Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

"post-modern", "post clasical"?

2 views
Skip to first unread message

Brendan R. Wehrung

unread,
Feb 12, 2006, 10:36:44 PM2/12/06
to
Last week I encountered the term "post-modern" when talking about
contemporary classical composers, but no definition or limits were offered.

Now comes another term, "post classical", in an article about cellist Matt
Haimovitz performing at an Ann Arbor lounge. I think this a an
interesting sidelight on the Metropolitan Opera's reach-out initiative (or
death spiral, depending on you point of view).

To stir the murky waters just a little more I'm going to toss in the
concept of "crossover", which is _supposed_ to be a bridge between two
mutually exclusionary genres of music, not that I agree any such thing
exists given the wide knowledge of pop groups exhibited here once in a
while.

Since some won't have the patience to read the entire article, here's the
heart of the matter, followed by the entire text.

Happy disputation!

Brendan

EXCERPT

The ease with which Haimovitz bridges the chasm between the Blind Pig and
the Seligman center opens a window on why he is one of the most important
young musicians in classical music. He is part of a growing number of
musicians who some critics are beginning to recognize as postclassical --
composers, instrumentalists and ensembles pushing beyond the stultifying
conventions and conservatism of the concert hall to reinvent classical
music for the 21st Century.

"Part of it is simply stripping away some of the image we've built around
classical music," says Haimovitz, speaking from Montreal, where he teaches
at McGill University.

"Some of it is simply showing up in a place like the Pig; it changes the
way they view what you're doing. More and more I'm reaching a broader
audience, and it's exciting because it makes me feel like a relevant
member of a community. When classical music is put on a pedestal and
removed from all that, I'm not comfortable."

There is no official postclassical manifesto but, generally, these are
musicians who embrace contemporary music, experiment with formats and
venues and refuse to cut themselves off from popular currents, jazz and
world music. They love the three Bs, but refuse to be limited by them.
They treat classical music as a living art form. Not surprisingly, they
are connecting with an audience far more diverse -- by age, race and class
-- than the well-to-do white-haired subscribers typical of classical music.

A short list of postclassical musicians might include composer-performers
like John Adams and Steve Reich and the Bang On a Can collective, the
Kronos String Quartet, Kristjan Jarvi's Absolute Ensemble and Eighth
Blackbird; and veteran instrumentalists like Yo-Yo Ma, Gidon Kremer and
Detroit-born Kim Kashkashian, all of whom, like Haimovitz, remain on
speaking terms with the establishment.

FULL ARTICLE

Music
ROCKING THE CELLO: Matt Haimovitz zigzags from classical halls to nightclubs

February 8, 2006
BY MARK STRYKER
FREE PRESS MUSIC WRITER

The last time cellist Matt Haimovitz appeared in metro Detroit, he played
a scintillating program of contemporary American music and Bach at the
Blind Pig, a scruffy rock club in Ann Arbor, for an audience of about 30
adventurous souls, most in their 20s and 30s. Haimovitz dressed down and,
in deference to the club's alternative vibe and damp acoustics, amplified
his cello.

You don't hear many classical musicians at the Blind Pig, but Haimovitz, a
35-year-old former prodigy with a ponytail, is not exactly the cellist
next door. His visit to the Blind Pig was part of a barnstorming tour that
took him to similar venues in 49 states. (He's still hoping to get to Alaska.)

Which is not to say that Haimovitz no longer circulates in the traditional
world of classical music. This weekend he performs twice under the
umbrella of the Chamber Music Society of Detroit at Seligman Performing
Arts Center (sans amplification). He joins the St. Lawrence String Quartet
on Friday to play Schubert's C Major String Quintet. On Saturday, he'll
perform all six of Bach's iconic solo cello suites in a marathon concert.

