Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Ansermet Discography

107 views
Skip to first unread message

Jerry

unread,
Nov 2, 2006, 1:10:50 PM11/2/06
to
Stumbled on this Ansermet discography (in Italian) that
looks about as good as any I've seen.

http://www.scona.ch/ansermet/discografia.php

There may be some minor errors (e.g. I believe the
Prokofiev Cinderella was only Suites 1 and 2 and was never
the full ballet, as suggested here).

Wasn't sure if there are any better ones out there.

ansermetniac

unread,
Nov 2, 2006, 1:16:59 PM11/2/06
to

Mine is more acurate and has the dates based upon the Decca file
cards.

Abbedd

Any man who afflicts the human race with ideas must be prepared to see them misunderstood.
- HL Mencken

Rolf

unread,
Nov 2, 2006, 1:26:23 PM11/2/06
to

ansermetniac schreef:

Hi jeff,
ehh... do you have it on-line somewhere?

Rolf

ansermetniac

unread,
Nov 2, 2006, 1:29:05 PM11/2/06
to

I had it online for a while . I took it down to finish it as I only
had it finished till 1962. I wil, finish it this weekend and post it.
It will only be the Decca recordings with the SRO for now. The
recordings with other orchestras do not matter as explained by
Ansermet in an interview

Abbedd
>
>Rolf

Rolf

unread,
Nov 2, 2006, 2:33:35 PM11/2/06
to

Thanks

Salvatore Mo

unread,
Nov 2, 2006, 2:38:50 PM11/2/06
to
ansermetniac wrote:
> On 2 Nov 2006 10:26:23 -0800, "Rolf" <78...@angelfire.com> wrote:
> >
> > Hi jeff,
> > ehh... do you have it on-line somewhere?
>
> I had it online for a while . I took it down to finish it as I only
> had it finished till 1962. I wil, finish it this weekend and post it.

On a website, I may hope?

> It will only be the Decca recordings with the SRO for now. The
> recordings with other orchestras do not matter as explained by
> Ansermet in an interview
>

In that case it is not the Ansermet discography.


ansermetniac

unread,
Nov 2, 2006, 2:50:52 PM11/2/06
to
On Thu, 2 Nov 2006 20:38:50 +0100, "Salvatore Mo"
<salva...@gmail.com> wrote:

>ansermetniac wrote:
>> On 2 Nov 2006 10:26:23 -0800, "Rolf" <78...@angelfire.com> wrote:
>> >
>> > Hi jeff,
>> > ehh... do you have it on-line somewhere?
>>
>> I had it online for a while . I took it down to finish it as I only
>> had it finished till 1962. I wil, finish it this weekend and post it.
>
>On a website, I may hope?

Yes


>
>> It will only be the Decca recordings with the SRO for now. The
>> recordings with other orchestras do not matter as explained by
>> Ansermet in an interview
>>
>
>In that case it is not the Ansermet discography

I can add the other orchestras later. I will satrt with the most
important

Abbedd.

vhorowitz

unread,
Nov 2, 2006, 2:54:38 PM11/2/06
to

The London recordings don't matter??? Guess I'll have to throw them
out.....

ansermetniac

unread,
Nov 2, 2006, 3:03:40 PM11/2/06
to
On 2 Nov 2006 11:54:38 -0800, "vhorowitz" <vladho...@hotmail.com>
wrote:

What London Recordings. The ones with the LSO and LPO. No, they don't
matter as much as the ones with the SRO, if at all, according to
Ansermet

When I said Decca I meant Decca/London

Rolf

unread,
Nov 2, 2006, 3:10:44 PM11/2/06
to

By the way, I have a 45 with Weber - Jubel overture and Beethoven
Leonore.
Do you know when this was recorded/issued?
Rolf

ansermetniac

unread,
Nov 2, 2006, 3:48:02 PM11/2/06
to

I have that too but mine has the Corolian. The jubel was never relased
in th US probobaly recorded 1960. leonore # 2 was recrded in 1960 #3
in 1958 #3 was never released in the USA

Matthew B. Tepper

unread,
Nov 2, 2006, 3:50:55 PM11/2/06
to
ansermetniac <anserm...@hotmail.com> appears to have caused the
following letters to be typed in
news:lvikk252opuo9d2ul...@4ax.com:

> On Thu, 2 Nov 2006 20:38:50 +0100, "Salvatore Mo"
><salva...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>ansermetniac wrote:
>>> On 2 Nov 2006 10:26:23 -0800, "Rolf" <78...@angelfire.com> wrote:
>>> >
>>> > Hi jeff,
>>> > ehh... do you have it on-line somewhere?
>>>
>>> I had it online for a while . I took it down to finish it as I only
>>> had it finished till 1962. I wil, finish it this weekend and post it.
>>
>>On a website, I may hope?
> Yes
>>
>>> It will only be the Decca recordings with the SRO for now. The
>>> recordings with other orchestras do not matter as explained by
>>> Ansermet in an interview
>>
>>In that case it is not the Ansermet discography
>

> I can add the other orchestras later. I will start with the most
> important

Sounds like a good and methodical way to proceed.

--
Matthew B. Tepper: WWW, science fiction, classical music, ducks!
My personal home page -- http://home.earthlink.net/~oy/index.html
My main music page --- http://home.earthlink.net/~oy/berlioz.html
To write to me, do for my address what Androcles did for the lion
Harrington/Coy is a gay wrestler who won't come out of the closet

vhorowitz

unread,
Nov 2, 2006, 9:11:19 PM11/2/06
to


Oh well, I still enjoy some of the LSO/LPO things. I guess I'm
surprised Ansermet disavowed them.

Looking forward to your SRO discography, in any case, thanks in advance.

ansermetniac

unread,
Nov 2, 2006, 9:28:39 PM11/2/06
to
On 2 Nov 2006 18:11:19 -0800, "vhorowitz" <vladho...@hotmail.com>
wrote:

he did not directly disavow them. He did by explaining the difference
between being a guest conductor and a regular conductor. In his case
this is more drastic as he founded, staffed and trained the SRO in his
unique image. The 1946 Petrushka with the LPO thrilled the world but
the 1949 version with the SRO is a hundred times better. Man for man,
on pape,r the SRO maybe cannot match the LPO but when Ansermet is
conducting they do, by giving Ansermet exactly and everything he needs

Abbedd

Gerard

unread,
Nov 3, 2006, 5:32:35 AM11/3/06
to
ansermetniac wrote:

> >
> > Oh well, I still enjoy some of the LSO/LPO things. I guess I'm
> > surprised Ansermet disavowed them.
> he did not directly disavow them. He did by explaining the difference
> between being a guest conductor and a regular conductor. In his case
> this is more drastic as he founded, staffed and trained the SRO in his
> unique image. The 1946 Petrushka with the LPO thrilled the world but
> the 1949 version with the SRO is a hundred times better.

What a nonsense. More than 12 times better is not possible (Stravinsky, Abbado,
Davis, Boulez come close).


0 new messages