering from attribution problems, Deco?
>
>>> Note: no response.
>
>Note: still no response.
Response.
>
>>>>>>> Edward M. Kennedy wrote:
>
>>>>>>>>>> Do youz like wabbits, trolen?
>
>>>>>>>>> Who is "trolen", Cypherpunk? There is nobody in this newsgroup using
>>>>>>>>> that alias. And what does your question have to do with classical
>>>>>>>>> music, Cypherpunk?
>
>>>>>>>> Is tholen not aware of an internationally acclaimed opera starring
>>>>>>>> Buggs
>>>>>>>> Bunny and Elmer Fudd?
>
>>>>>>> There is a big difference between an opera and a cartoon written to
>>>>>>> parody
>>>>>>> opera, Kennedy.
>
>>>>>> Classic erroneous presupposition.
>
>>>>> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>
>>>> How ironic.
>
>>> Where is the alleged irony, Deco?
>
>> What does your question have to do with rabbits, Tholen?
>
>I see that you didn't answer the question, Deco. No surprise there,
>really.
I see that you didn't answer the question, Tholen. No surprise there,
really.
Art Deco
>Art Deco <er...@caballista.org> writes:
>
>> :nelohT
>
>Still suffering from attribution problems, Deco?
>
>>>> :nelohT
>
>>> Still suffering from attribution problems, Deco?
>
>Note: no response.
Response.
>
>>>>>> :nelohT
>
>>>>> Still suffering from attribution problems, Deco?
>
>>> Note: no response.
>
>Note: still no response.
Response.
>
>>>>>>> Daniel Kolle <Daniel...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>>>>>>> Cyphe...@nyc.rr.com wrote:
>
>>>>>>>>> Do youz like wabbits, trolen?
>
>>>>>>>> Tholz is incapable of liking anything, Cypherpunk.
>
>>>>>>> Who is "Tholz", Kolle? There is nobody in this newsgroup using that
>>>>>>> alias.
>
>>>>>> Classic erroneous presupposition.
>
>>>>> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>
>>>> Non sequitur.
>
>>> Another unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>
>> Illogical.
>
>Another unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
Classic erroneous presupposition.
tho...@antispam.ham
> :nelohT
Still suffering from attribution problems, Deco?
>>> :nelohT
>> Still suffering from attribution problems, Deco?
Note: no response.
>>>>> :nelohT
>>>> Still suffering from attribution problems, Deco?
>> Note: no response.
> Response.
I see that you didn't answer the question, Deco. No surprise there,
really.
>>>>>>> :nelohT
>>>>>> Still suffering from attribution problems, Deco?
>>>> Note: no response.
>> Note: still no response.
> Response.
I see that you didn't answer the question, Deco. No surprise there,
really.
>>>>>>>> Edward M. Kennedy wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> Do youz like wabbits, trolen?
>>>>>>>>>> Who is "trolen", Cypherpunk? There is nobody in this newsgroup using
>>>>>>>>>> that alias. And what does your question have to do with classical
>>>>>>>>>> music, Cypherpunk?
>>>>>>>>> Is tholen not aware of an internationally acclaimed opera starring
>>>>>>>>> Buggs
>>>>>>>>> Bunny and Elmer Fudd?
>>>>>>>> There is a big difference between an opera and a cartoon written to
>>>>>>>> parody
>>>>>>>> opera, Kennedy.
>>>>>>> Classic erroneous presupposition.
>>>>>> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>>>>> How ironic.
>>>> Where is the alleged irony, Deco?
>>> What does your question have to do with rabbits, Tholen?
>> I see that you didn't answer the question, Deco. No surprise there,
>> really.
> I see that you didn't answer the question, Tholen. No surprise there,
> really.
I see that you still didn't answer the question, Deco. No surprise
there, really.
tho...@antispam.ham
> :nelohT
Still suffering from attribution problems, Deco?
>>> :nelohT
>> Still suffering from attribution problems, Deco?
Note: no response.
>>>>> :nelohT
>>>> Still suffering from attribution problems, Deco?
>> Note: no response.
> Response.
I see that you didn't answer the question, Deco. No surprise there,
really.
>>>>>>> :nelohT
>>>>>> Still suffering from attribution problems, Deco?
>>>> Note: no response.
>> Note: still no response.
> Response.
I see that you didn't answer the question, Deco. No surprise there,
really.