The ease with which Haimovitz bridges the chasm between the Blind Pig and
the Seligman center opens a window on why he is one of the most important
young musicians in classical music. He is part of a growing number of
musicians who some critics are beginning to recognize as postclassical --
composers, instrumentalists and ensembles pushing beyond the stultifying
conventions and conservatism of the concert hall to reinvent classical
music for the 21st Century.

"Part of it is simply stripping away some of the image we've built around
classical music," says Haimovitz, speaking from Montreal, where he teaches
at McGill University.

"Some of it is simply showing up in a place like the Pig; it changes the
way they view what you're doing. More and more I'm reaching a broader
audience, and it's exciting because it makes me feel like a relevant
member of a community. When classical music is put on a pedestal and
removed from all that, I'm not comfortable."

There is no official postclassical manifesto but, generally, these are
musicians who embrace contemporary music, experiment with formats and
venues and refuse to cut themselves off from popular currents, jazz and
world music. They love the three Bs, but refuse to be limited by them.
They treat classical music as a living art form. Not surprisingly, they
are connecting with an audience far more diverse -- by age, race and class
-- than the well-to-do white-haired subscribers typical of classical music.

A short list of postclassical musicians might include composer-performers
like John Adams and Steve Reich and the Bang On a Can collective, the
Kronos String Quartet, Kristjan Jarvi's Absolute Ensemble and Eighth
Blackbird; and veteran instrumentalists like Yo-Yo Ma, Gidon Kremer and
Detroit-born Kim Kashkashian, all of whom, like Haimovitz, remain on
speaking terms with the establishment.

Haimovitz is a compact man with a cherubic face and a soft-spoken façade
that masks a fierce streak of independence. He was not a born
rabble-rouser. His journey from prodigy to progressive was full of angst
and anomie, and one way to look at it is that before he could begin
reinventing classical music, he had to reinvent himself.

Born in Israel, he moved at age 5 with his parents to California. He took
up the cello at 7. Itzhak Perlman heard him and recommended him to Leonard
Rose, the great cellist at the Juilliard School. At 13, he replaced an
indisposed Rose in a quintet with Isaac Stern, Schlomo Mintz, Pinchas
Zukerman and Mstislav Rostropovich. At 17 he was signed to a contract with
the prestigious label Deutsche Grammophon, and was playing with the
world's top orchestras and conductors.

Big-time careers aren't always what they are cracked up to be, and
Haimovitz was soon waylaid by the disconnect between his outward success
and inner doubt. He grew weary of the isolation of the road and frustrated
by the small menu of warhorses he was required to play. Slowly, things
fell apart. His relationship with his record company soured when he nixed
the release of a $200,000 recording of the Dvorak concerto made with the
Berlin Philharmonic because he wasn't happy with his performance. "Then I
took a couple of years off," he says. "I just didn't feel rooted."

Haimovitz moved to Europe and focused on new music, collaborating with
composers like Gygory Ligeti and Henri Dutilleux. He then moved home,
enrolled at Harvard and met his wife, composer Luna Pearl Woolf. The pair
started a record label, Oxingale, and Haimovitz rebuilt his career.

Tired of waiting for audiences his age to find him in the concert hall, he
began to take the music directly to them in clubs and bars, traveling the
country like Jack Kerouac with a cello. It was a revelation

"I never know who is going to show up," he says. "It's such a mix of
backgrounds. Some people are into classical music, some are into folk,
indie rock or jazz. Sometimes it's packed and sometimes it's just 30
people, but no matter who is there, I have to make the evening work and
communicate. There's such electricity to play for so diverse an audience."
Haimovitz found the freedom inspiring. He could change his set list in
mid-performance, reacting to the audience or his own mood with a
spontaneity usually denied classical performers.

Haimovitz's Oxingale CDs reflect the diversity of his interest and
priorities, from the Bach suites to "Goulash," a concept album exploring
Eastern European themes, linking 20th Century classics by Bartok and
Ligeti with improvised duets with DJ Olive, a turntablist.

