Schumann biographies are a pretty lacklustre field, from the indeed
'workmanlike' and leaden Joan Chissell, to Jensen, to it seems this
Musgrave effort. So much has been rehashed, so much become hackneyed.
The Ostwald work goes way too far, even if it is never boring,
although it probably reflects some of the predelictions of the author
rather than its subject. The English can never really comprehend the
inspired artist Schumann, on the whole for them the more workmanlike
and conventional Mendelssohn and Brahms win far more admiration to
their rather limited musical horizons. The use of 'pubic performance'
is truly 'LOL' and risible, and shows how little effort is taken with
proof reading these days. Probably reflects the establishment English
view of Schumann's peripheral stature, but as you say the Schumann
cognoscenti recognize his true achievement and worth (Steven Isserlis
and John Eliot Gardiner are obviously not of this ilk).
I will try to get a copy of this, but it seems to be retreading
familiar ground. I have not yet read Daverio, and he is actually the
next author on my list (just downloaded the ebook versions of 2 of his
Schumann tracts, the biog and the one paired, or perhaps trioed, with
Schubert and Brahms).
I agree with you that the Davidsbuendlertaenze, Peri and Faust are all
mighty works, along with the Kresleriana, the Fantasy in C,
Dichterliebe, the Symphonic Studies, the Eichendorff Liederkreis, et
al. His symphonies are by turns sneered at and damned with faint
praise, but surely they are at the apex of the 19th century symphonic
repertoire along with Beethoven, Schubert and Brahms.