On Friday, August 2, 2013 11:18:24 AM UTC-4, John W Kennedy wrote:
> On 2013-08-02 02:16:01 +0000, laraine said:
> > On Wednesday, July 31, 2013 9:53:50 AM UTC-5, John W Kennedy wrote:
> >> On 2013-07-31 02:54:21 +0000, laraine said:
> >>> I've been trying to figure out voice classifications myself.
> >>> Are you not a fan of a system such as "fach", which allows for some
> >>> kinds of baritones to only be expected to reach the F# rather than G?
>
> >>>
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fach
>
> >> The article seems to describe more fachs than I have ever heard of, and
> >> it hardly seems worth it to call someone a "baritone" who has only one
> >> semitone higher than is expected of all basses (even amateur bass
> >> choristers are expected to have a high F).
>
> > But can many low basses really do a high F well, and for sustained amounts
> > of time?
>
> Judging from music obviously aimed at the church choir market, all of
> them. (It's a pet peeve of mine; you never see a church soprano section
> given a mandatory high C, or a tenor section given a high Bb, let alone
> C, but basses are expected to go from low E, or even D, all the way up
> to F.)