"The alternative world that has become part of my life ... I just can't
imagine living without that now," says Haimovitz. "Yet there are aspects
of the concert hall that I love and have never forsaken.

"My problem with it was the layers and formality that have built up over
the years. But I now feel comfortable playing an evening in a large formal
space with an orchestra and then going the next night and having a
completely different experience in a club and the audience has a
completely different relationship to me."

Matt Haimovitz
Born: Dec. 3, 1970, suburban Tel Aviv, Israel. Raised in California.
Residence: Montreal

On CD: Still available are Haimovitz's early Deutsche Grammophon
releases of concertos by Saint-Saens and Lalo and a three CD-set, "The
20th Century Cello," with music by Berio, Ligeti, Harbison, Britten,
Crumb, Dutilleux and others. His CDs for the Oxingale label include Bach's
solo cello suites, "Anthem," "Goulash," "Mozart the Mason" and "The Rose
Album."

What's next: A "Buck the Concerto" series of commissioned works
pairing the cello with unusual ensembles like a big band and choir.


Matthew B. Tepper

unread,
Feb 12, 2006, 10:52:56 PM2/12/06
to
"Modern" can encompass strongly dissonant music which still, by its gestures
and textures, can be heard to have its roots in the various Western musical
traditions. "Post-modern" is the bloop-bleep school of seemingly-random
sounds and noises. ;--)

--
Matthew B. Tepper: WWW, science fiction, classical music, ducks!
My personal home page -- http://home.earthlink.net/~oy/index.html
My main music page --- http://home.earthlink.net/~oy/berlioz.html
To write to me, do for my address what Androcles did for the lion
I ask you to judge me by the enemies I have made. ~ FDR (attrib.)

Paul Ilechko

unread,
Feb 12, 2006, 11:14:20 PM2/12/06
to
Matthew B. Tepper wrote:
> "Modern" can encompass strongly dissonant music which still, by its gestures
> and textures, can be heard to have its roots in the various Western musical
> traditions. "Post-modern" is the bloop-bleep school of seemingly-random
> sounds and noises. ;--)
>

Well, if you draw parallels to other artforms (like architecture or
painting), postmodernism includes picking and choosing from older styles
in a more playful manner, moving away from the deathly seriousness of
high modernism (which would presumably be 12 tone music in modern
classical), which is why composers such as Schnittke and later Rochberg
are often described as post modern.

So, no, I wouldn't agree with your characterization at all.

Matthew Fields

unread,
Feb 13, 2006, 7:32:18 AM2/13/06
to

Post-modern and Post-classical are all derived from Post-serial, from
Battle Creek, Michigan. Their major competitor is the Kellogg corporation,
also in Battle Creek.

--
Matthew H. Fields http://www.umich.edu/~fields
Music: Splendor in Sound
To be great, do better and better. Don't wait for talent: no such thing.
Brights have a naturalistic world-view. http://www.the-brights.net/

Peter T. Daniels

unread,
Feb 13, 2006, 8:19:25 AM2/13/06
to
Matthew B. Tepper wrote:
>
> "Modern" can encompass strongly dissonant music which still, by its gestures
> and textures, can be heard to have its roots in the various Western musical
> traditions. "Post-modern" is the bloop-bleep school of seemingly-random
> sounds and noises. ;--)

That sort of thing (Gunther Schuller comes to mind) was way before
"postmodernism" was invented by the French theorists.
--
Peter T. Daniels gram...@att.net

Nightingale

unread,
Feb 13, 2006, 8:41:43 AM2/13/06
to
Matthew Fields wrote:
> Post-modern and Post-classical are all derived from Post-serial, from
> Battle Creek, Michigan. Their major competitor is the Kellogg corporation,
> also in Battle Creek.
>

But wasn't Total serial a General Mills product?

--
Blessed Cecilia, appear in visions
To all musicians, appear and inspire:
Translated Daughter, come down and startle
Composing mortals with immortal fire.

