In article <rv5ttr$ugv$
1...@hope.eyrie.org>,
I wonder if January is indicative of what the year of releases will
be like, or if this is already most of them....
The liner notes thing is a real aggravation, though, not least
because there's a good chance there's nothing of interest in the
liner notes! But how to know...? And it always seems irresponsible
of me to comment on points that might well be discussed already by
the musicians/producers without having read what they have to say....
The incentive of Decca/Presto to be releasing this new album download
sans notes? Charge another $1 for them or something if that's what
they really want.... The current situation seems absurd.
Anyway, Visse/Ricercar review coming shortly. Brabant is that "17th
century choir" sound, but the most interesting program so far with
"a lot of music" even if some of it ends up being obscured by style.
(I haven't read their discussion yet, although I have it!) "Best
sounding" is still Cantica Symphonia, although most of their program
is material I didn't really need to hear more of....
(Note that both Maletto & Visse completely sidestep authorship
discussions, so maybe that'll be the general approach this year.
People can't resist some of the catchy
this-probably-isn't-really-by-Josquin music.... Whether anyone
tries explicitly to address the shift/overlap in tuning during the
Josquin era remains an open question.... So far, no. Seems like
something Kirkman would surely do, but we'll see....)