On Jul 29, 1:56 pm, td <tomdedea...@mac.com> wrote:
> Frankly, I think the Siloti verion works very well indeed. It was the
> choice of Cherkassky, Moiseiwitsch, Gilels and a host of other
> pianists of less repute.
[snip]
Which version did George Balanchine use for "Ballet Imperial" (1941,
with tutus), later retitled "Tchaikovsky Piano Concerto No. 2" (1973,
with chiffon skirts)?
http://www.balanchine.org/balanchine/display_result.jsp?num=194
I would assume that the longer andante would provide an extended
opportunity for the dance principals to display their talents, but
might also be more tiring to them.
Another question: is the music an adaptation of the concerto,
sans piano? Genuine virtuosity is required for the piano part,
as well as for the dancers, and it must require a certain degree of
self-effacement to play what is usually the starring role in a major
work yet to be so much in the background, down in the pit.
A web search shows that the ballet has been appearing in the
repertory of other companies,
http://ionarts.blogspot.com/2006/06/mariinsky-ballet
-dances-balanchine.html
for example. (Here it looks like either the revised title or tutus
should have been used. ;-)
--Ward Hardman
"The older I get, the more I admire and crave competence,
just simple competence, in any field from adultery to zoology."
- H.L. Mencken
The "AntiTroll02" who changed it is the "Guangdong Ding Dong" who
posts out of ChiCom country, as shown by his IP Address of
218.14.49.187.
The fake "Ward Hardman" who changed it is the "Guangdong Ding Dong"
who
posts out of ChiCom country, as shown by his IP Address of
218.14.49.187.
He can also be detected via his email address of
"ward.hardMAM(AT)gmail.com
Tard