Allen

unread,
Feb 13, 2006, 10:08:57 AM2/13/06
to

Matthew B. Tepper wrote:

> "Modern" can encompass strongly dissonant music which still, by its gestures
> and textures, can be heard to have its roots in the various Western musical
> traditions. "Post-modern" is the bloop-bleep school of seemingly-random
> sounds and noises. ;--)


Good description. Oh, wait! perhaps you are describing some of the
people who post on rmo?
Allen

Matthew Fields

unread,
Feb 13, 2006, 10:09:05 AM2/13/06
to
In article <43F087...@worldnet.att.net>,

"Postmodernism" comes specifically from historians--exactly the sort of
historians whom Asimov lampooned fairly early in Foundation.

Matthew Fields

unread,
Feb 13, 2006, 10:09:33 AM2/13/06
to
In article <43f08c9b$1...@usenet.zapto.org>, Nightingale <sin...@yorku.ca> wrote:
>Matthew Fields wrote:
>> Post-modern and Post-classical are all derived from Post-serial, from
>> Battle Creek, Michigan. Their major competitor is the Kellogg corporation,
>> also in Battle Creek.
>>
>
>But wasn't Total serial a General Mills product?
>

Yes, you've heard of diploma mills?

Allen

unread,
Feb 13, 2006, 10:11:38 AM2/13/06
to

Matthew Fields wrote:

> Post-modern and Post-classical are all derived from Post-serial, from
> Battle Creek, Michigan. Their major competitor is the Kellogg corporation,
> also in Battle Creek.
>

Some of the music that fits the description has the same effect as some
of those companies' products--specifically, those that contain large
amounts of bran.
Allen

Joe Roberts

unread,
Feb 13, 2006, 10:21:25 AM2/13/06
to

Well, we have the planets, birds, pines, fountains, seasons, colors ... it's
time for someone to score cereals. Who wants to take on the tone row for
All-Bran?

Joe


Matthew Fields

unread,
Feb 13, 2006, 10:43:22 AM2/13/06
to
In article <4pCdnWsP1PX...@comcast.com>,

Actually, Babbitt's All Set is pretty cool.

Peter T. Daniels

unread,
Feb 13, 2006, 1:56:06 PM2/13/06
to
Matthew Fields wrote:
>
> In article <43F087...@worldnet.att.net>,
> Peter T. Daniels <gram...@worldnet.att.net> wrote:
> >Matthew B. Tepper wrote:
> >>
> >> "Modern" can encompass strongly dissonant music which still, by its gestures
> >> and textures, can be heard to have its roots in the various Western musical
> >> traditions. "Post-modern" is the bloop-bleep school of seemingly-random
> >> sounds and noises. ;--)
> >
> >That sort of thing (Gunther Schuller comes to mind) was way before
> >"postmodernism" was invented by the French theorists.
> >--
> >Peter T. Daniels gram...@att.net
>
> "Postmodernism" comes specifically from historians--exactly the sort of
> historians whom Asimov lampooned fairly early in Foundation.

Not in the sense in which the word is used today.

If "postmodernism" was ever a technical term in historiography, it
didn't last long, and has been completely replaced by the Derrida (etc.)
sense.

Moreover, the 10th Collegiate dates the term to 1949, which just
postdates the first of the Foundation stories.

MrT

unread,
Feb 13, 2006, 2:44:20 PM2/13/06
to
The way things look to be going, you might just as well say "post
mortem"...

Best,

MrT

Matthew Fields

unread,
Feb 13, 2006, 3:00:06 PM2/13/06
to
In article <43F0D6...@worldnet.att.net>,

I didn't say Asimov used the term, only that he lampooned the trend
among historians.

