On Thursday, December 22, 2016 at 7:30:54 PM UTC-8,
cooper...@gmail.com wrote:
> Am I the only one who thinks that the two late masterpieces for wind ensemble are essential Strauss?
>
> AC
I'm glad you mentioned them.
I'm not sure I'd agree that any specific Strauss piece is essential Strauss, because he is so consistently interesting that one could ultimately just say, hear everything!
First of all, there's some repetition. If you've heard a couple of tone poems like Don Juan and Ein Heldenleben, you're not going to know that much more about Strauss by hearing Don Quixote and Death and Transfiguration. The reverse is also true. And if you know Salome, you won't learn that much more about Strauss by hearing Elektra. The works come in stylistic bunches. (If you've heard Elektra, it's probably more interesting to skip Salome, within the same "bunch," and hear Rosenkavalier or Ariadne next.)
That said, the key to approaching Strauss is sampling across his career, because Salome or Elektra won't tell you enough about Strauss that you can anticipate what it's like to hear Daphne or Arabella or Capriccio. And yes, nothing quite tells you what the wind Sonatinas are going to be like without hearing them. It is impossible to prepare for Metamorphosen or Four Last Songs by listening to early works, so yes, they're kind of "essential" too. The same is true in reverse chronology: you can hear Metamorphosen but know next to nothing about Also Sprach Zarathustra.
These late wind ensemble pieces are masterpieces and distinctive in his output--essential for wind enthusiasts, for sure. However, because they are distinctive, you can't really argue that one should hear them and not other works of his late period. Because they aren't particularly "representative," they're not "essential" for newbies.
The late wind sonatinas will surprise people raised on earlier Strauss works, like the first horn concerto, the early wind serenade, Don Juan and Also Sprach Zarathustra or Elektra. Strauss was always writing great music for winds, but in his later period his use of the winds just got better and better. That is a fundamental point for knowing Strauss, but I think just hearing, say Arabella gives you an inkling to how Strauss's scoring had not been completely codified by the time of Salome.
Another late work, the Oboe Concerto, is also a masterpiece and much needed companion if one is going to judge Strauss's last efforts. I feel almost as strongly about the second horn concerto, another great piece. Knowing the first horn concerto (and the Alpine Symphony!) is not enough if you want to appreciation Richard Strauss's close relationship to the horn.
--Jeff