>>>>>>>> Daniel Kolle <Daniel...@gmail.com> wrote:
Art Deco
>> :nelohT
>
>>>> :nelohT
>
>>> Still suffering from attribution problems, Deco?
>
>Note: no response.
Response.
>
>>>>>> :nelohT
>
>>>>> Still suffering from attribution problems, Deco?
>
>>> Note: no response.
>
>> Response.
>
>I see that you didn't answer the question, Deco. No surprise there,
>really.
I see that you are still suffering from reading comprehension problems,
Tholen. No surprise there, really.
>
>>>>>>>> :nelohT
>
>>>>>>> Still suffering from attribution problems, Deco?
>
>>>>> Note: no response.
>
>>> Note: still no response.
>
>> Response.
>
>I see that you didn't answer the question, Deco. No surprise there,
>really.
I see that you are still suffering from reading comprehension problems,
Tholen. No surprise there, really.
>
>>>>>>>>> Edward M. Kennedy wrote:
>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Do youz like wabbits, trolen?
>
>>>>>>>>>>> Who is "trolen", Cypherpunk? There is nobody in this newsgroup
>>>>>>>>>>> using
>>>>>>>>>>> that alias. And what does your question have to do with classical
>>>>>>>>>>> music, Cypherpunk?
>
>>>>>>>>>> Is tholen not aware of an internationally acclaimed opera starring
>>>>>>>>>> Buggs
>>>>>>>>>> Bunny and Elmer Fudd?
>
>>>>>>>>> There is a big difference between an opera and a cartoon written to
>>>>>>>>> parody
>>>>>>>>> opera, Kennedy.
>
>>>>>>>> Classic erroneous presupposition.
>
>>>>>>> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>
>>>>>> How ironic.
>
>>>>> Where is the alleged irony, Deco?
>
>>>> What does your question have to do with rabbits, Tholen?
>
>>> I see that you didn't answer the question, Deco. No surprise there,
>>> really.
>
>> I see that you didn't answer the question, Tholen. No surprise there,
>> really.
>
>I see that you still didn't answer the question, Deco. No surprise
>there, really.
I see that you still didn't answer the question, Tholen. No surprise
there, really.
--
Art Deco
>> :nelohT
>
>Still suffering from attribution problems, Deco?
>
>>>> :nelohT
>
>>> Still suffering from attribution problems, Deco?
>
>Note: no response.
Response.
>
>>>>>> :nelohT
>
>>>>> Still suffering from attribution problems, Deco?
>
>>> Note: no response.
>
>> Response.
>
>I see that you didn't answer the question, Deco. No surprise there,
>really.
Classic hallucination on your part, Tholen.
>
>>>>>>>> :nelohT
>
>>>>>>> Still suffering from attribution problems, Deco?
>
>>>>> Note: no response.
>
>>> Note: still no response.
>
>> Response.
>
>I see that you didn't answer the question, Deco. No surprise there,
>really.
Classic hallucination on your part, Tholen.
>
>>>>>>>>> Daniel Kolle <Daniel...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>>>>>>>>> Cyphe...@nyc.rr.com wrote:
>
>>>>>>>>>>> Do youz like wabbits, trolen?
>
>>>>>>>>>> Tholz is incapable of liking anything, Cypherpunk.
>
>>>>>>>>> Who is "Tholz", Kolle? There is nobody in this newsgroup using that
>>>>>>>>> alias.
>
>>>>>>>> Classic erroneous presupposition.
>
>>>>>>> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>
>>>>>> Non sequitur.
>
>>>>> Another unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>
>>>> Illogical.
>
>>> Another unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>
>> Classic erroneous presupposition.
>
>Another unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
On your part, Tholen.
tho...@antispam.ham
> :nelohT
Still suffering from attribution problems, Deco?
>>> :nelohT
>>>>> :nelohT
>>>> Still suffering from attribution problems, Deco?
>> Note: no response.
> Response.
I see that you didn't answer the question, Deco. No surprise there,
really.
>>>>>>> :nelohT
>>>>>> Still suffering from attribution problems, Deco?
>>>> Note: no response.
>>> Response.
>> I see that you didn't answer the question, Deco. No surprise there,
>> really.
> I see that you are still suffering from reading comprehension problems,
> Tholen. No surprise there, really.
Classic hallucination on your part, Deco.