Nightingale

unread,
Feb 13, 2006, 5:50:41 PM2/13/06
to
Matthew Fields wrote:
> In article <43f08c9b$1...@usenet.zapto.org>, Nightingale <sin...@yorku.ca> wrote:
>
>>Matthew Fields wrote:
>>
>>>Post-modern and Post-classical are all derived from Post-serial, from
>>>Battle Creek, Michigan. Their major competitor is the Kellogg corporation,
>>>also in Battle Creek.
>>>
>>
>>But wasn't Total serial a General Mills product?
>>
>
>
> Yes, you've heard of diploma mills?
>

Like the prestigious non-accredited universities that keep sending me email?

Matthew Fields

unread,
Feb 13, 2006, 6:04:26 PM2/13/06
to

I wonder how many politicians have their degrees from such institutions.
But I have no such wonders when it comes to chiropractors, homeopaths,
naturapaths, and astrologers.

Peter T. Daniels

unread,
Feb 13, 2006, 7:00:16 PM2/13/06
to

Ah. So you have actually no evidence that whatever trend you're
referring to was called "postmodernism" by historians.

I take it what you're referring to is something _other_ than his
"psychohistory," which he explained in his autobiographies was his
(favorable) reaction to Toynbee.

Matthew Fields

unread,
Feb 13, 2006, 7:43:43 PM2/13/06
to
In article <43F11D...@worldnet.att.net>,

Yes, what I'm referring to IS something other than his psychohistory.
It's his character who is working out the history of the galaxy by
analyzing the texts and arguments of the ancient masters of history
and deciding which one is most logical--WITHOUT getting his ass over
to Trantor to check out any of the facts.

Matthew B. Tepper

unread,
Feb 13, 2006, 8:15:21 PM2/13/06
to
Nightingale <sin...@yorku.ca> appears to have caused the following letters
to be typed in news:43f10d45$1...@usenet.zapto.org:

> Matthew Fields wrote:
>> In article <43f08c9b$1...@usenet.zapto.org>, Nightingale
>> <sin...@yorku.ca> wrote:
>>
>>>Matthew Fields wrote:
>>>
>>>>Post-modern and Post-classical are all derived from Post-serial, from
>>>>Battle Creek, Michigan. Their major competitor is the Kellogg
>>>>corporation, also in Battle Creek.
>>>
>>>But wasn't Total serial a General Mills product?
>>
>> Yes, you've heard of diploma mills?
>
> Like the prestigious non-accredited universities that keep sending me
> email?

Such as the one which kept offering me a "DIPPLOMA"?

Matthew B. Tepper

unread,
Feb 13, 2006, 8:15:21 PM2/13/06
to
"Matthew Fields" <sp...@uce.gov> appears to have caused the following
letters to be typed in news:3J9If.149$hi2...@news.itd.umich.edu:

> In article <43F11D...@worldnet.att.net>,
> Peter T. Daniels <gram...@worldnet.att.net> wrote:
>>Matthew Fields wrote:
>>>
>>> In article <43F0D6...@worldnet.att.net>,
>>> Peter T. Daniels <gram...@worldnet.att.net> wrote:
>>> >Matthew Fields wrote:
>>> >>
>>> >> In article <43F087...@worldnet.att.net>,
>>> >> Peter T. Daniels <gram...@worldnet.att.net> wrote:
>>> >> >Matthew B. Tepper wrote:
>>> >> >>
>>> >> >> "Modern" can encompass strongly dissonant music which still, by
>>> >> >> its gestures and textures, can be heard to have its roots in the
>>> >> >> various Western musical traditions. "Post-modern" is the
>>> >> >> bloop-bleep school of seemingly-random sounds and noises. ;--)
>>> >> >
>>> >> >That sort of thing (Gunther Schuller comes to mind) was way before
>>> >> >"postmodernism" was invented by the French theorists.
>>> >>

>>> >> "Postmodernism" comes specifically from historians--exactly the sort
>>> >> of historians whom Asimov lampooned fairly early in Foundation.
>>> >
>>> >Not in the sense in which the word is used today.
>>> >
>>> >If "postmodernism" was ever a technical term in historiography, it
>>> >didn't last long, and has been completely replaced by the Derrida
>>> >(etc.) sense.
>>> >
>>> >Moreover, the 10th Collegiate dates the term to 1949, which just
>>> >postdates the first of the Foundation stories.
>>>

