Only judging him from recordings, but I like his Scheherazade very much, his
Dvorak is pretty good also.
Of course he's a good conductor, he's a damn good conductor. Listen e.g. to
his Symphonie Fantastique (Berlioz). No one has ever given a better
performance of this wonderful work than MWC.
His other Berlioz recordings, "Harold en italie" and "Roméo et Juliette,"
are pretty fine too.
--
Matthew B. Tepper: WWW, science fiction, classical music, ducks!
My personal home page -- http://home.earthlink.net/~oy/index.html
My main music page --- http://home.earthlink.net/~oy/berlioz.html
To write to me, do for my address what Androcles did for the lion
Take THAT, Daniel Lin, Mark Sadek, James Lin & Christopher Chung!
Thanks. I've been looking for the best recording for many, many years. Finally
I know which one is the best.
Please tell us which one is the best.
-Sol Siegel, Philadelphia, PA
--------------------
"I really liked it. Even the music was good." - Yogi Berra, after seeing
"Tosca"
--------------------
(Remove "exitspam" from the end of my e-mail address to respond.)
Recently somebody wrote about a conductor "No one has ever given a better
performance of this wonderful work". I can't remember his name. I will have a
look in the archives if you're interested.
I've worked with him----in Cleveland in the early '80's. I know of the
contempt with which orchestral players are held by many in this group,
but I have to chime in and say that I found him phenominally boring.
If recordings with him sound good, it's because the musicians are
rising to the occasion in spite of him----a concept that is foreign to
many in this newsgroup.
Happy Holidays, Mr. Ellsworth (and others).
No dear Guus, we're only interested in the best recording. Please let us
know which one you consider as the best.
--
Paul Goldstein
Is this the same fellow who conducted the Gotheburg SO in Nielsen's
3rd symphony on the Sony label? If so, he's wonderful.
Norm Strong
I can't believe that anybody who posts here holds orchestral players in
contempt. I certainly don't. How would I have been able to spend the hours of
my life I've spent listening to orchestras playing music live and on records
without you? I even have a couple of close friends who are orchestral players,
and many years ago I was a bad amateur orchestral player myself.
-david gable
A favorite of Messiaen's and a champion of his music, Chung is very good in the
modern French repertory. (I'm less enthusiastic about his widely admired
Berlioz.)
I have a good live recording of Boulez's Notations 1-4 & 7 with Chung and the
Orchestre de Paris that includes the most sensational performance of Notation 7
I've heard: it's much more distinctively shaped than the virtuosically secure
performances with Barenboim and the CSO and David Robertson and Lyon forces
available in studio recordings. I wouldn't neccesarily have expected
sensational phrasing from Chung on the basis of some of the performances of
earlier music I've heard, but he certainly delivers here. Bravo to him and to
the Orchestre de Paris's principal trumpet, too.
-david gable, whose favorite Notation is 1 or 7
No one? His is the very best out of the (probably) more than a hundred
recordings of the Fantastique ever made? In any case, I wasn't wild about it.
-david gable
Sol L. Siegel wrote:
You beat me to it.
Allen
I still am David!
In terms of actual sound, that CD contains one of the most beautiful recordings
of a piano that I've ever heard. I wish all piano recordings sounded like
that. And his playing (like Bartoli's singing) is absolutely gorgeous.
Malcolm
That's not what I wrote.
>
>
> No dear Guus, we're only interested in the best recording.
>
>
You're not.
I think the problem crops up where professional musicians show disrespect for
audience opinions, or vice versa. That's certainly not the case with you.
As for your opinion of Mr. Chung, I am not surprised. How anyone can lead and
inspire colleagues as experienced as you is a mystery, actually. This is most
likely a rare experience.
How many of us reach the pinnacle of our professions and still think our bosses
are way cool? I've been lucky enough to work for inspiring, intelligent people;
but then, I haven't reached the pinnacle of my profession...
We orchestral musicians (I am not a professional) rarely agree on anything
except what a bad job the conductor is doing. Musicians are rightly appalled by
unclear beats, unsteady or unworkable tempi, idiotic rambling commentary during
rehearsal, stupid programming choices, over-rehearsing, under-rehearsing, etc.
etc. Goes with the territory. And when I actually am inspired I am often
disappointed to find out that others were not.
--Jeff
What makes you say that? I don't understand.
Janneman
> Is Myung-Whun Chung a good conductor?
No.
>I know of the contempt with which orchestral players are held by
>many in this group....
They are? By whom? Not me!
Gary Stucka
Apology accepted. And I will seal the acceptance by listening to some
CSO CDs. Thanks to you and your fellow CSO members for bring so much
joy to my life through recordings.
Neil Brennen
I think he's got a real feel for Messiaen, and his live Turangalila at
Carnegie Hall last season was thrilling. Unfortunately, he prefaced it
before intermission (!) with a La Mer that was as plodding as could be, a
real sea of sludge.
Still, on the night before or after, he showed up in Weill Hall with a
violinst, cellist, and clarinettist to play an excellent Quatuor pour le fin
du temps. And talk about good, imaginative programming - the first half
consisted of the Debussy Clarinet Rhapsody, Violin Sonata, and Cello Sonata.
I wouldn't say "no one", as there are several outstanding performances
on record of this popular work, but Chung's account of the Fantastique
reigns among the finest in my book, too.
--
Nicolai Zwar
http://www.nicolaizwar.com
"Do not spare them; put to death men and women, children and infants,
cattle and sheep, camels and donkeys." (Yahweh, apparently throwing one
of his tantrums.)
Yes.
> David7Gable wrote:
>>>No one has ever given a better
>>>performance of this wonderful work than MWC.
>>
>> No one? His is the very best out of the (probably) more than a hundred
>> recordings of the Fantastique ever made? In any case, I wasn't wild
>> about it.
>
> I wouldn't say "no one", as there are several outstanding performances
> on record of this popular work, but Chung's account of the Fantastique
> reigns among the finest in my book, too.
I agree. I also enjoy his "Harold" and "Damnation." Incidentally, DGG at
first declined to carry his S.F. in the USA, and then when "Damnation" came
out the Universal release book gave the popularity of his S.F. as a selling
point for it....
Poor Chung. What a blighted career. First all of that BS in Paris, and
then more recently his label sullied his reputation by associating him with
Bo-Bo. (At least Zubie had the excuse of a huge legal settlement he had to
pay off.)
--
Matthew B. Tepper: WWW, science fiction, classical music, ducks!
My personal home page -- http://home.earthlink.net/~oy/index.html
My main music page --- http://home.earthlink.net/~oy/berlioz.html
To write to me, do for my address what Androcles did for the lion
Take THAT, Daniel Lin, Mark Sadek, James Lin & Christopher Chung!