>>>>>>>>> :nelohT
>>>>>>>> Still suffering from attribution problems, Deco?
>>>>>> Note: no response.
>>>> Note: still no response.
>>> Response.
>> I see that you didn't answer the question, Deco. No surprise there,
>> really.
> I see that you are still suffering from reading comprehension problems,
> Tholen. No surprise there, really.
Classic hallucination on your part, Deco.
>>>>>>>>>> Edward M. Kennedy wrote:
>>>>>>>>> Classic erroneous presupposition.
>>>>>>> How ironic.
Classic hallucination on your part, Deco.
tho...@antispam.ham
> :nelohT
Still suffering from attribution problems, Deco?
>>> :nelohT
>> Still suffering from attribution problems, Deco?
Note: no response.
>>>>> :nelohT
>>>> Still suffering from attribution problems, Deco?
>> Note: no response.
> Response.
I see that you didn't answer the question, Deco. No surprise there,
really.
>>>>>>> :nelohT
>>>>>> Still suffering from attribution problems, Deco?
>>>> Note: no response.
>>> Response.
>> I see that you didn't answer the question, Deco. No surprise there,
>> really.
> Classic hallucination on your part, Tholen.
Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim on your part, Deco.
>>>>>>>>> :nelohT
>>>>>>>> Still suffering from attribution problems, Deco?
>>>>>> Note: no response.
>>>> Note: still no response.
>>> Response.
>> I see that you didn't answer the question, Deco. No surprise there,
>> really.
> Classic hallucination on your part, Tholen.
Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim on your part, Deco.
Art Deco
>Cla
Posting problems again, Tholen? Nothing came through.
tho...@antispam.ham
> :nelohT
Still suffering from attribution problems, Deco?
>> Cla
> Posting problems again, Tholen?
What does your question have to do with college basketball, Deco?
> Nothing came through.
ah
> ah <splif...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>Art Deco wrote:
>>> :nelohT
>>>
>>>>Daniel Kolle <Daniel...@gmail.com> writes:
>>>>
>>>>> Cyphe...@nyc.rr.com wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>> Do youz like wabbits, trolen?
>>>>
>>>>> Tholz is incapable of liking anything, Cypherpunk.
>>>>
>>>>Who is "Tholz", Kolle? There is nobody in this newsgroup using that
>>>>alias.
>>>
>>> Classic erroneous presupposition.
>>
>>How ironic.
>
> Classic pontification.
On your part.
--
ah
ah
I can verify.
--
ah
Art Deco
He can verify.
Art Deco
Classic lack of specificity.
tho...@antispam.ham
tho...@antispam.ham
Art Deco
Standard Tholen baby blanket, #3.
tho...@antispam.ham
> :nelohT
Still suffering from attribution problems, Deco?
>>> ah <splif...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>> Art Deco <er...@caballista.org> wrote:
>>>>>> :nelohT
>>>>> Still suffering from attribution problems, Deco?
>>>>>>> Cla
>>>>>> Posting problems again, Tholen?
>>>>> What does your question have to do with college basketball, Deco?
>>>>>> Nothing came through.
>>>>> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>>>> I can verify.
>>> He can verify.
>> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
> Standard Tholen baby blanket, #3.
Classic erroneous presupposition.
ah
> ah <splif...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>Art Deco wrote:
>>> ah <splif...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>Art Deco wrote:
>>>>> :nelohT
>>>>>
>>>>>>Daniel Kolle <Daniel...@gmail.com> writes:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Cyphe...@nyc.rr.com wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Do youz like wabbits, trolen?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Tholz is incapable of liking anything, Cypherpunk.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Who is "Tholz", Kolle? There is nobody in this newsgroup using that
>>>>>>alias.
>>>>>
>>>>> Classic erroneous presupposition.
>>>>
>>>>How ironic.
>>>
>>> Classic pontification.
>>
>>On your part.
>
> Classic lack of specificity.
No surprise there, really.
--
ah
ah
Standard Tholen baby blanket, #7.
--
ah
ah
Classic hallucination on your part, nelohT.
--
ah
tho...@antispam.ham
>> Art Deco <er...@caballista.org> wrote:
>>> :nelohT
>> Still suffering from attribution problems, Deco?
>>>>> ah <splif...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>> Art Deco <er...@caballista.org> wrote:
>>>>>>>> :nelohT
>>>>>>> Still suffering from attribution problems, Deco?