>>> I didn't say Asimov used the term, only that he lampooned the trend
>>> among historians.
>>
>>Ah. So you have actually no evidence that whatever trend you're
>>referring to was called "postmodernism" by historians.
>>
>>I take it what you're referring to is something _other_ than his
>>"psychohistory," which he explained in his autobiographies was his
>>(favorable) reaction to Toynbee.
>
> Yes, what I'm referring to IS something other than his psychohistory.
> It's his character who is working out the history of the galaxy by
> analyzing the texts and arguments of the ancient masters of history
> and deciding which one is most logical--WITHOUT getting his ass over
> to Trantor to check out any of the facts.

Presumably you mean Lord Dorwin, the armchair anthropologist and effete
court emissary with the Elmer Fudd accent, who can't be bothered with
primary sources as long as he can just sit in his library and weigh the
opinions of previous scholars without doing any new research himself. He
probably came to Terminus FROM Trantor; it was the "Siwius sectah" in an
unfashionable outskirt of the Galaxy which he has no intention to visit.

Asimov makes a cute little joke here, because this Dorwin is, in fact,
ineptly trying to discover the homeworld of humanity, the origin of OUR
species, as it were.

Nightingale

unread,
Feb 14, 2006, 8:30:03 AM2/14/06
to
Matthew B. Tepper wrote:

> Nightingale <sin...@yorku.ca> appears to have caused the following letters
> to be typed in news:43f10d45$1...@usenet.zapto.org:
>
>
>>Matthew Fields wrote:
>>
>>>In article <43f08c9b$1...@usenet.zapto.org>, Nightingale
>>><sin...@yorku.ca> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>Matthew Fields wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>Post-modern and Post-classical are all derived from Post-serial, from
>>>>>Battle Creek, Michigan. Their major competitor is the Kellogg
>>>>>corporation, also in Battle Creek.
>>>>
>>>>But wasn't Total serial a General Mills product?
>>>
>>>Yes, you've heard of diploma mills?
>>
>>Like the prestigious non-accredited universities that keep sending me
>>email?
>
>
> Such as the one which kept offering me a "DIPPLOMA"?
>

LOL! The writer must be a graduate of a prestigious non-accredited
school :-)

Peter T. Daniels

unread,
Feb 14, 2006, 9:51:39 AM2/14/06
to
Matthew Fields wrote:
>
> In article <43F11D...@worldnet.att.net>,
> Peter T. Daniels <gram...@worldnet.att.net> wrote:

> >> >> >That sort of thing (Gunther Schuller comes to mind) was way before
> >> >> >"postmodernism" was invented by the French theorists.

> >> >> "Postmodernism" comes specifically from historians--exactly the sort of


> >> >> historians whom Asimov lampooned fairly early in Foundation.
> >> >
> >> >Not in the sense in which the word is used today.
> >> >
> >> >If "postmodernism" was ever a technical term in historiography, it
> >> >didn't last long, and has been completely replaced by the Derrida (etc.)
> >> >sense.
> >> >
> >> >Moreover, the 10th Collegiate dates the term to 1949, which just
> >> >postdates the first of the Foundation stories.

> >> I didn't say Asimov used the term, only that he lampooned the trend


> >> among historians.
> >
> >Ah. So you have actually no evidence that whatever trend you're
> >referring to was called "postmodernism" by historians.
> >
> >I take it what you're referring to is something _other_ than his
> >"psychohistory," which he explained in his autobiographies was his
> >(favorable) reaction to Toynbee.
>
> Yes, what I'm referring to IS something other than his psychohistory.
> It's his character who is working out the history of the galaxy by
> analyzing the texts and arguments of the ancient masters of history
> and deciding which one is most logical--WITHOUT getting his ass over
> to Trantor to check out any of the facts.

