TomG
Some years ago, the Johanos/Dallas Symphony was the greatest thing since
fried rice, and I'd have to say I've never heard a better recording,
sonically speaking. This recording, in it's LP version, was universally
used as a demo in audio stores.
However, for sheer excitement, performance wise, the Kondrashin gets
the prize, altho it's sound is quite dated.
There are two Kondrashins available:
Kondrashin/Moscow Phil. +The Bells
RCA 32046 $11.20 $10.08
Kondrashin/RCG. +Tchaikovsky: Ste. No. 3
EMR 3962 $20.10 $18.09
The RCA is the one to beat; I have no idea how the EMR recording sounds,
or is performed, for that matter.
--
"Outside of that, Mrs. Lincoln, how did you like the play?"
> Any suggestions on the best Rachmaninov Symphonic Dances? Any help much
> appreciated!
1. Ashkenazy/Royal Concertgebouw (Decca mid price): a wild and furious
reading of the work. Great sound. If you like his Rachmaninov
symphonies, you will like it.
2. Jansons/St. Petersburg PO (EMI full price): powerfully driven and
awesome playing from the orchestra. Good sound. Not as bold as
Ashkenazy's, but equally exciting.
I personally like the Ashkenazy version more because of the
orchestra's richer sound.
Michael Lee
le...@ecf.toronto.edu
I think I would probably go with Ormandy/PhO on Sony. Should be pretty cheap. Rach
wrote this piece for them and theirs is still one of the best.
--
Don Patterson
"The President's Own"
United States Marine Band
The views expressed are my own and in no way reflect
those of the U.S. Marine Band or the Marine Corps.
>Some years ago, the Johanos/Dallas Symphony was the greatest
>thing since fried rice, and I'd have to say I've never heard a better
>recording, sonically speaking. This recording, in it's LP version, was
>universally used as a demo in audio stores.
I used it to audition my stereo speakers. This is still a fave of
mine, in performance and recording. It's now in a Vox Box, with
other Johanos/Dallas recordings- incongruously, the Ives Holidays
and Copland ballets. The Rachmaninoff and Ives make it easily
worth the price.
I also love the Ormandy/Philadelphia (the piece was dedicated to
them) on Sony Essential Classics.
-Sol Siegel, Philadelphia, PA
---------------------------------------------------------
"Power corrupts, but I wouldn't mind finding out for myself."
I imprinted on Ormandy/Philadelphia (stereo version) on Columbia LP. I don't know if it has appeared on CD, though. I love Ormandy's way with Rachmaninov (and so did Rachmaninov) and the orchestra played it like no other IMHO: full, lush, colorful playing by a virtuoso orchestra.
I also have Slatkin/St.Louis on VoxBox. It's cheap (complete Rachmaninov orchestral music for less than $10 in most places) and very good (IMO of course).
Cheers,
Lani Spahr
Ashkenazy with the Concertgbouw is for me the most perceptive in
cathcing the very subtle idiom of these works. playing is as brilliant
as usual and recording good.
Two piano version: Alexev and Demidenko on Hyperion. Introverted and
dark - plus fabulous two piano suite.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Neil Tingley Furtwaengler FAQ from r.m.c.r contributers at:
ne...@music.demon.co.uk http://www.netlink.co.uk/users/music/ & links to
London, UK G.H Gould and others "more about me" menu.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>Any suggestions on the best Rachmaninov Symphonic Dances? Any help much
>appreciated!
For the orchestral version, despite a recording that sounds like it
was made by the KGB in a public bathhouse, the 1963 recording by the
Moscow Philharmonic under Kiril Kondrashin remains unsurpassed for its
combination of raw energy and elan. And what a fine orchestra that
was! It's available on BMG/Melodiya, coupled with a fine performance
of "The Bells". Some way behind in my estimation, but still very fine,
is Previn with the LSO on EMI. I was quite disappointed by the
Ashkenazy version with the Concertgebouw on Decca/London -- quite
soggy. Some will sing the praises of the old Goossens/LSO recording on
Everest. It has some lovely moments but for me lacks energy overall.
Demidenko and Alexeev do a fine job with the 2-piano version on a
Hyperion disk with some interesting Medtner pieces. Argerich and
Rabinovitch on Teldec are very exciting, but when they get *too*
excited their tone gets rather clattery.
Great piece, in either version.
Tony Movshon
Center for Neural Science New York University
http://www.cns.nyu.edu mov...@nyu.edu
Thank you.
>
>Demidenko and Alexeev do a fine job with the 2-piano version on a
>Hyperion disk with some interesting Medtner pieces. Argerich and
>Rabinovitch on Teldec are very exciting, but when they get *too*
>excited their tone gets rather clattery.
>
>
Those are distinguished versions, but I keep coming back to Decca's
Previn/Askenazy collaboration, which I find more moving.
Brthe...@aol.com (John Blair)
> >Demidenko and Alexeev...
>
> Those are distinguished versions, but I keep coming back to Decca's
> Previn/Askenazy collaboration, which I find more moving.
I agree. Previn and Ashkenazy were born with Rachmaninov's music
in their blood. Their recordings of the Rachmaninov symphonies are still
among the very best ever recorded, not to mention the piano concerto cycle
they did together (there might be better individual performances, but as a
cycle, it is second to none). They really make music in the recording of
the 2-piano version of the Dances, instead of showing off their techniques
like so many of their competitors.
Michael Lee
le...@ecf.toronto.edu
Michael> On Fri, 13 Dec 1996, T.H. GILLINGWATER wrote:
>> Any suggestions on the best Rachmaninov Symphonic Dances? Any help
>> much appreciated!
Michael> 1. Ashkenazy/Royal Concertgebouw (Decca mid price): a wild
Michael> and furious reading of the work. Great sound. If you like
Michael> his Rachmaninov symphonies, you will like it.
Michael> 2. Jansons/St. Petersburg PO (EMI full price): powerfully
Michael> driven and awesome playing from the orchestra. Good sound.
Michael> Not as bold as Ashkenazy's, but equally exciting.
Michael> I personally like the Ashkenazy version more because of the
Michael> orchestra's richer sound.
Michael> Michael Lee le...@ecf.toronto.edu
Michael, I also have these two versions, and I'm completely of your
opinion! For interested readers: Jansons' is coupled with Rach's 3rd
symph., but I think there a two different releases of Ashkenazy's,
which is either coupled with the 3rd symph., or the Isle of the Dead
(also a lovely piece).
--
Dirk