>>>>>>>>> Cla
>>>>>>>> Posting problems again, Tholen?
>>>>>>> What does your question have to do with college basketball, Deco?
>>>>>>>> Nothing came through.
>>>>>>> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>>>>>> I can verify.
>>>>> He can verify.
>>>> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>>> Standard Tholen baby blanket, #3.
>> Classic erroneous presupposition.
> Standard Tholen baby blanket, #7.
Classic erroneous presupposition.
tho...@antispam.ham
>>>> Art Deco <er...@caballista.org> wrote:
>>>>> :nelohT
>>>>>> Cla
>>>>> Posting problems again, Tholen?
>>>>> Nothing came through.
>>> I can verify.
Who is "nelohT", ah? There is nobody in this newsgroup using that
alias.
ah
--
ah
tho...@antispam.ham
>>>> Art Deco <er...@caballista.org> wrote:
>>>>> :nelohT
>>>>>>> ah <splif...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>> Art Deco <er...@caballista.org> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> :nelohT
>>>>>>>>>>> Cla
>>>>>>>>>> Posting problems again, Tholen?
>>>>>>>>>> Nothing came through.
>>>>>>>> I can verify.
>>>>>>> He can verify.
>>>> Classic erroneous presupposition.
>> Classic erroneous presupposition.
Classic erroneous presupposition.
ah
--
ah
ah
Note: no response.
--
ah
tho...@antispam.ham
>>>>>> Art Deco <er...@caballista.org> wrote:
>>>>>>> :nelohT
>>>>>>>>> ah <splif...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> Art Deco <er...@caballista.org> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> :nelohT
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Cla
>>>>>>>>>>>> Posting problems again, Tholen?
>>>>>>>>>>>> Nothing came through.
>>>>>>>>>> I can verify.
>>>>>>>>> He can verify.
>>>>>> Classic erroneous presupposition.
>>>> Classic erroneous presupposition.
>> Classic erroneous presupposition.
Classic erroneous presupposition.
tho...@antispam.ham
>>>>>> Art Deco <er...@caballista.org> wrote:
>>>>>>> :nelohT
>>>>>>>> Cla
>>>>>>> Posting problems again, Tholen?
>>>>>>> Nothing came through.
>>>>> I can verify.
> Note: no response.
I'm well aware that you didn't answer the question, ah. No need to
tell me about it.
ah
--
ah
ah
Note: still no response.
--
ah
tho...@antispam.ham
>>>>>>>> Art Deco <er...@caballista.org> wrote:
>>>>>>>>> :nelohT
>>>>>>>>>> Cla
>>>>>>>>> Posting problems again, Tholen?
>>>>>>>>> Nothing came through.
>>>>>>> I can verify.
>>> Note: no response.
> Note: still no response.
I'm well aware that you still didn't answer the question, ah. No need
0xdeadabe
Shut up, a-hole.
<giggle>
ah
ah
Note: still no response.
--
ah
ah
btw, congratulations Doctor.
--
ah
ah
Art Deco
Non sequitur.
Art Deco
>ah <splif...@gmail.com> writes:
>
>> Dr. Robotnik wrote:
>
>Suffering from attribution problems, ah?
>Classic erroneous presupposition.
>
>> btw, congratulations Doctor.
>
>Who is "Doctor", ah? There is nobody in this newsgroup using that
>alias.
That's five examples in a row where you've run away from the
attributions, Tholen.
Art Deco
Six times for this one.
Art Deco
>Art Deco <er...@caballista.org> writes:
>
>> :nelohT
>
>Still suffering from attribution problems, Deco?
Still beating your wive, Tholen?
>
>>>> ah <splif...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>>>>> Art Deco <er...@caballista.org> wrote:
>
>>>>>>> :nelohT
>
>>>>>> Still suffering from attribution problems, Deco?
>
>>>>>>>> Cla
>
>>>>>>> Posting problems again, Tholen?
>
>>>>>> What does your question have to do with college basketball, Deco?
>
>>>>>>> Nothing came through.
>
>>>>>> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>
>>>>> I can verify.
>
>>>> He can verify.
>
>>> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>
>> Standard Tholen baby blanket, #3.
>
>Classic erroneous presupposition.
Standard Tholen baby blanket, #7.