So it's your assertion that Scholasticism, which goes back before
Abelard, and was not a "trend" among historians in the mid 20th century,
was suddenly renamed "postmodernism" by historians in 1949?

Pardon me if I don't believe you.

Message has been deleted

Ian Pace

unread,
Feb 14, 2006, 3:41:32 PM2/14/06
to

"Wayne Reimer" <wrdslremovethis¿@pacbell.net> wrote in message
news:MPG.1e5bd7e66...@news.sf.sbcglobal.net...
> In article <43F0D6...@worldnet.att.net>, gram...@worldnet.att.net
> says...
> I don't know who invented the term, but I remember it as originally
> being used in reference to architecture, not to the arts in general.
>
The British architect and architectural writer Charles Jencks cites the term
(post-modernism) as first originating in the 1870s, used by the British
artist John Watkins Chapman (with reference to post-impressionism), then in
1917 by the German Nietzschean and proto-Nazi philosopher Rudolf Pannwitz
(who used it to refer to a type of reborn heroism, athleticism, nationalism,
mysticism, militarism, religiosity in opposition to what he saw as the
decadent modern world). Other early uses of the term include those by
Federico de Onís, Hispanist at Columbia University, who used it in 1934 to
refer to a move away from the difficulty and perceived esoteric qualities of
modernist poetry, the British historian Arnold J. Toynbee, who used it in
1939 to refer to the collapse of the Wstern bourgeois order of the last few
centuries, the art historian Bernard Smith in 1945, to refer to socialist
realism in painting, the American poet Charles Olson during the 1950s, whose
definition I'm not sure of in detail, but it had something to do with
replacing fragmentation with fullness (very different to the later meaning
the term came to have), the writers and critics Irving Howe and Harry Levin
in 1959-60 to refer to the decline of high modernism. However, the term came
into more frequent use in the early 1970s in architecture, deriving from the
thought of American architect Robert Venturi, and in particular Jencks's own
book 'The Language of Postmodern Architecture' of 1977. In a more
theoretical and abstract sense, the term gained wide currency after
Jean-Francois Lyotard's 'The Postmodern Condition: A Report on Knowledge',
first published in French in 1979. There has been a mass of discussion and
writing on the subject ever since, including much trenchant criticism from
the left (a key text here is Frederic Jameson's 'Postmodernism, Or, The
Cultural Logic of Late Capitalism', of 1991). It is regularly applied to
developments in many of the arts and humanities, though perhaps slightly
less so with reference to music than elsewhere. Glenn Watkins' 'Pyramids at
the Louvre: Music, Culture and Collage from Stravinsky to the
Postmodernists' essentially locates post-modernism as coming out of
Stravinsky, whilst various perspectives are offered in Judy Lochead and
Joseph Auner (eds) - Postmodern Music/Postmodern Thought. Most often the
term is used to refer to music that turns its back on the tendencies towards
abstraction and high serialism of the post-war years (generally portrayed in
strawman form by postmodern critics) and instead celebrates eclecticism,
musical reference, irony, and 'play'. There can be penetrating work using
some such techniques (not least that of Mauricio Kagel, though I prefer not
to use the term in his case), but for the most part postmodern music, in my
opinion, demonstrates the aesthetics of the supermarket.

Ian


Matthew Fields

unread,
Feb 14, 2006, 3:22:22 PM2/14/06
to
In article <MPG.1e5bd7e66...@news.sf.sbcglobal.net>,

Wayne Reimer <wrdslremovethis濃pacbell.net> wrote:
>In article <43F0D6...@worldnet.att.net>, gram...@worldnet.att.net
>says...
>I don't know who invented the term, but I remember it as originally
>being used in reference to architecture, not to the arts in general.
>
>wr

Jacques Derrida is the usual subject.