--
0xdeadabe
wrote:
>ah <splif...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>Art Deco wrote:
>>> ah <splif...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>Art Deco wrote:
>>>>> ah <splif...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>Art Deco wrote:
>>>>>>> :nelohT
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>Daniel Kolle <Daniel...@gmail.com> writes:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Cyphe...@nyc.rr.com wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Do youz like wabbits, trolen?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Tholz is incapable of liking anything, Cypherpunk.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>Who is "Tholz", Kolle? There is nobody in this newsgroup using that
>>>>>>>>alias.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Classic erroneous presupposition.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>How ironic.
>>>>>
>>>>> Classic pontification.
>>>>
>>>>On your part.
>>>
>>> Classic lack of specificity.
>>
>>No surprise there, really.
>
>Non sequitur.
Shut the fuck up, Dicko, youz asshole.
0xdeadabe
wrote:
>:nelohT
>
>>Art Deco <er...@caballista.org> writes:
>>
>>> :nelohT
>>
>>Still suffering from attribution problems, Deco?
>
>Still beating your wive, Tholen?
What's a "wive", Dicko? Still beating your meat?
tho...@antispam.ham
> :nelohT
Still suffering from attribution problems, Deco?
>> ah <splif...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Art Deco <er...@caballista.org> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :nelohT
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Cla
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Posting problems again, Tholen?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Nothing came through.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> I can verify.
>>>>>>>>> Note: no response.
>>>>>>> Note: still no response.
>>>>> Note: still no response.
>>> Note: still no response.
Classic kookery on your part, Deco:
"Out-of-context quotes in your boilerplate spam, Davie,
how kooky."
--Art Deco
tho...@antispam.ham
> :nelohT
Still suffering from attribution problems, Deco?
>>> :nelohT
>> Still suffering from attribution problems, Deco?
> Still beating your wive, Tholen?
Classic erroneous presupposition. Classic grammatical error. I see
that you didn't answer the question, Deco. No surprise there, really.
>>>>> ah <splif...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>> Art Deco <er...@caballista.org> wrote:
>>>>>>>> :nelohT
>>>>>>> Still suffering from attribution problems, Deco?
>>>>>>>>> Cla
>>>>>>>> Posting problems again, Tholen?
>>>>>>> What does your question have to do with college basketball, Deco?
>>>>>>>> Nothing came through.
>>>>>>> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>>>>>> I can verify.
>>>>> He can verify.
>>>> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>>> Standard Tholen baby blanket, #3.
>> Classic erroneous presupposition.
> Standard Tholen baby blanket, #7.
Classic erroneous presupposition.
> --
> "Substantiation that you regard yourself as a God to be worhsipped [sic]
> should be your concern, Deco."
> -- David Tholen
Classic kookery on your part, Deco:
ah
>
> "Out-of-context quotes in your boilerplate spam, Davie,
> how kooky."
> --Art Deco
>
Standard Tholen baby blanket, #12.
--
ah
ah
Art Deco
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Classic
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Classic
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Classic
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Classic
>>>>>>>>>>> Classic
>>>>>>>>> Classic
>>>>>>> Classic
>>>>> Classic
>>> Classic
>Classic
I do not believe you, Tholen.
Art Deco
>Classic Classic
>Classic Classic
A bit light, but you can try harder next time, Tholen.
Art Deco
Note: still no response.
--
tho...@antispam.ham
> :nelohT
Still suffering from attribution problems, Deco?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Classic
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Classic
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Classic
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Classic
>>>>>>>>>>>> Classic
>>>>>>>>>> Classic
>>>>>>>> Classic
>>>>>> Classic
>>>> Classic
>> Classic
> I do not believe you, Tholen.
Non sequitur.
> "Substantiation that you regard yourself as a God to be worhsipped [sic]
> should be your concern, Deco."
> -- David Tholen
Classic kookery on your part, Deco:
tho...@antispam.ham
> :nelohT
Still suffering from attribution problems, Deco?
>> Classic Classic
>> Classic Classic
> A bit light, but you can try harder next time, Tholen.
Non sequitur.
> "Substantiation that you regard yourself as a God to be worhsipped [sic]
> should be your concern, Deco."
> -- David Tholen
Classic kookery on your part, Deco:
tho...@antispam.ham
> :nelohT
>> ah <splif...@gmail.com> writes:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Art Deco <er...@caballista.org> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :nelohT
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Cla
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Posting problems again, Tholen?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Nothing came through.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I can verify.