Matthew B. Tepper

unread,
Feb 14, 2006, 5:02:09 PM2/14/06
to
"Matthew Fields" <sp...@uce.gov> appears to have caused the following
letters to be typed in news:2_qIf.166$hi2...@news.itd.umich.edu:

> In article <MPG.1e5bd7e66...@news.sf.sbcglobal.net>,
> Wayne Reimer <wrdslremovethis濃pacbell.net> wrote:
>>In article <43F0D6...@worldnet.att.net>, gram...@worldnet.att.net
>>says...
>>> Matthew Fields wrote:
>>> >
>>> > In article <43F087...@worldnet.att.net>,
>>> > Peter T. Daniels <gram...@worldnet.att.net> wrote:
>>> > >Matthew B. Tepper wrote:
>>> > >>
>>> > >> "Modern" can encompass strongly dissonant music which still, by
>>> > >> its gestures and textures, can be heard to have its roots in the
>>> > >> various Western musical traditions. "Post-modern" is the
>>> > >> bloop-bleep school of seemingly-random sounds and noises. ;--)
>>> > >
>>> > >That sort of thing (Gunther Schuller comes to mind) was way before
>>> > >"postmodernism" was invented by the French theorists.
>>> >

>>> > "Postmodernism" comes specifically from historians--exactly the sort
>>> > of historians whom Asimov lampooned fairly early in Foundation.
>>>
>>> Not in the sense in which the word is used today.
>>>
>>> If "postmodernism" was ever a technical term in historiography, it
>>> didn't last long, and has been completely replaced by the Derrida
>>> (etc.) sense.
>>>
>>> Moreover, the 10th Collegiate dates the term to 1949, which just
>>> postdates the first of the Foundation stories.
>>>
>>I don't know who invented the term, but I remember it as originally
>>being used in reference to architecture, not to the arts in general.
>

> Jacques Derrida is the usual subject.

But since he's dead, aren't we now living in the age of post-Derridaism?

Ian Pace

unread,
Feb 14, 2006, 5:30:31 PM2/14/06
to

"Matthew Fields" <sp...@uce.gov> wrote in message
news:2_qIf.166$hi2...@news.itd.umich.edu...
No he isn't, he's associated with post-structuralism. There are some
possible links between the two, but they are different intellectual
phenomena.

Ian


Peter T. Daniels

unread,
Feb 14, 2006, 6:01:19 PM2/14/06
to
Wayne Reimer wrote:
>
> In article <43F0D6...@worldnet.att.net>, gram...@worldnet.att.net
> says...
> I don't know who invented the term, but I remember it as originally
> being used in reference to architecture, not to the arts in general.

In that context, probably Venturi and Scott Brown; embraced by Stanley
Tigerman, and Chicago is full of his whimsical postmodern buildings --
which have held up remarkably well over the past 40 years or so (they
_don't_ look dated or like period pieces, as, I'm sorry to say, many of
Frank Lloyd Wright's buildings of the 40s and 50s do).

William Sommerwerck

unread,
Feb 14, 2006, 6:43:37 PM2/14/06
to
> I don't know who invented the term, but I remember it as originally
> being used in reference to architecture, not to the arts in general.

You're forgetting that music is defrosted architecture.


Philip Peters

unread,
Feb 14, 2006, 10:09:04 PM2/14/06
to
Ian Pace wrote:

Try Lyotard.

P.
>
>

Message has been deleted

Peter T. Daniels

unread,
Feb 15, 2006, 10:14:25 AM2/15/06
to
Wayne Reimer wrote:
>
> > In article <L8GdnX4k5Niz9m_e...@comcast.com>, gizzle...@comcast.net says...

> > > I don't know who invented the term, but I remember it as originally
> > > being used in reference to architecture, not to the arts in general.
> >
> > You're forgetting that music is defrosted architecture.
> >
> >
> That's good. :-) For some reason, melting igloos come to mind...

Too bad RVW was at the wrong end of the earth.

0 new messages