>>>>>>>>>>> Note: no response.
>>>>>>>>> Note: still no response.
>>>>>>> Note: still no response.
>>>>> Note: still no response.
>>> Note: still no response.
> Note: still no response.
I'm well aware that ah still didn't answer the question, Deco. No need
to tell me about it.
> "Substantiation that you regard yourself as a God to be worhsipped [sic]
> should be your concern, Deco."
> -- David Tholen
Classic kookery on your part, Deco:
ah
On your part, Tholen.
--
ah
ah
Standard Tholen baby blanket, #12.
--
ah
ah
Note: still no response.
>
>> "Substantiation that you regard yourself as a God to be worhsipped [sic]
>> should be your concern, Deco."
>> -- David Tholen
>
> Classic kookery on your part, Deco:
>
> "Out-of-context quotes in your boilerplate spam, Davie,
> how kooky."
> --Art Deco
>
Standard Tholen baby blanket, #12.
--
ah
Art Deco
>ah <splif...@gmail.com> writes:
>Classic erroneous presupposition.
Standard Tholen baby blanket, #1.
--
Art Deco
>Still Non Classic
That depends on your definition of the word "classic", Tholen.
--
Art Deco
tho...@antispam.ham
> :nelohT
Still suffering from attribution problems, Deco?
>> Still Non Classic
> That depends on your definition of the word "classic", Tholen.
Non sequitur.
> "Substantiation that you regard yourself as a God to be worhsipped [sic]
> should be your concern, Deco."
> -- David Tholen
Classic kookery on your part, Deco:
Art Deco
>
>>> Still Non Classic
>
>> That depends on your definition of the word "classic", Tholen.
>
>Non sequitur.
Sequitur.
--
tho...@antispam.ham
> :nelohT
Still suffering from attribution problems, Deco?
>>>> Still Non Classic
>>> That depends on your definition of the word "classic", Tholen.
>> Non sequitur.
> Sequitur.
Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
> "Substantiation that you regard yourself as a God to be worhsipped [sic]
> should be your concern, Deco."
> -- David Tholen
Classic kookery on your part, Deco:
Art Deco
>>>>> Still Non Classic
>
>>>> That depends on your definition of the word "classic", Tholen.
>
>>> Non sequitur.
>
>> Sequitur.
>
>Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
Non sequitur.
--
Edward M. Kennedy
>>>>>> Still Non Classic
>>
>>>>> That depends on your definition of the word "classic", Tholen.
>>
>>>> Non sequitur.
>>
>>> Sequitur.
>>
>>Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>
> Non sequitur.
What does that have to do with wabbits, Deco?
--Tedward
tho...@antispam.ham
> :nelohT
Still suffering from attribution problems, Deco?
>>>>>> Still Non Classic
>>>>> That depends on your definition of the word "classic", Tholen.
>>>> Non sequitur.
>>> Sequitur.
>> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
> Non sequitur.
Another unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
> "Substantiation that you regard yourself as a God to be worhsipped [sic]
> should be your concern, Deco."
> -- David Tholen
Art Deco
I'm getting to that.
Art Deco
>
>>>>>>> Still Non Classic
>
>>>>>> That depends on your definition of the word "classic", Tholen.
>
>>>>> Non sequitur.
>
>>>> Sequitur.
>
>>> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>
>> Non sequitur.
>
>Another unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
Still non classic.
--
tho...@antispam.ham
> :nelohT
Still suffering from attribution problems, Deco?
>>>>>>>> Still Non Classic
>>>>>>> That depends on your definition of the word "classic", Tholen.
>>>>>> Non sequitur.
>>>>> Sequitur.
>>>> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>>> Non sequitur.
>> Another unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
> Still non classic.
Non sequitur.
> "Substantiation that you regard yourself as a God to be worhsipped [sic]
> should be your concern, Deco."
> -- David Tholen
Classic kookery on your part, Deco:
tho...@antispam.ham
> Edward M. Kennedy <e...@eio.com> wrote:
>> Art Deco <erfc...@usa.net> wrote
>>>>>>>> Still Non Classic
>>>>>>> That depends on your definition of the word "classic", Tholen.
>>>>>> Non sequitur.
>>>>> Sequitur.
>>>> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>>> Non sequitur.
>> What does that have to do with wabbits, Deco?
> I'm getting to that.
What's taking so long, Deco?
> "Substantiation that you regard yourself as a God to be worhsipped [sic]
> should be your concern, Deco."
> -- David Tholen
Art Deco
>Art Deco <erfc...@usa.net> writes:
>
>> Edward M. Kennedy <e...@eio.com> wrote:
>
>>> Art Deco <erfc...@usa.net> wrote
>
>>>>>>>>> Still Non Classic
>
>>>>>>>> That depends on your definition of the word "classic", Tholen.
>
>>>>>>> Non sequitur.
>
>>>>>> Sequitur.
>
>>>>> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>
>>>> Non sequitur.
>
>>> What does that have to do with wabbits, Deco?
>
>> I'm getting to that.
>
>What's taking so long, Deco?
What does your question have to do with aix, Tholen?
--
Art Deco
>Art Deco <erfc...@usa.net> writes:
>
>> :nelohT
>
>>>>>>>>> Still Non Classic
>
>>>>>>>> That depends on your definition of the word "classic", Tholen.
>
>>>>>>> Non sequitur.
>
>>>>>> Sequitur.
>
>>>>> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>
>>>> Non sequitur.
>
>>> Another unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>
>> Still non classic.
>
>Non sequitur.
Another unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
--
tho...@antispam.ham
> :nelohT
Still suffering from attribution problems, Deco?
>>> Edward M. Kennedy <e...@eio.com> wrote:
>>>> Art Deco <erfc...@usa.net> wrote
>>>>>>>>>> Still Non Classic
>>>>>>>>> That depends on your definition of the word "classic", Tholen.
>>>>>>>> Non sequitur.
>>>>>>> Sequitur.
>>>>>> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>>>>> Non sequitur.
>>>> What does that have to do with wabbits, Deco?
>>> I'm getting to that.
>> What's taking so long, Deco?
> What does your question have to do with aix, Tholen?
You should know, Deco, given that you posted your "getting to that" to
an aix newsgroup.
> "Substantiation that you regard yourself as a God to be worhsipped [sic]
> should be your concern, Deco."
> -- David Tholen
Classic kookery on your part, Deco:
tho...@antispam.ham
> :nelohT
Still suffering from attribution problems, Deco?
>>> :nelohT
>>>>>>>>>> Still Non Classic
>>>>>>>>> That depends on your definition of the word "classic", Tholen.
>>>>>>>> Non sequitur.
>>>>>>> Sequitur.
>>>>>> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>>>>> Non sequitur.
>>>> Another unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>>> Still non classic.
>> Non sequitur.
> Another unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
On your part, Deco.
> "Substantiation that you regard yourself as a God to be worhsipped [sic]
> should be your concern, Deco."
> -- David Tholen
Art Deco
>Art Deco <erfc...@usa.net> writes:
>
>> :nelohT
>
>Still suffering from attribution problems, Deco?
Non sequitur.
>
>>>> Edward M. Kennedy <e...@eio.com> wrote:
>
>>>>> Art Deco <erfc...@usa.net> wrote
>
>>>>>>>>>>> Still Non Classic
>
>>>>>>>>>> That depends on your definition of the word "classic", Tholen.
>
>>>>>>>>> Non sequitur.
>
>>>>>>>> Sequitur.
>
>>>>>>> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>
>>>>>> Non sequitur.
>
>>>>> What does that have to do with wabbits, Deco?
>
>>>> I'm getting to that.
>
>>> What's taking so long, Deco?
>
>> What does your question have to do with aix, Tholen?
>
>You should know, Deco, given that you posted your "getting to that" to
>an aix newsgroup.
Classic erroneous presupposition that I should know the whats or whys
about anything that you post, Tholen.
>
>> "Substantiation that you regard yourself as a God to be worhsipped [sic]
>> should be your concern, Deco."
>> -- David Tholen
>
>Classic kookery on your part, Deco:
>
> "Out-of-context quotes in your boilerplate spam, Davie,
> how kooky."
> --Art Deco
My little sig, containing the hilarious line you posted, is way, way
shorter than the hundreds of lines in your Ode to Art Deco (and
certificate of pwnership) that you tuck inside your off-topic digests,
Tholen. Of course, given your propensity for whining, you would whine
about a three-character sig.
--